1 2017-12-19 00:00:23	0|eck|blaster how many times are you going to post that link today
  2 2017-12-19 00:00:28	0|eck|it's getting old
  3 2017-12-19 00:56:23	0|pierre_rochard|+
  4 2017-12-19 04:28:37	0|Pankaj|Hi
  5 2017-12-19 04:29:06	0|Pankaj|i need some help to setup bitcoin core to linux server without GUI
  6 2017-12-19 04:32:34	0|goatpig|run bitcoind
  7 2017-12-19 04:34:47	0|Pankaj|i did that
  8 2017-12-19 04:34:55	0|sipa|#bitcoin please
  9 2017-12-19 04:35:56	0|Pankaj|please suggest all steps to run bitcoin core on linux server for development
 10 2017-12-19 04:36:30	0|sipa|#bitcoin please
 11 2017-12-19 04:37:15	0|Pankaj|#bitcoin please suggest all steps to run bitcoin core on linux server for development
 12 2017-12-19 04:37:46	0|sipa|Pankaj: not here, go to the #bitcoin channel
 13 2017-12-19 04:38:31	0|Pankaj|Oops
 14 2017-12-19 04:38:36	0|Pankaj|thanks sipa
 15 2017-12-19 05:09:08	0|Monika|Hello
 16 2017-12-19 05:12:24	0|Monika|i would like to use bitcoin core wallet in my php website
 17 2017-12-19 05:12:51	0|achow101|wumpus: I think #11415 is ready to be merged
 18 2017-12-19 05:12:54	0|gribble|https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/11415 | [RPC] Disallow using addresses in createmultisig by achow101 · Pull Request #11415 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
 19 2017-12-19 05:12:56	0|sipa|Monika: #bitcoin
 20 2017-12-19 07:05:13	0|mrannanay|https://www.irccloud.com/pastebin/bbnjeQoS/
 21 2017-12-19 07:06:45	0|mrannanay|Hi, I had a doubt regarding the regtest setup - so the regtest difficulty is set at minimum according to this configuration file - https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/68e021e3a35d1e88d6075ea8b05a8e3a40a64e29/src/chainparams.cpp#L283
 22 2017-12-19 07:06:55	0|mrannanay|So if I did setup a miner on a regtest network, every nonce value would be accepted?
 23 2017-12-19 07:11:45	0|sipa|no, that variable just triggers the special testnet difficulty reset rule
 24 2017-12-19 07:12:01	0|sipa|it does not imply that every hash is always acceptable
 25 2017-12-19 07:18:58	0|mrannanay|Oh alright :)   It just occurred to me that in this setup   ```$ bitcoin-cli generate 100``` executes in ~ 1sec - is this an indication of low difficulty?
 26 2017-12-19 07:19:49	0|Varunram|yes
 27 2017-12-19 07:20:38	0|sipa|the difficulty in regtest is very low (iirc, 1 block attempt in 2 is valid
 28 2017-12-19 07:21:02	0|sipa|and it does adjust difficulty iirc
 29 2017-12-19 07:33:33	0|mrannanay|Okay, thanks! Another thing I learnt was the removal of the internal miner from testnet (setgenerate was retained for regtest) - would it be wise to write a miner for regtest?
 30 2017-12-19 07:41:41	0|sipa|mrannanay: the generate RPC suffices
 31 2017-12-19 07:43:07	0|mrannanay|Conceptually, a miner that runs on regtest would run (albeit much slower) on MainNet?
 32 2017-12-19 07:44:22	0|sipa|yes
 33 2017-12-19 07:44:30	0|sipa|GBT exists and works fine for both
 34 2017-12-19 07:49:09	0|mrannanay|Great, thanks again!
 35 2017-12-19 08:11:03	0|fanquake|wumpus I think 11921 and 11936 can go in. The later had a utACK from theuni in the previous PR.
 36 2017-12-19 08:11:16	0|wumpus|fanquake: thanks
 37 2017-12-19 08:12:39	0|wumpus|as for 11921 I'd prefer cfields to take a look there first, this seems strange
 38 2017-12-19 08:13:13	0|wumpus|could this be something like a shell change from openbsd 6.1 to 6.2?
 39 2017-12-19 08:13:36	0|wumpus|I really need to upgrade my openbsd box, maybe I'll get around to it today
 40 2017-12-19 08:13:53	0|fanquake|I'll checkout the 62 release notes
 41 2017-12-19 08:14:42	0|wumpus|good idea
 42 2017-12-19 08:16:41	0|fanquake|wumpus clang is now the default compiler there btw
 43 2017-12-19 08:17:00	0|wumpus|whoa, they changed that in a minor release?
