1 2016-09-25 09:52:09	0|GitHub66|13bitcoin/06master 143f58a28 15Amir Abrams: [Doc] Add missing autogen to example builds
 2 2016-09-25 09:52:09	0|GitHub66|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj pushed 2 new commits to 06master: 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/9da7366be19b...279bbadc8ba9
 3 2016-09-25 09:52:10	0|GitHub66|13bitcoin/06master 14279bbad 15Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #8787: [Doc] Add missing autogen to example builds...
 4 2016-09-25 09:52:22	0|GitHub105|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj closed pull request #8787: [Doc] Add missing autogen to example builds (06master...06patch-1) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8787
 5 2016-09-25 10:08:25	0|MarcoFalke|Does the modal overlay work with -reindex?
 6 2016-09-25 11:04:09	0|wumpus|is libconsensus work still underway in an active enough fashion to warrant a project in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/projects? I haven't heard of it in quite a while. It may have been because of sidetracking due to segwit ofcourse.
 7 2016-09-25 11:10:33	0|GitHub25|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj pushed 2 new commits to 06master: 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/279bbadc8ba9...bc9e3ab29f9b
 8 2016-09-25 11:10:34	0|GitHub25|13bitcoin/06master 14bc9e3ab 15Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #8771: CONTRIBUTING: Mention not to open several pulls...
 9 2016-09-25 11:10:34	0|GitHub25|13bitcoin/06master 14faa91bc 15MarcoFalke: CONTRIBUTING: Mention not to open several pulls
10 2016-09-25 11:10:45	0|GitHub70|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj closed pull request #8771: CONTRIBUTING: Mention not to open several pulls (06master...06Mf1609-ContributeDoc) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8771
11 2016-09-25 11:12:23	0|GitHub183|13bitcoin/06master 14edeaf24 15Mitchell Cash: Fix future copyright year
12 2016-09-25 11:12:23	0|GitHub183|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj pushed 2 new commits to 06master: 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/bc9e3ab29f9b...b8d10fd4ef8f
13 2016-09-25 11:12:24	0|GitHub183|13bitcoin/06master 14b8d10fd 15Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #8802: Fix future copyright year...
14 2016-09-25 11:12:38	0|GitHub62|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj closed pull request #8802: Fix future copyright year (06master...06future_copyright) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8802
15 2016-09-25 11:17:17	0|GitHub49|13bitcoin/06master 14fa16991 15MarcoFalke: [travis] cross-mac: explicitly enable gui
16 2016-09-25 11:17:17	0|GitHub49|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj pushed 2 new commits to 06master: 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/b8d10fd4ef8f...b694b0d5a5b4
17 2016-09-25 11:17:18	0|GitHub49|13bitcoin/06master 14b694b0d 15Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #8791: [travis] cross-mac: explicitly enable gui...
18 2016-09-25 11:17:27	0|GitHub175|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj closed pull request #8791: [travis] cross-mac: explicitly enable gui (06master...06Mf1609-travisGui) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8791
19 2016-09-25 11:35:45	0|GitHub152|13bitcoin/06master 14b194872 15fanquake: Remove old manpages from contrib/debian
20 2016-09-25 11:35:45	0|GitHub152|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj pushed 2 new commits to 06master: 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/b694b0d5a5b4...bae178f3ca78
21 2016-09-25 11:35:46	0|GitHub152|13bitcoin/06master 14bae178f 15Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #8743: Remove old manpages from contrib/debian in favour of doc/man...
22 2016-09-25 11:35:55	0|GitHub12|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj closed pull request #8743: Remove old manpages from contrib/debian in favour of doc/man (06master...06remove-old-manpages) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8743
23 2016-09-25 12:01:59	0|btcdrak|wumpus: a project would help significantly.
24 2016-09-25 12:12:20	0|wumpus|any idea which issues and pulls to add to it?
25 2016-09-25 12:45:40	0|jonasschnelli|wumpus: wait, ... is this an ELF executable attached to this issue: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/8806
26 2016-09-25 12:46:00	0|wumpus|let me check
27 2016-09-25 12:46:08	0|jonasschnelli|The unzipped files has a header of "456C6646696C65"
28 2016-09-25 12:46:48	0|wumpus|I hadn't even seen it had a file attached. Booting up my analysis VM.
29 2016-09-25 12:47:24	0|jonasschnelli|Looks harmless. but I don't know this type of fileformat..
