1 2017-09-06 00:04:38	0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 14352d582 15Marko Bencun: Add vConnect to CConnman::Options...
  2 2017-09-06 00:04:38	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj pushed 2 new commits to 06master: 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/28485c783d82...6866b4912b80
  3 2017-09-06 00:04:39	0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 146866b49 15Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #10596: Add vConnect to CConnman::Options...
  4 2017-09-06 00:04:58	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj closed pull request #10596: Add vConnect to CConnman::Options (06master...06connmanoptions_connect) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10596
  5 2017-09-06 00:08:26	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15jtimon closed pull request #10822: RPC: Also serve txo from gettxout (not just utxo and mempool) (06master...06b15-rpc-txo) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10822
  6 2017-09-06 00:16:55	0|esotericnonsense|a question which I think is related to core dev, apologies if not
  7 2017-09-06 00:17:13	0|esotericnonsense|so the RPC interface should only be exposed to trusted clients in the sense of wallet commands etc
  8 2017-09-06 00:17:55	0|esotericnonsense|however, is it otherwise expected to be hardened? e.g. if I have some software running in a VM or on another machine, and give it access to the RPC, would it be reasonable to assume that it shouldn't be able to raise privileges and execute commands on the host
  9 2017-09-06 00:18:32	0|esotericnonsense|(basically, if i'm -disablewalleted, should I worry about anything other than possible DoS
 10 2017-09-06 00:22:45	0|jonasschnelli|esotericnonsense: Even without your wallet enabled you should threat your RPC interface private.
 11 2017-09-06 00:23:10	0|jonasschnelli|If you want to access it remotely, use VPN, SSH, stunnel or something.
 12 2017-09-06 00:23:29	0|jonasschnelli|Don't expose the RPC interface to the public internet
 13 2017-09-06 00:23:49	0|esotericnonsense|jonasschnelli: indeed. i suppose essentially what i'm wondering is how carefully I need to vet software which interfaces with the RPC.
 14 2017-09-06 00:23:52	0|jonasschnelli|(you could use an Apache or so reverse proxy with SSL auth)
 15 2017-09-06 00:24:20	0|jonasschnelli|I would do it carefully... use a VPN, reverse proxy or connect via SSH and use bitcoin-cli
 16 2017-09-06 00:24:31	0|esotericnonsense|for example, core node running on host1, host2 runs some software which interfaces with host1, but host2 is malicious for whatever reason; can host1 be broken into (overflows on rpc commands, etc)
 17 2017-09-06 00:25:07	0|esotericnonsense|i guess the actual answer is to run the core node in a sandbox to avoid this coming up at all
 18 2017-09-06 00:25:52	0|jonasschnelli|if host2 is assumed to be malicious then it should not be capable to access to the RPC interface
 19 2017-09-06 00:26:19	0|esotericnonsense|understood
 20 2017-09-06 00:26:55	0|esotericnonsense|for reference i'm going to play around with writing some nodejs code to interface with the RPC and I find npm an utter clusterf.ck to deal with in terms of security :P
 21 2017-09-06 00:34:28	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15instagibbs opened pull request #11252: when clearing addrman clear mapInfo and mapAddr (06master...06recreateaddrman) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/11252
 22 2017-09-06 00:47:51	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15JeremyRubin opened pull request #11253: Add != to Base58 class (06master...06add_neq_ctxdest) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/11253
 23 2017-09-06 01:23:59	0|cam9956|hello! anybody there?
 24 2017-09-06 01:24:20	0|cam9956|i need some help
 25 2017-09-06 01:24:49	0|cam9956|_flow_ are you there?
 26 2017-09-06 01:25:06	0|meshcollider|Hi, what do you need help with?
 27 2017-09-06 01:26:17	0|cam9956|i had a question, when i relese the coin does it have to be mined for anybody to get some or when i release it i get a few coins to sell out
 28 2017-09-06 01:27:04	0|meshcollider|This channel is for discussion about bitcoin core development sorry, try #bitcoin or https://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/
 29 2017-09-06 01:27:50	0|cam9956|yeah this is about bitcoin, i want to devalop my own coin with the bitcoin source
 30 2017-09-06 01:28:17	0|meshcollider|Again, this is for bitcoin *core* development, not general questions sorry :)
 31 2017-09-06 01:29:01	0|cam9956|what do you mean by "core development" and is there a irc i can contact for this?