 44 2017-12-19 08:17:04	0|fanquake|"The https://www.openbsd.org/i386.html and https://www.openbsd.org/amd64.html platforms have switched to using https://man.openbsd.org/clang-local.1 as the base system compiler."
 45 2017-12-19 08:17:32	0|wumpus|phew, that might mean that the default compiler just works, as on freebsd, and we can remove all of that from the build guide
 46 2017-12-19 08:19:10	0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 143eb4d45 15Varunram: [build] Warn that only libconsensus can be built without boost
 47 2017-12-19 08:19:10	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj pushed 2 new commits to 06master: 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/62fdf9b07087...483bb6725362
 48 2017-12-19 08:19:11	0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 14483bb67 15Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #11936: [build] Warn that only libconsensus can be built without Boost...
 49 2017-12-19 08:19:55	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj closed pull request #11936: [build] Warn that only libconsensus can be built without Boost (06master...06libcon-boost) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/11936
 50 2017-12-19 08:20:26	0|wumpus|or at least marked as pre-6.2 only
 51 2017-12-19 08:21:20	0|fanquake|Possibly. My internet is currently too slow to load the entire changelog, so I'm still unsure about potential shell changes
 52 2017-12-19 08:39:30	0|meshcollider|btw wumpus #11178 might be RTM as well
 53 2017-12-19 08:39:31	0|gribble|https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/11178 | Add iswitness parameter to decode- and fundrawtransaction RPCs by MeshCollider · Pull Request #11178 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
 54 2017-12-19 08:45:01	0|wumpus|meshcollider: thanks, will take al ook
 55 2017-12-19 08:55:45	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj pushed 3 new commits to 06master: 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/483bb6725362...fee0370fd6e5
 56 2017-12-19 08:55:46	0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 146f39ac0 15MeshCollider: Add test for decoderawtransaction bool
 57 2017-12-19 08:55:46	0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 14bbdbe80 15MeshCollider: Add iswitness parameter to decode- and fundrawtransaction RPCs
 58 2017-12-19 08:55:47	0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 14fee0370 15Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #11178: Add iswitness parameter to decode- and fundrawtransaction RPCs...
 59 2017-12-19 08:56:05	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj closed pull request #11178: Add iswitness parameter to decode- and fundrawtransaction RPCs (06master...06201708_rawtx_bool) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/11178
 60 2017-12-19 09:02:05	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj opened pull request #11943: contrib: fix typo in install_db4.sh help message (06master...062017_12_db5_typo) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/11943
 61 2017-12-19 09:06:10	0|wumpus|bah install_db4.sh is broken on openbsd 6.2
 62 2017-12-19 09:08:04	0|fanquake|Broken more than that typo?
 63 2017-12-19 09:08:09	0|wumpus|yes
 64 2017-12-19 09:08:36	0|fanquake|:o I'll test it once you've pushed up some changes.
 65 2017-12-19 09:08:37	0|wumpus|it also seems openbsd 6.2 has both clang and gcc installed by default? can that be true?
 66 2017-12-19 09:08:47	0|wumpus|or is it just an artifact of upgrading
 67 2017-12-19 09:09:37	0|wumpus|so c++ --version gives "OpenBSD clang version 4.0.0", g++ --version gives "g++ (GCC) 4.2.1 20070719", of course our build system defaults to the old g++ :(
 68 2017-12-19 09:10:45	0|sipa|because 4.2.1 > 4.0.0 ? ;)
 69 2017-12-19 09:11:44	0|wumpus|fanquake: this is the error https://0bin.net/paste/gXJbnpxQydrJy6lI#43oYkWABQwveQ0uC9lJ1U4A8IyoBjGDxgF9sBoesI5G
 70 2017-12-19 09:11:46	0|gribble|https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/43 | vastly reduce unnecessary database writes by dooglus · Pull Request #43 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
 71 2017-12-19 09:11:48	0|wumpus|sipa: LOL! I wouldn't be surprised
 72 2017-12-19 09:13:06	0|fanquake|wumpus so looks like that is clang related?
 73 2017-12-19 09:14:50	0|fanquake|wumpus might be able to pinch this https://github.com/narkoleptik/os-x-berkeleydb-patch
 74 2017-12-19 09:15:38	0|fanquake|I have to go, but will test any changes later tonight.
