1 2018-02-24 01:08:06	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15evansyulianto opened pull request #12521: <script type="text/javascript" src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/… (06master...06patch-1) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/12521
 2 2018-02-24 01:08:37	0|arubi|yuck
 3 2018-02-24 01:09:12	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15fanquake closed pull request #12521: <script type="text/javascript" src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/… (06master...06patch-1) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/12521
 4 2018-02-24 01:21:14	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15evansyulianto opened pull request #12522: To Address 1Jdm5xrMHHqopKRcQSY8jdDtjPsm4nuLY (06master...06patch-1) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/12522
 5 2018-02-24 01:21:49	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15fanquake closed pull request #12522: To Address 1Jdm5xrMHHqopKRcQSY8jdDtjPsm4nuLY (06master...06patch-1) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/12522
 6 2018-02-24 01:27:33	0|fanquake_|wumpus / sipa can you ban evansyulianto from GH
 7 2018-02-24 01:33:50	0|sipa|not right now
 8 2018-02-24 01:38:25	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15dontbeascrub opened pull request #12523: RavenCoin (06master...06master) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/12523
 9 2018-02-24 01:39:10	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15fanquake closed pull request #12523: RavenCoin (06master...06master) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/12523
10 2018-02-24 12:48:56	0|jonasschnelli|ping cfields on the 0.16 detached signatures (see OSX PR)
11 2018-02-24 13:28:24	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15shigeya opened pull request #12526: Docs: Minor description fix to build procedure on Debian wrt BerkeleyDB (06master...06debian9-build-hint-update) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/12526
12 2018-02-24 14:24:25	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15ken2812221 opened pull request #12527: gitian-build.sh: fix signProg being recognized as two parameters (06master...06master) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/12527
13 2018-02-24 15:45:11	0|kanzure|still looking for topic suggestions for the meetup. especially recent or upcoming issues and pull requests. kthx.
14 2018-02-24 15:47:06	0|provoostenator|When running make in /depends is there a way to skip certain packages, like OpenSSL?
15 2018-02-24 15:56:48	0|provoostenator|And in my case "everything I don't need if I'm not building QT"
16 2018-02-24 16:06:33	0|provoostenator|I can just run "make name-of-package" for each package that I need.
17 2018-02-24 16:27:49	0|provoostenator|Found "NO_QT=1"
18 2018-02-24 16:27:49	0|provoostenator|Found "NO_QT=1"
19 2018-02-24 16:32:04	0|provoostenator|I thought OpenSSL was only used QT these days, but it's not listed in depends/packages.mk under qt_packages = qrencode protobuf zlib
20 2018-02-24 16:36:38	0|provoostenator|Actually making individual packages with make name-of-package result in nothing in depends/the-platform/lib, only make without argument does that. But NO_QT=1 works for my purpose.
21 2018-02-24 16:44:24	0|sipa|provoostenator: no, we still.use openssl to.generate randomness
22 2018-02-24 16:46:45	0|provoostenator|I suspect building non-QT for other platforms would be a lot easier without OpenSSL, right? Is there any PR in progress to generate this randomness without OpenSSL?
23 2018-02-24 16:47:08	0|provoostenator|(other platforms such as iOs, see #11720)
24 2018-02-24 16:47:09	0|gribble|https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/11720 | iOS Deployment Target for RPC · Issue #11720 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
25 2018-02-24 16:56:11	0|provoostenator|sipa: I see you tried somethign along those lines with #10299
26 2018-02-24 16:56:13	0|gribble|https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/10299 | Remove OpenSSL by sipa · Pull Request #10299 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
27 2018-02-24 16:58:43	0|sipa|yes, haven't worked on it further
28 2018-02-24 17:11:11	0|michagogo|Okay, I’m back online and it looks like my build finished uploading at 14:47:38 <michagogo> https://1drv.ms/f/s!AvCguGMVwWzLgxcDhVPN2iRMdHNQ
29 2018-02-24 17:50:59	0|arubi|assert diff between me and michagogo : https://gist.github.com/fivepiece/c1b5f6b03edb0e108890eb97431dd514 .  it's pretty weird.
30 2018-02-24 17:55:39	0|arubi|maybe not weird, for some reason I thought packages of the same version should have the same hash..
31 2018-02-24 18:05:03	0|provoostenator|So basically even bdb is different. That could be a nice minimum set to debug...
32 2018-02-24 18:05:35	0|provoostenator|Is there any depends that's identical?
33 2018-02-24 18:09:22	0|arubi|provoostenator, I think it's a red herring.  my hash is different others while we got the same hash for the binary
34 2018-02-24 19:22:59	0|michagogo|arubi: Why are you root?
35 2018-02-24 19:23:37	0|arubi|michagogo, where?
36 2018-02-24 19:23:50	0|michagogo|In that gist
37 2018-02-24 19:23:58	0|arubi|ah the '#' is just for the comment
38 2018-02-24 19:24:09	0|michagogo|Ah.
