1 2017-05-26 00:29:08	0|jtimon|what is the point of https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/src/validation.cpp#L2707 ?
 2 2017-05-26 00:29:22	0|jtimon|There doesn't seem to be any case where consensusParams.vDeployments[anything].nTimeout == 0 at this point
 3 2017-05-26 00:29:57	0|jtimon|not just for segwit, for anything in any supported chain
 4 2017-05-26 00:30:26	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15earonesty reopened pull request #10442: add a -bip148 option (06master...06master) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10442
 5 2017-05-26 08:08:11	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15jonasschnelli reopened pull request #8745: [PoC] Add wallet inspection and modification tool "bitcoin-wallet-tool" (06master...062016/09/wallet-tool) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8745
 6 2017-05-26 09:39:04	0|jonasschnelli|cfields: maybe you can help solve the compile-issues here: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8745?
 7 2017-05-26 10:01:19	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15jonasschnelli opened pull request #10457: Don't use fixed "wallet.bak"-filename during salvagewallet (06master...062017/05/rename_bdb) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10457
 8 2017-05-26 12:56:11	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15dbolser opened pull request #10458: libevent2 -> libevent on FreeBSD install docs (060.14...06patch-1) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10458
 9 2017-05-26 13:21:41	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15dbolser opened pull request #10459: I found I needed to use gmake on FreeBSD 10.3 (060.14...06patch-2) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10459
10 2017-05-26 15:24:53	0|bitc-multi|hi
11 2017-05-26 15:25:29	0|bitc-multi|intressed for a Bot in Telegramm for multiply your btc? PN
12 2017-05-26 17:08:44	0|mlong|@sipa is there an objective C library for secp256k1
13 2017-05-26 17:10:14	0|sipa|how would i know?
14 2017-05-26 17:11:45	0|mlong|You built it no?
15 2017-05-26 17:13:05	0|sipa|i'm the primary author of libsecp256k1, a C library
16 2017-05-26 17:13:14	0|sipa|i don't know anything about objective C
17 2017-05-26 17:15:36	0|mlong|nice, alot of help there pete jesus
18 2017-05-26 17:16:32	0|sipa|i'm not sure what you want me to do... i honestly do not know anything about objective C
19 2017-05-26 17:17:24	0|mlong|obviously its out there, mobile wallets hello?
20 2017-05-26 17:17:37	0|sipa|yes, use goohle
21 2017-05-26 17:17:42	0|sipa|your guess is as good as mine
22 2017-05-26 17:17:50	0|sipa|*google
23 2017-05-26 17:25:43	0|cfields|jonasschnelli: i can take a look again, sure
24 2017-05-26 18:25:28	0|jonasschnelli|for the records: libsecp256k1 is used via BreadWallet which is iOS / Obj-C
25 2017-05-26 18:25:37	0|jonasschnelli|Obj-C is, like C++ a superset of C.
26 2017-05-26 18:25:53	0|jonasschnelli|So libsecp256k1 can be directly used within Obj-C code (.mm files)
27 2017-05-26 18:28:00	0|gmaxwell|https://blog.ledger.co/soft-launching-ledger-sgx-enclave-b9b50d80fd81
28 2017-05-26 18:36:19	0|TD-Linux|gmaxwell, they got a license from intel?
29 2017-05-26 18:38:03	0|instagibbs|TD-Linux, I believe so, they applied a while back
30 2017-05-26 18:47:49	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15sipa opened pull request #10460: Broadcast address every day, not 9 hours (06master...06hour_is_not_24_minutes) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10460
31 2017-05-26 18:48:49	0|jonasschnelli|gmaxwell: what do you think about the ledger SGX approach? Curios...
32 2017-05-26 18:56:48	0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 14efc2e33 15practicalswift: [trivial] Fix three recently introduced typos...
33 2017-05-26 18:56:48	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15sipa pushed 2 new commits to 06master: 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/4314544d46e8...b40ceed98a11
34 2017-05-26 18:56:49	0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 14b40ceed 15Pieter Wuille: Merge #10419: [trivial] Fix three recently introduced typos...
35 2017-05-26 18:57:23	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15sipa closed pull request #10419: [trivial] Fix three recently introduced typos (06master...06typos-201705) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10419
36 2017-05-26 19:14:41	0|TD-Linux|their implementation is pretty much all you could ask for given the constraints imposed by intel
37 2017-05-26 19:32:31	0|jonasschnelli|TD-Linux: I guess the ledger guy do well,.. but that Intel attestation... I don't know but that feels wrong.
38 2017-05-26 19:32:55	0|TD-Linux|jonasschnelli, I mean, it is a feature primarily designed for blu ray DRM.