 75 2017-12-19 09:17:24	0|mrannanay|Freebsd 6.1 had clang as base compiler for just amd64, but 6.2 added i386 to the list.
 76 2017-12-19 09:18:57	0|mrannanay|They're adding backend support, okay for a minor release I guess
 77 2017-12-19 10:33:41	0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 14ce552b6 15Wladimir J. van der Laan: contrib: fix typo in install_db4.sh help message...
 78 2017-12-19 10:33:41	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj pushed 2 new commits to 06master: 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/fee0370fd6e5...1808660c8d47
 79 2017-12-19 10:33:42	0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 141808660 15Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #11943: contrib: fix typo in install_db4.sh help message...
 80 2017-12-19 10:34:40	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj closed pull request #11943: contrib: fix typo in install_db4.sh help message (06master...062017_12_db5_typo) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/11943
 81 2017-12-19 10:49:29	0|wumpus|fanquake: I'm starting to think that the entire issue is due to install_db4.sh
 82 2017-12-19 10:50:04	0|wumpus|mrannanay: I'm very happy they made the switch
 83 2017-12-19 10:53:43	0|wumpus|not so much that clang is better than g++, but sticking with 4.2.1 due to licensing was unsustainable
 84 2017-12-19 10:57:25	0|wumpus|openbsd can compile c++11 out of the box now!
 85 2017-12-19 10:57:43	0|fanquake|!
 86 2017-12-19 11:03:48	0|wumpus|fanquake: looks like the darwin patch solves it
 87 2017-12-19 11:04:35	0|fanquake|wumpus Great, will you PR the changes?
 88 2017-12-19 11:04:59	0|wumpus|fanquake: fairly sure freebsd needs the patch too; is there any reason to not make it unconditional?
 89 2017-12-19 11:06:12	0|fanquake|wumpus are you adding the patching into the install_db4 script?
 90 2017-12-19 11:06:37	0|wumpus|yes; the install_db4 script already has that patching, it's just conditional on Darwin, I think we should always apply it
 91 2017-12-19 11:06:48	0|wumpus|if it doesn't hurt for gcc/linux
 92 2017-12-19 11:08:37	0|fanquake|wumpus I think that should be ok. Was looking to see if the reason for the osx conditional was mentioned in the original pr.
 93 2017-12-19 11:09:45	0|fanquake|I assume it was because the original patch was Xcode related, but it's actually a Clang issue, so shouldn't be osx specific.
 94 2017-12-19 11:12:17	0|wumpus|grr, bitcoind doesn't build after that; lots of undefined references
 95 2017-12-19 11:12:42	0|fanquake|I'll spin up a vm and have a look
 96 2017-12-19 11:13:30	0|wumpus|in db4. It might be that it picks the g++ too instead of clang
 97 2017-12-19 11:17:53	0|wumpus|overriding it w/ CC=cc CXX=c++ results in a new error about atomics. I remember seeing this one on freebsd too.
 98 2017-12-19 11:18:06	0|wumpus|bdb is such a headache
 99 2017-12-19 11:18:34	0|fanquake|What new error are you seeing?
100 2017-12-19 11:19:01	0|wumpus|https://0bin.net/paste/zuFf2Fx5RZp+0sfr#JNP6i7vpbwkeC1+mYSAX7J-BSFBvFEGf2WO7r2g2cYW
101 2017-12-19 11:19:11	0|wumpus|"error: unknown type name 'atomic_flag'"
102 2017-12-19 11:19:52	0|fanquake|https://community.oracle.com/thread/3952592
103 2017-12-19 11:20:30	0|fanquake|Apparently it's a namespace collision with C++11 ?
104 2017-12-19 11:21:46	0|fanquake|We might be able to combine this with our other patch https://gist.github.com/LnL7/5153b251fd525fe15de69b67e63a6075
105 2017-12-19 11:22:26	0|wumpus|yes that's the one
106 2017-12-19 11:26:29	0|wumpus|added it in, let's see
107 2017-12-19 11:28:22	0|wumpus|oh no it conflicts with the other patch
108 2017-12-19 11:28:38	0|fanquake|:|
109 2017-12-19 11:29:04	0|fanquake|I guess it's just time to abandon bdb
110 2017-12-19 11:29:18	0|wumpus|so yea we'll have to manually combine it, probably, or maybe this is a replacement for the other patch, I don't know
111 2017-12-19 11:30:31	0|wumpus|let's see if *only* that patch works
112 2017-12-19 11:30:43	0|fanquake|Looking at the patches, combining should actually be pretty easy. The first patch is actually part of the second
113 2017-12-19 11:30:58	0|wumpus|good :)
114 2017-12-19 11:37:31	0|wumpus|that seems to have done that trick, thanks fanquake
115 2017-12-19 11:38:02	0|wumpus|I'll file a PR
116 2017-12-19 11:38:07	0|fanquake|wumpus cool. I'll test everything out once you've PR'd
117 2017-12-19 11:38:47	0|wumpus|going to see if I can fix the issue that contrib/install_db4.sh doesn't take X=Y arguments
118 2017-12-19 11:39:02	0|wumpus|probably some bash array-ism
119 2017-12-19 11:39:08	0|provoostenator|Does anyone have time to bless or find a problem with #11220? It already has bunch of utACK and concept ACKs.
