1 2011-03-30 00:01:17 FellowTraveler has quit (Quit: Leaving.)
   2 2011-03-30 00:03:00 st-17217 has joined
   3 2011-03-30 00:12:27 AnonX has quit (Quit: Page closed)
   4 2011-03-30 00:12:51 <jgarzik> a watched block never generates
   5 2011-03-30 00:14:05 * jgarzik hacks ArtForz' python client to work with the new 'shy client' behavior
   6 2011-03-30 00:14:48 rlifchitz has quit (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
   7 2011-03-30 00:14:48 rlifchitz has joined
   8 2011-03-30 00:15:36 <sipa> jgarzik: ?
   9 2011-03-30 00:16:26 <jgarzik> sipa: if I don't queue a version message, it just sits there
  10 2011-03-30 00:18:54 <toffoo> hi, does anybody have a pre-compiled/installable version of PyOpenCL for OSX?  Google didn't help me.  I want to try m0mchil's poclbm miner but don't have Xcode installed on this Mac to build the PyOpenCL tar it needs.
  11 2011-03-30 00:19:30 <jgarzik> recv msg_addr(addrs=[CAddress(nServices=5596411371 ip=0.0.255.255 port=54714)])
  12 2011-03-30 00:19:35 <jgarzik> weird address on the P2P network
  13 2011-03-30 00:23:43 Spenvo has quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
  14 2011-03-30 00:26:21 jackSmith has quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
  15 2011-03-30 00:28:01 SykeP has quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
  16 2011-03-30 00:31:20 redMBA has quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
  17 2011-03-30 00:34:33 <EPiSKiNG> ;;bc,calc 11000000
  18 2011-03-30 00:34:34 <gribble> The average time to generate a block at 11000000 Khps, given current difficulty of 68978.89245792 , is 7 hours, 28 minutes, and 52 seconds
  19 2011-03-30 00:37:52 <luke-jr> jgarzik: I wonder if it could be from my IPv6 branch malfunctioning?
  20 2011-03-30 00:40:38 * jgarzik pokes miners to generate a block.  Any miner.
  21 2011-03-30 00:41:01 <phantomcircuit> jgarzik, looks like a broadcast address
  22 2011-03-30 00:41:10 <luke-jr> phantomcircuit: erm, no it doesn't
  23 2011-03-30 00:41:18 <luke-jr> it's not even a valid broadcast address
  24 2011-03-30 00:43:02 <jgarzik> 40 minutes since last block.  Murphy /would/ pick now, when I'm testing software on mainnet, to wait a while for block generation.
  25 2011-03-30 00:43:34 <luke-jr> jgarzik: it seems to work that way when I'm waiting for blocks, at least
  26 2011-03-30 00:43:36 <BurtyB> heh, we're doomed
  27 2011-03-30 00:44:27 <phantomcircuit> cookies
  28 2011-03-30 00:45:00 <phantomcircuit> anyways sqlalchemy keeps exploding on my ordered transaction_input/outputs list
  29 2011-03-30 00:45:22 <EPiSKiNG> ;;bc,calc 1054859
  30 2011-03-30 00:45:24 <gribble> The average time to generate a block at 1054859 Khps, given current difficulty of 68978.89245792 , is 3 days, 6 hours, and 54 seconds
  31 2011-03-30 00:45:59 <phantomcircuit> WHERE transaction_outputs.position = ? AND transaction_outputs.transaction_hash IS NULL
  32 2011-03-30 00:45:59 <phantomcircuit> PRIMARY KEY (position, transaction_hash),
  33 2011-03-30 00:46:01 <phantomcircuit> facepalm
  34 2011-03-30 00:47:48 toffoo has quit ()
  35 2011-03-30 00:48:30 jasonphd has joined
  36 2011-03-30 00:48:42 <luke-jr> jgarzik: ya got 2
  37 2011-03-30 00:48:47 <jgarzik> yep
  38 2011-03-30 00:49:10 roconnor has joined
  39 2011-03-30 00:50:06 st-17217 has quit (Ping timeout: 264 seconds)
  40 2011-03-30 00:50:55 devon_hillard has quit (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
  41 2011-03-30 00:51:27 toffoo has joined
  42 2011-03-30 00:53:12 kelp has joined
  43 2011-03-30 00:53:13 <EPiSKiNG> ;;bc,calc 1257710
  44 2011-03-30 00:53:14 <gribble> The average time to generate a block at 1257710 Khps, given current difficulty of 68978.89245792 , is 2 days, 17 hours, 25 minutes, and 56 seconds
  45 2011-03-30 00:55:25 DrQ has joined
  46 2011-03-30 01:01:18 overtorque has joined
  47 2011-03-30 01:03:39 <jasonphd> jgarzik: the solution that is submitted to the pool server is one string of data that has all of this encoded within it? (int nVersion; uint256 hashPrevBlock; uint256 hashMerkleRoot; unsigned int nTime; unsigned int nBits; unsigned int nNonce;)
  48 2011-03-30 01:05:07 malfy has quit (Ping timeout: 260 seconds)
  49 2011-03-30 01:06:19 <jgarzik> jasonphd: plus some other bits, yes.  but those are the 80 bytes that matter.
