1 2017-02-08 01:23:08	0|jtimon|BlueMatt: I don't have much experience with python asynchronous stuff without zmq/nanomsg, wouldn't touch lower level sockets in python :p
 2 2017-02-08 01:24:37	0|jtimon|unless you're running some weird high performance experiment on pypy or something
 3 2017-02-08 02:49:22	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15pstratem opened pull request #9716: [Net] Clarity TIMEOUT_INTERVAL constant meaning. (06master...062017-02-07-ping-timeout-interval) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9716
 4 2017-02-08 03:18:48	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15jtimon opened pull request #9717: Pow: Remove fCheckPOW from CheckBlockHeader (06master...06pre-0.14-dont-call-me) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9717
 5 2017-02-08 03:44:13	0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 1429c5328 15Wladimir J. van der Laan: bench: Fix initialization order in registration...
 6 2017-02-08 03:44:13	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15MarcoFalke pushed 2 new commits to 06master: 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/b709fe7ffc44...d304fef37460
 7 2017-02-08 03:44:14	0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 14d304fef 15MarcoFalke: Merge #9712: bench: Fix initialization order in registration...
 8 2017-02-08 03:44:28	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15MarcoFalke closed pull request #9712: bench: Fix initialization order in registration (06master...062017_02_fiasco) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9712
 9 2017-02-08 04:22:26	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15luke-jr opened pull request #9718: Qt/Intro: Various fixes (06master...06intro_fixes) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9718
10 2017-02-08 06:28:29	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15rebroad opened pull request #9719: Allow abortion of ConnectBlock() when shutdown requested. (06master...06AbortConnectBlockAtShutdown) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9719
11 2017-02-08 06:46:12	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15theuni opened pull request #9720: net: fix banning and disallow sending messages before receiving verack (06master...06fix-ban) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9720
12 2017-02-08 06:48:01	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15rebroad opened pull request #9721: Headers announcement for nodes that can do headers. (06master...06AnnounceUsingHeaders) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9721
13 2017-02-08 06:48:26	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15CryptAxe opened pull request #9722: GUI: Display warning when attempting address reuse (06master...06reuse) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9722
14 2017-02-08 10:14:22	0|divyang|hello
15 2017-02-08 13:38:57	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj pushed 3 new commits to 06master: 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/d304fef37460...6a55515a9b8f
16 2017-02-08 13:38:58	0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 145cc2ebb 15Wladimir J. van der Laan: Update OpenBSD and FreeBSD build steps...
17 2017-02-08 13:38:58	0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 148713de8 15Wladimir J. van der Laan: build: Add options to override BDB cflags/libs...
18 2017-02-08 13:38:59	0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 146a55515 15Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #9705: build: Add options to override BDB cflags/libs...
19 2017-02-08 13:39:21	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj closed pull request #9705: build: Add options to override BDB cflags/libs (06master...062017_02_bdb_location) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9705
20 2017-02-08 13:47:07	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj pushed 5 new commits to 06master: 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/6a55515a9b8f...dd163f578869
21 2017-02-08 13:47:08	0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 14fd13eca 15Matt Corallo: Lock cs_vSend and cs_inventory in a consistent order even in TRY
22 2017-02-08 13:47:09	0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 148465631 15Matt Corallo: Always enforce lock strict lock ordering (try or not)
23 2017-02-08 13:47:10	0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 142a962d4 15Matt Corallo: Fixup style a bit by moving { to the same line as if statements
24 2017-02-08 13:47:25	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj closed pull request #9674: Always enforce strict lock ordering (try or not) (06master...062017-02-inv-send-lockorder) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9674
25 2017-02-08 14:21:25	0|udiWertheimer|Hey, Udi from Colu here, maintainers of the coloredcoins.org protocol. We are looking to start devoting some dev time to contribute to Bitcoin Core (just wherever we can help, not related to colored coins development).
26 2017-02-08 14:22:18	0|Chris_Stewart_5|udiWertheimer: Awesome!
27 2017-02-08 14:22:34	0|udiWertheimer|first steps I'm thinking of is getting to know the project and helping with reviewing open pull requests, then probably look for small open issues to work on, or missing tests. wondered if you guys have any suggestions for getting started?
28 2017-02-08 14:23:54	0|achow101|udiWertheimer: look through the PRs page and see what you can review. take a look at what the current issues are and see if there is anything you can do with some of the open issues.