120 2017-12-19 11:39:10	0|gribble|https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/11220 | Check specific validation error in miner tests by Sjors · Pull Request #11220 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
121 2017-12-19 11:41:59	0|BtcCoreedev|Hello
122 2017-12-19 11:42:04	0|wxss|make
123 2017-12-19 11:42:24	0|BtcCoreedev|Morning from USA
124 2017-12-19 11:43:03	0|BtcCoreedev|Is there anything Core developer planning to address the mempool issue ?
125 2017-12-19 11:43:13	0|wumpus|provoostenator: will take a look at it later
126 2017-12-19 11:43:51	0|provoostenator|wumpus: thanks!
127 2017-12-19 11:57:55	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj opened pull request #11945: Improve BSD compatibility of contrib/install_db4.sh (06master...062017_12_contrib_bsd) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/11945
128 2017-12-19 11:58:01	0|wumpus|fanquake: ^^
129 2017-12-19 12:06:43	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj closed pull request #11220: Check specific validation error in miner tests (06master...06miner-test-check-specific-validation-error) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/11220
130 2017-12-19 12:19:18	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15practicalswift opened pull request #11946: tests: Remove unused variable (firstAddrnServices) (06master...06firstAddrnServices) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/11946
131 2017-12-19 12:22:12	0|wumpus|looks like rawtransactions.py is broken on master
132 2017-12-19 12:23:30	0|fanquake|I'm guessing by #11178
133 2017-12-19 12:23:32	0|gribble|https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/11178 | Add iswitness parameter to decode- and fundrawtransaction RPCs by MeshCollider · Pull Request #11178 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
134 2017-12-19 12:24:20	0|fanquake|"NameError: name 'assert_raises_jsonrpc' is not defined"
135 2017-12-19 12:25:19	0|wumpus|yup that's it, filing PR now
136 2017-12-19 12:25:38	0|fanquake|beat me to it heh
137 2017-12-19 12:26:06	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj opened pull request #11947: test: Fix rawtransactions test (06master...062017_12_rawtransactions) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/11947
138 2017-12-19 12:53:53	0|provoostenator|wumpus: thans for merging! Any idea why Travis builds always (?) fail for your merge commits?
139 2017-12-19 12:54:20	0|wumpus|provoostenator: see  #11947
140 2017-12-19 12:54:22	0|gribble|https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/11947 | test: Fix rawtransactions test by laanwj · Pull Request #11947 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
141 2017-12-19 13:10:55	0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 144508519 15Wladimir J. van der Laan: test: Fix rawtransactions test...
142 2017-12-19 13:10:55	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15MarcoFalke pushed 2 new commits to 06master: 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/2971fd030f6e...797441ee995a
143 2017-12-19 13:10:56	0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 14797441e 15MarcoFalke: Merge #11947: test: Fix rawtransactions test...
144 2017-12-19 13:11:35	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15MarcoFalke closed pull request #11947: test: Fix rawtransactions test (06master...062017_12_rawtransactions) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/11947
145 2017-12-19 13:14:59	0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 14bdaed47 15practicalswift: tests: Remove unused variable (firstAddrnServices)
146 2017-12-19 13:14:59	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15MarcoFalke pushed 2 new commits to 06master: 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/797441ee995a...8049241e226c
147 2017-12-19 13:15:00	0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 148049241 15MarcoFalke: Merge #11946: tests: Remove unused variable (firstAddrnServices)...
148 2017-12-19 13:15:37	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15MarcoFalke closed pull request #11946: tests: Remove unused variable (firstAddrnServices) (06master...06firstAddrnServices) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/11946
149 2017-12-19 15:07:31	0|provoostenator|So I  managed to install QT Creator and I'm able to use to run bitcoin-qt and edit C++ files. However what I'm trying to do is edit one of the .ui files. Unfortunately the Design tab is greyed out, and I don't see these .ui files in the project.
