1 2017-06-27 00:40:15 0|jtimon|I tried force pushing to #8994 several times but got timeouts all times, I don't think the branch is to blame, but perhaps I'm missing something. see https://travis-ci.org/bitcoin/bitcoin/builds/246986373
2 2017-06-27 00:40:17 0|gribble|https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/8994 | Testchains: Introduce custom chain whose constructor... by jtimon ÷ Pull Request #8994 ÷ bitcoin/bitcoin ÷ GitHub
3 2017-06-27 01:45:06 0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15hans-liu opened pull request #10675: Update INSTALL.md (06master...06master) 02 https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10675
4 2017-06-27 03:28:13 0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15instagibbs opened pull request #10676: document script-based return fields for validateaddress (06master...06validatata) 02 https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10676
5 2017-06-27 03:36:31 0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15instagibbs opened pull request #10677: RPC Docs: addmultisigaddress is intended for non-watchonly addresses (06master...06importmultiwatch) 02 https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10677
6 2017-06-27 04:54:54 0|sipa|important new feature: you can now sort PRs in github by most smileys!
7 2017-06-27 05:06:34 0|luke-jr|lol
8 2017-06-27 05:06:43 0|luke-jr|might actually be handy..
9 2017-06-27 05:59:58 0|wumpus|sort:reactions-heart-desc
10 2017-06-27 06:13:17 0|wumpus|#10636 seems to be causing some travis false positives, e.g. https://travis-ci.org/bitcoin/bitcoin/jobs/247360729 in zapwallettxes.py
11 2017-06-27 06:13:19 0|gribble|https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/10636 | [qa] util: Check return code after closing bitcoind proc by MarcoFalke ÷ Pull Request #10636 ÷ bitcoin/bitcoin ÷ GitHub
12 2017-06-27 06:14:24 0|wumpus|not been able to reproduce it locally (as usual :/)
13 2017-06-27 06:41:38 0|wumpus|https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/10678
14 2017-06-27 06:42:40 0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15schildbach opened pull request #10679: Document the non-DER-conformance of one test in tx_valid.json. (06master...06tx-valid-comment) 02 https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10679
15 2017-06-27 07:21:56 0|jtimon|mhmm, https://travis-ci.org/bitcoin/bitcoin/builds/247394405 run fast
16 2017-06-27 07:22:03 0|jtimon|or not? not sure
17 2017-06-27 07:24:31 0|luke-jr|I wonder if it would fly to PR https://github.com/BitcoinHardfork/bitcoin/pull/3 on Core, but with a date 7 years in the future..
18 2017-06-27 07:24:52 0|luke-jr|(with an accompanying BIP ofc)
19 2017-06-27 08:02:54 0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15MeshCollider opened pull request #10680: Fix inconsistencies and grammar in various files (06master...06fix_typos_and_inconsistencies) 02 https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10680
20 2017-06-27 08:10:47 0|wumpus|for a hardfork you certainly need a BIP first
21 2017-06-27 08:11:52 0|wumpus|which needs to be discussed, and there needs to be wide agreement on it, only then it makes sense to PR it
22 2017-06-27 08:14:20 0|luke-jr|right, I just mean whether it could get done, or would encounter politics for some reason
23 2017-06-27 08:33:32 0|wumpus|i'm sure it will encounter politics, but that shouldn't affect whether to do a proposal
24 2017-06-27 08:35:23 0|luke-jr|no point proposing something doomed to fail
25 2017-06-27 09:13:15 0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 1421180ff 15Pieter Wuille: Simplify return values of GetCoin/HaveCoin(InCache)...
26 2017-06-27 09:13:15 0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj pushed 2 new commits to 06master: 02 https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/234ffc677ee5...78783531b7cc
27 2017-06-27 09:13:16 0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 147878353 15Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #10581: Simplify return values of GetCoin/HaveCoin(InCache)...
28 2017-06-27 09:13:42 0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj closed pull request #10581: Simplify return values of GetCoin/HaveCoin(InCache) (06master...06simplehavecoin) 02 https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10581
29 2017-06-27 09:21:49 0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj closed pull request #10675: Update INSTALL.md (06master...06master) 02 https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10675
30 2017-06-27 09:34:46 0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 14c074752 15Ricardo Velhote: [RPC] Add an uptime command that displays the amount of time that bitcoind has been running
31 2017-06-27 09:34:46 0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj pushed 2 new commits to 06master: 02 https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/78783531b7cc...1680ee0edf46
32 2017-06-27 09:34:47 0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 141680ee0 15Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #10400: [RPC] Add an uptime command that displays the amount of time (in seconds) bitcoind has been running...
33 2017-06-27 10:08:09 0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj pushed 3 new commits to 06master: 02 https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/1680ee0edf46...7c87a9c748be
34 2017-06-27 10:08:10 0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 1476859e6 15John Newbery: [tests] Update functional tests documentation
35 2017-06-27 10:08:10 0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 14e7ba6c1 15John Newbery: [tests] add example test
36 2017-06-27 10:08:11 0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 147c87a9c 15Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #10612: The young person's guide to the test_framework...
