1 2016-06-20 01:29:59	0|gmaxwell|seeing a lot of non-final txn
  2 2016-06-20 07:59:10	0|jonasschnelli|wumpus: Let me do a last testing (executables on HiDPI) of https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8210
  3 2016-06-20 08:14:50	0|GitHub74|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj opened pull request #8227: tests: Try re-enabling RPC tests for Windows (06master...062016_05_win_reenable_rpc_tests) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8227
  4 2016-06-20 08:33:41	0|GitHub38|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj pushed 2 new commits to 06master: 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/a072d1a83787...223bf831cc81
  5 2016-06-20 08:33:42	0|GitHub38|13bitcoin/06master 14223bf83 15Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #8224: readme: Omit phrasing; 'new'...
  6 2016-06-20 08:33:42	0|GitHub38|13bitcoin/06master 147734479 15Will Binns: readme: Omit phrasing; 'new'...
  7 2016-06-20 08:33:49	0|GitHub45|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj closed pull request #8224: readme: Omit phrasing; 'new' (06master...06binns-update-readme) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8224
  8 2016-06-20 08:34:02	0|wumpus|jonasschnelli: ok!
  9 2016-06-20 08:49:30	0|GitHub138|13bitcoin/06master 149e3ec74 15Nathaniel Mahieu: Clarify documentation for running a tor node...
 10 2016-06-20 08:49:30	0|GitHub138|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj pushed 2 new commits to 06master: 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/223bf831cc81...377d1310acc7
 11 2016-06-20 08:49:31	0|GitHub138|13bitcoin/06master 14377d131 15Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #8203: Clarify documentation for running a tor node...
 12 2016-06-20 08:49:40	0|GitHub27|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj closed pull request #8203: Clarify documentation for running a tor node (06master...06master) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8203
 13 2016-06-20 09:50:54	0|wumpus|I'm getting errors cross-compiling to windows (using depends and ubuntu's mingw toolchain) on a fresh ubuntu 14.04 image
 14 2016-06-20 09:51:18	0|wumpus|somehow travis does manage to do it, though, so must be something specific here
 15 2016-06-20 09:58:39	0|wumpus|gah, -levent and -lopenssl isn't passed to the linker for some reason
 16 2016-06-20 09:58:51	0|wumpus|nuking and rebuilding everything
 17 2016-06-20 10:03:06	0|wumpus|oh I was missing pkgconfig
 18 2016-06-20 10:39:20	0|MarcoFalke|is there a guide to do native builds (on win)?
 19 2016-06-20 10:44:24	0|wumpus|no, AFAIK no one is succesfully doing those
 20 2016-06-20 10:45:04	0|MarcoFalke|so how did jonasschnelli run the rpc test on windows?
 21 2016-06-20 10:45:16	0|wumpus|it sounds like an exercise in sadomasochism, setting up msys and such
 22 2016-06-20 10:45:23	0|btcdrak|^
 23 2016-06-20 10:45:26	0|wumpus|well running the RPC test on windows doesn't require building on windows
 24 2016-06-20 10:45:31	0|btcdrak|I tried once.... I wont be doing that again.
 25 2016-06-20 10:45:34	0|wumpus|just needs a python interpreter I think
 26 2016-06-20 10:46:05	0|btcdrak|I think NicolasDorier tried a lot too. Eventually using ubuntu to crosscompile instead
 27 2016-06-20 10:46:10	0|MarcoFalke|pull tester needs some config. So you'd need to run ./configure, I guess?
 28 2016-06-20 10:46:56	0|wumpus|for running individual RPC tests you don't need any config (just BITCOIND environment variable), for the pull tester you may need some more stuff, probably easier to hack that yourself instead of trying to run configure on windows
 29 2016-06-20 10:47:53	0|wumpus|(e.g. just copy tests_config.py.in to tests_config.py and fill it in yourself)
 30 2016-06-20 10:48:49	0|wumpus|btcdrak: yeah it would be nice if someone did it and documented it, but I doubt anyone is that patient :)
 31 2016-06-20 10:50:17	0|wumpus|so easy to just set up a VM for cross building
 32 2016-06-20 10:50:22	0|wumpus|at least if you don't forget to install pkg-config :)
 33 2016-06-20 10:50:56	0|wumpus|maybe a how-to-set-up-a-VM-to-cross-compile guide may be mildly useful
 34 2016-06-20 10:51:20	0|wumpus|both for people that want to build for windows, or to cross compile for ARM (because they have too little memory to uild on the device itself)
 35 2016-06-20 11:34:26	0|GitHub106|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj pushed 6 new commits to 06master: 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/377d1310acc7...12a541e8dae0
 36 2016-06-20 11:34:27	0|GitHub106|13bitcoin/06master 14f25209a 15Cory Fields: depends: bump OSX toolchain...
