1 2016-10-15 06:12:31	0|wumpus|I have a new phone (Nexus 6P) and just realized it runs ARM 64 bit, had no idea, should definitely try to run bitcoin core on it
 2 2016-10-15 06:20:36	0|wumpus|sure, everyone knows that is possible by now, but given these specs it's probably faster on this than on most people's laptops :)
 3 2016-10-15 07:00:21	0|btcdrak|wumpus: you can run abcore
 4 2016-10-15 07:02:03	0|wumpus|it does pruning, I hope?
 5 2016-10-15 07:02:37	0|wumpus|ok it does, even enabled by default
 6 2016-10-15 07:44:50	0|GitHub1|13bitcoin/06master 14fafeec3 15MarcoFalke: [qt] sync-overlay: Don't show progress twice...
 7 2016-10-15 07:44:50	0|GitHub1|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj pushed 2 new commits to 06master: 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/03dd707dc027...088d1f441301
 8 2016-10-15 07:44:51	0|GitHub1|13bitcoin/06master 14088d1f4 15Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #8906: [qt] sync-overlay: Don't show progress twice...
 9 2016-10-15 07:45:00	0|GitHub49|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj closed pull request #8906: [qt] sync-overlay: Don't show progress twice (06master...06Mf1610-qtSyncProgress) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8906
10 2016-10-15 07:45:14	0|GitHub39|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj closed pull request #8903: Seed insecure_rand during start (06master...06patch-1) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8903
11 2016-10-15 08:28:24	0|GitHub108|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj pushed 4 new commits to 06master: 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/088d1f441301...49c591037289
12 2016-10-15 08:28:25	0|GitHub108|13bitcoin/06master 142c09a52 15Wladimir J. van der Laan: protocol.h: Move MESSAGE_START_SIZE into CMessageHeader...
13 2016-10-15 08:28:25	0|GitHub108|13bitcoin/06master 14f9bd92d 15Wladimir J. van der Laan: version.h: s/shord/short/ in comment
14 2016-10-15 08:28:26	0|GitHub108|13bitcoin/06master 141df3111 15Wladimir J. van der Laan: protocol.h: Make enums in GetDataMsg concrete values...
15 2016-10-15 08:28:34	0|GitHub133|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj closed pull request #8880: protocol.h: Move MESSAGE_START_SIZE into CMessageHeader (06master...062016_10_cosmetic) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8880
16 2016-10-15 09:54:57	0|wumpus_|-!- Irssi: Your nick is owned by Debian  eh
17 2016-10-15 09:55:45	0|gmaxwell|wtf?
18 2016-10-15 09:57:02	0|wumpus|it's a weird message, but that just seems that Debian my IRC name, but due to netsplit antics it's stuck
19 2016-10-15 09:57:25	0|wumpus|could switch back now
20 2016-10-15 09:57:33	0|wumpus|it was vaguely scary :)
21 2016-10-15 13:45:38	0|kanzure|or, what's your strongest argument for not editing bip1
22 2016-10-15 13:45:45	0|kanzure|er..
23 2016-10-15 13:46:12	0|GitHub185|[13bitcoin] 15rebroad opened pull request #8925: Display minimum ping in debug window. (06master...06DebugWindowMinPing) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8925
24 2016-10-15 16:45:16	0|GitHub17|[13bitcoin] 15jl2012 opened pull request #8927: Add script tests for FindAndDelete in pre-segwit and segwit scripts (06master...06findanddeletetest) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8927
25 2016-10-15 17:21:21	0|GitHub144|[13bitcoin] 15TheBlueMatt opened pull request #8928: Fix init segfault where InitLoadWallet() calls ATMP before genesis (06master...062016-10-fix-segfault) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8928
26 2016-10-15 17:22:57	0|BlueMatt|^ I think travis has been lying about tests passing, my reading of the code says it /should/ segfault :/
27 2016-10-15 17:57:42	0|GitHub106|[13bitcoin] 15sigwo opened pull request #8929: add software-properties-common (06master...06patch-6) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8929
28 2016-10-15 19:46:23	0|luke-jr|BlueMatt: undefined behaviour is not guaranteed to segfault :D
29 2016-10-15 19:58:35	0|friendsofbitcoin|Which Core dev would be willing to review and creat any needed unit test for this in demand pull request - https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7534 I would be willing to offer a reward of 0.5BTC for efforts pushing this through. I apologize in advance if this question is inappropriate for this venue as Im not familiar with any precedents
30 2016-10-15 20:26:57	0|luke-jr|(done)
31 2016-10-15 21:46:00	0|GitHub39|[13bitcoin] 15TheBlueMatt opened pull request #8930: Move orphan processing to ActivateBestChain (06master...06net_processing_3) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8930
32 2016-10-15 22:03:22	0|alpalp|how hard would it be to modify mining block selection to choose other than first seen?
33 2016-10-15 22:29:17	0|luke-jr|alpalp: not very. see preciousblock RPC.
34 2016-10-15 22:29:28	0|luke-jr|it's not generally a good idea, however.
35 2016-10-15 22:30:07	0|alpalp|why's that luke?
36 2016-10-15 22:31:09	0|alpalp|for example, I might be able  to make more fees mining off the 2nd block seen than first.
37 2016-10-15 22:32:05	0|luke-jr|it's liable to cause consensus delay and/or failure
38 2016-10-15 22:32:28	0|luke-jr|for example, you might prefer to make less fees if others will prefer your block over an earlier one
39 2016-10-15 22:32:37	0|sipa|one of the problems that may worsen with declining aubsidy
40 2016-10-15 22:32:55	0|sipa|the incentive to not work on top of the tip may increase in some circumstances
41 2016-10-15 22:34:17	0|luke-jr|I think it gets significantly worse if your peers prefer other than first-seen
42 2016-10-15 22:35:13	0|alpalp|trying to understand the danger before I open a can of worms.
43 2016-10-15 22:35:25	0|alpalp|if there are two "equal" tips at some point in time
44 2016-10-15 22:35:54	0|alpalp|definitely aware of issues down the road with low subsidy
45 2016-10-15 22:36:29	0|alpalp|luke-jr why is it worse if peers are not doing this strategy?