 32 2017-09-06 01:30:03	0|praxeology|cam9956: probably #bitcoin would be your best bet
 33 2017-09-06 01:30:24	0|cam9956|ok
 34 2017-09-06 01:30:28	0|praxeology|oh, your own coin
 35 2017-09-06 01:30:48	0|cam9956|yeah with the bitcoin source code
 36 2017-09-06 01:31:08	0|praxeology|go to #yet_another_bitcoin_fork
 37 2017-09-06 01:31:12	0|cam9956|basically distributing
 38 2017-09-06 01:31:24	0|cam9956|as the channel?
 39 2017-09-06 01:33:48	0|Chicago|cam9956, They're saying go find another channel because clone coins are off-topic for here as they do not generally pertain to Bitcoin Core development.
 40 2017-09-06 01:34:28	0|cam9956|what is bitcoin "core development" though
 41 2017-09-06 01:35:28	0|meshcollider|Bitcoin Core is the reference client for bitcoin
 42 2017-09-06 01:35:57	0|cam9956|oh ok bye!
 43 2017-09-06 01:37:58	0|cam8857_|when i release the coin does it have to be mined for anybody to get some or when i release it i get a few coins to sell out?
 44 2017-09-06 01:39:40	0|Chicago|cam8857_, you can have a 100% premine.  Just let us know when you release so that we can buy them on the open market.
 45 2017-09-06 01:39:44	0|Chicago|<.<
 46 2017-09-06 01:39:48	0|Chicago|>.>
 47 2017-09-06 01:40:06	0|cam8857_|premine? what do you mean?
 48 2017-09-06 01:41:55	0|cam8857_|ohh wait im in the wrong irc...
 49 2017-09-06 05:54:42	0|dcousens|am I missing something in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/11201#issuecomment-327379774 ?
 50 2017-09-06 05:58:41	0|kallewoof|signraw works but sendraw fails in some cases.
 51 2017-09-06 05:59:02	0|kallewoof|This function is supposed to find those cases and tell you without actually sending the tx to the network.
 52 2017-09-06 05:59:04	0|dcousens|kallewoof: right,  but the OP doesn't want to send at all, so that is OK?
 53 2017-09-06 05:59:17	0|dcousens|signraw doesn't send either
 54 2017-09-06 05:59:18	0|dcousens|?
 55 2017-09-06 05:59:59	0|kallewoof|Idea is, you sign, then you verify and if everything is cool you do whatever other last minute checks (double check addy or such) and then you finally sendraw.
 56 2017-09-06 06:00:19	0|kallewoof|Or you mkae a tx using custom software and you just wanna see if it will relay without actually sending it.
 57 2017-09-06 06:00:25	0|kallewoof|(signing using said custom sw)
 58 2017-09-06 06:00:35	0|dcousens|kallewoof: right, but you can still use signrawtransaction in the custom software case
 59 2017-09-06 06:00:40	0|dcousens|(I do)
 60 2017-09-06 06:01:36	0|dcousens|I leave the private keys blank, and don't have a bitcoind w/ wallet support, and it verifies whether the tx is complete or has errors etc
 61 2017-09-06 06:05:17	0|dcousens|kallewoof: eg I just created a tx with bitcoinjs, signed it using bitcoinjs,  then signrawtx [txhex, inputs, []],  complete: true,  then I modified inputs to have a different id, same txhex, and I get a checksig error
 62 2017-09-06 06:11:33	0|kallewoof|dcounsens: there are cases where signraw succeeds and sendraw fails, though. This is meant to catch those. Am I misundersatnding you?
 63 2017-09-06 06:12:23	0|dcousens|kallewoof: right,  signraw will fail for policy reasons,  which is why I suggested, why not just a policy check flag?
 64 2017-09-06 06:12:35	0|dcousens|rather than a new RPC command
 65 2017-09-06 06:12:41	0|dcousens|uh, won't fail***
 66 2017-09-06 06:12:46	0|dcousens|signraw won't fail for policy reasons
 67 2017-09-06 06:13:39	0|sipa|signraw _only_ checks script validity
 68 2017-09-06 06:13:44	0|sipa|not transaction validity
 69 2017-09-06 06:14:36	0|sipa|things like locktime, feerate, inputs unspent, input value >= output value, ...