30 2016-09-25 12:50:06	0|wumpus|not an ELF file, as in the UNIX/Linux executable format, those start with 7f454c46. It indeed does say ElfFile though in the header
31 2016-09-25 12:50:49	0|jonasschnelli|Yes. Maybe a issue during zipping... or done by github
32 2016-09-25 12:50:53	0|wumpus|it's this http://forensicswiki.org/wiki/Windows_XML_Event_Log_(EVTX)
33 2016-09-25 12:51:03	0|jonasschnelli|Yes. Was also just stumpled over that page.
34 2016-09-25 12:51:07	0|jonasschnelli|So,.. false alarm. :)
35 2016-09-25 12:51:37	0|jonasschnelli|But I was suppriesed that you can upload a zip file to github containing a +x file
36 2016-09-25 12:52:37	0|wumpus|yep, but better be safe than sorry, it would not have been the first time someone tried to upload a questionable file to the repository with an issue
37 2016-09-25 12:53:03	0|wumpus|the annoying thing is that these get URLs like https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/files/491570/bitcoin.zip, as if we've uploaded them
38 2016-09-25 12:53:27	0|jonasschnelli|Yes. Thats bad!
39 2016-09-25 12:53:52	0|jonasschnelli|And I guess the issue author can always edit an old, closed issue to get one of these URLs.
40 2016-09-25 12:54:25	0|wumpus|indeed, and you have to contact github to get them removed
41 2016-09-25 12:54:35	0|jonasschnelli|sigh
42 2016-09-25 12:54:37	0|wumpus|you can remove the link, but that doesnt remove the file
43 2016-09-25 12:55:20	0|wumpus|in any case this user means no harm, but it's good to pay attention to this, it's a questionable github feature
44 2016-09-25 13:22:01	0|btcdrak|wumpus: let's ping jtimon
45 2016-09-25 13:22:38	0|GitHub161|[13bitcoin] 15MarcoFalke opened pull request #8807: [univalue] Pull subtree from upstream (06master...06Mf1609-univalueSync) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8807
46 2016-09-25 13:24:59	0|btcdrak|wumpus: open tickets #8337 #8493 #7820 #7779 should go in the project
47 2016-09-25 13:25:46	0|btcdrak|also #8329 #7829
48 2016-09-25 13:26:12	0|btcdrak|and finally #6714
49 2016-09-25 13:28:13	0|wumpus|thanks!
50 2016-09-25 13:59:40	0|wumpus|btcdrak: something like https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/projects/6 ?
51 2016-09-25 14:00:24	0|btcdrak|wumpus: looks good to me
52 2016-09-25 14:22:23	0|GitHub168|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj pushed 3 new commits to 06master: 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/bae178f3ca78...37871f216e0d
53 2016-09-25 14:22:24	0|GitHub168|13bitcoin/06master 143650668 15MarcoFalke: Squashed 'src/univalue/' changes from f32df99..daf1285...
54 2016-09-25 14:22:24	0|GitHub168|13bitcoin/06master 149bf41af 15MarcoFalke: Merge commit '3650668cdbbf369dd8f30c8e8eb5bb883325942d' into HEAD
55 2016-09-25 14:22:25	0|GitHub168|13bitcoin/06master 1437871f2 15Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #8807: [univalue] Pull subtree from upstream...
56 2016-09-25 14:22:38	0|GitHub139|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj closed pull request #8807: [univalue] Pull subtree from upstream (06master...06Mf1609-univalueSync) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8807
57 2016-09-25 14:22:40	0|morcos|cfields_: jeremyrubin: Is there room for some speedup by using move semantics on CCoinsCacheEntry inside of CCoinsViewCache:BatchWrite?  We're always deleting the cache version anyway.
