1 2017-08-23 00:52:43 0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15jimpo opened pull request #11116: [script] Unit tests for script/standard and IsMine functions. (06master...06script-standard-tests) 02 https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/11116
2 2017-08-23 01:12:03 0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15sipa opened pull request #11117: Prepare for non-Base58 addresses (06master...06201708_nocbitcoinaddress) 02 https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/11117
3 2017-08-23 09:57:49 0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj closed pull request #11109: Fix a typo in line 926 (06master...06patch-1) 02 https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/11109
4 2017-08-23 10:00:44 0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 14a65e028 15practicalswift: Build with --enable-werror under OS X
5 2017-08-23 10:00:44 0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj pushed 2 new commits to 06master: 02 https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/3e55f13bfc98...2c9f5ecf3fd4
6 2017-08-23 10:00:45 0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 142c9f5ec 15Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #10923: travis: Build with --enable-werror under OS X...
7 2017-08-23 10:01:21 0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj closed pull request #10923: travis: Build with --enable-werror under OS X (06master...06thread-safety-analysis) 02 https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10923
8 2017-08-23 10:16:09 0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 14ecb11f5 15Andreas Schildbach: Document the non-strict-DER-conformance of one test in tx_valid.json....
9 2017-08-23 10:16:09 0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj pushed 2 new commits to 06master: 02 https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/2c9f5ecf3fd4...31b2612bbf19
10 2017-08-23 10:16:10 0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 1431b2612 15Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #10679: Document the non-DER-conformance of one test in tx_valid.json....
11 2017-08-23 10:17:12 0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj closed pull request #10679: Document the non-DER-conformance of one test in tx_valid.json. (06master...06tx-valid-comment) 02 https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10679
12 2017-08-23 14:13:37 0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15MarcoFalke opened pull request #11119: [doc] build-windows: Mention that only trusty works (06master...06Mf1708-docBuildWinTrusty) 02 https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/11119
13 2017-08-23 15:51:13 0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15instagibbs opened pull request #11120: verifytxoutproof returns object including blockhash (06master...06verifytxoutproof-blockhash) 02 https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/11120
14 2017-08-23 16:58:16 0|michagogo|Hmm, the gitian build is taking a really long time
15 2017-08-23 16:58:28 0|michagogo|2:20 and counting and it's still on Linux
16 2017-08-23 17:09:42 0|michagogo|Oh, that's probably because it first does all the depends, on 4 architectures
17 2017-08-23 17:09:46 0|michagogo|Including Qt on two of them
18 2017-08-23 18:06:29 0|luke-jr|michagogo: right
19 2017-08-23 18:59:51 0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 142b4ea52 15John Newbery: [tests] fix timeout issues from TestNode...
20 2017-08-23 18:59:51 0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj pushed 2 new commits to 06master: 02 https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/31b2612bbf19...41496e20f369
21 2017-08-23 18:59:52 0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 1441496e2 15Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #11077: [tests] fix timeout issues from TestNode...
22 2017-08-23 19:00:36 0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj closed pull request #11077: [tests] fix timeout issues from TestNode (06master...06test_node_fixes) 02 https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/11077
23 2017-08-23 19:26:22 0|luke-jr|does pay-to-contract require disclosing the pubkey to prove the commitment?
24 2017-08-23 19:31:23 0|gmaxwell|Yes, at least if its not constructed in the totally busted way thats posted on the list.
25 2017-08-23 19:34:48 0|luke-jr|aww, nuts. would have been a nice way to commit to a second key used to sign messages and such
26 2017-08-23 19:34:58 0|luke-jr|guess that will need to wait for MAST-type stuff
27 2017-08-23 20:06:43 0|instagibbs|luke-jr, why do you think #11089 is 0.16 and not 0.15.1
28 2017-08-23 20:09:15 0|wumpus|0.15.1 was going to be the segwit wallet release
29 2017-08-23 20:09:38 0|wumpus|so P2SH-P2WPKH sounded like something to backport for that, let me know if wrong
30 2017-08-23 20:11:09 0|instagibbs|If we're supporting nested-p2sh that makes perfect sense
31 2017-08-23 20:12:04 0|wumpus|that's a lower target than full native p2wsh so I think we should in any case
32 2017-08-23 20:13:12 0|luke-jr|wumpus: eww
33 2017-08-23 20:13:19 0|wumpus|what?
34 2017-08-23 20:13:21 0|luke-jr|segwit wallet release should just be an early 0.16
35 2017-08-23 20:13:24 0|luke-jr|it's new features
36 2017-08-23 20:13:32 0|wumpus|we discussed this in the meeting
37 2017-08-23 20:13:45 0|wumpus|not going to renegotiate on this
38 2017-08-23 20:14:14 0|luke-jr|I don't remember that at all. And meetings aren't for decisions anyway, remember?
39 2017-08-23 20:14:27 0|luke-jr|anyhow, not worth arguing over. just a dumb label.
40 2017-08-23 20:15:10 0|wumpus|yeah, exactly, we want to do an early segwit wallet release and 0.15.1 is as good as any label imo, yes it's a feature but at least a specific one that we really need now
41 2017-08-23 20:15:32 0|wumpus|it's kind of stupid that segwit is activating and the wallet isn't 100% ready for it
42 2017-08-23 20:15:34 0|wumpus|but anyhow
43 2017-08-23 20:15:38 0|luke-jr|not like we're short on numbers in any field *shrug*
44 2017-08-23 20:16:06 0|wumpus|yeah we could still delay 0.15.0
45 2017-08-23 20:16:40 0|wumpus|but adding a feature betwen rcs would be even more heresical so...
46 2017-08-23 20:16:47 0|luke-jr|def don't delay 0.15 :p
47 2017-08-23 20:16:58 0|luke-jr|I meant just 0.16 in a few months ASAP, and 0.17 for the next big one
48 2017-08-23 20:17:12 0|wumpus|whatever we do people will complain
49 2017-08-23 20:18:19 0|wumpus|I wouldn't have minded that
50 2017-08-23 20:18:53 0|luke-jr|anyway, tagging it for interim-segwit-release is fine, I was just confused by the numbering
51 2017-08-23 20:19:12 0|wumpus|just to have less time between major releases for once, but read back the meeting log, most preferred 0.15.1 as segwit wallet release at least I remember
52 2017-08-23 20:21:55 0|wumpus|and yes versions are just user communication, confusion can be taken away by being clear in the release notes, hey at least we don't suddenly change to 1.x.y or 14.x.y or 9.9.9 like some crazy spin-offs...
53 2017-08-23 20:22:12 0|luke-jr|haha
54 2017-08-23 20:32:12 0|instagibbs|ok, at least we're in agreement in what kind of release it will be.
55 2017-08-23 20:32:15 0|instagibbs|:)
56 2017-08-23 20:53:38 0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15jnewbery opened pull request #11121: TestNode tidyups (06master...06test_node_tidyups) 02 https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/11121
57 2017-08-23 21:15:47 0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 1408ce33f 15MarcoFalke: qa: Move wait_until to util
58 2017-08-23 21:15:47 0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15MarcoFalke pushed 2 new commits to 06master: 02 https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/41496e20f369...8858b6ddd3bc
59 2017-08-23 21:15:48 0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 148858b6d 15MarcoFalke: Merge #11068: qa: Move wait_until to util...
60 2017-08-23 21:16:34 0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15MarcoFalke closed pull request #11068: qa: Move wait_until to util (06master...06Mf1708-qaWaitUntilMiniNode) 02 https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/11068