 37 2016-06-20 11:34:27	0|GitHub106|13bitcoin/06master 14f6eb4e2 15fanquake: [depends] OpenSSL 1.0.1k - update config_opts
 38 2016-06-20 11:34:28	0|GitHub106|13bitcoin/06master 146194d9a 15Jonas Schnelli: Fix bitcoin_qt.m4 and fix-xcb-include-order.patch
 39 2016-06-20 11:34:31	0|GitHub169|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj closed pull request #8210: [Qt] Bump to Qt5.6.1 (06master...062016/06/qt_561) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8210
 40 2016-06-20 11:41:44	0|GitHub106|13bitcoin/06master 14fad1845 15MarcoFalke: [qa] test_framework: Use different rpc_auth_pair for each node
 41 2016-06-20 11:41:44	0|GitHub106|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj pushed 2 new commits to 06master: 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/12a541e8dae0...65c2058cc8e4
 42 2016-06-20 11:41:45	0|GitHub106|13bitcoin/06master 1465c2058 15Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #8066: [qa] test_framework: Use different rpc_auth_pair for each node...
 43 2016-06-20 11:41:49	0|GitHub87|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj closed pull request #8066: [qa] test_framework: Use different rpc_auth_pair for each node (06master...06Mf1605-qaAuthPairDiff) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8066
 44 2016-06-20 12:06:32	0|GitHub129|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj closed pull request #8185: [0.12.2] Various qa and test backports (060.12...06Mf1606-qaBackports) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8185
 45 2016-06-20 12:06:37	0|GitHub189|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj pushed 16 new commits to 060.12: 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/0f8d574e8f65...44fdacc19f9f
 46 2016-06-20 12:06:38	0|GitHub189|13bitcoin/060.12 142d2b045 15Pavel Janík: Reenable multithread scheduler test...
 47 2016-06-20 12:06:38	0|GitHub189|13bitcoin/060.12 14658307e 15Wladimir J. van der Laan: test: Add more thorough test for dbwrapper iterators...
 48 2016-06-20 12:06:39	0|GitHub189|13bitcoin/060.12 144fd6008 15Cory Fields: travis: 'make check' in parallel and verbose...
 49 2016-06-20 12:07:15	0|GitHub167|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj closed pull request #8184: WIP: OSX toolchain bump (06master...06osx-sdk-bump) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8184
 50 2016-06-20 12:07:55	0|GitHub45|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj closed pull request #8053: [WIP] [depends] Qt 5.6.1 (06master...06depends-qt-5-6-0) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8053
 51 2016-06-20 12:10:11	0|GitHub83|13bitcoin/06master 14595b22e 15Pieter Wuille: Stop treating importaddress'ed scripts as change...
 52 2016-06-20 12:10:11	0|GitHub83|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj pushed 2 new commits to 06master: 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/65c2058cc8e4...a6ddb19bd91d
 53 2016-06-20 12:10:12	0|GitHub83|13bitcoin/06master 14a6ddb19 15Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #7687: Stop treating importaddress'ed scripts as change...