 70 2017-09-06 06:14:43	0|sipa|that's not just policy
 71 2017-09-06 06:15:53	0|dcousens|ok
 72 2017-09-06 06:16:20	0|dcousens|ta :), i'll modify my reply
 73 2017-09-06 06:18:29	0|dcousens|ta sipa
 74 2017-09-06 06:18:35	0|dcousens|(and kallewoof )
 75 2017-09-06 07:12:17	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15JeremyRubin closed pull request #11253: Add != to Base58 class (06master...06add_neq_ctxdest) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/11253
 76 2017-09-06 07:28:48	0|promag|sipa: isn´t this https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/11117/files#r137145517 worth the change?
 77 2017-09-06 10:31:16	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15ysangkok opened pull request #11255: Release Notes: Fix SHA256-with-SSE4 PR link (060.15...06patch-1) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/11255
 78 2017-09-06 11:09:08	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15esotericnonsense opened pull request #11256: RPC: add weight to mempool entry output (06master...062017-09-add-weight-to-mempool-entry) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/11256
 79 2017-09-06 16:00:25	0|promag|MarcoFalke: done https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/11125
 80 2017-09-06 16:08:23	0|MarcoFalke|promag: Great. Going to take a look today
 81 2017-09-06 16:14:00	0|promag|MarcoFalke: review commit by commit, I think it's the best. I'll be around if you need to discuss it.
 82 2017-09-06 16:39:15	0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/060.15 1458f1e54 15Janus Troelsen: Release Notes: Fix SHA256-with-SSE4 PR link
 83 2017-09-06 16:39:15	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj pushed 2 new commits to 060.15: 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/48790e0efaf4...134d824193a0
 84 2017-09-06 16:39:16	0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/060.15 14134d824 15Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #11255: Release Notes: Fix SHA256-with-SSE4 PR link...
 85 2017-09-06 17:01:40	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj pushed 3 new commits to 06master: 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/6866b4912b80...815fe62421cb
 86 2017-09-06 17:01:41	0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 140311836 15Suhas Daftuar: Allow setting nMinimumChainWork on command line
 87 2017-09-06 17:01:42	0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 14815fe62 15Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #10357: Allow setting nMinimumChainWork on command line...
 88 2017-09-06 17:01:42	0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 14eac64bb 15Suhas Daftuar: [qa] Test nMinimumChainWork...
 89 2017-09-06 17:02:00	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj closed pull request #10357: Allow setting nMinimumChainWork on command line (06master...062017-05-chainwork-commandline) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10357
 90 2017-09-06 17:19:56	0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 14dea086f 15MeshCollider: Stop test_bitcoin-qt touching ~/.bitcoin
 91 2017-09-06 17:19:56	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj pushed 2 new commits to 06master: 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/815fe62421cb...5368614aa106
 92 2017-09-06 17:19:57	0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 145368614 15Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #11210: Stop test_bitcoin-qt touching ~/.bitcoin...
 93 2017-09-06 17:20:36	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj closed pull request #11210: Stop test_bitcoin-qt touching ~/.bitcoin (06master...06201708_qt_test_dir) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/11210
 94 2017-09-06 17:39:47	0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 1462ecce7 15João Barbosa: [doc] Add RPC response notes
 95 2017-09-06 17:39:47	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj pushed 2 new commits to 06master: 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/5368614aa106...21e2f2f79961
 96 2017-09-06 17:39:48	0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 1421e2f2f 15Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #11135: Update developer notes with RPC response guidelines...
 97 2017-09-06 17:40:27	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj closed pull request #11135: Update developer notes with RPC response guidelines (06master...062017-08-rpc-response-notes) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/11135
 98 2017-09-06 18:05:59	0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 14faa8d95 15MarcoFalke: [qa] TestNode: Add wait_until_stopped helper method
 99 2017-09-06 18:05:59	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15MarcoFalke pushed 2 new commits to 06master: 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/21e2f2f79961...31809d6f8514
100 2017-09-06 18:06:00	0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 1431809d6 15MarcoFalke: Merge #11067: [qa] TestNode: Add wait_until_stopped helper method...
101 2017-09-06 18:06:37	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15MarcoFalke closed pull request #11067: [qa] TestNode: Add wait_until_stopped helper method (06master...06Mf1708-qaTestnodeWaitStopHelper) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/11067
102 2017-09-06 18:14:54	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15jnewbery opened pull request #11258: [WIP] [rpc] Add initialblockdownload to getblockchaininfo (06master...06expose_ibd) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/11258
103 2017-09-06 18:15:52	0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 1437495e0 15Jeremy Rubin: Reorder C{,Mutable}Transaction for better packing
104 2017-09-06 18:15:52	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj pushed 2 new commits to 06master: 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/31809d6f8514...59e17899a762
105 2017-09-06 18:15:53	0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 1459e1789 15Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #8330: Structure Packing Optimizations in C{,Mutable}Transaction...