  50 2011-03-30 01:06:55 jackSmith has joined
  51 2011-03-30 01:09:18 sneak has quit (Ping timeout: 264 seconds)
  52 2011-03-30 01:09:56 <jasonphd> are those items the first 80 characters of the string?
  53 2011-03-30 01:11:14 sneak has joined
  54 2011-03-30 01:11:40 sneak is now known as Guest96970
  55 2011-03-30 01:12:34 toffoo has quit ()
  56 2011-03-30 01:13:07 toffoo has joined
  57 2011-03-30 01:13:35 <jasonphd> jgarzik: are those items the first 80 characters of the string? if so, is there a sample function available that shows how to break it in to its component parts?
  58 2011-03-30 01:15:16 <EPiSKiNG> is it possible to have two different model video cards in one computer for mining?
  59 2011-03-30 01:15:17 da2ceZzzz has joined
  60 2011-03-30 01:15:22 <EPiSKiNG> in windows 7 x64
  61 2011-03-30 01:16:06 <phantomcircuit> oh wow
  62 2011-03-30 01:16:11 <phantomcircuit> no wonder this doesn't work
  63 2011-03-30 01:16:25 da2ceZzzz is now known as da2ce7
  64 2011-03-30 01:16:25 da2ce7 has quit (Changing host)
  65 2011-03-30 01:16:25 da2ce7 has joined
  66 2011-03-30 01:16:42 <phantomcircuit> with sqlalchemy if you have a back reference it doesn't populate until you've actually put it in the db
  67 2011-03-30 01:16:49 <phantomcircuit> which is too late for a merge
  68 2011-03-30 01:16:53 <phantomcircuit> god that's dumb
  69 2011-03-30 01:23:11 <EPiSKiNG> new catalyst drivers out today
  70 2011-03-30 01:23:26 <EPiSKiNG> wonder if they're any better for mining
  71 2011-03-30 01:26:39 <CIA-96> bitcoin: phantomcircuit <phantomcircuit@covertinferno.org> sqlite3 * radf0c71063c1 bitcoin-alt/bitcoin/ (peer.py storage.py): create statements and get_block/s
  72 2011-03-30 01:26:40 <CIA-96> bitcoin: phantomcircuit <phantomcircuit@covertinferno.org> sqlite3 * r36507ab30f31 bitcoin-alt/bitcoin/storage.py: get_blocks
  73 2011-03-30 01:32:51 osmosis has joined
  74 2011-03-30 01:34:13 mention has joined
  75 2011-03-30 01:43:56 <yebyen> nanotube: they are basically like testnet coins, but I don't know how testnet coins are incompatible with the regular net or each other... these are most certainly incompatible
  76 2011-03-30 01:44:24 <yebyen> nanotube: i set the block chain parameters to arbitrary settings myself
  77 2011-03-30 01:45:01 alex5771 has quit (Quit: alex5771)
  78 2011-03-30 01:45:10 <yebyen> and since i have a couple hundred thousand of them
  79 2011-03-30 01:45:27 <doublec> what do you use them for? testing?
  80 2011-03-30 01:46:22 <EPiSKiNG> does GPU RAM speed affect MH/s??
  81 2011-03-30 01:58:24 EPiSKiNG has quit ()
  82 2011-03-30 01:58:31 jackSmith has quit (Quit: Leaving)
  83 2011-03-30 01:58:47 sprash has joined
  84 2011-03-30 02:00:07 Stellar has joined
  85 2011-03-30 02:00:11 gasteve has quit (Quit: gasteve)
  86 2011-03-30 02:04:00 <jasonphd> anyone know how to break apart a given solution string in to its component parts?
  87 2011-03-30 02:05:15 <tcatm> what string?
  88 2011-03-30 02:08:05 <jasonphd> the data that is submitted by a miner to the pool as a solution
  89 2011-03-30 02:08:42 <dermoth> home!~thomas@169-79.162.dsl.aei.ca|isn't that defined in the api?
  90 2011-03-30 02:10:22 <dermoth> home!~thomas@169-79.162.dsl.aei.ca|Hey i've been testing cpuminer, and I get pretty strange performance results...