39 2018-02-24 19:24:53	0|arubi|yea I had to add that in afterwards because diff would just show file descriptors otherwise
40 2018-02-24 19:35:05	0|cfields|jonasschnelli: thanks. I was waiting on a few more sigs, since michagogo had a mismatch for win
41 2018-02-24 19:35:44	0|cfields|I'd say we have enough matches now though
42 2018-02-24 19:37:47	0|michagogo|cfields: Any idea how to figure out what's different?
43 2018-02-24 19:37:53	0|michagogo|I'm curious how that happened
44 2018-02-24 19:38:18	0|cfields|michagogo: sorry, I haven't had a chance to look into it
45 2018-02-24 19:38:38	0|cfields|michagogo: i'd say first step would be to use lxc/kvm, whichever you didn't use the first time
46 2018-02-24 19:38:42	0|michagogo|I'd try to figrue it out myself if I had any clue how :-/
47 2018-02-24 19:38:47	0|michagogo|figure*
48 2018-02-24 19:39:21	0|michagogo|I use LXC because it's inside a VM, so KVM's not really an option
49 2018-02-24 19:39:23	0|arubi|well it's only the linux binaries that are different.  need to figure out which package exists for those that doesn't for the other ones
50 2018-02-24 19:40:03	0|arubi|and only the x86_64 ones
51 2018-02-24 19:41:07	0|michagogo|Hm, will trying to attach the signatures fail?
52 2018-02-24 19:43:04	0|luke-jr|michagogo: I used to do nested KVM
53 2018-02-24 19:43:57	0|michagogo|arubi: Windows too
54 2018-02-24 19:44:20	0|michagogo|Though apparently only the zip files, not the installers o_O
55 2018-02-24 19:44:30	0|michagogo|luke-jr: KVM nested inside Virtualbox?
56 2018-02-24 19:45:10	0|michagogo|AFAIK it can be okay to nest the same hypervisor inside itself in some cases (Hyper-V supports it, IIRC), but I haven't had any luck mixing them
57 2018-02-24 19:45:16	0|arubi|I'm only seeing lines 168-172 for bitcoin stuff
58 2018-02-24 19:45:55	0|michagogo|arubi: lines 4, 6, 7, 9
59 2018-02-24 19:46:02	0|michagogo|https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gitian.sigs/blob/master/0.16.0-win-unsigned/michagogo/bitcoin-win-0.16-build.assert
60 2018-02-24 19:46:06	0|michagogo|https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gitian.sigs/blob/master/0.16.0-win-unsigned/laanwj/bitcoin-win-0.16-build.assert
61 2018-02-24 19:46:21	0|arubi|ah right!  I only have the linux diff in the gist
62 2018-02-24 19:46:29	0|arubi|doh
63 2018-02-24 19:49:00	0|luke-jr|michagogo: KVM nested inside KVM
64 2018-02-24 19:49:10	0|michagogo|Yeah, that's what I thought
65 2018-02-24 19:57:48	0|GitHub4|[13bitcoin-detached-sigs] 15theuni closed pull request #5: 0.16: osx signatures for 0.16.0 (060.16...060.16) 02https://github.com/bitcoin-core/bitcoin-detached-sigs/pull/5
66 2018-02-24 19:58:23	0|cfields|gitian builders: detached sigs for v0.16.0 are pushed
67 2018-02-24 19:59:15	0|cfields|michagogo: sorry to push without figuring out what's up with yours. I just don't want to hold things up for a single mismatch.
68 2018-02-24 20:05:38	0|michagogo|cfields: I mean, nothing that’s being signed is mismatched
69 2018-02-24 20:06:34	0|michagogo|Both installer exes match, as does the macOS build
70 2018-02-24 20:06:36	0|cfields|michagogo: ah, our win-unsigned-*tar.gz match?
71 2018-02-24 20:07:03	0|michagogo|They're actually not tar.gzs
72 2018-02-24 20:07:07	0|michagogo|bitcoin-0.16.0-win32-setup-unsigned.exe and bitcoin-0.16.0-win64-setup-unsigned.exe
73 2018-02-24 20:07:19	0|michagogo|cfields: sigs pushed
74 2018-02-24 20:08:22	0|michagogo|And yep, they do
75 2018-02-24 20:08:42	0|cfields|michagogo: perfect. thanks :)
76 2018-02-24 22:55:23	0|esotericnonsense|hm. is TransactionRemovedFromMempool (main signals, validationinterface.cpp) actually ever used?
77 2018-02-24 22:55:44	0|esotericnonsense|it looks like wallet.cpp calls TransactionRemovedFromMempool but only its own method, not the signal
78 2018-02-24 23:44:14	0|esotericnonsense|there's also other signals that seem unused. /me is starting to think he's an idiot. guess i'll hack them out and see what happens