1 2018-03-03 04:04:24	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15fanquake opened pull request #12585: [0.16] depends: Switch to downloading expat from GitHub (060.16...060-16-expat) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/12585
 2 2018-03-03 04:37:53	0|dongcarl|arubi: I looked at landley's mkroot. Seems fantastic actually.
 3 2018-03-03 04:38:55	0|dongcarl|Instead of (Host (Debian VM (Ubuntu LXC))) it's possible to do (Host (mkroot QEMU (mkroot chroot)))
 4 2018-03-03 04:42:31	0|dongcarl|And he seems really competent with this stuff as he did Aboriginal Linux and now toybox
 5 2018-03-03 04:49:33	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15fanquake opened pull request #12586: docs: Update osx brew install instruction (06master...06homebrew-python3-python) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/12586
 6 2018-03-03 05:16:47	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15jonasschnelli opened pull request #12587: Introduce g_wallet_manager, prepare for better dynamic wallet loading/unloading (06master...062018/03/dyn_wallet) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/12587
 7 2018-03-03 05:21:35	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15kosciej opened pull request #12588: Remove deprecated PyZMQ call from Python ZMQ example (06master...06zmq_example_fix) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/12588
 8 2018-03-03 07:05:14	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15crypt0rick opened pull request #12589: Block doc patch 1 (06master...06BlockDoc-patch-1) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/12589
 9 2018-03-03 07:11:40	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15fanquake closed pull request #12589: Block doc patch 1 (06master...06BlockDoc-patch-1) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/12589
10 2018-03-03 08:06:42	0|mmgen|Now that bech32 is supported, shouldn't the status of BIP173 be changed from 'Proposed' to 'Final'?
11 2018-03-03 08:29:41	0|mmgen|https://bitcoincore.org/en/segwit_wallet_dev/ still shows BIP173 as having 'Draft' status
12 2018-03-03 08:33:20	0|mmgen|and instructions for creating bech32 addr are missing there
13 2018-03-03 10:05:56	0|mmgen|i take back the last comment. there is Native Pay-to-Witness-Public-Key-Hash under 'Advanced designs'
14 2018-03-03 10:06:22	0|mmgen|however, the page needs a general update to reflect bech32 adoption
15 2018-03-03 10:24:47	0|arubi|dongcarl, right mkroot is really sweet.  I'm basically in the process of migrating away from debian to an mkroot native setup.  it seems so clean.  also good to hear that at least virtualbox works
16 2018-03-03 10:35:49	0|dongcarl|arubi: cool. What does your setup look like roughly? It'd be extremely nice to get canonical and its bloat out of the picture
17 2018-03-03 10:39:55	0|arubi|(continuing in #bitcoin-dev)
18 2018-03-03 13:26:19	0|mmgen|From BIP141: However, a scriptPubKey with OP_0 followed by a 41-byte non-zero data push will pass, since it is not considered to be a witness program
19 2018-03-03 13:26:37	0|mmgen|unless i'm missing something, this is a mistake
20 2018-03-03 13:26:57	0|mmgen|and OP_1 was intended
21 2018-03-03 13:39:25	0|arubi|mmgen, segwit scriptpubkeys are a maximum length of 42 bytes, where the first byte is the version, and the rest is the push of a witness program
22 2018-03-03 13:39:44	0|arubi|so that program is a maximum of 40 bytes.  41 bytes is not a valid witness program, so it's just a normal scriptpubkey
23 2018-03-03 14:02:34	0|mmgen|arubi: got it, thank you!
24 2018-03-03 14:02:46	0|arubi|np
25 2018-03-03 14:07:14	0|mmgen|yep, here's what i was missing: "A scriptPubKey ... that consists of a 1-byte push opcode (for 0 to 16) followed by a data push *between 2 and 40 bytes* gets a new special meaning."
26 2018-03-03 14:08:15	0|felco|Hi, were is the translation work is being done? I have submitted some changes in the past but I just forgot to bookmark the website
27 2018-03-03 14:08:43	0|mmgen|felco: i think it's transifex
28 2018-03-03 14:09:29	0|felco|mmgen Thanks!
