1 2017-04-03 06:53:34	0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 144b87973 15practicalswift: [rpc] Remove auth cookie on shutdown...
 2 2017-04-03 06:53:34	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj pushed 2 new commits to 06master: 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/ebfd65379811...e6033e00b164
 3 2017-04-03 06:53:35	0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 14e6033e0 15Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #10139: [rpc] Remove auth cookie on shutdown...
 4 2017-04-03 06:53:58	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj closed pull request #10139: [rpc] Remove auth cookie on shutdown (06master...06delete-auth-cookies) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10139
 5 2017-04-03 06:55:24	0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/060.14 14f15268d 15practicalswift: [rpc] Remove auth cookie on shutdown...
 6 2017-04-03 06:55:24	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj pushed 1 new commit to 060.14: 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/commit/f15268db3bf1a8c4ea410f4f63c6187b45e06ded
 7 2017-04-03 10:06:32	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj pushed 2 new commits to 06master: 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/e6033e00b164...a2cd0b0eecfe
 8 2017-04-03 10:06:33	0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 146d5dd60 15Thomas Snider: No need to use OpenSSL malloc/free
 9 2017-04-03 10:06:33	0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 14a2cd0b0 15Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #10058: No need to use OpenSSL malloc/free...
10 2017-04-03 10:07:02	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj closed pull request #10058: No need to use OpenSSL malloc/free (06master...06tjps_ssl_mutex) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10058
11 2017-04-03 11:24:56	0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 147482781 15Pieter Wuille: Allow non-power-of-2 signature cache sizes
12 2017-04-03 11:24:56	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj pushed 2 new commits to 06master: 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/a2cd0b0eecfe...cb598cfba1cb
13 2017-04-03 11:24:57	0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 14cb598cf 15Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #9533: Allow non-power-of-2 signature cache sizes...
14 2017-04-03 11:25:08	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj closed pull request #9533: Allow non-power-of-2 signature cache sizes (06master...06anysigcachesize) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9533
15 2017-04-03 13:05:37	0|rubensayshi|is there a way to restrict a node to only accept incoming connections from local network?
16 2017-04-03 13:06:50	0|sipa|you can bind to localhost
17 2017-04-03 13:06:54	0|sipa|or use a firewall :)
18 2017-04-03 13:08:30	0|rubensayshi|yea, guess I'll firewall it
19 2017-04-03 14:19:01	0|emucode|hi, I would like to learn how to write unit tests, can you give me some hints?
20 2017-04-03 14:19:29	0|emucode|what commands available in test framework could be use for UT for BIP148?
21 2017-04-03 14:22:41	0|sipa|'commands' ?
22 2017-04-03 14:23:08	0|sipa|the unit tests can access all functions that are exposed by modules in the software to be tested
23 2017-04-03 15:17:55	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15ryanofsky opened pull request #10142: Run bitcoin_test-qt under minimal QPA platform (06master...06pr/qtmin) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10142
24 2017-04-03 15:18:39	0|btcdrak|emucode: the unit tests are in src/tests, where as the functional tests are in qa/rpc
25 2017-04-03 15:19:30	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15ryanofsky closed pull request #10117: Fix "make check" on systems with qt and libxcb but no active DISPLAY (06master...06pr/noqapp) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10117
26 2017-04-03 15:20:18	0|emucode|btcdrak: I would like to write unit test, that creates a block, we assume that current date is 2016-09-01, and in this blog it sets on or off BIP9 flag, and segwit flag, and see if that block would be rejected or accepted
27 2017-04-03 15:21:35	0|emucode|I didn't yet write UTs for btc. Which other existing tests I should study to learn that?