37 2017-06-27 10:08:35 0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj closed pull request #10612: The young person's guide to the test_framework (06master...06templatefunctionaltest) 02 https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10612
38 2017-06-27 13:21:38 0|jnewbery|jtimon: I've been away for the last week but it looks like no-one gave you the most obvious answer to your question
39 2017-06-27 13:21:41 0|jnewbery|> what's the simplest way to find out whoch commit deleted a given variable, say, pwalletMain
40 2017-06-27 13:21:51 0|jnewbery|git log -S<string>
41 2017-06-27 13:22:55 0|jnewbery|wumpus jcorgan : I think this is easier than git bisect/grep ^^
42 2017-06-27 14:09:33 0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15instagibbs opened pull request #10681: add gdb attach process to test README (06master...06gdbattach) 02 https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10681
43 2017-06-27 14:14:03 0|instagibbs|jnewbery, oh right, certain string searching, even better
44 2017-06-27 14:18:10 0|Chris_Stewart_5|Is it a consensus rule that the miner's reward is at coinbaseTx.vout[0]?
45 2017-06-27 14:20:24 0|instagibbs|no
46 2017-06-27 14:29:50 0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj pushed 3 new commits to 06master: 02 https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/7c87a9c748be...ac52492cd227
47 2017-06-27 14:29:51 0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 14506b700 15Jorge Timón: Util: Remove redundant calls to gArgs.IsArgSet()...
48 2017-06-27 14:29:51 0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 14ed866ab 15Jorge Timón: Indentation after 'Remove redundant calls to gArgs.IsArgSet()'
49 2017-06-27 14:29:52 0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 14ac52492 15Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #10118: Util: Remove redundant calls to argsGlobal.IsArgSet()...
50 2017-06-27 14:30:05 0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj closed pull request #10118: Util: Remove redundant calls to argsGlobal.IsArgSet() (06master...060.14-args-class2) 02 https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10118
51 2017-06-27 14:52:04 0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15esneider opened pull request #10682: Trivial: Move the AreInputsStandard documentation next to its implementation (06master...06move-doc) 02 https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10682
52 2017-06-27 14:59:33 0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj opened pull request #10683: rpc: Move the `generate` RPC call to rpcwallet (06master...062017_06_wallet_mining) 02 https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10683
53 2017-06-27 15:14:09 0|wumpus|Chris_Stewart_5: no, the coinbase tx can have arbitrary outputs like any transaction
54 2017-06-27 15:14:39 0|wumpus|(the amount just needs to be <= blockreward+fees)
55 2017-06-27 15:20:44 0|wumpus|jnewbery: forgot about -S
56 2017-06-27 15:29:59 0|Chris_Stewart_5|Is there any strong feelings on constraining the miner output to be at index 0? I'm working on a drivechain proposal BIP that would do this... and fix the witness commitment at index 1
57 2017-06-27 15:41:48 0|wumpus|some mining pools pay out to multiple parties in the coinbase transaction, I think that would be broken then?
58 2017-06-27 15:42:42 0|sipa|jnewbery: wah, i didn't know about -S
59 2017-06-27 16:16:59 0|jnewbery|sipa: yeah, it's a useful trick!
60 2017-06-27 17:28:40 0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 14fab1fb7 15MarcoFalke: [qa] blockchain: Pass on closed connection during generate call
61 2017-06-27 17:28:40 0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj pushed 2 new commits to 06master: 02 https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/ac52492cd227...acb11535cb84
62 2017-06-27 17:28:41 0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 14acb1153 15Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #10659: [qa] blockchain: Pass on closed connection during generate call...
63 2017-06-27 17:29:12 0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj closed pull request #10659: [qa] blockchain: Pass on closed connection during generate call (06master...06Mf1706-qaStopPass) 02 https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10659
64 2017-06-27 18:12:30 0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15morcos opened pull request #10684: Remove no longer used mempool.exists(outpoint) (06master...06lessHaveCoin) 02 https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10684
65 2017-06-27 18:47:09 0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15TheBlueMatt opened pull request #10685: Clarify CCoinsViewMemPool documentation. (06master...062017-06-ccoinsviewmempool-doc-cleanup) 02 https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10685
66 2017-06-27 19:21:31 0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15morcos closed pull request #10586: More economical fee estimates for opt-in-RBF transactions (06master...06aggressiveEstimates) 02 https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10586
67 2017-06-27 20:53:24 0|BlueMatt|wumpus: when you get a chance, can you respond to sipa's question at https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10179#issuecomment-310548915 ?
68 2017-06-27 23:12:45 0|BlueMatt|uhhh, we dont parse options with "--", right?
69 2017-06-27 23:14:56 0|BlueMatt|oh, maybe we do
70 2017-06-27 23:16:06 0|sipa|we do
71 2017-06-27 23:16:20 0|sipa|I thought?
72 2017-06-27 23:16:27 0|BlueMatt|yes
73 2017-06-27 23:16:30 0|BlueMatt|i believe so
74 2017-06-27 23:32:31 0|cfields|yea, there's some magic in there to add or remove a -
75 2017-06-27 23:59:14 0|PRab|I'm having trouble with my gitian build for 0.14.2. http://sebsauvage.net/paste/?df3f6f7b71515e7b#Zwec/18rxhOtXoI13s1CRQaII2dtsfBxEzZ3ACjJGwE=
76 2017-06-27 23:59:18 0|PRab|Any ideas?
77 2017-06-27 23:59:36 0|PRab|I already tried running gbuild --upgrade like it says to.
78 2017-06-27 23:59:54 0|sipa|sdaftuar: ugh, i was not aware that DISCOURAGE_UPGRADABLE_NOPS was permitted without CLTV/CSV