29 2018-03-03 14:25:38	0|felco|I have corrected a line on the 0.15 release, it got fixed in the 0.15.1 but I see that in the 0.16 the same translation error come back
30 2018-03-03 14:26:18	0|felco|Lang: PT-br
31 2018-03-03 14:27:51	0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 14a9761ca 15Dimitris Apostolou: Fix typos and cleanup...
32 2018-03-03 14:27:51	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15MarcoFalke pushed 2 new commits to 06master: 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/90a0aed51194...ded6a2afa549
33 2018-03-03 14:27:52	0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 14ded6a2a 15MarcoFalke: Merge #12584: Fix typos and cleanup documentation...
34 2018-03-03 14:28:48	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15MarcoFalke closed pull request #12584: Fix typos and cleanup documentation (06master...06rex4539-documentation) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/12584
35 2018-03-03 14:30:29	0|kosta|Guys, I have a C++ related question... There is `src/uint256.cpp` file... Why do we need Explicit instantiations for base_blob<160> and base_blob<256>?
36 2018-03-03 14:31:01	0|kosta|I'm talking about the lines 69-81 if `master` branch...
37 2018-03-03 14:46:48	0|kosta|Guys, sorry for C++ 101 question. I found the answer. ))
38 2018-03-03 15:29:51	0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 146012f1c 15MarcoFalke: Merge #12582: Fix ListCoins test failure due to unset g_wallet_allow_fallback_fee...
39 2018-03-03 15:29:51	0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 147ba2d57 15Russell Yanofsky: Fix ListCoins test failure due to unset g_wallet_allow_fallback_fee...
40 2018-03-03 15:29:51	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15MarcoFalke pushed 2 new commits to 06master: 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/ded6a2afa549...6012f1caf744
41 2018-03-03 15:30:44	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15MarcoFalke closed pull request #12582: Fix ListCoins test failure due to unset g_wallet_allow_fallback_fee (06master...06pr/listg2) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/12582
42 2018-03-03 16:40:19	0|nman999|has anyone installed Berkeley DB on Debian Stretch using contrib/install_db4.sh ?
43 2018-03-03 16:49:13	0|felco|In the "Verify Message" window you read this: "Be careful not to read more into the signature than what is in the signed message itself, to avoid being tricked by a man-in-the-middle attack." - Were it says "not to read more into the signature" should I understand that it is saying to me to be careful to inclune anything besides what is in the signed message, right?
44 2018-03-03 16:50:10	0|felco|Sorry - "to be careful *to not include* anything besides what is in the signed message, right?"
45 2018-03-03 17:07:08	0|luke-jr|felco: no
46 2018-03-03 17:07:37	0|luke-jr|felco: it means the signature proves only one thing: that the message came from the same person who will receive funds sent to that address
47 2018-03-03 17:08:12	0|luke-jr|felco: in particular, it does not imply the person owns any number of bitcoins at the present; or that the person will uphold their word
48 2018-03-03 17:08:48	0|luke-jr|it also does not imply the person owns the private key backing the address in question
49 2018-03-03 17:21:13	0|felco|luke-jr Thanks!
50 2018-03-03 18:28:27	0|esotericnonsense|luke-jr: it doesn't prove that the message came from the person who will receive the funds either?
51 2018-03-03 18:30:02	0|esotericnonsense|well. that they are the originator of the message anyway. i suppose they are signing off on it.
52 2018-03-03 18:37:19	0|luke-jr|esotericnonsense: it does prove that, that's my point
53 2018-03-03 20:21:30	0|luke-jr|is it just me, or has the "Inputs:" part of the GUI transaction details been broken for confirmed transactions ever since ultraprune? :x
54 2018-03-03 20:25:38	0|luke-jr|(maybe for the best, since it seems to be confusing addresses for inputs!)
55 2018-03-03 21:05:02	0|felco|Reviewed the whole ptBR translation and found lots of errors, corrected all of them, now it needs review! =)
56 2018-03-03 21:18:19	0|luke-jr|felco: on Transifex?
57 2018-03-03 21:18:30	0|felco|luke-jr Yes
58 2018-03-03 21:18:51	0|luke-jr|thanks