1 2016-03-21 00:01:27	0|morcos|mine is in ~/.config/Bitcoin/Bitcoin-Qt.conf
  2 2016-03-21 00:01:40	0|morcos|I assume you are asking a different question, but settings in that file have bit me a few times
  3 2016-03-21 00:01:41	0|Luke-Jr|morcos: on Windows, it's in the registry; on Mac, somewhere else
  4 2016-03-21 00:02:01	0|Luke-Jr|the only reliable way to check is probably to use Qt
  5 2016-03-21 00:02:33	0|sipa|morcos: it's for answering a question on Stackexchange
  6 2016-03-21 00:02:43	0|sipa|additional information: windows
  7 2016-03-21 00:03:40	0|morcos|sipa: yeah the data directory is listed in the QT settings
  8 2016-03-21 01:48:10	0|moli|sipa, i'm not sure if you're looking for bitcoin-conf, but on windows by default it's in:   C:\Users\UserName\AppData\Roaming\Bitcoin\bitcoin-conf
  9 2016-03-21 01:49:57	0|moli|oops, i meant bitcoin.conf
 10 2016-03-21 02:33:56	0|sipa|moli: i'm aware of that; but i'm not looking for the default datadir, i'm looking for how to find the datadir if it's been configured to be not the default
 11 2016-03-21 02:56:58	0|moli|sipa, i don't use the default, so my datadir is something like this:  C:\bitcoin-0.12.0\bin\bitcoin-qt.exe -datadir=C:\Bitcoin
 12 2016-03-21 02:57:15	0|moli|so in the folder Bitcoin it has wallet.dat, bitcoin.conf, etc
 13 2016-03-21 02:57:27	0|moli|and to find a file in windows, i use "Search"
 14 2016-03-21 02:58:46	0|moli|and bitcoin.conf doesn't come with the download package, i have to create it and then put it in Bitcoin folder
 15 2016-03-21 03:04:35	0|sipa|moli: Bitcoi-Qt allows you to configure the datadir on first use, and stores it in the registry
 16 2016-03-21 03:05:06	0|sipa|if you put the datadir on the command line, it's wasy of course :)
 17 2016-03-21 03:12:40	0|moli|yes, i guess i like to do it my way so i can remember where i put it, and i notice you have bitcoin.conf.5 in your bitcoin-segwit, i wish we could have bitcoin.conf in windows download package
 18 2016-03-21 03:18:19	0|GitHub59|[13bitcoin] 15CypherGrue opened pull request #7726: Correct importaddress help reference to importpubkey (06master...06master) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7726
 19 2016-03-21 03:33:15	0|moli|sipa and devs, and thanks for all the hard work you've done!  :)
 20 2016-03-21 08:06:20	0|jonasschnelli|sipa: we might want to list the datadir in the debug window...
 21 2016-03-21 08:06:48	0|jonasschnelli|We could remove the "build date" for stable releases (keep it for self compiled versions).
 22 2016-03-21 10:45:08	0|wumpus|jonasschnelli: +1 on removing build date and adding the datadir
 23 2016-03-21 10:45:25	0|jonasschnelli|Okay. Will change that soon.
 24 2016-03-21 10:45:39	0|wumpus|build date should really be removed, it's non sensical for gitian builds anyway
 25 2016-03-21 11:04:25	0|GitHub112|13bitcoin/06master 143252208 15João Barbosa: Improve EncodeBase58 performance
 26 2016-03-21 11:04:25	0|GitHub112|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj pushed 2 new commits to 06master: 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/29e1131c4642...7b832d286bd1
 27 2016-03-21 11:04:26	0|GitHub112|13bitcoin/06master 147b832d2 15Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #7656: Improve EncodeBase58 performance...
 28 2016-03-21 11:04:35	0|GitHub94|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj closed pull request #7656: Improve EncodeBase58 performance (06master...06enhancement/speedup-encodebase58) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7656
 29 2016-03-21 11:08:51	0|MarcoFalke|wumpus, to be consistent, I'd have to add the future import for every .py file in /qa ?!
 30 2016-03-21 11:09:04	0|wumpus|MarcoFalke: yes
 31 2016-03-21 11:09:11	0|wumpus|any that uses print as a function, at least
 32 2016-03-21 11:09:23	0|wumpus|it *enforces* using print as a function
 33 2016-03-21 11:09:36	0|wumpus|so it's better to do it for all I guess
 34 2016-03-21 11:10:48	0|wumpus|that's why I started with the files used directly by the build system in #7723 - we can require python2.7 for the qa tests for now, but it's more annoying if `make check` needs a special dependency
 35 2016-03-21 11:11:25	0|MarcoFalke|You are planning to support py2 and py3 for the build system?
