1 2017-06-19 00:12:59	0|owowo|draadpiraat[m], yes it more and more feels like a religion. The opium for the ppl. You end up hating the devil and god :P
 2 2017-06-19 00:14:01	0|owowo|draadpiraat[m], but to give you an answer, the arch angel told me, nobody does monitor the apostates
 3 2017-06-19 00:29:21	0|NewBTCDev|Is this the best guide to use to get bitcoind up and running after compiling? https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Running_Bitcoin
 4 2017-06-19 00:31:43	0|owowo|yes
 5 2017-06-19 00:35:58	0|NewBTCDev|thank you
 6 2017-06-19 00:38:44	0|jtimon|cfields: MarcoFalke Updated #10193
 7 2017-06-19 00:38:46	0|gribble|https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/10193 | scripted-diff: Remove #include foreach.hpp> by jtimon · Pull Request #10193 · bitcoin bitcoin · GitHub
 8 2017-06-19 00:43:14	0|NewBTCDev|Compiled just fine, and setup the config file... but running ./bitcoind doesn't give me any feedback on what its doing... I stopped it and checked that ./bitcoind -version worked. That worked as expected...  I set printtoconsole=1 to see if that would spit out progress but it didnt... novice linux user so I just discovered the TOP command and noticed bitcoind Is running. I'm running on the test net so I assume its synchin
 9 2017-06-19 00:55:05	0|Chris_Stewart_5|NewBTCDev: Try bitcoind -daemon
10 2017-06-19 00:55:22	0|Chris_Stewart_5|and then you can use bitcoin-cli to run commands, this is more on topic for #bitcoin not bitcoin-core-dev
11 2017-06-19 00:57:54	0|Chris_Stewart_5|also if anyone is feeling generous, I'm trying allow 'chainActive' to be used in the interpreter, but I am having trouble figuring out how to exactly allow that to be reachable without bitcoin-tx failing to compile
12 2017-06-19 00:58:00	0|Chris_Stewart_5|https://github.com/drivechain-project/bitcoin/pull/13
13 2017-06-19 00:59:57	0|NewBTCDev|Thank you Chris, I'll go there! Appreciate the help
14 2017-06-19 01:10:56	0|jtimon|Chris_Stewart_5: why would you want to use chainActive inside the interpreter? feels like a terrible layer violation
15 2017-06-19 01:12:03	0|Chris_Stewart_5|jtimon: For the current proposal of blind merge mining we are integrating a new op code that only allows a miner to claim an output iff they include a hash in the coinbase tx
16 2017-06-19 01:12:06	0|jtimon|can't you just pass whatever you need to TransactionSignatureChecker's constructor ?
17 2017-06-19 01:12:38	0|jtimon|with a fast look, all you need is chainActive.Tip()->coinbase right?
18 2017-06-19 01:12:44	0|Chris_Stewart_5|Yes
19 2017-06-19 01:13:07	0|Chris_Stewart_5|so you would suggest just passing that as an arg to TransactionSignatureChecker?
20 2017-06-19 01:13:24	0|jtimon|maybe pass the relevant coinbase to the TransactionSignatureChecker constructor?
21 2017-06-19 01:13:49	0|Chris_Stewart_5|Yeah, I didn't think about doing it that way. That would be much cleaner.
22 2017-06-19 01:14:25	0|Chris_Stewart_5|I'll code it up and see what it looks like, thanks!
23 2017-06-19 01:15:25	0|jtimon|or perhaps something more similar to what is done with the locktime or something, but I don't like that much anyway, I consider BaseSignatureChecker having those methos kind of a layer violation already
24 2017-06-19 01:15:42	0|jtimon|Chris_Stewart_5: no problem, happy that you like the idea
25 2017-06-19 01:18:08	0|Chris_Stewart_5|I agree it is weird to have locktime checking stuff in a 'SignatureChecker' but I'm not going to worry about organization right now, I just want to get some sort of MVP for BMM done
26 2017-06-19 01:18:27	0|Chris_Stewart_5|and see if it is actually viable.. not sure if I am convinced this scheme will actually work..
