1 2016-03-11 00:50:24	0|achow101|Is there any way in Bitcoin Core to mine to a specific address when in regtest mode?
 2 2016-03-11 01:45:44	0|warren|achow101: you can construct a valid block outside of core and submit it
 3 2016-03-11 01:57:31	0|achow101|warren: I suppose I could do that, but that just make things annoying since this is just for rpc tests for Armory. Do you know if the Bitcoin Core rpc tests have mining implmented in them? If so I can just borrow that
 4 2016-03-11 01:58:42	0|gmaxwell|achow101: import the key it choses into armory? hm. we could make the generate take an option for the output, I guess. it seems like a reasonable request.
 5 2016-03-11 01:59:40	0|achow101|warren: can't import the key since armory doesn't accept compressed keys yet.
 6 2016-03-11 02:09:37	0|achow101|well it looks like the rpc tests do have regtest mining stuff there, but I'm not sure that it will work well with not being in the Bitcoin Core project.
 7 2016-03-11 07:20:25	0|GitHub182|13bitcoin/06master 14e219503 15Wladimir J. van der Laan: Fix memleak in TorController [rework]...
 8 2016-03-11 07:20:25	0|GitHub182|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj pushed 2 new commits to 06master: 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/c8d2473e6cb0...3da5d1bc2e5d
 9 2016-03-11 07:20:26	0|GitHub182|13bitcoin/06master 143da5d1b 15Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #7637: Fix memleak in TorController [rework]...
10 2016-03-11 07:20:33	0|GitHub152|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj closed pull request #7637: Fix memleak in TorController [rework] (06master...062016_03_torcontrol_leak) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7637
11 2016-03-11 07:21:03	0|GitHub46|13bitcoin/06master 148fc81e0 15Wladimir J. van der Laan: mempool: Reduce ERROR logging for mempool rejects...
12 2016-03-11 07:21:03	0|GitHub46|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj pushed 2 new commits to 06master: 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/3da5d1bc2e5d...26a2a7214fe1
13 2016-03-11 07:21:04	0|GitHub46|13bitcoin/06master 1426a2a72 15Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #7592: mempool: Re-remove ERROR logging for mempool rejects...
14 2016-03-11 07:21:08	0|GitHub68|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj closed pull request #7592: mempool: Re-remove ERROR logging for mempool rejects (06master...062016_02_mempool_error_spam) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7592
15 2016-03-11 07:25:46	0|GitHub32|13bitcoin/06master 14110b62f 15Patrick Strateman: Remove vfReachable and modify IsReachable to only use vfLimited....
16 2016-03-11 07:25:46	0|GitHub32|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj pushed 2 new commits to 06master: 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/26a2a7214fe1...9f14e5ad918d
17 2016-03-11 07:25:47	0|GitHub32|13bitcoin/06master 149f14e5a 15Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #7553: Remove vfReachable and modify IsReachable to only use vfLimited....
18 2016-03-11 07:25:51	0|GitHub55|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj closed pull request #7553: Remove vfReachable and modify IsReachable to only use vfLimited. (06master...062016-02-17-reachable) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7553
19 2016-03-11 07:30:40	0|GitHub23|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj closed pull request #7640: Removes forward slash (/) from user agent in peers tab UI. (06master...06master) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7640
20 2016-03-11 07:41:02	0|GitHub32|13bitcoin/06master 1472c2651 15Jonas Schnelli: [Wallet] move wallet help string creation to CWallet
21 2016-03-11 07:41:02	0|GitHub32|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj pushed 2 new commits to 06master: 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/9f14e5ad918d...86a1ec5b2c97
22 2016-03-11 07:41:03	0|GitHub32|13bitcoin/06master 1486a1ec5 15Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #7576: [Wallet] move wallet help string creation to CWallet...
23 2016-03-11 07:41:06	0|GitHub180|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj closed pull request #7576: [Wallet] move wallet help string creation to CWallet (06master...062016/02/wallet_helpstr) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7576
24 2016-03-11 07:43:24	0|GitHub33|13bitcoin/06master 142ab835a 15Elliot Olds: Check if zmq is installed in tests, update docs...
25 2016-03-11 07:43:24	0|GitHub33|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj pushed 2 new commits to 06master: 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/86a1ec5b2c97...0fa88ef784dd
26 2016-03-11 07:43:25	0|GitHub33|13bitcoin/06master 140fa88ef 15Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #7635: [Documentation] Add dependency info to test docs...
27 2016-03-11 07:43:28	0|GitHub79|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj closed pull request #7635: [Documentation] Add dependency info to test docs (06master...06docs4) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7635
28 2016-03-11 08:44:55	0|GitHub192|13bitcoin/060.12 14f04f4fd 15MarcoFalke: [doc/log] Fix markdown syntax and line terminate LogPrint...