  91 2011-03-30 02:11:09 <dermoth> home!~thomas@169-79.162.dsl.aei.ca|On an old Xeon (pre EM64T), the best algo is 4way, followed by crypto
  92 2011-03-30 02:11:22 alex5771 has joined
  93 2011-03-30 02:11:24 <dermoth> home!~thomas@169-79.162.dsl.aei.ca|On an old Xeon (pre EM64T), the best algo is 4way, followed by crypto<fill-in-blank)-adm then the non-asm one
  94 2011-03-30 02:11:56 da2ce7 has quit ()
  95 2011-03-30 02:12:37 <dermoth> home!~thomas@169-79.162.dsl.aei.ca|then I went on ans tested on recent 64-bit Xeons, and strangely their best algorithms is the crypto-asm one from the 32-bit binaty compiled on the old xeon (-march=native)
  96 2011-03-30 02:14:22 alex5771 has quit (Client Quit)
  97 2011-03-30 02:14:26 <dermoth> home!~thomas@169-79.162.dsl.aei.ca|on the old xeon, 4way is twice as fast as the default, and the the c crypto is noticably faster and the asm is between 4way and the c crypto....  on the new xeon the default algo is the 2nd best, and the others are slightly slower
  98 2011-03-30 02:14:44 da2ce7 has joined
  99 2011-03-30 02:14:44 da2ce7 has quit (Changing host)
 100 2011-03-30 02:14:44 da2ce7 has joined
 101 2011-03-30 02:15:01 mention has quit (Quit: Leaving)
 102 2011-03-30 02:16:10 <tcatm> jasonphd: hexstring -> binary -> split into 32bit values
 103 2011-03-30 02:17:44 <lfm> dermoth|home: ya its startnge isnt it. all these x86 compatibles are different
 104 2011-03-30 02:18:24 <lfm> wow thats an odd way to type strange
 105 2011-03-30 02:18:28 <forrestv> luke-jr, thinking more about the running difficulty calculation, that makes the process memoryfull
 106 2011-03-30 02:18:40 <forrestv> if each period is separate, it's memoryless
 107 2011-03-30 02:18:50 <luke-jr> …
 108 2011-03-30 02:18:56 <forrestv> but it being memoryful might need to oscillations or something ...
 109 2011-03-30 02:19:22 <jasonphd> tcatm: thanks. do you know if the hex string is low nibble first or high nibble first?
 110 2011-03-30 02:19:50 <forrestv> …
 111 2011-03-30 02:20:25 <tcatm> jasonphd: high first
 112 2011-03-30 02:20:28 <forrestv> thoughts?
 113 2011-03-30 02:20:29 <tcatm> i.e. left
 114 2011-03-30 02:32:10 <forrestv> *memoryful, *lead. luke-jr, do you have any comment on that? >.<
 115 2011-03-30 02:40:04 <roconnor> @hoogle runPut
 116 2011-03-30 02:40:06 <roconnor> oops
 117 2011-03-30 02:41:51 blablaa has quit (Ping timeout: 250 seconds)
 118 2011-03-30 02:46:46 <roconnor> in which order are the bytes of a hash transmitted?
 119 2011-03-30 02:47:27 <tcatm> where?
 120 2011-03-30 02:48:05 <bd_> roconnor: Typically byte orders are specified in the hash function's specification
 121 2011-03-30 02:48:13 <roconnor> in say the fields of inv or block
 122 2011-03-30 02:48:13 <bd_> You can treat the resulting digest as a byte vector
 123 2011-03-30 02:49:03 <roconnor> the wiki gives an example where the double sha256 of "hello" is 9595c9df90075148eb06860365df33584b75bff782a510c6cd4883a419833d50
 124 2011-03-30 02:49:18 <roconnor> how would that has be transmitted if it were the hash of a block
 125 2011-03-30 02:49:26 <roconnor> in the inv hash field
 126 2011-03-30 02:49:36 <bd_> Read left to right :)
 127 2011-03-30 02:49:40 <roconnor> 95 first or 95 last?
 128 2011-03-30 02:49:55 <bd_> Note: If this example is in arabic text, you may need to read right to left.
 129 2011-03-30 02:50:21 <bd_> anyway - the sha256 hash spec specifies the byte order
 130 2011-03-30 02:50:38 <bd_> So you just need to perform the hash, then dump the resulting blob of bytes, in the same order the hash produced, into the message
 131 2011-03-30 02:52:12 * roconnor suspects bd_ is wrong but isn't sure
 132 2011-03-30 02:53:23 <tcatm> roconnor: >>> bitcoin.ser_uint256(0x9595c9df90075148eb06860365df33584b75bff782a510c6cd4883a419833d50).encode("hex")
 133 2011-03-30 02:53:27 <tcatm> '503d8319a48348cdc610a582f7bf754b5833df65038606eb48510790dfc99595'
 134 2011-03-30 02:53:32 <luke-jr> forrestv: I call it BS ☺
 135 2011-03-30 02:53:44 <roconnor> tcatm: thanks.  So it is reversed
 136 2011-03-30 02:54:21 <bd_> Hm? Wait, bitcoin reverses it? Seriously? :|
 137 2011-03-30 02:54:58 <bd_> lemme check the source here :)
 138 2011-03-30 02:55:01 <forrestv> ah, yay.