 54 2016-06-20 12:10:15	0|GitHub103|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj closed pull request #7687: Stop treating importaddress'ed scripts as change (06master...06fixscriptimport) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7687
 55 2016-06-20 12:31:11	0|GitHub195|[13bitcoin] 15fanquake opened pull request #8229: [WIP][Doc] Update OS X build notes for 10.11 SDK (06master...06osx-build-notes-new) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8229
 56 2016-06-20 12:34:33	0|wumpus|looks like the transifex client (tx) is broken on ubuntu, both 16.04 and 14.04
 57 2016-06-20 12:34:58	0|wumpus|this makes me unable to update translations rom transifex, which is very shitty before a release
 58 2016-06-20 12:35:24	0|wumpus|https://github.com/transifex/transifex-client/issues/103
 59 2016-06-20 12:36:10	0|GitHub47|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj pushed 7 new commits to 06master: 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/a6ddb19bd91d...f6598df76583
 60 2016-06-20 12:36:11	0|GitHub47|13bitcoin/06master 149523e8a 15Matt Corallo: Make verify-commits path-independent
 61 2016-06-20 12:36:11	0|GitHub47|13bitcoin/06master 14f7d4a25 15Matt Corallo: Make verify-commits POSIX-compliant
 62 2016-06-20 12:36:12	0|GitHub47|13bitcoin/06master 1422421fa 15Peter Todd: Remove pointless warning...
 63 2016-06-20 12:36:19	0|GitHub89|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj closed pull request #7713: Fixes for verify-commits script (06master...062016-03-fix-verify-commits) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7713
 64 2016-06-20 12:53:51	0|GitHub79|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj pushed 6 new commits to 06master: 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/f6598df76583...94ab58b5ccda
 65 2016-06-20 12:53:52	0|GitHub79|13bitcoin/06master 141b0bcc5 15Pieter Wuille: Track orphan by prev COutPoint rather than prev hash
 66 2016-06-20 12:53:52	0|GitHub79|13bitcoin/06master 14db0ffe8 15Gregory Maxwell: This eliminates the primary leak that causes the orphan map to...
 67 2016-06-20 12:53:53	0|GitHub79|13bitcoin/06master 1411cc143 15Gregory Maxwell: Adds an expiration time for orphan tx....
 68 2016-06-20 12:54:01	0|GitHub70|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj closed pull request #8179: Evict orphans which are included or precluded by accepted blocks. (06master...06reap_orphans) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8179
 69 2016-06-20 13:00:14	0|wumpus|what are we going to do for RBF in 0.13?
 70 2016-06-20 13:00:40	0|btcdrak|wasnt jonasschnelli going to simplify his patch?
 71 2016-06-20 13:14:33	0|wumpus|but what about eg. https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7817
 72 2016-06-20 13:19:23	0|wumpus|or the bumpfee command https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7865
 73 2016-06-20 13:21:48	0|GitHub43|13bitcoin/06master 14ad0752e 15Pieter Wuille: Stop trimming when mapTx is empty
 74 2016-06-20 13:21:48	0|GitHub43|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj pushed 2 new commits to 06master: 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/94ab58b5ccda...1f86d64f6d87
 75 2016-06-20 13:21:49	0|GitHub43|13bitcoin/06master 141f86d64 15Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #8220: Stop trimming when mapTx is empty...
 76 2016-06-20 13:21:58	0|GitHub160|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj closed pull request #8220: Stop trimming when mapTx is empty (06master...06notrimempty) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8220
 77 2016-06-20 13:46:30	0|wumpus|or what about importmulti: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7551 ? also still has the 0.13 milestone, and pedrobranco  did a lot of work on it the last week
 78 2016-06-20 13:52:26	0|wumpus|nah probably just too late
 79 2016-06-20 13:52:51	0|wumpus|kind of unfortunate the things that almost made it into 0.13, on the other hand, at least 0.14 will have some useful featurs
 80 2016-06-20 14:23:16	0|instagibbs|I assume there's a function to parse unsigned char array into hex string in Core? Can't think of it at the moment.
