1 2016-08-13 06:30:41	0|wumpus|rc3 executables uploaded https://bitcoin.org/bin/bitcoin-core-0.13.0/test.rc3/
 2 2016-08-13 07:42:32	0|cjcj|Is the Odroid suitable to run a full node?
 3 2016-08-13 08:07:16	0|midnightmagic|cjcj: Only if you're okay with someone else having total control over your device.
 4 2016-08-13 08:07:25	0|midnightmagic|cjcj: But this isn't the place for it. Please ask in #bitcoin.
 5 2016-08-13 08:11:01	0|cjcj|midnightmagic: Total control? Is the device backdoored or what? Got a link?
 6 2016-08-13 08:11:08	0|cjcj|midnightmagic: Sorry, I'll move along
 7 2016-08-13 13:10:32	0|GitHub166|13bitcoin/06master 14e11f9a2 15Justin Camarena: [doc] typos, READMEs, comments...
 8 2016-08-13 13:10:32	0|GitHub166|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj pushed 2 new commits to 06master: 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/0d0abcac1efe...94368d643473
 9 2016-08-13 13:10:33	0|GitHub166|13bitcoin/06master 1494368d6 15Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #8503: [doc] typos, text errors...
10 2016-08-13 13:10:44	0|GitHub142|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj closed pull request #8503: [doc] typos, text errors (06master...06Test-branch) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8503
11 2016-08-13 13:13:22	0|GitHub117|13bitcoin/06master 14216d796 15Luke Dashjr: configure: Allow building bench_bitcoin by itself
12 2016-08-13 13:13:22	0|GitHub117|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj pushed 2 new commits to 06master: 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/94368d643473...fe1780ed3eca
13 2016-08-13 13:13:23	0|GitHub117|13bitcoin/06master 14fe1780e 15Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #8492: configure: Allow building bench_bitcoin by itself...
14 2016-08-13 13:13:34	0|GitHub130|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj closed pull request #8492: configure: Allow building bench_bitcoin by itself (06master...06conf_only_bench) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8492
15 2016-08-13 13:28:50	0|GitHub49|13bitcoin/06master 148a270b2 15Luke Dashjr: Bugfix: Allow building libbitcoinconsensus without any univalue
16 2016-08-13 13:28:50	0|GitHub49|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj pushed 2 new commits to 06master: 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/fe1780ed3eca...efce84d888a6
17 2016-08-13 13:28:51	0|GitHub49|13bitcoin/06master 14efce84d 15Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #8293: Bugfix: Allow building libbitcoinconsensus without any univalue...
18 2016-08-13 13:29:00	0|GitHub52|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj closed pull request #8293: Bugfix: Allow building libbitcoinconsensus without any univalue (06master...06sys_univalue_opt) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8293
19 2016-08-13 13:55:28	0|GitHub32|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj pushed 4 new commits to 06master: 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/efce84d888a6...38590729631c
20 2016-08-13 13:55:29	0|GitHub32|13bitcoin/06master 145e187e7 15whythat: use c++11 std::unique_ptr instead of boost::shared_ptr
21 2016-08-13 13:55:29	0|GitHub32|13bitcoin/06master 14947913f 15whythat: use std::map::erase(const_iterator, const_iterator) to get non-constant iterator
22 2016-08-13 13:55:30	0|GitHub32|13bitcoin/06master 14c784086 15whythat: use std::map::emplace() instead of std::map::insert()
23 2016-08-13 13:55:38	0|GitHub41|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj closed pull request #8353: Trivial: tiny c++11 refactors (06master...06cpp11) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8353
24 2016-08-13 14:12:03	0|GitHub138|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj opened pull request #8504: test: Remove java comparison tool (06master...062016_08_jexit) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8504
25 2016-08-13 15:46:33	0|instagibbs|bitcoin.org is down, someone have rc3 binary link
26 2016-08-13 17:22:45	0|GitHub16|[13bitcoin] 15leijurv opened pull request #8505: Trivial: Fix typo in main.cpp (06master...06replacable-typo) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8505
27 2016-08-13 17:29:07	0|wumpus|instagibbs: have it yet? if not I'll upload it to my server
28 2016-08-13 17:49:55	0|achow101|instagibbs: I have it up on github https://github.com/achow101/bitcoin/releases/tag/v0.13.0rc3
29 2016-08-13 18:28:54	0|GitHub107|[13bitcoin] 15leijurv opened pull request #8506: Trivial: Fix typo in mining.cpp (06master...06serialise-typo) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8506
30 2016-08-13 18:34:17	0|GitHub93|[13bitcoin] 15leijurv opened pull request #8507: Trivial: Standardize spelling of "optimization" vs "optimisation" in main.cpp (06master...06optimization-typo) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8507
31 2016-08-13 18:40:06	0|GitHub47|[13bitcoin] 15leijurv closed pull request #8507: Trivial: Standardize spelling of "optimization" vs "optimisation" in main.cpp (06master...06optimization-typo) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8507
32 2016-08-13 18:41:54	0|GitHub140|[13bitcoin] 15leijurv closed pull request #8506: Trivial: Standardize spelling of "serialize" and "optimize" in mining.cpp and main.cpp (06master...06serialise-typo) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8506
33 2016-08-13 18:45:49	0|wumpus|achow101: cool solution
34 2016-08-13 18:47:40	0|wumpus|always forget that you can use github to host executables w/ tags
35 2016-08-13 18:56:58	0|btcdrak|Maybe we could host the RCs at https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/releases/tag/v0.13.0rc3
36 2016-08-13 22:26:29	0|instagibbs|so I realized that Core on Windows has a "Verified Publisher" of "The Bitcoin Foundation Inc"
37 2016-08-13 22:27:10	0|instagibbs|I don't really understand their security model for checking publishers of software, but I did a double-take there
38 2016-08-13 22:36:08	0|sipa|i think we shoukd try to get some other certificate...
39 2016-08-13 22:36:31	0|sipa|but i assume you need some registered organization in order to be able to do so
40 2016-08-13 22:45:55	0|gmaxwell|I'm doubtful.
41 2016-08-13 22:56:56	0|btcdrak|I thought cfields was looking into that, maybe my memory fails me.
42 2016-08-13 22:57:40	0|luke-jr|yeah
43 2016-08-13 23:53:35	0|midnightmagic|Is there some way to shut off the thumbs-up and -down for github issues? It's just turning into pointless reddit-like dogpiling which conveys zero actual meaning.
44 2016-08-13 23:54:09	0|gmaxwell|I wish there were, I asked previously.
45 2016-08-13 23:55:36	0|midnightmagic|"We used to have ack comments instead" I imagine is the reason.
46 2016-08-13 23:56:24	0|gmaxwell|I'm sure some projects were laden with meaningless +1s that this helped with.