58 2016-09-25 14:36:08	0|sipa|morcos: i've been thinking for a while about another coinsclviewcache like structure, that contains updates which are likely written... which writes the changes directly to the parent, and the old value in the subcache, only to be used whenreverting
59 2016-09-25 14:37:15	0|morcos|sipa: hmm..  interesting.   is this in lieu of a potential switch to a non-txid based structure, or just an easier change for now
60 2016-09-25 14:40:49	0|morcos|sipa: i think we have a slew of performance improvements which aren't too far off from PR'ing.. one is based on keeping a consistent hot cache on top of pcoinstip...  i think if the changes to that are just moves to pcoinstip, it should be fast, b/c the time to populate it is amortized.  the trick is not erasing all the rest of it
61 2016-09-25 14:44:10	0|sipa|morcos: yeah, i don't have time to work on any of this, so don't let it interfere with ongoing work
62 2016-09-25 14:44:19	0|sipa|just throwing it out there as an idea
63 2016-09-25 14:44:52	0|morcos|sipa: do you think the move idea has any merit?  seems like it might not be a large change, just c++11 i'm not very familiar with
64 2016-09-25 14:45:51	0|sipa|morcos: no idea what it refers to, i haven't been following the past days (busy with moving)
65 2016-09-25 14:46:04	0|sipa|but if it's simple and it helps, i'm all for it
66 2016-09-25 14:46:27	0|morcos|sipa: i was just suggesting above, that if we make a way to std:move CCoinsCacheEntry's we can do that inside of BatchWrite instead of swapping the the underlying coins
67 2016-09-25 14:53:48	0|sipa|morcos: that simplifies the code, but it doesn't have much of a performance impact
68 2016-09-25 14:54:05	0|sipa|swap and move assign are often the same thing
69 2016-09-25 14:55:27	0|morcos|sipa: ok, that's what i was wondering.
70 2016-09-25 14:56:54	0|morcos|the erasing of the old cache is just so painful (performance wise)..
71 2016-09-25 17:19:13	0|luke-jr|whoa, univalue got updated? :p
72 2016-09-25 17:23:17	0|GitHub25|[13bitcoin] 15paveljanik opened pull request #8808: Do not shadow variables (gcc set) (06master...0620160925_Wshadow_gcc) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8808
73 2016-09-25 17:31:56	0|Chris_Stewart_5|Is there a better way to test serialization symmetry for something that implementions SerializationOp? This seems like a hacky way to do it
74 2016-09-25 17:31:59	0|Chris_Stewart_5|https://github.com/Christewart/bitcoin/blob/35cf95761270db7123c0deabb9ae40e324c5e7d9/src/test/block_properties.cpp#L14-L21
75 2016-09-25 17:32:50	0|wumpus|luke-jr: I was as surprised as you are :)
76 2016-09-25 17:33:14	0|luke-jr|hehe
77 2016-09-25 17:38:30	0|paveljanik|one ping per week for four weeks...
78 2016-09-25 18:06:13	0|GitHub186|[13bitcoin] 15MarcoFalke opened pull request #8809: [qt] sync-overlay: Don't show redundant information (06master...06Mf1609-qtSyncInf) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8809
79 2016-09-25 18:06:24	0|GitHub2|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj opened pull request #8810: tests: Add exception error message for JSONRPCException (06master...062016_09_tests_rpc_error) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8810
80 2016-09-25 18:11:52	0|MarcoFalke|wumpus: Can you enable travis on https://github.com/bitcoin-core/univalue?
81 2016-09-25 18:12:26	0|wumpus|yes, I think so
82 2016-09-25 18:14:07	0|wumpus|should be enabed now...
83 2016-09-25 18:17:00	0|MarcoFalke|thx. I was asking because I noticed https://github.com/jgarzik/univalue/pull/27 fail the osx builds on your pull
84 2016-09-25 18:18:34	0|wumpus|strange
85 2016-09-25 18:20:02	0|wumpus|thought it was a trivial improvement
86 2016-09-25 18:20:56	0|MarcoFalke|Could be just travis having messed up the osx environment. (Seems to happen regularly)
87 2016-09-25 18:30:24	0|luke-jr|MarcoFalke: the BIP process does not actually allow for amending BIP 1
88 2016-09-25 18:40:13	0|wumpus|I think it does, BIP1 doesn't have final status
89 2016-09-25 18:45:27	0|MarcoFalke|In the text of BIP1 it says it is never meant to be completed, so you can always change it
90 2016-09-25 18:46:45	0|wumpus|yes
91 2016-09-25 18:46:51	0|MarcoFalke|If it says somewhere in BIP1 that it is not allowed to amend, just remove that line :P. Chicken-egg problem solved
92 2016-09-25 18:50:49	0|wumpus|I'm quite sure it doesn't say that
93 2016-09-25 19:30:02	0|GitHub70|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj opened pull request #8811: rpc: Add support for JSON-RPC named arguments (06master...062016_09_rpc_named_arguments) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8811