1 2017-09-10 00:52:13	0|freshbtcer2|anyone in here that could help me out a bit? If youre a dev this will be no brainers to you
  2 2017-09-10 00:55:27	0|sipa|ask, don't ask to ask
  3 2017-09-10 00:59:40	0|freshbtcer2|well i edited the source code and compiled, generated the merkle and genesis just fine, but after i entered genesis twice into main.cpp and once into checkpoints.cpp and merkle once into main.cpp, i got an error Incorrect or no genesis block found. Wrong datadir for network?
  4 2017-09-10 01:00:03	0|freshbtcer2|heres the whole error output
  5 2017-09-10 01:00:06	0|freshbtcer2|2017-09-10 00:11:08 Error: Incorrect or no genesis block found. Wrong datadir for network?
  6 2017-09-10 01:00:06	0|freshbtcer2|2017-09-10 00:11:08 LoadBlockIndexDB(): last block file info: CBlockFileInfo(blocks=1, size=285, heights=0...0, time=2017-09-09...2017-09-09)
  7 2017-09-10 01:00:06	0|freshbtcer2|2017-09-10 00:11:08 LoadBlockIndexDB(): transaction index disabled
  8 2017-09-10 01:00:07	0|freshbtcer2|2017-09-10 00:11:08 Shutdown : In progress...
  9 2017-09-10 01:00:07	0|freshbtcer2|2017-09-10 00:11:08 StopNode()
 10 2017-09-10 01:00:08	0|freshbtcer2|2017-09-10 00:11:09 Flushed 0 addresses to peers.dat  50ms
 11 2017-09-10 01:00:10	0|freshbtcer2|2017-09-10 00:11:09 Committing 0 changed transactions to coin database...
 12 2017-09-10 01:00:12	0|freshbtcer2|2017-09-10 00:11:09 Shutdown : done
 13 2017-09-10 01:01:49	0|freshbtcer2|but also in net.cpp i added my local ip where i compiled.. i tried compiling on a digital ocean droplet but it failed... can i compile locally and scp to droplet to get that node running
 14 2017-09-10 01:06:17	0|freshbtcer2|2017-09-10 00:11:08 LoadBlockIndexDB(): last block file = 0
 15 2017-09-10 01:06:17	0|freshbtcer2|2017-09-10 00:11:08 LoadBlockIndexDB(): last block file info: CBlockFileInfo(blocks=1, size=285, heights=0...0, time=2017-09-09...2017-09-09)
 16 2017-09-10 01:06:18	0|freshbtcer2|2017-09-10 00:11:08 Error: Incorrect or no genesis block found. Wrong datadir for network?
 17 2017-09-10 01:06:18	0|freshbtcer2|2017-09-10 00:11:08 LoadBlockIndexDB(): transaction index disabled
 18 2017-09-10 01:06:18	0|freshbtcer2|2017-09-10 00:11:08 Shutdown : In progress...
 19 2017-09-10 01:06:21	0|freshbtcer2|2017-09-10 00:11:08 StopNode()
 20 2017-09-10 01:06:23	0|freshbtcer2|2017-09-10 00:11:09 Flushed 0 addresses to peers.dat  50ms
 21 2017-09-10 01:06:25	0|freshbtcer2|2017-09-10 00:11:09 Committing 0 changed transactions to coin database...
 22 2017-09-10 01:06:27	0|freshbtcer2|2017-09-10 00:11:09 Shutdown : done
 23 2017-09-10 01:06:48	0|freshbtcer2|thats the whole error output if anyone wants to help somebody in need
 24 2017-09-10 01:07:24	0|sipa|freshbtcer2: please do not paste more than 3 lines on irc; use a pastebin sote
 25 2017-09-10 01:07:45	0|sipa|freshbtcer2: development of altcoins is also offtopic here
 26 2017-09-10 01:08:17	0|freshbtcer2|ok sorry about that, been a while since being in an irc channel
 27 2017-09-10 01:09:07	0|freshbtcer2|well dont know where else to go i just figured btc devs are great at what they do and could answer it simply
 28 2017-09-10 01:13:13	0|sipa|try #altcoin-dev or ##altcoin-dev (i'm unsure)
 29 2017-09-10 01:16:35	0|meshcollider|the latter, ##altcoin-dev
 30 2017-09-10 02:04:36	0|Oskii|I'm having trouble seeing the chat here
 31 2017-09-10 02:25:58	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15MarcoFalke opened pull request #11295: doc: Old fee_estimates.dat are discarded by 0.15.0 (060.15...06Mf1709-docFeeEst015) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/11295
 32 2017-09-10 02:30:56	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15MarcoFalke closed pull request #11005: Tests: Add a lint check for trailing whitespace (06master...06whitespace) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/11005
 33 2017-09-10 02:42:43	0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 14f38c051 15fanquake: [depends] Don't build libevent sample code
 34 2017-09-10 02:42:43	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15MarcoFalke pushed 2 new commits to 06master: 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/3255d6347b1f...11dacc6154c4
 35 2017-09-10 02:42:44	0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 1411dacc6 15MarcoFalke: Merge #11286: [depends] Don't build libevent sample code...
