1 2016-05-07 02:03:59	0|jl2012|https://twitter.com/sysmannet/status/728709054936186880 Less Bitcoin Orphans as results of bitcoin p2p network & src code performance improvements
 2 2016-05-07 02:05:22	0|sipa|0.12.1 should not have impact on that, i think
 3 2016-05-07 02:07:05	0|jl2012|sipa: yes, but that could be a result of some miners upgrading directly from 0.11.2 to 0.12.1.  Or just statistical variation
 4 2016-05-07 02:39:42	0|phantomcircuit|sipa: there's a fix for block downloads between 0.12.0 and 0.12.1
 5 2016-05-07 02:40:02	0|phantomcircuit|some of the sybil nodes claim to be network nodes but aren't
 6 2016-05-07 02:41:18	0|sipa|oh right
 7 2016-05-07 02:48:08	0|gmaxwell|someone should probably respond "more improvements coming!"
 8 2016-05-07 05:08:07	0|gmaxwell|It would be really nice to get the gitian process building ppa/rpm and  also arm binaries.
 9 2016-05-07 05:11:41	0|luke-jr|yes.. but real RPMs, not just repackaged statics :/
10 2016-05-07 05:12:06	0|luke-jr|note PPAs *cannot* be self-compiled :x
11 2016-05-07 06:12:23	0|wallet42|i want gitian-style homebrew (osx packagemanager) bottles/builds
12 2016-05-07 08:18:28	0|wumpus|there was a pull that added arm binaries to gitian descriptors, I am not sure what happend to it
13 2016-05-07 08:19:39	0|wumpus|ah, was closed because of a different solution, but never followed up https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7659
14 2016-05-07 08:20:10	0|wumpus|probably we want armhf and aarch64 :-) no need for GUI binaries but bitcoind and the utilities would be nice
15 2016-05-07 08:20:40	0|wumpus|(this hopefully reduces the additional download size)
16 2016-05-07 08:45:24	0|NicolasDorier|wumpus: Sipash
17 2016-05-07 08:52:52	0|wumpus|heh
18 2016-05-07 15:45:45	0|instagibbs|sipa, looking at the chart I think his sample timeframe for 0.12.1 is too short to even tell
19 2016-05-07 15:46:33	0|instagibbs|which is whatever, the improvements in 0.12 are clear
20 2016-05-07 16:42:30	0|achow101|any planned date for the repository move?
21 2016-05-07 17:39:33	0|Chris_Stewart_5|What relation does SIGHASH_ANYONECANPAY have with sequence numbers?
22 2016-05-07 18:00:42	0|Chris_Stewart_5|or signature hashes in general and sequence numbers, asking because of this test case
23 2016-05-07 18:01:00	0|Chris_Stewart_5|https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/src/test/data/tx_valid.json#L91