106 2017-09-06 18:54:16	0|GAit|is github user promag in IRC?
107 2017-09-06 18:54:33	0|GAit|oh he usually is just not now, fair enough
108 2017-09-06 18:54:33	0|sipa|sometimes
109 2017-09-06 18:55:11	0|sipa|he's here now :p
110 2017-09-06 18:55:14	0|promag|:)
111 2017-09-06 18:55:15	0|promag|´
112 2017-09-06 18:55:21	0|promag|sup?
113 2017-09-06 18:55:46	0|promag|GAit: need something?
114 2017-09-06 18:57:14	0|GAit|oh I just wanted to say I am not ignoring your suggestion re: 11099 with the multiple failure modes of DumpMempool, i.e. the test doesn't exercise the "return false" within the exception handler but i think that's much harder to cause and i wanted to minimize changes to DumpMempool or how it affects other callers
115 2017-09-06 18:57:27	0|GAit|and also i wanted to thank you for all the feedback, very valuable
116 2017-09-06 18:58:34	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj pushed 3 new commits to 06master: 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/59e17899a762...d745b4cf7b09
117 2017-09-06 18:58:35	0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 14617c459 15Suhas Daftuar: qa: rpc test for wtxid in mempool entry
118 2017-09-06 18:58:35	0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 147e5d596 15Suhas Daftuar: RPC: add wtxid to mempool entry output
119 2017-09-06 18:58:36	0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 14d745b4c 15Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #11203: rpc: add wtxid to mempool entry output...
120 2017-09-06 18:58:44	0|promag|there's also "Also, RenameOver() doesn't throw, and IMO we should fail if the mempool.dat can't be updated"
121 2017-09-06 18:59:03	0|promag|maybe in a follow up patch add handling for that
122 2017-09-06 18:59:04	0|GAit|right but that's IMHO for a different PR
123 2017-09-06 18:59:09	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj closed pull request #11203: rpc: add wtxid to mempool entry output (06master...062017-08-add-wtxid-to-mempool-entry) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/11203
124 2017-09-06 18:59:10	0|promag|voila
125 2017-09-06 18:59:29	0|promag|I can create that, it's on the todo list
126 2017-09-06 18:59:36	0|GAit|i'll be happy to review
127 2017-09-06 19:41:31	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj closed pull request #10872: Docs: Syntax highlight shell commands in the building notes (06master...06hilite) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10872
128 2017-09-06 19:45:04	0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 1441bf159 15practicalswift: Remove unreachable code
129 2017-09-06 19:45:04	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj pushed 2 new commits to 06master: 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/d745b4cf7b09...39ae41389a86
130 2017-09-06 19:45:05	0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 1439ae413 15Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #10845: Remove unreachable code...
131 2017-09-06 19:45:32	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj closed pull request #10845: Remove unreachable code (06master...06remove-unreachable-code) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10845
132 2017-09-06 19:56:06	0|promag|jnewbery: in portuguese, xpto it's like foo :)
133 2017-09-06 20:32:03	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj pushed 3 new commits to 06master: 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/39ae41389a86...961901f77e55
134 2017-09-06 20:32:04	0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 145c8ff0d 15Pieter Wuille: Introduce wrappers around CBitcoinAddress...
135 2017-09-06 20:32:04	0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 14864cd27 15Pieter Wuille: Move CBitcoinAddress to base58.cpp
136 2017-09-06 20:32:05	0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 14961901f 15Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #11117: Prepare for non-Base58 addresses...
137 2017-09-06 20:32:36	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj closed pull request #11117: Prepare for non-Base58 addresses (06master...06201708_nocbitcoinaddress) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/11117
138 2017-09-06 20:52:00	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15promag opened pull request #11259: Remove duplicate destination decoding (06master...062017-09-remove-duplicate-destination-decoding) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/11259
139 2017-09-06 20:52:56	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15MarcoFalke pushed 3 new commits to 06master: 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/961901f77e55...bc561b4b7d6a
140 2017-09-06 20:52:57	0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 141aa97ee 15Lawrence Nahum: Add savemempool RPC
141 2017-09-06 20:52:57	0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 14467cbbc 15Lawrence Nahum: Add return value to DumpMempool
142 2017-09-06 20:52:57	0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 14bc561b4 15MarcoFalke: Merge #11099: [RPC][mempool]: Add savemempool RPC...