 36 2017-09-10 02:43:30	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15MarcoFalke closed pull request #11286: [depends] Don't build libevent sample code (06master...06dont-build-libevent-samples) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/11286
 37 2017-09-10 02:55:03	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15MarcoFalke opened pull request #11296: [0.14] travis: filter out pyenv (060.14...06Mf1709-travisNoPyenv) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/11296
 38 2017-09-10 02:55:59	0|meshcollider|Can someone please restart travis on #11289
 39 2017-09-10 02:57:19	0|luke-jr|done
 40 2017-09-10 03:06:29	0|meshcollider|thanks
 41 2017-09-10 04:14:40	0|meshcollider|we're getting so many random travis failures from "if [ -d ~/.bitcoin ]; then false; fi"
 42 2017-09-10 04:14:54	0|meshcollider|why do some builds end up with the directory being created and others don't?
 43 2017-09-10 04:15:03	0|meshcollider|If its that variable, perhaps that check should be removed?
 44 2017-09-10 04:18:12	0|sipa|i don't understand what's causing it
 45 2017-09-10 04:19:53	0|meshcollider|yeah both #11289 and I see your #11167 has 3 failures in it, no code change should do that
 46 2017-09-10 04:20:27	0|meshcollider|Perhaps we could just add a line to .travis.yml in the before_script: section or something to delete the directory if it exists
 47 2017-09-10 04:27:35	0|sipa|meshcollider: want to create a PR?
 48 2017-09-10 04:28:09	0|meshcollider|Yep will do, we could just rerun travis on it a few times to see if we still get any random errors because I have no idea how to test locally
 49 2017-09-10 04:29:02	0|sipa|meshcollider: i'll restart some
 50 2017-09-10 04:29:55	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15MeshCollider opened pull request #11297: Make sure ~/.bitcoin doesn't exist before build (06master...06201709_travis_delete_dir) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/11297
 51 2017-09-10 04:31:38	0|sipa|restarted 11289
 52 2017-09-10 04:32:30	0|meshcollider|Well the fix in 11297 wouldn't have an effect on 11289 unless it was merged
 53 2017-09-10 04:32:49	0|sipa|of course
 54 2017-09-10 04:33:35	0|meshcollider|But clearly 11289 only changes RPC helptext, should definitely not have made any directories lol
 55 2017-09-10 04:33:53	0|sipa|restarted 11167
 56 2017-09-10 04:37:17	0|meshcollider|Oh you could restart 11268 too since that should be fixed now by 11271
 57 2017-09-10 04:39:23	0|sipa|done
 58 2017-09-10 04:43:35	0|meshcollider|hmm yep #11289 failed again, same issue, so lets see how travis does with 11297
 59 2017-09-10 04:48:18	0|sipa|ay
 60 2017-09-10 05:08:49	0|meshcollider|yep it passed, want to run it one more time just to make sure we didn't get lucky?
 61 2017-09-10 05:09:24	0|sipa|restarted
 62 2017-09-10 05:30:28	0|meshcollider|ok yep it passed again
 63 2017-09-10 05:30:39	0|meshcollider|guessing that fixes the issue then :)
 64 2017-09-10 16:29:59	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15MarcoFalke closed pull request #11296: [0.14] travis: filter out pyenv (Cory Fields) (060.14...06Mf1709-travisNoPyenv) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/11296
 65 2017-09-10 16:43:45	0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 1491c39e3 15Jonas Schnelli: Update CONTRIBUTRING.md to reduce unnecesarry review workload
 66 2017-09-10 16:43:45	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15MarcoFalke pushed 2 new commits to 06master: 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/11dacc6154c4...ee50c9e48786
 67 2017-09-10 16:43:46	0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 14ee50c9e 15MarcoFalke: Merge #11276: [Docs] Update CONTRIBUTING.md to reduce unnecessary review workload...
 68 2017-09-10 16:44:25	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15MarcoFalke closed pull request #11276: [Docs] Update CONTRIBUTING.md to reduce unnecessary review workload (06master...062017/09/cont) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/11276
 69 2017-09-10 20:31:41	0|kanzure|if a bip125-replaceable transaction's replacement does not have sufficient fee as defined by bip125, does the replacement become a valid replacement if the replacement gets a descendant that pays sufficient fee (child pays for parent)?
 70 2017-09-10 22:01:37	0|promag_|does AcceptBlock handle forks?
 71 2017-09-10 22:03:12	0|sipa|no, it just adds knowledge about a block to the database
 72 2017-09-10 22:03:28	0|sipa|ActivateBestChain deals with switching to the best known valid chain
 73 2017-09-10 22:05:58	0|promag|does this sounds good https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/master...promag:201709-skip-invalid-out-of-order-blocks?expand=1 ?
 74 2017-09-10 22:08:30	0|promag|or there is a tree of blocks?