 139 2011-03-30 02:58:01 <bd_> The thing to watch out for is if converting a literal like that is how it packs the hash into the uint256 - instead of a memcpy or something... still trying to find where it does the conversion though
 140 2011-03-30 02:58:14 <roconnor> tcatm: some of my hashes are correct but reversed, which is kinda screwing with my head at the moment :D
 141 2011-03-30 02:58:14 <dermoth> home!~thomas@169-79.162.dsl.aei.ca|well even on my athlon 64 x2, 4way is slightly faster from the 32bit binary than from the 64bit one... but the difference is negligible, I suspect the optimisation happens outside the actual code (and I used aggressive compile-time optimizations (except for -O2) on the 32bit binary)
 142 2011-03-30 02:58:56 [Noodles] has quit (Quit: Miranda IM! Smaller, Faster, Easier. http://miranda-im.org)
 143 2011-03-30 02:59:54 eao has quit (Ping timeout: 246 seconds)
 144 2011-03-30 03:01:23 <bd_> roconnor, tcatm: util.h, Hash() - it's treating the uint256 as a raw byte buffer
 145 2011-03-30 03:01:26 * roconnor suspects that the byte order of hashes is getting messed up somewhere in the protocol
 146 2011-03-30 03:01:26 <bd_> so it's not reversed
 147 2011-03-30 03:01:42 <bd_> Your python example is inputting a numeric literal, which _does_ get reversed
 148 2011-03-30 03:02:15 <roconnor> oh
 149 2011-03-30 03:02:20 <roconnor> maybe bd_ is right
 150 2011-03-30 03:02:25 <dermoth> home!~thomas@169-79.162.dsl.aei.ca|and the 32-bit asm implementation is the closest one to the 4-way on my athlon 64... makes me wonder if an assembler version in 64bit could rival or even beat 4way on this cpu, which most likely doesn't benefit directly from 4way algo.
 151 2011-03-30 03:04:03 <jasonphd> tcatm: once i've packed/unpacked the solution data and have a 31 element array, how do i know which element belongs to which variable (int nVersion; uint256 hashPrevBlock; uint256 hashMerkleRoot; unsigned int nTime; unsigned int nBits; unsigned int nNonce;)?
 152 2011-03-30 03:06:39 <roconnor> bd_: okay, so the goal of mining is to get 0's at the end of the hash.
 153 2011-03-30 03:06:43 <tcatm> jasonphd: 32bit nVersion, 256bit hashPrevBlock, 256bit hashMerkleRoot, 32bit nTime, 32bit nBits and 32bit nNonce
 154 2011-03-30 03:07:26 <nanotube> yebyen: heh ic nice. :)
 155 2011-03-30 03:07:45 <bd_> roconnor: No, it's to get the value (as interpreted as a little-endian 256-bit integer) below a certain value
 156 2011-03-30 03:07:52 <bd_> er, to get the hash below it, rather
 157 2011-03-30 03:08:10 <roconnor> ah
 158 2011-03-30 03:08:12 <roconnor> okay
 159 2011-03-30 03:08:22 <roconnor> bd_: thanks
 160 2011-03-30 03:08:25 <roconnor> I'm sorry I doubted you
 161 2011-03-30 03:08:51 <bd_> don't worry about it, endian issues can be tricky :)
 162 2011-03-30 03:09:07 <bd_> If only intel had settled on big endian - the One True endianness... :|
 163 2011-03-30 03:10:08 noagendamarket has joined
 164 2011-03-30 03:11:31 * roconnor thinks his testnet coins have been "stolen" away from him :D
 165 2011-03-30 03:15:03 EPiSKiNG has joined
 166 2011-03-30 03:15:17 sprash has quit (Remote host closed the connection)
 167 2011-03-30 03:17:04 Teslah has quit (Ping timeout: 248 seconds)
 168 2011-03-30 03:18:25 Minert has joined
 169 2011-03-30 03:19:55 <JFK911> bd_: intel endian sux
 170 2011-03-30 03:25:28 <luke-jr> w00t endian warz!
