1 2016-05-04 09:34:29	0|GitHub168|13bitcoin/06master 149a8a7d0 15Puru: bitcoin-cli.cpp: Use symbolic constant for exit code
 2 2016-05-04 09:34:29	0|GitHub168|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj pushed 2 new commits to 06master: 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/88b77c7da0a6...da46f9fd6651
 3 2016-05-04 09:34:30	0|GitHub168|13bitcoin/06master 14da46f9f 15Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #7989: bitcoin-cli.cpp: Use symbolic constant for exit code...
 4 2016-05-04 09:34:39	0|GitHub2|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj closed pull request #7989: bitcoin-cli.cpp: Use symbolic constant for exit code (06master...06patch-2) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7989
 5 2016-05-04 09:35:04	0|GitHub135|13bitcoin/06master 14de98290 15Cory Fields: build: No need to check for leveldb atomics...
 6 2016-05-04 09:35:04	0|GitHub135|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj pushed 2 new commits to 06master: 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/da46f9fd6651...559fbae8c658
 7 2016-05-04 09:35:05	0|GitHub135|13bitcoin/06master 14559fbae 15Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #7982: build: No need to check for leveldb atomics...
 8 2016-05-04 09:35:14	0|GitHub46|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj closed pull request #7982: build: No need to check for leveldb atomics (06master...06leveldb-atomics) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7982
 9 2016-05-04 09:42:13	0|GitHub151|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj opened pull request #8000: tinyformat: force USE_VARIADIC_TEMPLATES (06master...062016_05_tinyformat_variadic) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8000
10 2016-05-04 10:34:13	0|btcdrak|8000!
11 2016-05-04 10:37:11	0|paveljanik|ToTheMoon 8)
12 2016-05-04 11:03:19	0|GitHub134|[13bitcoin] 15MarcoFalke opened pull request #8001: [0.12.2] backport script_tests improvements (060.12...06Mf1605-012testbp) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8001
13 2016-05-04 11:05:18	0|GitHub128|[13bitcoin] 15fanquake opened pull request #8002: [depends] Add -stdlib=libc++ to darwin CXX flags (06master...06depends-darwin-stdlib) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8002
14 2016-05-04 12:29:06	0|GitHub34|13bitcoin/06master 14faf3d11 15MarcoFalke: [doc] Update bitcoin-core GitHub links
15 2016-05-04 12:29:06	0|GitHub34|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj pushed 2 new commits to 06master: 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/559fbae8c658...fc23fee69047
16 2016-05-04 12:29:07	0|GitHub34|13bitcoin/06master 14fc23fee 15Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #7975: [doc] Update bitcoin-core GitHub links...
17 2016-05-04 12:29:16	0|GitHub199|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj closed pull request #7975: [doc] Update bitcoin-core GitHub links (06master...06Mf1604-doc) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7975
18 2016-05-04 12:31:31	0|assder|Are you planning to move from bitcoin to bitcoin-core on github?
19 2016-05-04 12:38:18	0|wumpus|that's the plan, eventually, yes
20 2016-05-04 12:39:04	0|wumpus|all the sub-repositories have been moved, just not the main one
21 2016-05-04 12:44:29	0|assder|When is it planned to occur? Has it to do with the recent drama?
22 2016-05-04 12:44:44	0|wumpus|no, it was planned for a long time, and I don't see it happening any time soon
23 2016-05-04 12:44:56	0|assder|Can you move all PRs and activity from one repo to another?
24 2016-05-04 12:45:01	0|wumpus|yes
25 2016-05-04 12:45:12	0|wumpus|and it automatically creates a redirect
26 2016-05-04 12:45:43	0|wumpus|(if you move the entire repository from one place to another, PRs and such move with it)
27 2016-05-04 12:45:58	0|assder|Ok. Thanks for the answers.
28 2016-05-04 13:28:51	0|Chris_Stewart_5|In tx_valid.json, is there a convention that assumes that the first outpoint corresponds to the first input in the serialized tx being tested?
29 2016-05-04 13:50:57	0|Guest7895|see the comments at the top of the file
30 2016-05-04 13:52:31	0|GitHub30|13bitcoin/06master 14d90351f 15Gregory Maxwell: More comments on the design of AttemptToEvictConnection....
31 2016-05-04 13:52:31	0|GitHub30|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj pushed 2 new commits to 06master: 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/fc23fee69047...8206835cc173
32 2016-05-04 13:52:32	0|GitHub30|13bitcoin/06master 148206835 15Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #7974: More comments on the design of AttemptToEvictConnection....
33 2016-05-04 13:52:46	0|GitHub37|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj closed pull request #7974: More comments on the design of AttemptToEvictConnection. (06master...06attempt_to_evict_comment) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7974
34 2016-05-04 14:37:43	0|Chris_Stewart_5|Guest7895: Where does it indicate this is the case?
35 2016-05-04 14:38:52	0|Guest7895|Chris_Stewart_5: sorry, i'm confusing it with script_test.json
36 2016-05-04 18:00:36	0|morcos|BlueMatt: gmaxwell: do either of you have some more detailed stats on the 96% reduction based on txs that are already in your mempool.  some earlier tests i was doing were finding closer to 91% of the bytes in a block were already in my mempool, so i'd like to understand the discrepancy.
37 2016-05-04 18:04:47	0|gmaxwell|morcos: I assume the discrepency is just network behavior when measuring. I got roughly the same number on couple day averages seperated by a couple weeks; but some spam attack or change in miner software would no doubt change it.
38 2016-05-04 18:05:46	0|gmaxwell|it's also uptime related, as I get much lower number for the first day or two after restart, which are excluded.
39 2016-05-04 18:05:48	0|morcos|yeah thats possible, my tests were less recent than yours i think
40 2016-05-04 18:09:46	0|gmaxwell|(I think my last two measurements were 96% and 97%)
41 2016-05-04 18:10:23	0|gmaxwell|My numbers are actually higher in comparison than just 'in mempool' since the bytes to send the shortids (typically around 20k for a 1MB block) count against it.
42 2016-05-04 19:37:13	0|michagogo|Has anyone by any chance tried to use gitian on Xenial?
43 2016-05-04 19:37:26	0|michagogo|Or for that matter, anything newer than Trusty?
44 2016-05-04 19:44:16	0|Jimbo_|?
45 2016-05-04 19:44:16	0|Jimbo_|Hi everyone. I'm getting a stable crash from bitcoin-qt.exe on WinXP. Is this platform still supported
46 2016-05-04 20:13:00	0|Chris_Stewart_5|Are these transactions treated the same for signatures because CScript::FindAndDelete removes the remaining operations in the script for when we run OP_CHECKSIG?
47 2016-05-04 20:13:03	0|Chris_Stewart_5|https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/src/test/data/tx_valid.json#L39-L43
48 2016-05-04 20:15:08	0|Chris_Stewart_5|also, can anyone point to an example that serializes a CScript to stdout?
49 2016-05-04 22:12:08	0|GitHub55|[13bitcoin] 15avar opened pull request #8003: Get rid of a compiler warning due to #if 0'd test (06master...06fix-unused-function-compiler-warning) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8003