143 2017-09-06 20:53:27	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15MarcoFalke closed pull request #11099: [RPC][mempool]: Add savemempool RPC (06master...06dump_mempool_rpc) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/11099
144 2017-09-06 21:54:54	0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 14c001992 15MeshCollider: Fix potential null dereferences
145 2017-09-06 21:54:54	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj pushed 2 new commits to 06master: 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/bc561b4b7d6a...6acdb1fab770
146 2017-09-06 21:54:55	0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 146acdb1f 15Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #11238: Add assertions before potential null deferences...
147 2017-09-06 21:55:35	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj closed pull request #11238: Add assertions before potential null deferences (06master...06201708_fbinfer_fixes) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/11238
148 2017-09-06 22:17:59	0|jnewbery|promag : obrigado :)
149 2017-09-06 22:18:43	0|promag|jnewbery: np
150 2017-09-06 22:19:20	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj closed pull request #10889: Docs: Run windows build in a clean path (06master...06docswin) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10889
151 2017-09-06 22:28:13	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15MarcoFalke opened pull request #11260: travis: Check that default datadir is never created, Check SHAs only once (06master...06Mf1708-travisYaml) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/11260
152 2017-09-06 22:41:51	0|wumpus|looks like we have a few new warnings:
153 2017-09-06 22:41:53	0|wumpus|base58.cpp:308:6: warning: ‘bool {anonymous}::CBitcoinAddress::IsScript() const’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
154 2017-09-06 22:42:00	0|wumpus|base58.cpp:298:6: warning: ‘bool {anonymous}::CBitcoinAddress::GetKeyID(CKeyID&) const’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
155 2017-09-06 22:43:08	0|wumpus|promag: mind to addresss ^^ in #11259?
156 2017-09-06 22:43:18	0|promag|np
157 2017-09-06 22:43:48	0|wumpus|at least, if it's not result of a bug or something, haven't looked in detail yet
158 2017-09-06 22:43:59	0|promag|I'll take a look
159 2017-09-06 22:45:08	0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 14478d4fb 15Sjors Provoost: [docs] explain how to recompile only what bitcoind tests need...
160 2017-09-06 22:45:08	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj pushed 2 new commits to 06master: 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/6acdb1fab770...bcc8a620eae9
161 2017-09-06 22:45:09	0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 14bcc8a62 15Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #11219: [docs] explain how to recompile a modified unit test...
162 2017-09-06 22:45:53	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj closed pull request #11219: [docs] explain how to recompile a modified unit test (06master...06patch-1) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/11219
163 2017-09-06 22:46:24	0|wumpus|so the compiler can identify unused *methods* now? that's interesting - i guess because it's local to the file
164 2017-09-06 22:48:35	0|wumpus|that was with gcc 6.3.0, btw
165 2017-09-06 22:49:15	0|promag|wumpus: rebased, new commit
166 2017-09-06 22:50:39	0|promag|wumpus: I think so too
167 2017-09-06 22:57:31	0|wumpus|promag: thanks, will rebuild to check
168 2017-09-06 23:01:13	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15practicalswift opened pull request #11261: scripted-diff: Use <cxxx> instead of deprecated <xxx.h> when including C compatibility headers (06master...06cinclude) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/11261
169 2017-09-06 23:03:44	0|promag|is it me or github mail notifications are lagging?
170 2017-09-06 23:05:49	0|wumpus|yes, it seems slow
171 2017-09-06 23:23:16	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj pushed 3 new commits to 06master: 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/bcc8a620eae9...089b742a210b
172 2017-09-06 23:23:17	0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 1486e6dd4 15João Barbosa: Remove duplicate destination decoding
173 2017-09-06 23:23:17	0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 148d0041e 15João Barbosa: Remove unused GetKeyID and IsScript methods from CBitcoinAddress
174 2017-09-06 23:23:18	0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 14089b742 15Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #11259: Remove duplicate destination decoding...
175 2017-09-06 23:23:58	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj closed pull request #11259: Remove duplicate destination decoding (06master...062017-09-remove-duplicate-destination-decoding) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/11259
176 2017-09-06 23:26:11	0|MarcoFalke|wumpus: 10838
177 2017-09-06 23:29:18	0|wumpus|MarcoFalke: hmm?
