1 2017-06-24 00:45:28 0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15theuni opened pull request #10663: net: split resolve out of connect (06master...06split-resolve-connect) 02 https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10663
2 2017-06-24 05:00:12 0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15donlondon opened pull request #10665: go (06master...06release) 02 https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10665
3 2017-06-24 05:32:02 0|annanay25|Hi, where can I find a Roadmap of Bitcoin development?
4 2017-06-24 06:48:55 0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15sipa closed pull request #10665: go (06master...06release) 02 https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10665
5 2017-06-24 07:25:55 0|wumpus|sipa: how would that work? you'd pass in two lambas - one gets called if the value is present, and the other if the return value is not present?
6 2017-06-24 07:29:11 0|sipa|wumpus: yup
7 2017-06-24 07:30:39 0|sipa|Maybe a = (a -> b, () -> b) -> b
8 2017-06-24 07:31:05 0|sipa|in haskellish type notation
9 2017-06-24 07:32:02 0|wumpus|though if the function would no longer have a return type at all, it would have the advantage that callbacks can be asynchronous
10 2017-06-24 07:32:48 0|wumpus|that would be more NodeJS than Haskell though :-(
11 2017-06-24 08:17:15 0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 14fab9b60 15MarcoFalke: doc: Remove outdated minrelaytxfee comment
12 2017-06-24 08:17:15 0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj pushed 2 new commits to 06master: 02 https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/e2921405dff1...8c841a31a91f
13 2017-06-24 08:17:16 0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 148c841a3 15Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #10626: doc: Remove outdated minrelaytxfee comment...
14 2017-06-24 08:17:42 0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj closed pull request #10626: doc: Remove outdated minrelaytxfee comment (06master...06Mf1706-docInit) 02 https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10626
15 2017-06-24 08:20:32 0|MarcoFalke|! [remote rejected] master -> master (cannot lock ref 'refs/heads/master': is at 8c841a31a91ffe7e449c4733d14664b79cb39378 but expected e2921405dff1331d0a1ba6a2e97b2cc23992e72a)
16 2017-06-24 08:20:39 0|MarcoFalke|What are the odds? :)
17 2017-06-24 08:21:59 0|wumpus|oh! did our merges collide? I think it happened to me once, before
18 2017-06-24 08:22:30 0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 145155d11 15Andrew Chow: Initialize randomness in benchmarks...
19 2017-06-24 08:22:30 0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15MarcoFalke pushed 2 new commits to 06master: 02 https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/8c841a31a91f...e0a7801223fd
20 2017-06-24 08:22:31 0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 14e0a7801 15MarcoFalke: Merge #10662: Initialize randomness in benchmarks...
21 2017-06-24 08:22:54 0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15MarcoFalke closed pull request #10662: Initialize randomness in benchmarks (06master...06fix-bench) 02 https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10662
22 2017-06-24 09:28:29 0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 14dd869c6 15Gregory Maxwell: Add an explanation of quickly hashing onto a non-power of two range....
23 2017-06-24 09:28:29 0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj pushed 2 new commits to 06master: 02 https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/e0a7801223fd...232508fe0fcb
24 2017-06-24 09:28:30 0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 14232508f 15Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #10577: Add an explanation of quickly hashing onto a non-power of two range....
25 2017-06-24 09:28:50 0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj closed pull request #10577: Add an explanation of quickly hashing onto a non-power of two range. (06master...06hashrange-comment) 02 https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10577
26 2017-06-24 10:20:00 0|wumpus|NicolasDorier: #10622 is strange - it looks like a stale bitcoin-config.h is floating around, but I'd expect git clean -dfx to take care of that
27 2017-06-24 10:20:01 0|gribble|https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/10622 | Compile error (ubuntu trusty) ÷ Issue #10622 ÷ bitcoin/bitcoin ÷ GitHub
28 2017-06-24 10:25:39 0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj pushed 6 new commits to 06master: 02 https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/232508fe0fcb...2772dc9f2199
29 2017-06-24 10:25:40 0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 146d0bd5b 15Cory Fields: net: do not allow resolving to an internal address...
30 2017-06-24 10:25:40 0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 147f31762 15Cory Fields: net: add an internal subnet for representing unresolved hostnames...
31 2017-06-24 10:25:41 0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 146cdc488 15Cory Fields: net: switch to dummy internal ip for dns seed source...
32 2017-06-24 10:25:59 0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj closed pull request #10446: net: avoid extra dns query per seed (06master...06no-double-resolve) 02 https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10446
33 2017-06-24 11:31:20 0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj closed pull request #9919: UNIX sockets support for RPC (06master...062017_03_unix_socket) 02 https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9919
34 2017-06-24 11:31:57 0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj closed pull request #9979: p2p: Bare minimum to support UNIX sockets (06master...062017_03_unix_socket_p2p) 02 https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9979
35 2017-06-24 13:15:44 0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 140ef7de9 15John Newbery: [RPCs] Remove submitblock parameters argument help text
36 2017-06-24 13:15:44 0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj pushed 2 new commits to 06master: 02 https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/2772dc9f2199...00350bd6db91
37 2017-06-24 13:15:45 0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 1400350bd 15Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #10191: [trivial] Rename unused RPC arguments 'dummy'...