 36 2016-03-21 11:11:33	0|wumpus|yes
 37 2016-03-21 11:11:39	0|MarcoFalke|Sounds reasonable, but I don't think we can do it for the rpc tests
 38 2016-03-21 11:12:03	0|wumpus|it's only a few files, anyway
 39 2016-03-21 11:12:05	0|wumpus|I agree
 40 2016-03-21 11:12:12	0|wumpus|but please do the print_functions properly, that's all I ask :p
 41 2016-03-21 11:12:31	0|wumpus|unicode literal is more annoying, in general
 42 2016-03-21 11:12:34	0|MarcoFalke|Ok, will do; but don't complain about the huge diff
 43 2016-03-21 11:12:44	0|wumpus|I never complained about a huge diff in the test code
 44 2016-03-21 11:13:24	0|MarcoFalke|fine :)
 45 2016-03-21 11:15:27	0|wumpus|and I mean if everyone is okay with dropping python2 support I'm fine with that, but I predict it's going to be another thing people feel very strongly about, and I'm saving that energy for arguing for c++11 for now :)
 46 2016-03-21 11:32:02	0|wumpus|MarcoFalke: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/7717#issuecomment-199233464
 47 2016-03-21 11:40:52	0|GitHub165|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj pushed 4 new commits to 06master: 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/7b832d286bd1...ddfd79659e31
 48 2016-03-21 11:40:53	0|GitHub165|13bitcoin/06master 14fab6880 15MarcoFalke: [qa] Add amount tests
 49 2016-03-21 11:40:53	0|GitHub165|13bitcoin/06master 14faf756a 15MarcoFalke: [amount] Make GetFee() monotonic...
 50 2016-03-21 11:40:54	0|GitHub165|13bitcoin/06master 14fad13b1 15MarcoFalke: [amount] Preempt issues with negative fee rates
 51 2016-03-21 11:41:00	0|GitHub81|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj closed pull request #7705: [amount] Add tests and make GetFee() monotonic (06master...06Mf1603-amountFix) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7705
 52 2016-03-21 11:44:37	0|GitHub166|13bitcoin/06master 14c90036f 15Patrick Strateman: Always disconnect old nodes which request filtered connections.
 53 2016-03-21 11:44:37	0|GitHub166|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj pushed 2 new commits to 06master: 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/ddfd79659e31...9426632cb58d
 54 2016-03-21 11:44:38	0|GitHub166|13bitcoin/06master 149426632 15Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #7708: De-neuter NODE_BLOOM...
 55 2016-03-21 11:44:47	0|GitHub6|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj closed pull request #7708: De-neuter NODE_BLOOM (06master...062016-03-17-nodebloom) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7708
 56 2016-03-21 11:45:22	0|wumpus|BlueMatt: can you take a look at https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7713, it changes verify-commits.sh
 57 2016-03-21 11:47:37	0|GitHub129|13bitcoin/06master 14fab3890 15MarcoFalke: [qa] rpc-test: Normalize assert()
 58 2016-03-21 11:47:37	0|GitHub129|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj pushed 2 new commits to 06master: 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/9426632cb58d...3b4324b1edd7
 59 2016-03-21 11:47:38	0|GitHub129|13bitcoin/06master 143b4324b 15Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #7720: [qa] rpc-test: Normalize assert()...
 60 2016-03-21 11:47:47	0|GitHub82|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj closed pull request #7720: [qa] rpc-test: Normalize assert() (06master...06Mf1603-qaAssertNorm) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7720
 61 2016-03-21 11:51:07	0|GitHub97|13bitcoin/06master 140f17692 15João Barbosa: Improve COutPoint less operator
 62 2016-03-21 11:51:07	0|GitHub97|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj pushed 2 new commits to 06master: 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/3b4324b1edd7...3c27067dd2db
 63 2016-03-21 11:51:08	0|GitHub97|13bitcoin/06master 143c27067 15Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #7712: Improve COutPoint less operator...
 64 2016-03-21 11:51:14	0|GitHub164|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj closed pull request #7712: Improve COutPoint less operator (06master...06enhancement/improve-coutpoint-less-operator) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7712
 65 2016-03-21 11:51:53	0|GitHub131|13bitcoin/06master 14c5825d2 15Denis Lukianov: Correct importaddress help reference to importpubkey
 66 2016-03-21 11:51:53	0|GitHub131|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj pushed 2 new commits to 06master: 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/3c27067dd2db...9af69fa7e7b7
 67 2016-03-21 11:51:54	0|GitHub131|13bitcoin/06master 149af69fa 15Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #7726: Correct importaddress help reference to importpubkey...