29 2017-02-08 14:24:01	0|Chris_Stewart_5|If you haven't read already: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/doc/developer-notes.md
30 2017-02-08 14:24:22	0|achow101|also, since the 0.14 release cycle is currently upon us, it would be nice if you could review the PRs in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/milestone/21
31 2017-02-08 14:24:32	0|achow101|(that's the 0.14 milestone)
32 2017-02-08 14:45:49	0|udiWertheimer|gotcha. thanks
33 2017-02-08 16:13:54	0|BlueMatt|ok, so it looks like all the last-minute race testing is starting to clean up, but that means we need review to get 0.14 branched and rc1 out the door.... https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/milestone/21 has the list, plus #9708 would be nice
34 2017-02-08 16:13:55	0|gribble|https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/9708 | Clean Up all known races/platform-specific UB by TheBlueMatt · Pull Request #9708 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
35 2017-02-08 16:27:30	0|luke-jr|is github broken? it doesn't seem to be accepting my forcepush
36 2017-02-08 16:30:32	0|cdecker|luke-jr: protected branch?
37 2017-02-08 16:30:47	0|luke-jr|cdecker: it let me push, but it isn't updating the PR
38 2017-02-08 16:30:56	0|luke-jr|wasn't*.. finally did
39 2017-02-08 16:31:28	0|cdecker|Oh yeah, I noticed some lag upon push as well
40 2017-02-08 16:31:38	0|luke-jr|9718 looks good to go for 0.14 now
41 2017-02-08 16:43:44	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15luke-jr opened pull request #9724: Qt/Intro: Add explanation of IBD process (06master...06intro_explain) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9724
42 2017-02-08 17:18:42	0|cfields|BlueMatt: want me to just close 9695? as far as i can tell it's just a dupe now
43 2017-02-08 18:06:11	0|BlueMatt|cfields: meh, whatever, the point of splitting them is in case people complain about the copies in 9708 we can just merge 9707 and deal with it separately
44 2017-02-08 18:38:39	0|luke-jr|BlueMatt: could your size be rounded up based on filesystem overhead?
45 2017-02-08 18:39:00	0|BlueMatt|luke-jr: unless ext4+du rounds up a shitload?
46 2017-02-08 18:39:10	0|BlueMatt|i mean it is many files
47 2017-02-08 18:39:20	0|BlueMatt|but I think the const should incl reasonable overhead in any case?
48 2017-02-08 18:39:21	0|luke-jr|du --apparent-size ?
49 2017-02-08 18:39:32	0|BlueMatt|du -hs
50 2017-02-08 18:39:44	0|luke-jr|try with --apparent-size
51 2017-02-08 18:40:30	0|luke-jr|also, is -h using SI or 1024-based?
52 2017-02-08 18:40:39	0|BlueMatt|no idea
53 2017-02-08 18:48:54	0|sipa|109 GiB here, or 117 GB
54 2017-02-08 18:49:05	0|BlueMatt|heh, that would do it
55 2017-02-08 18:49:17	0|sipa|including chainstate and undo data
56 2017-02-08 18:49:23	0|BlueMatt|oh
57 2017-02-08 18:49:26	0|BlueMatt|oh, yes
58 2017-02-08 18:49:34	0|sipa|which we should include, i think
59 2017-02-08 18:49:43	0|sipa|undo data is 10%
60 2017-02-08 18:50:23	0|luke-jr|so = 120?
61 2017-02-08 18:50:34	0|sipa|du by default is 1024-based, unless you pass --si
62 2017-02-08 18:50:36	0|BlueMatt|yes, 120
63 2017-02-08 18:50:39	0|luke-jr|sipa: note chainstate is a separate number used also when pruning is enabled
64 2017-02-08 18:50:46	0|sipa|ok
65 2017-02-08 18:50:50	0|BlueMatt|i mean whatever, just has to be reasonable rounded up
66 2017-02-08 18:50:51	0|BlueMatt|120 sounds good
67 2017-02-08 18:50:52	0|BlueMatt|fine
68 2017-02-08 18:51:17	0|sipa|oh, my numbers exclude chainstate
69 2017-02-08 18:51:20	0|sipa|sorry
70 2017-02-08 18:51:29	0|sipa|but include undo data
71 2017-02-08 18:53:31	0|sipa|120 sounds good
72 2017-02-08 18:53:46	0|luke-jr|sipa: does -prune limit undo data?
73 2017-02-08 18:56:05	0|luke-jr|I guess so
74 2017-02-08 18:58:09	0|sipa|it also deletes undo data, yes
75 2017-02-08 18:58:27	0|sipa|and the ratio between blocks and undo data is pretty much constant
76 2017-02-08 21:22:06	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15TheBlueMatt opened pull request #9725: CValidationInterface Cleanups (06master...062017-01-wallet-cache-inmempool-1) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9725
77 2017-02-08 22:38:40	0|BlueMatt|is it a supported feature that if you do a getmempoolentry/getrawmempool/etc and a transaction shows up which applies to your wallet, a later call (immediately thereafter) to getbalance will show the balance including that transaction?
78 2017-02-08 22:38:46	0|BlueMatt|or is it only supported that sendrawtransaction followed by a getbalance/listtransactions/etc/etc will be consistent?