28 2017-04-03 15:21:58	0|emucode|*in this block
29 2017-04-03 15:38:23	0|wumpus|emucode: would be better to use a functional test for that than a unit test. Unit tests are meant to test single function/classes in isolation
30 2017-04-03 15:39:07	0|wumpus|emucode: as for existing tests, there's a test/functional/segwit.py and test/functional/bip9-softforks.py
31 2017-04-03 15:43:19	0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 143bde556 15John Newbery: Add -debugexclude option to switch off logging for specified components
32 2017-04-03 15:43:19	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj pushed 2 new commits to 06master: 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/cb598cfba1cb...471ed00fcd3b
33 2017-04-03 15:43:20	0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 14471ed00 15Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #10123: Allow debug logs to be excluded from specified component...
34 2017-04-03 15:43:40	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj closed pull request #10123: Allow debug logs to be excluded from specified component (06master...06debugexclude) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10123
35 2017-04-03 15:55:16	0|luke-jr|what prevents a 0-value output with 0-length sPK from being pruned prematurely from the UTXO set?
36 2017-04-03 15:58:22	0|sipa|go add it to to CScript::,×IsProvablyUnsoendable
37 2017-04-03 16:32:39	0|luke-jr|sipa: ? it's *not* unspendable, but CCoins stuff assumes IsNull TxOut is deleted
38 2017-04-03 16:35:55	0|sipa|luke-jr: such a scriptPubKey is unspendable anyway
39 2017-04-03 16:36:08	0|luke-jr|why? scriptSig=OP_TRUE
40 2017-04-03 16:36:27	0|sipa|so treating it as non-existiant is fine
41 2017-04-03 16:36:34	0|sipa|hmm
42 2017-04-03 16:38:50	0|sipa|luke-jr: CTxOut::IsNull requires amount == -1
43 2017-04-03 16:40:32	0|instagibbs|luke-jr, both scritpubkey evaluation has to happen too, right?
44 2017-04-03 16:40:59	0|luke-jr|sipa: aha
45 2017-04-03 16:41:01	0|instagibbs|oh nvm
46 2017-04-03 16:43:19	0|sipa|luke-jr: you had me worried for a minute
47 2017-04-03 16:43:43	0|luke-jr|sorry, oversight of that detail
48 2017-04-03 16:44:06	0|luke-jr|also figured 0.8 was long enough ago that ti wouldn't matter anyay
49 2017-04-03 16:45:28	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15jnewbery opened pull request #10143: [net] Allow disconnectnode RPC to be called with node id (06master...06disconnect_node_by_id) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10143
50 2017-04-03 20:04:44	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15sdaftuar opened pull request #10144: Prioritisetransaction wasn't always updating ancestor fee (06master...062017-04-fix-mempool-modified-ancestor-fees) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10144
51 2017-04-03 21:30:44	0|instagibbs|not that this matters much post-mempool persistaence, but it seems that during a reindex wallet transactions will fail to be reaccepted because they're all non-final, with chainActive.Height() being 0. Is this intended?
52 2017-04-03 21:31:45	0|gmaxwell|instagibbs: since it retries I dunno that its a problem.
53 2017-04-03 21:32:16	0|instagibbs|mm true. Just shows as missing balance until then.
54 2017-04-03 21:35:14	0|instagibbs|gmaxwell, where is the rebroadcast logic set?
55 2017-04-03 21:35:35	0|gmaxwell|instagibbs: Resendwallettransactions.
56 2017-04-03 21:35:52	0|instagibbs|ok, one and the same, the first invocation is just useless
57 2017-04-03 21:53:05	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15theuni closed pull request #10143: [net] Allow disconnectnode RPC to be called with node id (06master...06disconnect_node_by_id) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10143
58 2017-04-03 21:54:15	0|instagibbs|Ok, the mempool attempt for resend fix also fixes this bug as well.
59 2017-04-03 22:05:43	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15theuni reopened pull request #10143: [net] Allow disconnectnode RPC to be called with node id (06master...06disconnect_node_by_id) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10143
60 2017-04-03 22:13:43	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15JeremyRubin opened pull request #10145: Separate Contextual checks and handling & switch on enum in net_processing.cpp  (06master...06netprocessing_enum_rebased) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10145