1 2016-09-19 01:11:59	0|luke-jr|Is the address leakage issue significant enough that we need a backport for 0.13?
  2 2016-09-19 01:12:59	0|gmaxwell|it's a bugfix that is a zero effort backport. Its usually hard to assess the risk of information leaks.
  3 2016-09-19 02:19:26	0|luke-jr|gmaxwell: yes, but it might also be a risk because it changes p2p behaviour globally? (I haven't looked too closely at its implications.)
  4 2016-09-19 02:20:09	0|luke-jr|but more to the point: it's not merged in master yet
  5 2016-09-19 04:30:22	0|gmaxwell|luke-jr: sure, shoudln't be backported until after.
  6 2016-09-19 05:20:28	0|GitHub82|[13bitcoin] 15jl2012 opened pull request #8756: Implement excessive sighashing protection policy with conservative counting (06master...06sighashpolicylite) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8756
  7 2016-09-19 07:28:18	0|GitHub139|13bitcoin/06master 14d9c99c3 15Wladimir J. van der Laan: net: No longer send local address in addrMe...
  8 2016-09-19 07:28:18	0|GitHub139|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj pushed 2 new commits to 06master: 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/1e5799c52535...239e8ce95896
  9 2016-09-19 07:28:19	0|GitHub139|13bitcoin/06master 14239e8ce 15Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #8740: net: No longer send local address in addrMe...
 10 2016-09-19 07:28:28	0|GitHub126|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj closed pull request #8740: net: No longer send local address in addrMe (06master...062016_09_addrfrom_version) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8740
 11 2016-09-19 07:34:24	0|luke-jr|well, that's one way to solve that :p
 12 2016-09-19 07:42:15	0|GitHub140|13bitcoin/06master 14fad41f3 15MarcoFalke: [qa] walletbackup: Sync blocks inside the loop
 13 2016-09-19 07:42:15	0|GitHub140|[13bitcoin] 15MarcoFalke pushed 2 new commits to 06master: 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/239e8ce95896...483e8e4f4875
 14 2016-09-19 07:42:16	0|GitHub140|13bitcoin/06master 14483e8e4 15MarcoFalke: Merge #8724: [qa] walletbackup: Sync blocks inside the loop...
 15 2016-09-19 07:42:28	0|GitHub31|[13bitcoin] 15MarcoFalke closed pull request #8724: [qa] walletbackup: Sync blocks inside the loop (06master...06Mf1609-qaWalletBackupFix) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8724
 16 2016-09-19 09:38:42	0|GitHub157|13bitcoin/06master 14fa5d276 15MarcoFalke: [init] ParameterInteraction() iff wallet enabled
 17 2016-09-19 09:38:42	0|GitHub157|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj pushed 2 new commits to 06master: 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/483e8e4f4875...a5b20edd3dc6
 18 2016-09-19 09:38:43	0|GitHub157|13bitcoin/06master 14a5b20ed 15Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #8494: [init, wallet] ParameterInteraction() iff wallet enabled...
 19 2016-09-19 09:38:52	0|GitHub56|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj closed pull request #8494: [init, wallet] ParameterInteraction() iff wallet enabled (06master...06Mf1608-initWalletParamInt) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8494
 20 2016-09-19 12:36:53	0|jonasschnelli|Should listsinceblock list mempool transactions? IMO no... but it does
 21 2016-09-19 13:02:58	0|GitHub73|[13bitcoin] 15jonasschnelli opened pull request #8757: Fix issue with conflicted mempool tx in listsinceblock (06master...062016/09/listsinceblock) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8757
 22 2016-09-19 13:18:47	0|GitHub53|13bitcoin/06master 14b16a7f6 15Michael Ford: [Doc] Target protobuf 2.6 in OS X build notes....
 23 2016-09-19 13:18:47	0|GitHub53|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj pushed 2 new commits to 06master: 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/a5b20edd3dc6...254ea97e940f
 24 2016-09-19 13:18:48	0|GitHub53|13bitcoin/06master 14254ea97 15Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #8754: [Doc] Target protobuf 2.6 in OS X build notes....