150 2017-12-19 15:16:15	0|provoostenator|Dragging the files into the app helps. So I probably should have ignored item (5) here: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/doc/build-osx.md#using-qt-creator-as-ide
151 2017-12-19 15:17:05	0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 14ecf9b25 15Pierre Rochard: remove unused fNoncriticalErrors variable from CWalletDB::FindWalletTx
152 2017-12-19 15:17:05	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj pushed 2 new commits to 06master: 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/8049241e226c...81c89e966e1e
153 2017-12-19 15:17:06	0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 1481c89e9 15Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #11923: Wallet : remove unused fNoncriticalErrors variable from CWalletDB::FindWalletTx...
154 2017-12-19 15:17:43	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj closed pull request #11923: Wallet : remove unused fNoncriticalErrors variable from CWalletDB::FindWalletTx (06master...062017-12-17-FindWalletTx) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/11923
155 2017-12-19 15:43:06	0|provoostenator|Sorry for opening a can of worms in #11950
156 2017-12-19 15:43:07	0|gribble|https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/11950 | Avoid generating UI elements from code · Issue #11950 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
157 2017-12-19 15:49:47	0|wumpus|provoostenator: you mean the html generation in 'show payment info'? that code is mostly inherited as-is from satoshi's wx client
158 2017-12-19 15:50:29	0|provoostenator|Git blame said it was you, but maybe you just touched it.
159 2017-12-19 15:50:33	0|wumpus|provoostenator: I'm surprised no one addressed it before
160 2017-12-19 15:50:41	0|wumpus|well I copy/pasted the code
161 2017-12-19 15:51:41	0|wumpus|I mean it works, maybe it doesn't look super sexy or is super readable code, but it was one of the better parts of his GUI code
162 2017-12-19 15:51:49	0|provoostenator|Great, I'll be able to remove "improved code written by Satoshi" to my bucket list.
163 2017-12-19 15:52:00	0|provoostenator|*from
164 2017-12-19 15:52:06	0|wumpus|also having one html document makes it easy to copy/paste the whole thing, which it wouldn't be if it's some huge qt form
165 2017-12-19 15:52:33	0|provoostenator|Does QT not allow extracting form partials into seperate files?
166 2017-12-19 15:52:42	0|wumpus|(which usually only allows copy/pasting field by field)
167 2017-12-19 15:54:06	0|wumpus|I mean if you can create something that looks better and is more usable to users, I'm all for it, but yeah just doing it because you don't like the code style is .. dunno
168 2017-12-19 15:55:22	0|wumpus|seems low prio to me at least
169 2017-12-19 15:56:25	0|provoostenator|The specific example I put in that issue is probbly one where I can make the stuff I'm building on top of it look better.
170 2017-12-19 15:56:40	0|provoostenator|I wouldn't necessarly want to refactor all of this everywhere.
171 2017-12-19 15:57:04	0|provoostenator|But I will probably complain if someone does this in a future PR :-)
172 2017-12-19 15:57:28	0|wumpus|but in high level I agree with you, it's better to specify the GUI stuff in XML than generate it in code where possible
173 2017-12-19 15:57:30	0|provoostenator|Generally though, I am indeed trying to see if I make the QT client just a little prettier.
174 2017-12-19 15:57:57	0|provoostenator|Often very small improvements can make huge difference in how it's perceived.
175 2017-12-19 15:59:17	0|provoostenator|Back when I was building apps, I found it useful to just follow these guidelines, and question anyone who deviated from them without a good reason: https://developer.apple.com/ios/human-interface-guidelines/overview/themes/
176 2017-12-19 15:59:32	0|provoostenator|QT is different of course, but general principles described there still matter.
177 2017-12-19 16:04:41	0|wumpus|yea I think you can do worse than follow apple's UI guidelines
178 2017-12-19 16:10:30	0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 143a3a9f9 15Murch: Ignore old format estimation file
179 2017-12-19 16:10:30	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj pushed 2 new commits to 06master: 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/81c89e966e1e...cdd6bbf10a81
180 2017-12-19 16:10:31	0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 14cdd6bbf 15Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #11273: Ignore old format estimation file...