 81 2016-06-20 14:23:52	0|sipa|yes, it's called ParseHex :)
 82 2016-06-20 14:23:57	0|sipa|in utilstrencodings
 83 2016-06-20 14:24:12	0|sipa|wumpus: agree, importmulti is late
 84 2016-06-20 14:24:24	0|sipa|too bad :(
 85 2016-06-20 14:24:30	0|instagibbs|ParseHex goes hex str to bytes
 86 2016-06-20 14:24:34	0|instagibbs|I need the opposite :P
 87 2016-06-20 14:24:47	0|instagibbs|ill look around there though
 88 2016-06-20 14:25:36	0|Chris_Stewart_5|instagibbs: Possibly some where around here? https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/src/serialize.h#L510
 89 2016-06-20 14:25:48	0|instagibbs|HexStr maybe
 90 2016-06-20 14:26:03	0|sipa|HexStr indeed
 91 2016-06-20 14:26:19	0|instagibbs|thanks
 92 2016-06-20 14:26:30	0|sipa|instagibbs: i wouldn't call that parsing, though :)
 93 2016-06-20 14:26:39	0|sipa|but that's a semantics discussion
 94 2016-06-20 14:27:00	0|instagibbs|eh true enough
 95 2016-06-20 14:32:33	0|pedrobranco|wumpus: yes, unfortunately i was late in importmulti :(
 96 2016-06-20 14:33:31	0|pedrobranco|will need some help in adding some features, and how importmulti should work in some situations
 97 2016-06-20 14:34:51	0|pedrobranco|look forward to finish the importmulti :)
 98 2016-06-20 15:49:59	0|jonasschnelli|wumpus: btcdrak: I have plans to split the bumpfee PR into two parts (one to add opt-in feature to CreateTransaction() another for the bumpfee).
 99 2016-06-20 15:50:07	0|jonasschnelli|Both parts needs review and are not ready for 0.13
100 2016-06-20 15:50:29	0|jonasschnelli|We could merge petertodds global RBF opt-in PR though
101 2016-06-20 15:50:41	0|jonasschnelli|But 0.13 will have no bump feature.
102 2016-06-20 15:50:52	0|jonasschnelli|(only over rawtx)
103 2016-06-20 15:52:15	0|Chris_Stewart_5|cfields_: If you could take a look at the question and give me some insight it would be much appreciated https://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/46062/add-dependency-bitcoin-core
104 2016-06-20 15:53:41	0|jonasschnelli|Chris_Stewart_5: cfields_ is currently away (for multiple days)
105 2016-06-20 15:53:57	0|jonasschnelli|But I'm familiar with the dependencies build system... I'll have a look
106 2016-06-20 15:55:16	0|Chris_Stewart_5|jonasschnelli: It would be much appreciated :-)
107 2016-06-20 15:55:47	0|sipa|i assume that you'll need autoconf magic to find the library
108 2016-06-20 15:57:25	0|Chris_Stewart_5|Ooh, things happening 'auto-magically'
109 2016-06-20 15:57:26	0|jonasschnelli|Chris_Stewart_5: I'm not very familiar with cmake...but I guess sipa is right
110 2016-06-20 15:57:32	0|jonasschnelli|You need to find the library in configure.ac
111 2016-06-20 15:57:49	0|jonasschnelli|Otherwise you don't have the corresponding -I and -L CXXFLAG
112 2016-06-20 15:58:10	0|jonasschnelli|adding the library to the depends/ system alone is not sufficient.
113 2016-06-20 15:58:41	0|jonasschnelli|Chris_Stewart_5: you need something like https://github.com/Christewart/bitcoin/blob/master/configure.ac#L551
114 2016-06-20 15:59:03	0|sipa|it will first need to work when just building normally
115 2016-06-20 15:59:14	0|sipa|depends is to make it work deterministically
116 2016-06-20 15:59:49	0|Chris_Stewart_5|sipa: What is the difference? I'm not super familiar C++ build systems
117 2016-06-20 16:00:06	0|sipa|Chris_Stewart_5: forget depends
118 2016-06-20 16:00:22	0|Chris_Stewart_5|Ok, and just try and link the file from the command line or something?
119 2016-06-20 16:00:56	0|sipa|Chris_Stewart_5: no, i mean, first make things work the normal way (add source files to makefile.am, make configure.ac find the dependency, ...)
120 2016-06-20 16:01:11	0|jonasschnelli|Agree with sipa.
121 2016-06-20 16:01:18	0|sipa|so autogen & configure & make work
122 2016-06-20 16:01:35	0|sipa|depends is the step afterwards, you don't need depends when just building through makr
123 2016-06-20 16:01:38	0|sipa|*make
124 2016-06-20 16:01:43	0|Chris_Stewart_5|Ok, i'll start off in that direction then. Thanks
125 2016-06-20 17:47:26	0|GitHub130|[13bitcoin] 15thelazier opened pull request #8230: Fix LogPrint to LogPrintf (060.12...06patch-1) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8230
126 2016-06-20 17:50:06	0|rubensayshi|sipa, wumpus recall the discussion about bare multisig
127 2016-06-20 17:50:32	0|rubensayshi|I have some1 with BTC in an actual bare multisig which is now essentially unspendable :(
128 2016-06-20 17:51:36	0|gmaxwell|How'd they even create the txouts?