 75 2017-09-10 22:10:12	0|sipa|yes, the block database stores a tree of blocks
 76 2017-09-10 22:10:28	0|sipa|only the active chain is just a single path through
 77 2017-09-10 22:11:54	0|promag|ok so that branch is wrong
 78 2017-09-10 22:12:05	0|promag|ty
 79 2017-09-10 22:13:52	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj closed pull request #11295: doc: Old fee_estimates.dat are discarded by 0.15.0 (060.15...06Mf1709-docFeeEst015) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/11295
 80 2017-09-10 22:13:53	0|wumpus|going to tag 0.15.0 final
 81 2017-09-10 22:13:59	0|achow101|yay!
 82 2017-09-10 22:14:45	0|sipa|wumpus: we may want to add a note that multiwallet does not work with batch json
 83 2017-09-10 22:15:19	0|wumpus|not going to hold it up longer on release notes, sorry
 84 2017-09-10 22:15:25	0|wumpus|* [new tag]             v0.15.0 -> v0.15.0
 85 2017-09-10 22:15:29	0|luke-jr|eh, how *could* it?
 86 2017-09-10 22:15:48	0|sipa|okay
 87 2017-09-10 22:15:52	0|luke-jr|different endpoints seem fundamentally incompatible with batch, even in theory XD
 88 2017-09-10 22:16:07	0|wumpus|well the batch would apply to the same endpoint
 89 2017-09-10 22:16:09	0|wumpus|ideally
 90 2017-09-10 22:17:23	0|sipa|luke-jr: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/11257
 91 2017-09-10 22:18:19	0|wumpus|there's no fundamental reason why it couldn't work, but it doesn't work right now, but anyhow this whole multiwallet is experimental in any case
 92 2017-09-10 22:19:27	0|sipa|fair
 93 2017-09-10 22:20:02	0|luke-jr|ah
 94 2017-09-10 22:22:26	0|sipa|it's not a regression in any case, just an unexpected missing feature
 95 2017-09-10 22:23:13	0|wumpus|indeed, wouldn't be the only multiwallet feature that isn't implemented yet
 96 2017-09-10 22:26:08	0|esotericnonsense|0.14.2 release tag: 1999 commits to master since this release
 97 2017-09-10 22:26:30	0|esotericnonsense|damn :P
 98 2017-09-10 22:26:51	0|esotericnonsense|(also since 0.14.0, of course)
 99 2017-09-10 22:27:23	0|sipa|anyone a clue how https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/11297 could be fixing an issue?
100 2017-09-10 22:28:34	0|sipa|there are random travis failures, where at the end of the test, ~/.bitcoin exists... that PR solving something implies that ~/.bitcoin already exists at the start of the test run
101 2017-09-10 22:29:00	0|wumpus|it shouldn't do anything if travis starts with a clean VM
102 2017-09-10 22:29:52	0|wumpus|are you sure it solves it? that's hard to say for an intermittent issue. It'd be quite absurd.
103 2017-09-10 22:30:15	0|wumpus|oh, or maybe not - does travis cache the entire homedir?
104 2017-09-10 22:30:18	0|wumpus|@cfields
105 2017-09-10 22:30:52	0|wumpus|if so, this could happen for old PRs that existed (and have run travis once) before the fix was merged
106 2017-09-10 22:30:54	0|sipa|oh, perhaps it's due to a cache that existed from before the tests-do-not-touch-.bitcoin issue was merged?
107 2017-09-10 22:31:00	0|wumpus|yes!
108 2017-09-10 22:31:18	0|wumpus|what PRs does it happen on?
109 2017-09-10 22:31:34	0|wumpus|I'll wipe the cache for them to see
110 2017-09-10 22:31:59	0|sipa|i just saw it happen on #10498
111 2017-09-10 22:32:01	0|gribble|https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/10498 | Use static_cast instead of C-style casts for non-fundamental types by practicalswift · Pull Request #10498 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
112 2017-09-10 22:32:13	0|wumpus|or hm if it happens on all old PRs it might be better to nuke all caches
113 2017-09-10 22:32:28	0|wumpus|but I'll try for one first
114 2017-09-10 22:33:12	0|sipa|#11289 has it
115 2017-09-10 22:33:14	0|gribble|https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/11289 | Add wallet backup text to import* and add* RPCs by MeshCollider · Pull Request #11289 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
116 2017-09-10 22:43:49	0|sipa|#10489 just passed succesfully
117 2017-09-10 22:43:50	0|gribble|https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/10489 | build: silence gcc7s implicit fallthrough warning by theuni · Pull Request #10489 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
118 2017-09-10 22:44:01	0|sipa|eh, no
119 2017-09-10 22:44:09	0|sipa|#10498
120 2017-09-10 22:44:11	0|gribble|https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/10498 | Use static_cast instead of C-style casts for non-fundamental types by practicalswift · Pull Request #10498 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
121 2017-09-10 23:13:58	0|meshcollider|If 11280 missed tag you can close it, no point leaving it open :)
122 2017-09-10 23:17:06	0|wumpus|nah let's see, it'd be nice to add it to the release notes that are uploaded to bitcoin core
123 2017-09-10 23:17:11	0|wumpus|bitcoin.org*