1 2016-08-20 03:11:36	0|phantomcircuit|is travis still broken?
 2 2016-08-20 03:11:39	0|phantomcircuit|cfields: wumpus ^
 3 2016-08-20 03:28:41	0|btcdrak|phantomcircuit: itnis fixed. the offending commit was reverted.
 4 2016-08-20 03:28:59	0|btcdrak|it is*
 5 2016-08-20 06:51:50	0|GitHub40|[13bitcoin] 15PrinceofOrange opened pull request #8552: Bitcoin 139 d4.9 (06master...06bitcoin-139-d4.9) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8552
 6 2016-08-20 08:30:50	0|GitHub151|[13bitcoin] 15domob1812 opened pull request #8554: trivial: remove unused variable (06master...06remove-block-tmp) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8554
 7 2016-08-20 08:42:54	0|jonasschnelli|Segwit test failed again on travis: https://travis-ci.org/bitcoin/bitcoin/jobs/153752648
 8 2016-08-20 08:43:02	0|jonasschnelli|loc: https://travis-ci.org/bitcoin/bitcoin/jobs/153752648#L2431
 9 2016-08-20 08:43:29	0|jonasschnelli|https://travis-ci.org/bitcoin/bitcoin/jobs/153752648#L1696
10 2016-08-20 08:43:34	0|jonasschnelli|Assertion failed: 0E-8 != 999.980
11 2016-08-20 08:48:54	0|MarcoFalke|jonasschnelli: The issue is known
12 2016-08-20 09:48:05	0|btcdrak|? the test shows as passed
13 2016-08-20 10:14:20	0|jonasschnelli|I rekicked travis.
14 2016-08-20 10:14:21	0|jonasschnelli|But the link above should lead you to the issue.
15 2016-08-20 10:22:39	0|btcdrak|jonasschnelli: no that's the point, it leads to a passed test :-p
16 2016-08-20 10:29:12	0|jonasschnelli|Eh! Strange.
17 2016-08-20 17:54:01	0|Taek|Does FIBRE only work if you have a datacenter connection?
18 2016-08-20 19:18:04	0|c0der0|so this is where the developers that sign bitcoin core reside? I saw the message at bitcoin.org and needed to verify if 01EA5486DE18A882D4C2684590C8019E36C2E964 is the right key
19 2016-08-20 19:40:31	0|moli|c0der0, wrong channel, ask in #bitcoin
20 2016-08-20 23:51:25	0|luke-jr|BlueMatt: ping
21 2016-08-20 23:53:12	0|BlueMatt|hi
22 2016-08-20 23:53:14	0|BlueMatt|luke-jr:
23 2016-08-20 23:53:30	0|luke-jr|BlueMatt: https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/423 thoughts?
24 2016-08-20 23:53:55	0|BlueMatt|oh, yes, on my review pipeline, I havent looked at it since some changes were made
25 2016-08-20 23:54:03	0|luke-jr|ok, just checking
26 2016-08-20 23:54:11	0|BlueMatt|nono, thanks for the reminder
27 2016-08-20 23:54:25	0|BlueMatt|I'll queue it up to reivew on plane
28 2016-08-20 23:54:36	0|luke-jr|BlueMatt: BIP 111 should be Accepted yet?
29 2016-08-20 23:55:03	0|BlueMatt|probably not? I think most spv clients dont support it yet
30 2016-08-20 23:55:28	0|luke-jr|that'd be required for Final, not Accepted
31 2016-08-20 23:55:44	0|luke-jr|(and even then, only some of them need to support it for Final I think)
32 2016-08-20 23:57:44	0|BlueMatt|well i havent really gone and looked at what all the various clients support
33 2016-08-20 23:57:49	0|luke-jr|sdaftuar: petertodd: sipa: ping
34 2016-08-20 23:58:18	0|BlueMatt|anyway, I'm not farmiliar with the the status modes
35 2016-08-20 23:58:45	0|luke-jr|BlueMatt: "Accepted" just requires Author consent, and the proposal to be complete; "Final" is when the network adopts it.
36 2016-08-20 23:59:38	0|BlueMatt|strange defn for accepted :/