 25 2016-09-19 13:19:04	0|GitHub35|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj closed pull request #8754: [Doc] Target protobuf 2.6 in OS X build notes. (06master...06osx-protobuf-doc) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8754
 26 2016-09-19 13:38:38	0|GitHub185|13bitcoin/06master 14dad932c 15Anders Øyvind Urke-Sætre: Minor change in section name...
 27 2016-09-19 13:38:38	0|GitHub185|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj pushed 2 new commits to 06master: 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/254ea97e940f...0171a1e559aa
 28 2016-09-19 13:38:39	0|GitHub185|13bitcoin/06master 140171a1e 15Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #8720: Minor change in section name...
 29 2016-09-19 13:38:52	0|GitHub123|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj closed pull request #8720: Minor change in section name (06master...06patch-1) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8720
 30 2016-09-19 13:44:13	0|GitHub181|13bitcoin/06master 14c4084c2 15fanquake: Specify Protobuf version 2 in paymentrequest.proto
 31 2016-09-19 13:44:13	0|GitHub181|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj pushed 2 new commits to 06master: 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/0171a1e559aa...2ebb8099d9a2
 32 2016-09-19 13:44:14	0|GitHub181|13bitcoin/06master 142ebb809 15Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #8742: Specify Protobuf version 2 in paymentrequest.proto...
 33 2016-09-19 13:44:27	0|GitHub155|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj closed pull request #8742: Specify Protobuf version 2 in paymentrequest.proto (06master...06proto2-vs-proto3) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8742
 34 2016-09-19 13:45:03	0|GitHub197|13bitcoin/06master 14fa644d0 15MarcoFalke: [qa] wallet: Check legacy wallet as well
 35 2016-09-19 13:45:03	0|GitHub197|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj pushed 2 new commits to 06master: 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/2ebb8099d9a2...9ac01301f5c4
 36 2016-09-19 13:45:04	0|GitHub197|13bitcoin/06master 149ac0130 15Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #8716: [qa] wallet: Check legacy wallet as well...
 37 2016-09-19 13:45:13	0|GitHub191|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj closed pull request #8716: [qa] wallet: Check legacy wallet as well (06master...06Mf1609-qaWalletLegacy) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8716
 38 2016-09-19 13:54:08	0|sipa|lol @ zu
 39 2016-09-19 14:47:13	0|GitHub111|13bitcoin/06master 14f3552da 15Cory Fields: net: fix maxuploadtarget setting...
 40 2016-09-19 14:47:13	0|GitHub111|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj pushed 2 new commits to 06master: 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/9ac01301f5c4...f07424a6716c
 41 2016-09-19 14:47:14	0|GitHub111|13bitcoin/06master 14f07424a 15Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #8707: net: fix maxuploadtarget setting...
 42 2016-09-19 14:47:25	0|GitHub18|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj closed pull request #8707: net: fix maxuploadtarget setting (06master...06fix-maxupload) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8707
 43 2016-09-19 14:52:06	0|GitHub199|13bitcoin/06master 14dddd04f 15MarcoFalke: [qa] Refactor RPCTestHandler to prevent TimeoutExpired
 44 2016-09-19 14:52:06	0|GitHub199|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj pushed 2 new commits to 06master: 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/f07424a6716c...c40dd70d0da7
 45 2016-09-19 14:52:07	0|GitHub199|13bitcoin/06master 14c40dd70 15Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #8750: [qa] Refactor RPCTestHandler to prevent TimeoutExpired...
 46 2016-09-19 14:52:19	0|GitHub0|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj closed pull request #8750: [qa] Refactor RPCTestHandler to prevent TimeoutExpired (06master...06Mf1609-qaRefactorTimeout) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8750
 47 2016-09-19 14:54:34	0|GitHub0|13bitcoin/06master 14b4fb512 15Pavel Janík: UndoReadFromDisk works on undo files (rev), not on block files.
 48 2016-09-19 14:54:34	0|GitHub0|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj pushed 2 new commits to 06master: 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/c40dd70d0da7...8bae52a9a0d1
 49 2016-09-19 14:54:35	0|GitHub0|13bitcoin/06master 148bae52a 15Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #8737: Trivial: UndoReadFromDisk works on undo files (rev), not on block files....