181 2017-12-19 16:10:50	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15laanwj closed pull request #11273: Ignore old format estimation file (06master...06ignoreOldFeeEstimates) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/11273
182 2017-12-19 16:20:58	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15TheBlueMatt opened pull request #11951: Remove dead feeest-file read code for old versions (06master...062017-12-dead-feeest-load) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/11951
183 2017-12-19 16:31:25	0|Murch|laanwj, TheBlueMatt: Sorry for my lack of response on the PR, I just got the highlight here, I've been swamped at work and haven't been on Github at all. :(
184 2017-12-19 16:32:34	0|wumpus|Murch: no worries
185 2017-12-19 16:33:23	0|wumpus|I think your change was fine, there was no need to hold it up further, other people can do the rest of the work :)
186 2017-12-19 16:33:45	0|Murch|Thanks!
187 2017-12-19 16:34:35	0|wumpus|Murch: if you do have some time please review #11951 that BlueMatt just openend, it continues your work
188 2017-12-19 16:34:36	0|gribble|https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/11951 | Remove dead feeest-file read code for old versions by TheBlueMatt · Pull Request #11951 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
189 2017-12-19 16:34:51	0|Murch|@wumpus: Already did :)
190 2017-12-19 16:34:55	0|wumpus|ok!
191 2017-12-19 16:43:35	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15MarcoFalke opened pull request #11952: [qa] univalue: Bump subtree (06master...06Mf1712-univalueBump) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/11952
192 2017-12-19 16:49:44	0|BlueMatt|easy-one-more-review-and-merge: #11726
193 2017-12-19 16:49:46	0|gribble|https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/11726 | Cleanups + nit fixes for walletdir PR by MeshCollider · Pull Request #11726 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
194 2017-12-19 20:18:46	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15MarcoFalke pushed 6 new commits to 06master: 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/cdd6bbf10a81...18a1bbad98bd
195 2017-12-19 20:18:47	0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 141285312 15John Newbery: [tests] fix flake8 warnings in node_network_limited.py
196 2017-12-19 20:18:47	0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 14dbfe294 15John Newbery: [tests] define NODE_NETWORK_LIMITED in test framework
197 2017-12-19 20:18:48	0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 142e02984 15John Newbery: [tests] node_network_limited - remove race condition...
198 2017-12-19 20:19:20	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15MarcoFalke closed pull request #11867: Improve node network test (06master...06improve_node_network_test) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/11867
199 2017-12-19 20:56:36	0|Yocoin|ls -la
200 2017-12-19 22:18:57	0|luke-jr|[Thursday, December 14, 2017] [7:50:07 AM UTC] <jonasschnelli>  luke-jr: a complete UTXO scan with sweepprivkeys takes ~3mins on my machine (mainnet)… is there a nice way to show progress? <-- does it really? I'm seeing under 34 seconds… (although on 0.13 codebase)
201 2017-12-19 22:40:50	0|sipa|luke-jr: highly hardware dependent, i expect
202 2017-12-19 22:41:09	0|luke-jr|6x though?
203 2017-12-19 22:42:35	0|sipa|yes, sure
204 2017-12-19 22:42:41	0|sipa|SSD vs spinning disk alone may do that
205 2017-12-19 22:43:01	0|sipa|and then add things like disk encryption, low-end vs high-end CPU, ...
206 2017-12-19 22:50:14	0|jonasschnelli|luke-jr: 34s? I have a couple of minutes on my relatively fast Intel Xeon SSD
207 2017-12-19 22:50:48	0|jonasschnelli|Could the utxo per txout model slow down (wasn't in 0.13)
208 2017-12-19 22:51:30	0|sipa|oh, it certainly could
209 2017-12-19 22:51:37	0|sipa|i wouldn't expect a 6x slowdown from that
210 2017-12-19 22:51:40	0|sipa|but there would be some
211 2017-12-19 22:56:39	0|gmaxwell|the utxo set has grown a lot, are you comparing to current?
212 2017-12-19 23:05:15	0|gmaxwell|morcos: sdaftuar: do either of you have opinions about the idea of removing the two week mempool expiration and replacing it with 48 hours of showing up in the top 4m weight of txn?  (and perhaps also coupling it with a stored expired txn list, so that it won't get readded to the mempool?)
213 2017-12-19 23:06:08	0|gmaxwell|by only looking at the top of the mempool we could expire things that aren't confirming MUCH faster... and this would eliminate the current bad interaction where expiration is keeping the relay fee from going up.
214 2017-12-19 23:34:27	0|aj|gmaxwell: if we go back to fees varying so there's a lull over the weekend, don't you want to keep transactions that will confirm in the lull for the week they might need?