38 2017-06-24 13:15:59 0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj closed pull request #10191: [trivial] Rename unused RPC arguments 'dummy' (06master...06remove_submit_block_params) 02 https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10191
39 2017-06-24 13:40:05 0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 14e503b2b 15tnaka: fixed listunspent rpc convert parameter
40 2017-06-24 13:40:05 0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj pushed 2 new commits to 06master: 02 https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/00350bd6db91...b62b4c873e18
41 2017-06-24 13:40:06 0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 14b62b4c8 15Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #10627: fixed listunspent rpc convert parameter...
42 2017-06-24 13:40:30 0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj closed pull request #10627: fixed listunspent rpc convert parameter (06master...06fixed-listunspent) 02 https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10627
43 2017-06-24 13:45:33 0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 141887337 15Gregory Maxwell: Add a comment explaining the use of MAX_BLOCK_BASE_SIZE.
44 2017-06-24 13:45:33 0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj pushed 2 new commits to 06master: 02 https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/b62b4c873e18...eee398fa123f
45 2017-06-24 13:45:34 0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 14eee398f 15Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #10608: Add a comment explaining the use of MAX_BLOCK_BASE_SIZE....
46 2017-06-24 13:46:02 0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj closed pull request #10608: Add a comment explaining the use of MAX_BLOCK_BASE_SIZE. (06master...06size_comment) 02 https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10608
47 2017-06-24 14:00:43 0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj closed pull request #10339: Optimization: Calculate block hash less times (06master...06b15-optimization-blockhash) 02 https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10339
48 2017-06-24 14:40:25 0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj pushed 5 new commits to 06master: 02 https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/eee398fa123f...bef02fb6ac9f
49 2017-06-24 14:40:26 0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 149bb66ab 15Russell Yanofsky: Add RescanFromTime method and use from rpcdump...
50 2017-06-24 14:40:26 0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 14ccf84bb 15Russell Yanofsky: Move birthday optimization out of ScanForWalletTransactions...
51 2017-06-24 14:40:27 0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 145b2be2b 15Russell Yanofsky: Make CWallet::RescanFromTime comment less ambiguous
52 2017-06-24 14:40:50 0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj closed pull request #10412: Improve wallet rescan API (06master...06pr/scanclean) 02 https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10412
53 2017-06-24 16:19:56 0|Victorsueca|gee, that's some activity there
54 2017-06-24 16:30:29 0|achow101|Does anyone know what commit(s) or PRs removed IP transactions? I was looking at #253 but it says 0 commits and 0 changes and the commit it references is completely unrelated :(
55 2017-06-24 16:30:30 0|gribble|https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/253 | Remove send to IP address and IP transactions support by laanwj ÷ Pull Request #253 ÷ bitcoin/bitcoin ÷ GitHub
56 2017-06-24 19:14:59 0|_void|Hi! I've been reading about sidechains (and I'm reading now a Vitalik's post about sharding) and there is something I don't get, because I always thought that to secure a sidechain the only thing needed is a hash on the main chain
57 2017-06-24 19:15:36 0|Lauda|Wrong channel
58 2017-06-24 19:15:53 0|_void|Mmm sorry, I'm new here
59 2017-06-24 19:16:34 0|Lauda|try #bitcoin-dev
60 2017-06-24 19:18:22 0|_void|Mhh what's the difference? I think I should use some channel for "discuss" like the mailing list (dev and discuss)
61 2017-06-24 19:21:45 0|sipa|this channel is about development of one specific implementation of the bitcoin protocol called bitcoin core
62 2017-06-24 19:25:12 0|_void|Now I see, there are a bunch of channels, maybe you see me here anyway, I'm thinking of joining the dev community :)
63 2017-06-24 19:33:52 0|sipa|achow101: i think it was removed in various steps
64 2017-06-24 22:00:17 0|TheV01D|hello ppl
65 2017-06-24 22:00:46 0|TheV01D|I want to use base58 and key.h in a seperate program
66 2017-06-24 22:01:00 0|TheV01D|linker complaining bout memory_cleanse
67 2017-06-24 23:11:26 0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15jtimon closed pull request #10462: Consensus: Modified BIP8 implementation (06master...06b15-bip8-min) 02 https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10462
68 2017-06-24 23:16:35 0|jtimon|it almost never needs rebase, but I have looked if it needs it or not so many times...there doesn't seem to be much interest in #9176 wumpus should I close it?
69 2017-06-24 23:16:36 0|gribble|https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/9176 | Globals: Pass Consensus::Params through CBlockTreeDB::LoadBlockIndexGuts() by jtimon ÷ Pull Request #9176 ÷ bitcoin/bitcoin ÷ GitHub
70 2017-06-24 23:18:12 0|jtimon|is in a sense similar to #10339 in the sense that people seem to dislike more explicit arguments
71 2017-06-24 23:18:15 0|gribble|https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/10339 | Optimization: Calculate block hash less times by jtimon ÷ Pull Request #10339 ÷ bitcoin/bitcoin ÷ GitHub