178 2017-09-06 23:29:28	0|MarcoFalke|ready for merge ;)
179 2017-09-06 23:29:38	0|promag|MarcoFalke: 11125
180 2017-09-06 23:29:48	0|wumpus|even without your release notes change? ok
181 2017-09-06 23:30:16	0|wumpus|yes 11125 is ready
182 2017-09-06 23:30:29	0|MarcoFalke|The release notes change will force another pull to be rebased
183 2017-09-06 23:30:37	0|MarcoFalke|, which already has some utACKs
184 2017-09-06 23:30:46	0|wumpus|true
185 2017-09-06 23:31:10	0|wumpus|right, I missed that there was a reasoning behind skipping it
186 2017-09-06 23:31:22	0|promag|sipa: care to rebase 11167?
187 2017-09-06 23:31:36	0|promag|I don't mind adding the release notes..
188 2017-09-06 23:32:22	0|MarcoFalke|wumpus: I never shared the reasoning. Either BlueMatt missed it or did it on purpose. Either way is fine, heh
189 2017-09-06 23:32:36	0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 14aece8a4 15Matt Corallo: (finally) remove getinfo in favor of more module-specific infos
190 2017-09-06 23:32:36	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj pushed 2 new commits to 06master: 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/089b742a210b...66a5b419eff5
191 2017-09-06 23:32:37	0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 1466a5b41 15Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #10838: (finally) remove getinfo...
192 2017-09-06 23:33:01	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj closed pull request #10838: (finally) remove getinfo (06master...062017-07-seriously-fuck-getinfo) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10838
193 2017-09-06 23:33:27	0|wumpus|argh 11125 needs rebase too, now @promag
194 2017-09-06 23:33:53	0|BlueMatt|hmmm, what'd i do?
195 2017-09-06 23:34:16	0|wumpus|conflict: test/functional/bitcoin_cli.py
196 2017-09-06 23:34:22	0|promag|great branch name 2017-07-seriously-fuck-getinfo
197 2017-09-06 23:34:29	0|wumpus|nothing that could be avoided anyhwo
198 2017-09-06 23:34:38	0|promag|wumpus: 1 sec
199 2017-09-06 23:34:42	0|wumpus|lol nice
200 2017-09-06 23:39:50	0|promag|wumpus: rebased 11125
201 2017-09-06 23:40:49	0|wumpus|thanks
202 2017-09-06 23:41:03	0|promag|renamed cli_get_info to cli_response and rpc_get_info to rpc_response, I can revert thou
203 2017-09-06 23:42:00	0|promag|I was going to inline like assert_equal(self.nodes[0].cli.getblockchaininfo(), self.nodes[0].getblockchaininfo())
204 2017-09-06 23:44:15	0|meshcollider|how is fanquake able to add and remove labels, etc if hes not a member?
205 2017-09-06 23:44:33	0|meshcollider|or is he a member but just hasn't set it to display
206 2017-09-06 23:45:08	0|wumpus|he is a member
207 2017-09-06 23:47:18	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj pushed 7 new commits to 06master: 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/66a5b419eff5...645a7ecc0b8d
208 2017-09-06 23:47:19	0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 147696841 15João Barbosa: Fix style in -stdin and -stdinrpcpass handling
209 2017-09-06 23:47:19	0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 14e127494 15João Barbosa: [test] Improve assert_raises_jsonrpc docstring
210 2017-09-06 23:47:20	0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 145c18a84 15João Barbosa: [test] Add support for custom arguments to TestNodeCLI
211 2017-09-06 23:47:53	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj closed pull request #11125: Add bitcoin-cli -stdin and -stdinrpcpass functional tests (06master...062017-08-stdinrpcpass-functional-test) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/11125
212 2017-09-06 23:48:00	0|meshcollider|things have been moving so fast these last couple of days, its awesome
213 2017-09-06 23:48:06	0|meshcollider|so many merges
214 2017-09-06 23:49:31	0|wumpus|yes we've caught up a little bit on the PR backlog :)
215 2017-09-06 23:50:06	0|MarcoFalke|Like 12 new pulls and 14 merged/closed. Delta is like two or something
216 2017-09-06 23:50:38	0|wumpus|yeah...
217 2017-09-06 23:51:15	0|promag|still, merge fest!
218 2017-09-06 23:52:03	0|sipa|ya
219 2017-09-06 23:52:18	0|MarcoFalke|ja, who's not ready for bed by now?
220 2017-09-06 23:52:45	0|meshcollider|its only midday over here in NZ ;)
221 2017-09-06 23:53:25	0|promag|1am here, must take kids to school by 8am, I can troll a bit more