27 2017-06-19 01:35:17	0|kallewoof|luke-jr: what's up?
28 2017-06-19 01:35:25	0|kallewoof|(you pinged)
29 2017-06-19 01:35:49	0|luke-jr|kallewoof: nm, your listsinceblock PR tests relied on features silently missing in 0.14 test_framework
30 2017-06-19 01:36:00	0|luke-jr|figured it out and dealt with it
31 2017-06-19 01:36:43	0|kallewoof|OK!
32 2017-06-19 02:50:03	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15tnakagawa opened pull request #10627: fixed listunspent rpc convert parameter (06master...06fixed-listunspent) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10627
33 2017-06-19 06:08:25	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15fanquake opened pull request #10628: [depends] expat 2.2.1 (06master...06expat-2-2-1) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10628
34 2017-06-19 06:43:30	0|draadpiraat[m]|owowo: it was a figure of speech dont read so much into it
35 2017-06-19 06:52:44	0|wumpus|luke-jr: ack, going to build
36 2017-06-19 06:57:28	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15jtimon closed pull request #8337: Consensus: MOVEONLY: Move functions for header verification (06master...060.12.99-consensus-moveonly-header) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8337
37 2017-06-19 06:57:39	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15jtimon closed pull request #8493: Untested: libconsensus: Expose VerifyHeader (06master...060.13-consensus-header) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8493
38 2017-06-19 07:00:12	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15jtimon closed pull request #9177: NOMERGE: WIP: Support block signed custom testchains (06master...060.13-blocksign) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9177
39 2017-06-19 07:03:27	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15booxie opened pull request #10629: 0.10 (06master...060.10) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10629
40 2017-06-19 07:03:30	0|luke-jr|wumpus: thanks
41 2017-06-19 07:06:47	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15fanquake closed pull request #10629: 0.10 (06master...060.10) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10629
42 2017-06-19 10:16:41	0|wumpus|I've reported "ipoptika" for spamming (because of https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10400#issuecomment-309393687). Probably we shouldn't delete the post before a github employee has looked at it.
43 2017-06-19 10:47:45	0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 1422229de 15MarcoFalke: doc: Add 0.14.2 release notes
44 2017-06-19 10:47:45	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15MarcoFalke pushed 2 new commits to 06master: 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/643fa0b22d70...c38f540298f0
45 2017-06-19 10:47:46	0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 14c38f540 15MarcoFalke: Merge #10623: doc: Add 0.14.2 release notes...
46 2017-06-19 10:48:20	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15MarcoFalke closed pull request #10623: doc: Add 0.14.2 release notes (06master...06Mf1706-docRel) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10623
47 2017-06-19 15:08:02	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15practicalswift opened pull request #10631: Use the override specifier (C++11) where we expect to be overriding the virtual function of a base class (06master...06overrides-ii) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10631
48 2017-06-19 19:24:58	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15MarcoFalke opened pull request #10632: qa: Add stopatheight test (06master...06Mf1706-qaStopAtHeight) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10632
49 2017-06-19 22:58:10	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15dimitris-t opened pull request #10633: Fixes typos in wallet.cpp (06master...06patch-1) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10633
50 2017-06-19 23:33:56	0|achow101|so apparently there is some makefile problems related to the IsMine functions and removing the wallet stuff from validateaddress
51 2017-06-19 23:34:04	0|achow101|https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10583#issuecomment-309602071 for reference
52 2017-06-19 23:34:55	0|achow101|Could someone help me out here with fixing this? I have figured out that it has something to do with linking order and the fact that IsMine is not used in libbitcoin_server which is linked first
53 2017-06-19 23:35:08	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15dimitris-t opened pull request #10634: Fixed typos in optionsdialog.ui (06master...06patch-2) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10634
54 2017-06-19 23:45:13	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15dimitris-t opened pull request #10635: Fixed typo in rpcconsole.cpp (06master...06patch-3) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10635