129 2016-06-20 17:51:48	0|rubensayshi|from before v0.21.1
130 2016-06-20 17:51:52	0|rubensayshi|12
131 2016-06-20 17:52:15	0|gmaxwell|rubensayshi: no version of bitcoin core will ever create bare multisig outputs.
132 2016-06-20 17:52:47	0|rubensayshi|yea, so it was created with counterwallet, which does bare multisig
133 2016-06-20 17:53:04	0|rubensayshi|didn't really expect people to use it, but they do xD
134 2016-06-20 17:53:25	0|btcdrak|rubensayshi: maybe create a signed tx spending it and ask a pool to mine it kindly.
135 2016-06-20 17:53:29	0|rubensayshi|there's probably other people outside of counterparty users with the same issue .. though I agree it's rare
136 2016-06-20 17:54:15	0|gmaxwell|large ones aren't even IsStandard to pay to.
137 2016-06-20 17:54:22	0|gmaxwell|Whats the txid:vout?
138 2016-06-20 17:54:33	0|rubensayshi|c6d964ea9a27e125c1b40188e9aee191aac03adc4c53ec811d9d2ce74c380768:2
139 2016-06-20 17:55:04	0|rubensayshi|there's a release scheduled with P2SH support for the counterparty backend, I guess I should double down on adding it to the wallet and making something to migrate
140 2016-06-20 17:55:23	0|gmaxwell|rubensayshi: that havs value 0.00635110
141 2016-06-20 17:55:26	0|rubensayshi|and poke around pools to find one that's willing to mine the TXs
142 2016-06-20 17:56:08	0|gmaxwell|and was created 16 days ago.
143 2016-06-20 17:56:31	0|rubensayshi|if there's 1 then there's others ...
144 2016-06-20 17:57:30	0|gmaxwell|rubensayshi: I misread your earlier text and thought you said "some 1 BTC".
145 2016-06-20 17:58:22	0|rubensayshi|nah, this case is just a fraction
146 2016-06-20 17:58:31	0|rubensayshi|though there's counterparty tokens bound to it
147 2016-06-20 17:58:48	0|rubensayshi|I can probably find a miner to fix this for counterparty
148 2016-06-20 17:59:25	0|rubensayshi|I'm just brining it up cause there's probably more, let me query the blocktrail DB to see how much value there's stuck in bare multisig
149 2016-06-20 18:01:01	0|gmaxwell|rubensayshi: probably your time would be better spent helping to get counterparty onto it's own network instead of trying to steganographically hide data in Bitcoin transactions.
150 2016-06-20 18:02:58	0|btcdrak|^
151 2016-06-20 18:05:03	0|gmaxwell|(Though I do wish we'd followed my suggestion of size=max(size, (sigops*MAX_BLOCK_SIZE+MAX_SIGOPS-1)//MAX_SIGOPS) ).
152 2016-06-20 18:06:49	0|rubensayshi|gmaxwell, wouldn't that result in non-full blocks again?
153 2016-06-20 18:07:13	0|rubensayshi|I thought the fix was about the blocks not being full, not about the fee per block earned?
154 2016-06-20 18:08:45	0|gmaxwell|I don't give a shit if the block is full or not, rational behavior for the miner is to maximize income, even if it doesn't fill the block.  Ignorant people may howl about something not being full, but the only real issue in my mind was that the block would end up massively under full and not even making the expected income for the miner due to cheap attack transactions.
155 2016-06-20 18:09:22	0|gmaxwell|The attack was paying very low fees, and blocking out a whole block with it. What I suggested would end up making them have to pay roughly as much to fill the block with txdata or sigops, so why bother using sigops to fill it?
156 2016-06-20 18:09:59	0|gmaxwell|luke's argument was just that the transactions were clearly abusive and should be filtered even if they pay high fees. Which is a reasonable argument.
157 2016-06-20 18:10:19	0|gmaxwell|but not strictly needed to fix the problem.
