1 2016-12-30 02:23:47 0|gmaxwell|I think #9420 can obviously be merged. 2 2016-12-30 02:23:49 0|gribble|https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/9420 | Fix linker error when configured with --enable-lcov by droark ÃÂ· Pull Request #9420 ÃÂ· bitcoin/bitcoin ÃÂ· GitHub 3 2016-12-30 07:44:02 0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 14e2b5c98 15Douglas Roark: Fix linker error when configured with --enable-lcov 4 2016-12-30 07:44:02 0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15jonasschnelli pushed 2 new commits to 06master: 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/dce853ef76ef...bebe3697fdad 5 2016-12-30 07:44:03 0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 14bebe369 15Jonas Schnelli: Merge #9420: Fix linker error when configured with --enable-lcov... 6 2016-12-30 07:44:19 0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15jonasschnelli closed pull request #9420: Fix linker error when configured with --enable-lcov (06master...06fixlcov) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9420 7 2016-12-30 08:48:02 0|jonasschnelli|Right? Finding the active headers tip with (only) getchaintips is not possible right now? 8 2016-12-30 08:48:55 0|jonasschnelli|Assume we have a split and two headers-only chains (with the same height), you can't see which headers chain has more work? 9 2016-12-30 09:41:36 0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15jonasschnelli opened pull request #9446: SetMerkleBranch: remove unused code, remove cs_main lock requirement (06master...062016/12/merklebranch) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9446 10 2016-12-30 15:36:00 0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15morcos opened pull request #9447: Allow 2 simultaneous block downloads (06master...06doubledownload) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9447 11 2016-12-30 15:49:59 0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15MarcoFalke reopened pull request #7522: Bugfix: Only use git for build info if the repository is actually the right one (06master...06bugfix_gitdir) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7522 12 2016-12-30 23:51:25 0|morcos|BlueMatt: The issue of a block request coming in before you've updated the tip is what's causing the Travis failure in 9447, it's not clear to me why it happens reliably there and not in 9375 as it seems like it should in 9375 13 2016-12-30 23:52:15 0|morcos|in the sendheaders.py test, you announce a reorg and then FindNextBlocksToDownload kicks in when you've announced enough blocks on the new chain to match nChainWork of your tip 14 2016-12-30 23:53:18 0|morcos|it turns out that the block requests generated by FindNextBlocksToDownload can actually arrive before tip is updated in the peer announcing the reorg.. it might be as simple as checking the cached block in ProcessGetData as well..