 171 2011-03-30 03:29:06 Stellar has quit (Quit: Signed)
 172 2011-03-30 03:29:52 Stellar has joined
 173 2011-03-30 03:31:33 * roconnor decides to print out hashes in reverse order for display purposes
 174 2011-03-30 03:32:01 unping has quit (Quit: Leaving)
 175 2011-03-30 03:34:04 osmosis has quit (Quit: Ex-Chat)
 176 2011-03-30 03:35:18 sabalaba has quit (Quit: Leaving)
 177 2011-03-30 03:35:27 * roconnor 's code is upto 280 lines now
 178 2011-03-30 03:35:34 joepie92 has joined
 179 2011-03-30 03:35:48 MasterBob has joined
 180 2011-03-30 03:36:01 MasterBob has left ("Leaving")
 181 2011-03-30 03:37:37 joepie91 has quit (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
 182 2011-03-30 03:42:27 <dermoth> home!~thomas@169-79.162.dsl.aei.ca|hummm it would be nice if bitcoin could be started in a way it communicates with bitcoind.... so I could launch the daemon on boot, and the gui would let me control it
 183 2011-03-30 03:45:03 <tcatm> dermoth|home: try js-remote :)
 184 2011-03-30 03:45:17 Zenith77 has joined
 185 2011-03-30 03:48:31 ducki2p has quit (Remote host closed the connection)
 186 2011-03-30 03:48:31 x6763 has quit (Write error: Broken pipe)
 187 2011-03-30 03:48:31 echelon has quit (Write error: Broken pipe)
 188 2011-03-30 03:49:18 <dermoth> home!~thomas@169-79.162.dsl.aei.ca|tcatm, looks nice!
 189 2011-03-30 03:49:22 <luke-jr> dermoth|home: https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Wallet_protocol
 190 2011-03-30 03:49:23 <dermoth> home!~thomas@169-79.162.dsl.aei.ca|thanks
 191 2011-03-30 03:49:35 <luke-jr> tcatm: how do you actually run js-remote?
 192 2011-03-30 03:49:44 SykeP has joined
 193 2011-03-30 03:49:59 <dermoth> home!~thomas@169-79.162.dsl.aei.ca|luke-jr, looks like either within a webserver, or as a standalong webserver
 194 2011-03-30 03:50:05 <dermoth> home!~thomas@169-79.162.dsl.aei.ca|slandalone
 195 2011-03-30 03:51:32 <luke-jr> dermoth|home: does it show your history of transactions?
 196 2011-03-30 03:51:59 <tcatm> either via included SSLserver or using apache
 197 2011-03-30 03:52:21 <tcatm> or hack your browser/bitcoind to accept RPC directly without a proxy
 198 2011-03-30 03:52:51 echelon has joined
 199 2011-03-30 03:53:10 <luke-jr> tcatm: how do you maintain an up-to-date realtime display of transactions? or do you?
 200 2011-03-30 03:53:57 ducki2p has joined
 201 2011-03-30 03:54:00 <tcatm> Yep, js-remote tries to update the transactions as fast as possible without using too much bandwidth or PCU
 202 2011-03-30 03:54:32 <tcatm> the algorithm isn't perfect but works very well so far
 203 2011-03-30 03:55:09 <jasonphd> tcatm: does this look live i've calculated it correctly? http://codepad.org/JNHILdba
 204 2011-03-30 03:55:19 robotarmy has quit (Remote host closed the connection)
 205 2011-03-30 03:55:55 <tcatm> jasonphd: you should reverse both hashes
 206 2011-03-30 03:56:20 robotarmy has joined
 207 2011-03-30 03:56:20 <tcatm> at least when you display them
 208 2011-03-30 03:56:39 <jasonphd> you mean hashPrevBlock and hashMerkleRoot?
 209 2011-03-30 03:57:18 <tcatm> yep
 210 2011-03-30 03:57:25 robotarmy has quit (Remote host closed the connection)
 211 2011-03-30 03:57:44 <luke-jr> tcatm: so you too have a complex algorithm to poll listtransactions?