 50 2016-09-19 14:54:53	0|GitHub129|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj closed pull request #8737: Trivial: UndoReadFromDisk works on undo files (rev), not on block files. (06master...0620160915_Undo_error_message_fix) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8737
 51 2016-09-19 14:55:36	0|GitHub122|13bitcoin/06master 1437a7fe9 15isle2983: [copyright] add MIT License copyright header to zmq_sub.py
 52 2016-09-19 14:55:36	0|GitHub122|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj pushed 2 new commits to 06master: 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/8bae52a9a0d1...1cf11cc3eca8
 53 2016-09-19 14:55:37	0|GitHub122|13bitcoin/06master 141cf11cc 15Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #8701: [copyright] add MIT License copyright header to zmq_sub.py...
 54 2016-09-19 14:55:47	0|GitHub99|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj closed pull request #8701: [copyright] add MIT License copyright header to zmq_sub.py (06master...06zmq_sub-copyright) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8701
 55 2016-09-19 15:01:41	0|GitHub113|[13bitcoin] 15MarcoFalke opened pull request #8760: [init] Get rid of some ENABLE_WALLET (06master...06Mf1609-walletInitGuard) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8760
 56 2016-09-19 15:02:54	0|GitHub74|13bitcoin/06master 144677b19 15isle2983: [copyright] add MIT License copyright header to remaining Python files
 57 2016-09-19 15:02:54	0|GitHub74|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj pushed 2 new commits to 06master: 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/1cf11cc3eca8...894c0ad9a9ab
 58 2016-09-19 15:02:55	0|GitHub74|13bitcoin/06master 14894c0ad 15Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #8702: [copyright] add MIT License copyright header to remaining Python files...
 59 2016-09-19 15:03:04	0|GitHub34|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj closed pull request #8702: [copyright] add MIT License copyright header to remaining Python files (06master...06misc-copyright) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8702
 60 2016-09-19 15:16:01	0|michagogo|sipa: maybe when we port the code over. Right now we're still in C++…
 61 2016-09-19 15:21:58	0|sipa|michagogo: ?
 62 2016-09-19 15:40:16	0|michagogo|sipa: aren't those references a Python thing?
 63 2016-09-19 15:47:12	0|sipa|?
 64 2016-09-19 15:48:24	0|sipa|i'm talking about the mingw issue that causes the "Content-length: zu" line in the http responses
 65 2016-09-19 16:03:11	0|GitHub9|13bitcoin/06master 14d9ff591 15Pieter Wuille: Move static global randomizer seeds into CConnman
 66 2016-09-19 16:03:11	0|GitHub9|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj pushed 2 new commits to 06master: 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/894c0ad9a9ab...047ded0b12f3
 67 2016-09-19 16:03:12	0|GitHub9|13bitcoin/06master 14047ded0 15Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #8688: Move static global randomizer seeds into CConnman...
 68 2016-09-19 16:03:22	0|GitHub182|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj closed pull request #8688: Move static global randomizer seeds into CConnman (06master...06detrandconnman) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8688
 69 2016-09-19 17:14:12	0|GitHub23|13bitcoin/06master 14783e930 15isle2983: [copyright] Add missing copyright headers
 70 2016-09-19 17:14:12	0|GitHub23|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj pushed 2 new commits to 06master: 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/047ded0b12f3...d8b4b631c5be
 71 2016-09-19 17:14:13	0|GitHub23|13bitcoin/06master 14d8b4b63 15Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #8676: Add missing copyright headers...
 72 2016-09-19 17:14:25	0|GitHub173|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj closed pull request #8676: Add missing copyright headers (06master...06missing-copyright) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8676
 73 2016-09-19 18:38:56	0|instagibbs|sipa: does the v2 cb assume that clients will prefer newer versions over old? I can't make heads or tails of how version agreement is achieved otherwise
 74 2016-09-19 18:39:16	0|instagibbs|I'm just reading the bip for now
 75 2016-09-19 18:57:16	0|gmaxwell|wumpus: perhaps someone with a running fedora system could confirm, but I believe the maximum locked memory ulimit by default on fedora and centos is 32kb.