29 2016-03-11 08:44:55	0|GitHub192|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj pushed 1 new commit to 060.12: 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/commit/f04f4fd2eed581a5e287d14036d790cf2badcbe6
30 2016-03-11 08:45:03	0|GitHub19|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj closed pull request #7666: [0.12.1] Fix doc and output for rpcauth (060.12...06Mf1603-012fixdocrpcauth) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7666
31 2016-03-11 13:13:50	0|GitHub158|[13bitcoin] 15musalbas opened pull request #7667: Move GetTempPath() to testutil (06master...06patch-gettemppath) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7667
32 2016-03-11 13:40:20	0|jonasschnelli|wumpus: I tried to change the wallet init (instantiation) with a scoped pointer. But IMO the idea of scoped pointers is that you can really leak them and therefore you can release them and return them to somewhere outside of the scope (http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_59_0/libs/smart_ptr/scoped_ptr.htm).
33 2016-03-11 13:40:34	0|jonasschnelli|*you can't release them*
34 2016-03-11 13:42:58	0|sipa|use a const scoped pointer :)
35 2016-03-11 13:43:09	0|sipa|those can't be released
36 2016-03-11 13:50:02	0|jonasschnelli|sipa: IIRC, you can't release a non-scoped pointer. Isn't that the idea of the scoped pointer? Avoid leaks?
37 2016-03-11 13:50:10	0|jonasschnelli|*a non-const scoped pointer*
38 2016-03-11 13:51:13	0|sipa|what is a non-scoped pointer?
39 2016-03-11 13:51:36	0|sipa|ah
40 2016-03-11 13:54:09	0|sipa|oh, i'm confusing with unique_ptr
41 2016-03-11 16:43:43	0|morcos|hmm...  so i was hoping to write the BIP112 rpc tests with the {locktime OP_CSV OP_DROP} in the scriptPubKey to keep things as close to actual usage as possible
42 2016-03-11 16:44:19	0|morcos|however it seems like it'll be quite difficult to figure out how to sign anything like that..  none of the existing tools will do it right?
43 2016-03-11 16:59:35	0|GitHub16|[13bitcoin] 15achow101 opened pull request #7668: Fix history deletion bug after font size change (06master...06rpcconsole-hist-fix) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7668
44 2016-03-11 17:06:36	0|sipa|morcos: see #7601 :)
45 2016-03-11 17:06:43	0|sipa|(cltv, not csv, though)
46 2016-03-11 17:09:01	0|morcos|yeah...  might be nice to have some kind of more generic signing functionality for manual tx creation..  or including the python code for that or something..  anyway, i'm going to cheat and put it in scriptSig..
47 2016-03-11 17:17:00	0|wumpus|jonasschnelli: depends on the kind of scoped point, a auto_ptr (and its c++11 replacement, unique_ptr) can defnitely be released
48 2016-03-11 17:18:42	0|wumpus|this is used in CreateNewBlock for example
49 2016-03-11 19:06:02	0|jonasschnelli|wumpus: thanks. Will have a look there.
50 2016-03-11 19:25:04	0|cfields_|jonasschnelli: what are you trying to accomplish?
51 2016-03-11 19:41:21	0|jonasschnelli|cfields_: check my PR: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7577/files#diff-b2bb174788c7409b671c46ccc86034bdR2994 there is a use case where I create a instance and in case of an error, it should auto-delete the instance.
52 2016-03-11 19:42:20	0|cfields_|jonasschnelli: ah
53 2016-03-11 19:43:14	0|cfields_|jonasschnelli: post-c++11, you'd make it a unique_ptr, and move semantics let you return it
54 2016-03-11 19:43:28	0|sipa|cfields_: how is c++11 coming along, btw?
55 2016-03-11 19:43:36	0|sipa|still blocked on travis?
56 2016-03-11 19:43:59	0|cfields_|sipa: still no word from travis. I'm working something using docker as a test
57 2016-03-11 19:44:31	0|cfields_|not sure if it'll work fully, testing it out
58 2016-03-11 19:44:43	0|cfields_|(actually working on that right now. the c++11 delay is irritating me)
59 2016-03-11 19:47:17	0|sipa|awesome
60 2016-03-11 23:36:19	0|Luke-Jr|cfields_: be careful we don't end up with a special Travis that only works for 'bitcoin' org
61 2016-03-11 23:36:30	0|Luke-Jr|apparently we ended up with that already to some extent :/
62 2016-03-11 23:40:08	0|sipa|travis on my local bitcoin repo seems to work
63 2016-03-11 23:44:27	0|Luke-Jr|sipa: I did workarounds recently
64 2016-03-11 23:44:55	0|Luke-Jr|see https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7487