 212 2011-03-30 03:58:15 <luke-jr> tcatm: yet you think JSON-RPC is just fine? :/
 213 2011-03-30 03:58:18 <tcatm> luke-jr: basic algorithm: call getbalance 0 and check if it is different from previous call, then call txlist.refresh()
 214 2011-03-30 04:01:01 x6763 has joined
 215 2011-03-30 04:01:21 Zenith77 has quit (Quit: Leaving)
 216 2011-03-30 04:01:31 devrandom has joined
 217 2011-03-30 04:01:33 CPU has quit (Quit: Page closed)
 218 2011-03-30 04:01:34 <tcatm> txlist.refresh() then requests n transactions (i.e. if the user starts scrolling you should increase n) and updates its internal transaction list. after that's done it sets timeout for next checkBalance() based on the time it took to process transaction list
 219 2011-03-30 04:02:49 <luke-jr> tcatm: didn't think of getbalance hack :p
 220 2011-03-30 04:03:15 <luke-jr> https://gitorious.org/bitcoin/spesmilo/blobs/master/cashier.py#line272
 221 2011-03-30 04:03:20 <luke-jr> that's what we're doing right now
 222 2011-03-30 04:03:34 <tcatm> It doesn't work well when you send and receive the same amount at the same time :/
 223 2011-03-30 04:03:42 <tcatm> i.e. send to yourself
 224 2011-03-30 04:04:40 <tcatm> https://github.com/tcatm/bitcoin-js-remote/blob/master/txlist.js txlist.refresh() is at the bottom
 225 2011-03-30 04:04:49 <luke-jr> ah
 226 2011-03-30 04:05:11 <tcatm> https://github.com/tcatm/bitcoin-js-remote/blob/master/bitcoinapp.js search for txlist.refresh to see where it is called
 227 2011-03-30 04:05:37 <luke-jr> tcatm: spesmilo always maintains a complete list of all transactions
 228 2011-03-30 04:05:39 ApertureScience has quit (Quit: Linux: because a PC is a terrible thing to waste)
 229 2011-03-30 04:06:35 ApertureScience has joined
 230 2011-03-30 04:06:58 <tcatm> js-remote used to do that, too... until I tried it on my android device with >500 transactions
 231 2011-03-30 04:07:01 <jasonphd> tcatm: from that little exercise that took me way longer than i would like to admit, i've come to the conclusion that I don't really know what it would take to defeat a cheater in a pool.... from previous conversations it was recommended to cache all submissions and don't allow duplicates until the next round, and for each submission check the "hashPrevBlock" to make sure it is correct.....
 232 2011-03-30 04:07:27 <jasonphd> a cheater could easily cache all of his accepted submissions, when a new round starts just run those submissions through a quick script to update the "hashPrevBlock" and re-submit them all for some quick credit
 233 2011-03-30 04:08:15 <luke-jr> tcatm: yeah… that's why I'm working on a new protocol :P
 234 2011-03-30 04:08:21 <tcatm> luke-jr: suggestion: grab 5 times as many tx as you can show on the screen even if the window was fullscreen, then fetch more once the user starts scrolling
 235 2011-03-30 04:08:29 <luke-jr> although my current workaround-mess shouldn't do TOO bad
 236 2011-03-30 04:08:38 <jgarzik> jasonphd: no
 237 2011-03-30 04:08:43 <jgarzik> jasonphd: the hash wouldn't match
 238 2011-03-30 04:09:03 <luke-jr> tcatm: it just loads the full list at startup, then like 8 every second to check for new ones
 239 2011-03-30 04:09:09 <jgarzik> jasonphd: each block is uniquely identified by sha256(sha256(data)), so you cannot change contents and have the same hash result
 240 2011-03-30 04:09:14 <luke-jr> (and if it doesn't see at least the last old one, it tries again with 16)
 241 2011-03-30 04:11:27 <tcatm> luke-jr: I should merge my python client with spesmilo :)
 242 2011-03-30 04:11:32 <jasonphd> jgarzik: see this data where i've broken the submission in to its component parts http://codepad.org/JNHILdba  ... what part of the submission is the hash that could be checked?
 243 2011-03-30 04:11:50 <luke-jr> tcatm: didn't know you had one
 244 2011-03-30 04:12:06 <luke-jr> tcatm: Spesmilo does support TBC though-- if that's a problem :p
 245 2011-03-30 04:12:15 <jgarzik> jasonphd: hashPrevBlock changes for each block
 246 2011-03-30 04:12:25 <tcatm> it's only a lib but it's capable of sending and receiving TX (and keeps a blockchain)
 247 2011-03-30 04:12:39 <jgarzik> jasonphd: thus, a new block invalidates all submissions, because workers will submit an out-of-date hashPrevBlock
 248 2011-03-30 04:12:41 <tcatm> It could even serve as a very simple getwork server :)
 249 2011-03-30 04:12:43 <luke-jr> tcatm: oh, so it's a Wallet?
 250 2011-03-30 04:13:01 <luke-jr> IMO, that doesn't belong in the same codebase as a User Interface :p
 251 2011-03-30 04:13:42 <tcatm> That's was missing. It doesn't store a wallet yet.
 252 2011-03-30 04:13:55 <jasonphd> jgarzik: but if a worker kept his own copy of all submissions, waiting for the next block so that hashPrevBlock would have changed, then runs his copies of submissions through a script to only change the hashPrevBlock part of the submission, and then re-submits to the pool?
 253 2011-03-30 04:13:58 <jgarzik> tcatm: does it handle block chain reorg?
 254 2011-03-30 04:14:03 <tcatm> jgarzik: yep
 255 2011-03-30 04:14:34 larsivi has joined
 256 2011-03-30 04:14:45 <jgarzik> jasonphd: see above.  that changes the double-sha256 hash.
