1 2017-10-07 00:06:16 0|andytoshi|whew, 1000 bt2 buy wall at 0.25
2 2017-10-07 00:09:09 0|andytoshi|oops, wrong channel, sorry
3 2017-10-07 02:04:12 0|midnightmagic|Could I request that whoever is in charge of updating bitcoin.org and bitcoincore.org put up statements that I can point to when complaining to Twitter about impersonating accounts? Do these statements already exist?
4 2017-10-07 02:53:50 0|meshcollider|Yeah surely there's something we can do about this ... :(
5 2017-10-07 02:56:55 0|sipa|try opening an issue on https://github.com/bitcoin-dot-org/bitcoin.org/issues ?
6 2017-10-07 03:18:26 0|achow101|midnightmagic: what kind of statements?
7 2017-10-07 03:18:43 0|achow101|is the second bullet of https://bitcoincore.org/en/2017/08/18/btc1-misleading-statements/ enough?
8 2017-10-07 03:31:37 0|midnightmagic|achow101: Probably getting the blue checkmark at this point would probably be a good idea, if it's at all possible.
9 2017-10-07 03:32:09 0|achow101|midnightmagic: yeah.. what's the process for that?
10 2017-10-07 03:33:27 0|midnightmagic|Not a clue, I've never gotten a blue checkmark. https://support.twitter.com/articles/20174631 ?
11 2017-10-07 03:35:05 0|achow101|Whoever controls the bitcoincoreorg account is going to need to do that. I guess that's probably btcdrak
12 2017-10-07 03:40:45 0|midnightmagic|:-/
13 2017-10-07 04:10:18 0|jonasschnelli|BlueMatt: is removing the 40attempts-use-also-peers-with-missing-relevant-services unproblematic? https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/11456/files#diff-9a82240fe7dfe86564178691cc57f2f1L1829
14 2017-10-07 04:10:49 0|jonasschnelli|I guess you hardly find a useful peer with that logic...
15 2017-10-07 06:00:14 0|gmaxwell|justanotheruser: peers without witness are not longer outbound useful at all.
16 2017-10-07 06:00:18 0|gmaxwell|er jonasschnelli
17 2017-10-07 06:00:24 0|gmaxwell|we'll never fetch blocks from them anymore.
18 2017-10-07 06:03:02 0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15fanquake opened pull request #11460: [depends] mac_alias 2.0.6, ds_store 1.1.2 (06master...06update-mac-alias) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/11460
19 2017-10-07 06:11:00 0|sipa|gmaxwell: but with NODE_LIMITED we may still try to connect to a limited node if no NETWORK nodes are available (and we need history)
20 2017-10-07 06:13:13 0|jonasschnelli|sipa: but the current NODE_NETWORK implementation has this finger-printing prevention and will never serve <288...
21 2017-10-07 06:13:21 0|jonasschnelli|(as also recommended by the BIP)
22 2017-10-07 06:22:59 0|sipa|jonasschnelli: ?
23 2017-10-07 06:23:19 0|sipa|jonasschnelli: oh, you mean LIMITED will not serve further back, sure
24 2017-10-07 06:23:45 0|sipa|but connecting to a LIMITED is still far better than not connecting to anything at all
25 2017-10-07 06:24:01 0|sipa|at the very least to learn about more peer
26 2017-10-07 06:24:49 0|fanquake|Hey cfields, could you ping me if your online sometime this arvo
27 2017-10-07 07:28:35 0|gmaxwell|sipa: perhaps but the mechenism we used for segwit might not really be the best one for that.
28 2017-10-07 08:43:17 0|MarcoFalke|Seems we can create issues and tag them with "hacktoberfest" to get other people fix it... :3
29 2017-10-07 08:43:24 0|MarcoFalke|https://github.com/search?q=label:hacktoberfest+state:open+type:issue
30 2017-10-07 08:43:49 0|MarcoFalke|Just created one to see what happens.
31 2017-10-07 08:50:25 0|fanquake|Do we have to give away free shirts
32 2017-10-07 09:00:59 0|MarcoFalke|Not that I am aware of
33 2017-10-07 09:08:29 0|fanquake|MarcoFalke was just being sarcastic :p
34 2017-10-07 09:09:49 0|MarcoFalke|heh, there might be some leftover shirts from sf to give away
35 2017-10-07 09:11:50 0|gmaxwell|BlueMatt: this is a ppa user:
36 2017-10-07 09:11:52 0|gmaxwell|02:06:47 < someone235> Hi, after installing bitcoin-qt on Ubuntu 16.04 I get this error: "bitcoin-qt: error while loading shared libraries: libzmq.so.3: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory". Someone knows how to fix it?
37 2017-10-07 10:01:04 0|meshcollider|MarcoFalke: I'm a poor student, I'll claim one if there is ;)
38 2017-10-07 10:08:25 0|meshcollider|gmaxwell: that sounds like a dependency issue, I'm not 100% sure but you could try `apt-get purge libzmq3` and then reinstall
39 2017-10-07 11:01:34 0|Sentineo|gmaxwell: libzmq was not in ppa before iirc, could it be that the dependency was left out of the package?
40 2017-10-07 11:09:19 0|MarcoFalke|A fresh install works fine with the dependencies: "Selecting previously unselected package libzmq5:amd64."
41 2017-10-07 15:38:53 0|BlueMatt|gmaxwell: strange...ppa magics deps, dunno how they got the package to install without its dep
42 2017-10-07 21:20:19 0|Bullpay|anyone care to help me out with a small issue? 2017-10-07T21:15:28.711Z] info: Header Service: we have not received a response to getHeaders from the network, retrying.
43 2017-10-07 21:20:34 0|Bullpay|[2017-10-07T21:15:14.699Z] info: Connected to peer: 127.0.0.1, network: livenet, version: 70015, subversion: /Satoshi:0.15.99/, status: ready, port: 8333, best height: 288324
44 2017-10-07 21:21:24 0|Bullpay|bitcore-node keeps saying it cant get a response / retrying any ideas why?
45 2017-10-07 21:21:47 0|Bullpay|this is a p2p setup bitcore-node over bitcoind
46 2017-10-07 21:23:15 0|Bullpay|or if there is anyone here that can get me an insightAPI/UI system up and running over bitcoind full node I will pay you in BTC!
47 2017-10-07 21:30:33 0|meshcollider|Bullpay: not the right channel sorry, try #bitcoin or the bitcoin stackexchange?
48 2017-10-07 21:31:11 0|Bullpay|opps you are right
49 2017-10-07 21:33:41 0|meshcollider|BlueMatt: maybe it had already been installed or thought it had because of something else, but the install was broken