1 2018-05-05 00:07:24	0|phantomcircuit|ossifrage, it should be substantially cheaper
 2 2018-05-05 00:08:46	0|ossifrage|phantomcircuit, thanks, I remember the initial txindex build being painful thanks to depressingly slow spinning rust
 3 2018-05-05 00:09:08	0|phantomcircuit|rebuilding would have to go rescan the entire chain again
 4 2018-05-05 00:09:20	0|phantomcircuit|the upgrade is, iirc just reading the existing database and writting a new one
 5 2018-05-05 00:09:50	0|ossifrage|10% took ~21minutes
 6 2018-05-05 00:10:09	0|phantomcircuit|but i guess it might be rebuilding anyways?
 7 2018-05-05 00:10:11	0|phantomcircuit|no idea
 8 2018-05-05 00:11:44	0|ossifrage|One of the iothreads has already written 28GB (way more then any thread has read)
 9 2018-05-05 00:13:18	0|sipa|that's expected for leveldb
10 2018-05-05 00:16:35	0|phantomcircuit|sipa, is it reading the previous database and writting out, or reindexing?
11 2018-05-05 00:16:45	0|sipa|converting the previous db
12 2018-05-05 01:22:25	0|fanquake|wumpus nice speedup in #13151
13 2018-05-05 01:22:27	0|gribble|https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/13151 | net: Serve blocks directly from disk when possible by laanwj · Pull Request #13151 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
14 2018-05-05 01:22:43	0|fanquake|I'll try and recreate your results using bitcoincore-indexd
15 2018-05-05 02:48:57	0|ossifrage|Ouch, after a really long time running the txindex upgrade, I ran out of disk :-(
16 2018-05-05 03:43:51	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15ken2812221 opened pull request #13171: [WIP] Change gitian-descriptors to use bionic instead (06master...06gitian) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/13171
17 2018-05-05 04:29:31	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15OldMiR opened pull request #13172: Remove double MSG_DONTWAIT (06master...06master) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/13172
18 2018-05-05 08:20:13	0|jonasschnelli|2018-05-05T08:07:56Z Upgrading txindex database... [0%]
19 2018-05-05 08:20:13	0|jonasschnelli|2018-05-05T08:15:04Z Upgrading txindex database... [10%]
20 2018-05-05 08:20:38	0|jonasschnelli|If we haven't, we probably should mention that in the release notes (that the upgrade is pretty slow)
21 2018-05-05 13:09:34	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15jnewbery closed pull request #10554: ZMQ: add publishers for wallet transactions. (06master...06zmq_wallet_tx) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10554
22 2018-05-05 14:21:22	0|pierre_rochard|I’ve added high priority for review to https://bitcoinacks.com/ it’s a little intrusive having them pinned at the top but, well, that’s the point!
23 2018-05-05 14:22:35	0|pierre_rochard|luke-jr: the filters are unintuitive so I’ve added an Open PRs button at the top as a shortcut, since that’s a popular set of filters. I looked into the horizontal scroll and the framework I’m using does too much magick for me to change its behavior
24 2018-05-05 14:34:23	0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 14cbba1d2 15practicalswift: Add compile time checking for all ::mempool.cs runtime locking assertions
25 2018-05-05 14:34:23	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15MarcoFalke pushed 2 new commits to 06master: 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/f82e1c948212...66cc47be982a
26 2018-05-05 14:34:24	0|bitcoin-git|13bitcoin/06master 1466cc47b 15MarcoFalke: Merge #13080: mempool: Add compile time checking for ::mempool.cs runtime locking assertions...
27 2018-05-05 14:35:19	0|bitcoin-git|[13bitcoin] 15MarcoFalke closed pull request #13080: mempool: Add compile time checking for ::mempool.cs runtime locking assertions (06master...06mempool.cs) 02https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/13080
28 2018-05-05 15:06:04	0|fanquake|pierre_rochard nice
29 2018-05-05 15:06:35	0|fanquake|pierre_rochard Looks like you are showing a lot more of the body text now? I think there might be a bit too much showing, as it ends up with quite tall rows.
30 2018-05-05 15:08:46	0|fanquake|i.e https://0bin.net/paste/OQbnisqm6+JxruVd#usS48X+UEn5ZIOBZUrbtTWfodm4avG9vrwDTInmvIWX
31 2018-05-05 15:12:22	0|pierre_rochard|fanquake: agree, I’m spoiled with a 4k monitor, I’m going to remove body from the list view for now because I don’t think a shorter preview would be useful, the full body will still be visible with the details modal (the eye button on the left)
32 2018-05-05 17:51:29	0|BlueMatt|sdaftuar: wait, huh? I'm missing context here
33 2018-05-05 17:52:26	0|BlueMatt|sdaftuar: generally, you should be able to register before any callbacks fire
34 2018-05-05 17:52:37	0|BlueMatt|and if you're registered before a calllback is generated, you're guaranteed to get it
35 2018-05-05 18:55:40	0|jamesob|is there any reason that LogPrintf et al live on as macros vs. being functions on BCLog::Logger?
36 2018-05-05 18:58:13	0|sipa|jamesob: yes, avoiding serialization overhead of its arguments when debug category is disabled
37 2018-05-05 18:58:32	0|jamesob|sipa: thanks, good to know