1 2016-11-28 05:08:46	0|jl2012|i need to do some debug. How could I make it to print all p2p messages to the log?
 2 2016-11-28 05:09:06	0|achow101|jl2012: -debug=net
 3 2016-11-28 05:09:14	0|jl2012|thanks!
 4 2016-11-28 05:18:38	0|jl2012|achow101: what if I also want to see the full messages, such as the block data being sent?
 5 2016-11-28 05:19:48	0|achow101|I don't think there is an option to log all of that. you can wireshark it though
 6 2016-11-28 06:56:14	0|shangzhou|2:34 PM <wumpus> shangzhou: it has no (ut)ACKs at all,certainly still needs review
 7 2016-11-28 06:58:47	0|shangzhou|wumpus: #9037 just a reminder :)
 8 2016-11-28 06:58:49	0|gribble|https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/9037 | net: Add test-before-evict discipline to addrman by EthanHeilman · Pull Request #9037 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
 9 2016-11-28 06:59:14	0|wumpus|shangzhou: it still has no ACKs, so is by no means ready for merging, no need to remind me of it
10 2016-11-28 06:59:42	0|wumpus|(well it has kazcw's but it was there last time IIRC)
11 2016-11-28 07:00:21	0|wumpus|would be great if people reviewed it ofc
12 2016-11-28 07:00:22	0|shangzhou|Ok thanks
13 2016-11-28 07:01:18	0|wumpus|but I'm perfectly able to revisit pull requests that still haven't moved forward, while I tend to miss the ones which everybody (TM) acked and should be merged, that's why I asked people
14 2016-11-28 07:50:02	0|BlueMatt|wumpus: re: #9229 yes, but the fix should be fixing the autotools detection of inet_pton, not continuing to work around it?
15 2016-11-28 07:50:03	0|gribble|https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/9229 | Remove calls to getaddrinfo_a by TheBlueMatt · Pull Request #9229 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
16 2016-11-28 07:50:11	0|BlueMatt|(or are you suggesting just remove that codeblock?0
17 2016-11-28 08:04:12	0|BlueMatt|(though its also weird we have so many ifdef branches there....)
18 2016-11-28 08:18:30	0|jonasschnelli|BlueMatt: Haven't really looked at this, but AFAIK libevent provides portable wrappers for some of those functions..
19 2016-11-28 08:18:59	0|BlueMatt|jonasschnelli: yes, eventually we should switch everything to libevent...for now, lets just fix the segfault in a backport-able way :p
20 2016-11-28 08:19:25	0|jonasschnelli|Yes. Makes sense.
21 2016-11-28 08:29:40	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15fsb4000 opened pull request #9233: Fix some typos (06master...06master) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9233
22 2016-11-28 09:01:36	0|wumpus|the getaddrinfo_a issue is curious, I have a nagging feeling we're just using it wrong, it's hard to believe a standard library function to be so trivially broken. Then again, in that case it makes sense to replace its usage too.
23 2016-11-28 09:45:01	0|wumpus|BlueMatt: I'm not suggesting any specific fix, just trying to figure out what is going wrong in the first place
24 2016-11-28 09:45:31	0|wumpus|BlueMatt: using inet_pton on systems that actually have it is great, I don't know why it falsely detects its presence on windows
25 2016-11-28 09:47:43	0|wumpus|only on windows *64 bit* at that
26 2016-11-28 09:58:08	0|fanquake|wumpus looks like pretty much all the code in 9229 was introduced in #4421
27 2016-11-28 09:58:10	0|gribble|https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/4421 | Use async name resolving to improve net thread responsiveness by 4tar · Pull Request #4421 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
28 2016-11-28 10:01:06	0|wumpus|fanquake: indeed, good find
29 2016-11-28 10:10:34	0|fanquake|wumpus re 'none required', see https://www.gnu.org/software/autoconf/manual/autoconf-2.69/html_node/Libraries.html
30 2016-11-28 10:10:38	0|fanquake|"The result of this test is cached in the ac_cv_search_function variable as ‘none required’ if function is already available"
31 2016-11-28 11:36:38	0|jl2012|where is the code for sending block to another node through p2p network?
32 2016-11-28 13:45:21	0|jonasschnelli|jl2012: have a look at ProcessGetData in main.cpp
33 2016-11-28 13:45:31	0|jonasschnelli|There is a if (inv.type == MSG_BLOCK)
34 2016-11-28 15:09:49	0|timothy|may I ask an "ethic" question?
35 2016-11-28 16:17:35	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj opened pull request #9234: torcontrol: Explicitly request RSA1024 private key (06master...062016_11_torcontrol_key_ttpe) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9234