 257 2011-03-30 04:14:57 <jgarzik> jasonphd: and it also won't match the merkle or any of the other details
 258 2011-03-30 04:15:22 <luke-jr> tcatm: oh, so just a Peer
 259 2011-03-30 04:15:24 <jasonphd> jgarzik: so you take the entire data that is submitted and double-sha256 hash it, but then what do you compare it to?
 260 2011-03-30 04:15:41 <jgarzik> jasonphd: target
 261 2011-03-30 04:16:13 <jgarzik> jasonphd: I think you're still fundamentally missing piece about how mining works, and what's in those data structures
 262 2011-03-30 04:16:29 <jasonphd> if double-sha256-hash(data) < target then OK?
 263 2011-03-30 04:17:24 <jgarzik> jasonphd: "sha256(sha256(data)) < target" is the fundamental proof-of-work algorithm of bitcoin
 264 2011-03-30 04:17:38 <luke-jr> jasonphd: sha256(sha256(lastBlockHash+time+data)) < target
 265 2011-03-30 04:18:12 <forrestv> why not something like sha256(sha256(data)) % difficulty == 0?
 266 2011-03-30 04:18:16 <jgarzik> jasonphd: but for a proxying pool server, you must check that 'data' matches something your bitcoind would accept, if 'target' were larger
 267 2011-03-30 04:20:46 phantomcircuit has quit (Remote host closed the connection)
 268 2011-03-30 04:20:56 <jasonphd> thanks for your help.
 269 2011-03-30 04:21:01 <luke-jr> forrestv: isn't that the same if you invert the hash?
 270 2011-03-30 04:21:36 <CIA-96> bitcoin: phantomcircuit <phantomcircuit@covertinferno.org> sqlalchemy * rc29b282bb2dc bitcoin-alt/bitcoin/ (__init__.py peer.py storage.py): improved foreignkeys for transaction_inputs/outputs
 271 2011-03-30 04:21:38 <CIA-96> bitcoin: phantomcircuit <phantomcircuit@covertinferno.org> sqlalchemy * r44b81b2afa16 bitcoin-alt/bitcoin/peer.py: removed extraneous TODO
 272 2011-03-30 04:21:39 <CIA-96> bitcoin: phantomcircuit <phantomcircuit@covertinferno.org> sqlite3 * r6418f7a6e135 bitcoin-alt/bitcoin/ (__init__.py storage.py): implemented storage for bulk
 273 2011-03-30 04:21:48 jasonphd has quit ()
 274 2011-03-30 04:21:52 <forrestv> luke-jr, invert the hash?
 275 2011-03-30 04:22:05 <luke-jr> forrestv: endian flip
 276 2011-03-30 04:22:24 <forrestv> ah ... no?
 277 2011-03-30 04:24:55 Weishaupt has joined
 278 2011-03-30 04:26:16 phantomcircuit has joined
 279 2011-03-30 04:30:51 robotarmy has joined
 280 2011-03-30 04:30:52 robotarmy has quit (Changing host)
 281 2011-03-30 04:30:52 robotarmy has joined
 282 2011-03-30 04:39:38 jostmey has joined
 283 2011-03-30 04:41:43 jostmey has quit (Client Quit)
 284 2011-03-30 04:42:33 jostmey has joined
 285 2011-03-30 04:46:02 <luke-jr> forrestv: well, for powers of 2 anyhow
 286 2011-03-30 04:47:43 DrQ has quit (Ping timeout: 276 seconds)
 287 2011-03-30 04:48:04 justinx0r has joined
 288 2011-03-30 04:48:15 justinx0r has left ()
 289 2011-03-30 04:50:18 jostmey has quit (Quit: jostmey)
 290 2011-03-30 04:53:35 <forrestv> 4 timestamp uint32_t A timestamp recording when this block was created (Limited to 2106!)
 291 2011-03-30 04:53:42 <forrestv> what does 'limited to 2016' mean here?
 292 2011-03-30 04:53:54 <lfm> forrestv: something like that could be an alternative "proof of work" (more like (difficulty *2^32) % hash == 0 actually but the same idea)
 293 2011-03-30 04:53:54 <forrestv> is the timestamp the block index within the difficulty period ... ?
 294 2011-03-30 04:54:39 <lfm> timestamp is just a timestamp
 295 2011-03-30 04:55:02 <forrestv> then wtf does '(Limited to 2106!)' mean? :p
 296 2011-03-30 04:55:11 <manveru> forrestv: sounds like the year
 297 2011-03-30 04:55:21 <forrestv> ohh.
 298 2011-03-30 04:55:24 <grbgout> hey manveru, how's that bank coming? :)
 299 2011-03-30 04:55:39 <forrestv> How often does the difficulty change? Every 2016 blocks.