 68 2016-03-21 11:51:59	0|GitHub194|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj closed pull request #7726: Correct importaddress help reference to importpubkey (06master...06master) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7726
 69 2016-03-21 12:41:28	0|GitHub99|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj pushed 8 new commits to 06master: 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/9af69fa7e7b7...29b2be6ad789
 70 2016-03-21 12:41:29	0|GitHub99|13bitcoin/06master 149206634 15BtcDrak: Update alert notification and GUI
 71 2016-03-21 12:41:29	0|GitHub99|13bitcoin/06master 14bbb9d1d 15BtcDrak: Remove p2p alert handling
 72 2016-03-21 12:41:30	0|GitHub99|13bitcoin/06master 1401fdfef 15BtcDrak: Remove `-alerts` option
 73 2016-03-21 12:41:36	0|GitHub62|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj closed pull request #7692: Remove p2p alert system (06master...06remove_alert) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7692
 74 2016-03-21 13:00:06	0|sipa|wumpus: i was thinking of writing an alert replacement based on theymos's proposal, using schnorr multisig once that's stable in libsecp256k1 (that would allow the entire message, including signature(s), to fit in an op_return)
 75 2016-03-21 13:00:51	0|wumpus|sipa: sgtm
 76 2016-03-21 13:55:31	0|GitHub114|[13bitcoin] 15jtimon opened pull request #7727: Travis test (not to merge): Introduce silent bug in CFeeRate (06master...060.12.99-feerate-test-bug) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7727
 77 2016-03-21 15:20:27	0|morcos|Luke-Jr and any one else: I'd like to improve fee estimation for 0.13.  I think it'll be a lot easier if I can start from cleaner code by ripping out priority estimation.  I believe no one cares much about that?
 78 2016-03-21 15:20:49	0|morcos|It looks to me like you don't get a valid priority estimate until 66 blocks (hacked up with longer block estimates)
 79 2016-03-21 15:21:35	0|morcos|So the effect of the priority estimation cdoe now is to do basically only 1 thing, not let you send a free transaction if your mempool is limited, otherwise it gets an answer of -1 for priority estimation and defaults to AllowFree
 80 2016-03-21 15:24:38	0|morcos|That seems like pretty bad behavior, but its also only available from a debug option now anyway after #7686
 81 2016-03-21 15:24:48	0|morcos|Are there any objections to removing priority estimation?
 82 2016-03-21 15:42:57	0|GitHub50|[13bitcoin] 15jtimon opened pull request #7728: Fees: Tests: Check CFeeRate internal precision in mempool_tests.cpp (06master...060.12.99-feerate-precision-test) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7728
 83 2016-03-21 16:02:26	0|GitHub184|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj opened pull request #7729: rpc: introduce 'label' API for wallet (06master...062016_03_wallet_label_api) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7729
 84 2016-03-21 17:03:21	0|GitHub174|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj pushed 5 new commits to 06master: 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/29b2be6ad789...c946a15075ba
 85 2016-03-21 17:03:22	0|GitHub174|13bitcoin/06master 145fa66e4 15Alex Morcos: Create SingleNodeConnCB class for RPC tests
 86 2016-03-21 17:03:22	0|GitHub174|13bitcoin/06master 149e072a6 15Alex Morcos: Implement "feefilter" P2P message....
 87 2016-03-21 17:03:23	0|GitHub174|13bitcoin/06master 14b536a6f 15Alex Morcos: Add p2p test for feefilter
 88 2016-03-21 17:03:26	0|GitHub196|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj closed pull request #7542: Implement "feefilter" P2P message (06master...06feefilter) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7542
 89 2016-03-21 17:03:36	0|GitHub37|[13bitcoin] 15jtimon closed pull request #7727: Travis test (not to merge): Introduce silent bug in CFeeRate (06master...060.12.99-feerate-test-bug) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7727
 90 2016-03-21 17:04:44	0|sipa|morcos: agree on removing the estimation
 91 2016-03-21 17:16:56	0|morcos|wumpus: i think you accidentally applied the feefilter to github's web server.
 92 2016-03-21 17:17:42	0|wumpus|it will only accept http requests with enough fee now?
 93 2016-03-21 17:18:08	0|morcos|apparently
 94 2016-03-21 17:18:50	0|wumpus|angry unicorn: 402 Payment Required
 95 2016-03-21 17:35:07	0|GitHub169|[13bitcoin] 15morcos opened pull request #7730: Remove priority estimation (06master...06removePriEst) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7730
 96 2016-03-21 19:33:01	0|GitHub31|[13bitcoin] 15jtimon opened pull request #7731: Discussion: By "more precision", I don't mean using rational numbers in CFeeRate (06master...060.12.99-feerate) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7731
 97 2016-03-21 19:36:32	0|jtimon|morcos: wumpus: MarcoFalke this is what I meant the other day, I'm sorry it took me days to have something that could potentially make some sense: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7731
 98 2016-03-21 19:45:15	0|jtimon|could we need more precision in practice in the foreseable future? it is the first time that I consider this from the "we may actually need this at some point" and not just purely from "reusable style is generally better unless tradeoffs" standpoint
 99 2016-03-21 19:47:59	0|jtimon|anyway, just food for thought (and 1 test I wasn't expecting), should go do some actual work, this was too much of a distraction
100 2016-03-21 22:35:47	0|BlueMatt|wumpus: will do