 76 2016-09-19 18:59:14	0|gmaxwell|wumpus: any idea why we're using so much locked memory? 300k for a big wallet sounds like a lot.
 77 2016-09-19 19:10:49	0|BlueMatt|the help documentation for getblocktemplate does not anywhere explain how to get it to spit out a response post-segwit :(
 78 2016-09-19 19:10:57	0|BlueMatt|(nor does the segwit-gbt bip, afaict)
 79 2016-09-19 19:11:39	0|BlueMatt|luke-jr: ^
 80 2016-09-19 19:13:27	0|gmaxwell|BlueMatt: yes it does...
 81 2016-09-19 19:15:25	0|gmaxwell|BlueMatt: you want the relevant BIP9 rules, it's described in BIP 145 and BIP 9.
 82 2016-09-19 19:18:44	0|BlueMatt|ahh, its mentioned in a one-line below a chart...thats confusing
 83 2016-09-19 19:18:49	0|BlueMatt|anyway, its not mentioned in the rpc help text
 84 2016-09-19 19:19:17	0|BlueMatt|and I dont really know enough about gbt to trust myself to not confuse the spec adding the "rules" thinggy to the help text
 85 2016-09-19 19:19:30	0|luke-jr|?
 86 2016-09-19 19:20:31	0|BlueMatt|luke-jr: the help text for getblocktemplate does not explain how to add the "rules" entry so that it will return anything except an error
 87 2016-09-19 19:20:59	0|luke-jr|oh
 88 2016-09-19 19:21:05	0|luke-jr|it has a link to the BIPs ☺
 89 2016-09-19 19:21:12	0|BlueMatt|.....
 90 2016-09-19 19:21:35	0|luke-jr|for better or worse, it's not really feasible to implement GBT from less than the BIPs
 91 2016-09-19 19:23:49	0|luke-jr|getwork was just removed
 92 2016-09-19 19:23:52	0|gmaxwell|BlueMatt: go write a integrated stratum server instead, that hides all this stuff.
 93 2016-09-19 19:24:14	0|luke-jr|gmaxwell: libblkmaker already hides it ;)
 94 2016-09-19 19:24:16	0|BlueMatt|gmaxwell: true, but every time I ask anyone they also want to kill stratum
 95 2016-09-19 19:24:36	0|BlueMatt|though, really, I think if you were to just return essentially the stratum data, but as binary instead of hex, people would be happy
 96 2016-09-19 19:25:52	0|gmaxwell|BlueMatt: well it still leaves the protocol utterly unauthenticated which is bad.
 97 2016-09-19 19:26:15	0|gmaxwell|but it would certantly be a usability step up.
 98 2016-09-19 19:26:39	0|BlueMatt|true, easy enough to add a sig field that just gets appended to the end
 99 2016-09-19 19:26:44	0|luke-jr|+1
100 2016-09-19 19:53:19	0|TD-Linux|gmaxwell, 64kB on fedora 24
101 2016-09-19 21:02:52	0|instagibbs|BlueMatt: does the v2 cb assume that clients will prefer newer versions over old? I can't make sense of the latest bip text on agreement, although this might be my head cold....
102 2016-09-19 21:03:30	0|BlueMatt|instagibbs: does the sample negotiation not help? the text is dense, but the sample and actual code are pretty readable, imo
103 2016-09-19 21:04:18	0|instagibbs|it seems to assume it, yes, but it's an "example" after all :P
104 2016-09-19 21:05:29	0|instagibbs|in other words, is it assumed I could send "1, 2" and you could send "2, 1" in the initial messages? If so, I just need to sit down and read it again I think.
105 2016-09-19 21:15:03	0|BlueMatt|yes, you should be able to send any preference you want...if its not clear from the spec tell me where i should change it
106 2016-09-19 21:19:31	0|instagibbs|Ok so then that part is clear, but I can't connect dots. I'll try again tomorrow after sleep.