39 2017-05-26 19:33:31	0|jonasschnelli|I didn't know that... I though it was design as a general purpose CPU enclave
40 2017-05-26 19:34:51	0|TD-Linux|okay, well intel sells it as that. but the first licensed application was powerdvd's bluray player
41 2017-05-26 19:35:28	0|jonasschnelli|Good to know.
42 2017-05-26 19:35:57	0|jonasschnelli|I'm not sure if I would trist SGX to store my keys. Things like that (https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/hardware/-super-malware-steals-encryption-keys-from-intel-sgx-enclaves/) frightens me.
43 2017-05-26 19:37:30	0|jonasschnelli|IMO SGX lays a floor for "next generation backdoors"
44 2017-05-26 19:37:53	0|TD-Linux|the scare of that is possibly one reason intel licenses the feature
45 2017-05-26 19:39:35	0|jonasschnelli|But only intel knows... I guess they can hand out licenses to who they want including all sorts of "agencies"...
46 2017-05-26 19:39:59	0|TD-Linux|jonasschnelli, that ship has already sailed with the ME, which has much more power than SGX.
47 2017-05-26 19:40:59	0|jonasschnelli|Yeah,... ME is worse. But if users starts to trust SGX (with the ledger or similar), intel as "indirect access" to keys.
48 2017-05-26 19:41:15	0|jonasschnelli|It may gives a very wong sense of security to users...
49 2017-05-26 19:41:38	0|jonasschnelli|(I guess we are OT here, but since nobody complains and gmaxwell posted the URL we continue)
50 2017-05-26 19:42:57	0|TD-Linux|jonasschnelli, SGX can only talk with its parent process
51 2017-05-26 19:44:20	0|jonasschnelli|TD-Linux: but AFAIK some researchers showed cache attacks via other enclaves
52 2017-05-26 19:44:45	0|TD-Linux|yes, those are identical to normal cross process or cross VM cache attacks
53 2017-05-26 19:45:02	0|TD-Linux|I think it's reasonable to say that SGX is no worse than no SGX, but not as good as a hardware wallet.
54 2017-05-26 19:45:47	0|jonasschnelli|TD-Linux: Indeed.
55 2017-05-26 19:45:48	0|jonasschnelli|But
56 2017-05-26 19:46:40	0|jonasschnelli|The part that can make it worse is the eventually false sense of security. Corporations may consider storing keys via SGX rather then a completely decoupled environment / HSM
57 2017-05-26 20:21:08	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15sipa pushed 3 new commits to 06master: 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/b40ceed98a11...b4b057a3e071
58 2017-05-26 20:21:09	0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 14822755a 15Pieter Wuille: Fix: make CCoinsViewDbCursor::Seek work for missing keys...
59 2017-05-26 20:21:10	0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 14513da90 15Gregory Maxwell: Add test for empty chain and reorg consistency for gettxoutsetinfo.
60 2017-05-26 20:21:10	0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 14b4b057a 15Pieter Wuille: Merge #10445: Add test for empty chain and reorg consistency for gettxoutsetinfo....
61 2017-05-26 20:21:42	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15sipa closed pull request #10445: Add test for empty chain and reorg consistency for gettxoutsetinfo. (06master...06test_more_gettxoutset) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10445
62 2017-05-26 20:56:09	0|sipa|cfields: present?
63 2017-05-26 20:56:24	0|cfields|sipa: sure! what is it?
64 2017-05-26 20:57:48	0|sipa|cfields: i don't understand https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10441/files#r118787467
65 2017-05-26 20:58:15	0|cfields|sipa: maybe i misunderstood your question, then
66 2017-05-26 20:58:24	0|sipa|i think you can just delete the else branch
67 2017-05-26 20:58:36	0|sipa|and leave addrConnect.nServices untouched
68 2017-05-26 20:59:02	0|sipa|and if you think you can't, then my understanding of the code is probably wrong
69 2017-05-26 20:59:45	0|cfields|sipa: look at line 1799. in the event that we _don't_ have our quota of preferred outgoing nodes yet, but we've selected a last resort after 40 tries, we're only expecting NODE_NETWORK from it
70 2017-05-26 21:01:26	0|sipa|ah, yes!
71 2017-05-26 21:01:28	0|sipa|of course
72 2017-05-26 21:01:35	0|sipa|utACK
73 2017-05-26 21:01:55	0|cfields|phew, you had me scrutinizing that really hard :)
74 2017-05-26 22:53:34	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15sipa opened pull request #10461: Update style guide (06master...06stylish) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10461
75 2017-05-26 23:50:12	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15jtimon opened pull request #10462: BIP8 implementation (06master...06b15-bip8-min) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10462