158 2016-06-20 18:11:15	0|rubensayshi|hmm, your suggestion seems reasonable and not as complex as coding up a way to only add high sigops/byte txs if it doesn't push it over the limit
159 2016-06-20 18:13:41	0|gmaxwell|Seperately, bare multisig should become non-standard-- if for nothing else because it seriously burns up sigops space--, but that should happen on the creating it side first.
160 2016-06-20 18:14:54	0|rubensayshi|I agree
161 2016-06-20 18:34:37	0|Chris_Stewart_5|What is the reasoning behind requiring standard transactions? Security? DOS prevention?
162 2016-06-20 18:34:52	0|Chris_Stewart_5|for relaying txs
163 2016-06-20 18:37:54	0|gmaxwell|Preserving forward compatiblity and reducing varrious abuse vectors.
164 2016-06-20 20:37:35	0|midnightmagic|\o/
165 2016-06-20 20:54:44	0|btcdrak|25 blocks to go for CSV point of no return
166 2016-06-20 21:11:09	0|spudowiar|btcdrak: CSV?
167 2016-06-20 21:11:44	0|btcdrak|spudowiar: the current softfork bundle of BIP68,112,113.
168 2016-06-20 21:12:21	0|spudowiar|More confused but OK
169 2016-06-20 21:12:29	0|spudowiar|I'll check them BIPs out
170 2016-06-20 21:12:38	0|spudowiar|*dashes to GitHub*
171 2016-06-20 21:12:57	0|spudowiar|Anyway, I'm just dumb
172 2016-06-20 21:13:54	0|spudowiar|Wow, that's cool
173 2016-06-20 21:15:15	0|spudowiar|btcdrak: is this the same as segwit?
174 2016-06-20 21:15:25	0|spudowiar|I'm dumb no need to answer if you don't want to
175 2016-06-20 21:15:30	0|spudowiar|I'm just curious :)
176 2016-06-20 21:16:24	0|btcdrak|no this is a different set of protocol changes. tldr allows for timelocking bitcoins relative to when they are first confirmed in a block
177 2016-06-20 21:16:40	0|spudowiar|I get that
178 2016-06-20 21:16:44	0|btcdrak|see BIP112
179 2016-06-20 21:16:45	0|spudowiar|But what's segwit then?
180 2016-06-20 21:16:54	0|btcdrak|BIP141
181 2016-06-20 21:17:02	0|spudowiar|Thanks :)
182 2016-06-20 21:17:13	0|spudowiar|Thanks for wasting your time with me :)
183 2016-06-20 21:17:21	0|btcdrak|(together with 143 and 144 also)
184 2016-06-20 21:17:26	0|spudowiar|I'm just an annoyance but a curious annoyance who's just trying to learb
185 2016-06-20 21:17:30	0|spudowiar|*learn
186 2016-06-20 21:18:00	0|btcdrak|spudowiar: :)
187 2016-06-20 21:19:09	0|spudowiar|I wish I was more mature and less annoying :/
188 2016-06-20 21:19:17	0|spudowiar|Maybe when I'm an adult? :/
189 2016-06-20 21:19:20	0|spudowiar|:(
190 2016-06-20 21:58:35	0|owowo|is it now 19 blocks left? I lost track...
191 2016-06-20 21:59:10	0|btcdrak|18
192 2016-06-20 22:01:24	0|molz|btcdrak, how do you get that number?
193 2016-06-20 22:01:45	0|btcdrak|1916-numberofcsvsignals
194 2016-06-20 22:04:36	0|molz|1916-1898.. but where do you get 1916?
195 2016-06-20 22:04:59	0|molz|"sincePeriodStart": {
196 2016-06-20 22:04:59	0|molz|"total": 1968,
197 2016-06-20 22:05:01	0|btcdrak|BIP9 spec
198 2016-06-20 22:05:35	0|btcdrak|prolly should be asking in #bitcoin or #bitcoin-dev
199 2016-06-20 23:08:01	0|_anthony_|what version number will the current version of core start using once CSV is activated?
200 2016-06-20 23:09:50	0|btcdrak|0x20000000
201 2016-06-20 23:10:16	0|_anthony_|will any version number >=4 be valid?
202 2016-06-20 23:10:31	0|btcdrak|yes
203 2016-06-20 23:10:39	0|_anthony_|cool thanks