 300 2011-03-30 04:55:40 <manveru> >> Time.at(2 ** 32)
 301 2011-03-30 04:55:42 <manveru> => 2106-02-07 15:28:16 +0900
 302 2011-03-30 04:55:44 <forrestv> similarity confused me
 303 2011-03-30 04:56:01 <lfm> well the blocks are numbered from the zero block (the genesis block) and every 2016 blocks from there the difficulty is recomputed
 304 2011-03-30 04:56:51 <forrestv> lfm, why do you think your proof of work formula is better? it doesn't make sense to reverse the hash and difficulty like you did ..
 305 2011-03-30 04:57:32 <forrestv> if (difficulty * 2^32) happened to be prime (i know it can't be, but another constant could be used) there would be no solution to that
 306 2011-03-30 04:57:33 <lfm> forrestv: oops ya, you are right, I was just meaning to add the 2^32 factor
 307 2011-03-30 04:57:41 <forrestv> ah, okay :)
 308 2011-03-30 04:57:51 <EPiSKiNG> damn.. this 5970 is maxing out my wimpy x2 555
 309 2011-03-30 04:58:03 <EPiSKiNG> both cores are 100% always
 310 2011-03-30 04:58:13 <EPiSKiNG> I even overclocked it
 311 2011-03-30 04:58:24 <EPiSKiNG> poclbm-gui
 312 2011-03-30 04:58:26 <lfm> EPiSKiNG: what sdk are you using?
 313 2011-03-30 04:58:35 <EPiSKiNG> 2.2 i believe
 314 2011-03-30 04:58:39 <EPiSKiNG> what's the best way to check?
 315 2011-03-30 04:59:01 <lfm> find the install file
 316 2011-03-30 04:59:15 <EPiSKiNG> yah, 2.2
 317 2011-03-30 04:59:27 <lfm> maybe try 2.1
 318 2011-03-30 05:00:09 <EPiSKiNG> I guess I could!
 319 2011-03-30 05:00:12 <dermoth> home!~thomas@169-79.162.dsl.aei.ca|well I just managed to get the sse2_64 run on the newer xeons, and it well over twice as fast! yay!
 320 2011-03-30 05:00:29 <EPiSKiNG> mh/s yet?
 321 2011-03-30 05:00:36 <lfm> EPiSKiNG: your cpu should be near idle. people run multiple 5790 on semprons
 322 2011-03-30 05:00:48 <EPiSKiNG> wierd...
 323 2011-03-30 05:01:12 <lfm> dermoth|home: wtg
 324 2011-03-30 05:01:37 theorbtwo has joined
 325 2011-03-30 05:02:08 <dermoth> home!~thomas@169-79.162.dsl.aei.ca|they should offer a binary version, because only very recent distros have the required yasm version for it
 326 2011-03-30 05:02:28 <grbgout> you can always grab yasm manually...
 327 2011-03-30 05:02:31 <dermoth> home!~thomas@169-79.162.dsl.aei.ca|;;bc,calc 22877.12
 328 2011-03-30 05:02:31 <gribble> The average time to generate a block at 22877.12 Khps, given current difficulty of 68978.89245792 , is 21 weeks, 2 days, 21 hours, 15 minutes, and 47 seconds
 329 2011-03-30 05:02:39 <lfm> ya, you can always upgrade the yasm tho
 330 2011-03-30 05:02:55 <grbgout> dermoth|home: you're getting 22877.12 with a CPU?
 331 2011-03-30 05:03:07 <dermoth> home!~thomas@169-79.162.dsl.aei.ca|I didn't even realize originally that I was missing an also
 332 2011-03-30 05:03:16 <dermoth> home!~thomas@169-79.162.dsl.aei.ca|grbgout, no there's 8 cores :)
 333 2011-03-30 05:03:43 <grbgout> I get 21250 with a GeForce GT 240 >_<
 334 2011-03-30 05:05:11 robotarmy has quit (Remote host closed the connection)
 335 2011-03-30 05:05:34 <dermoth> home!~thomas@169-79.162.dsl.aei.ca|and according to the benchmarks some ati go over 600,000
 336 2011-03-30 05:05:49 <lfm> yup
 337 2011-03-30 05:06:12 roconnor has quit (Remote host closed the connection)
 338 2011-03-30 05:06:53 noagendamarket has quit (Changing host)
 339 2011-03-30 05:06:54 noagendamarket has joined
 340 2011-03-30 05:06:57 <grbgout> I missed out on an auction for an HD 4890 that closed for only $70.  Not the best card, obviously, but it has roughly 10 times the Streaming Processors that my GT 240 has :\
 341 2011-03-30 05:08:01 <lfm> 4xxx arnt the best power consumption / hash either
 342 2011-03-30 05:08:06 <dermoth> home!~thomas@169-79.162.dsl.aei.ca|how many of them can you technically put on a single PCI bus?
 343 2011-03-30 05:08:31 <grbgout> dermoth|home: depends on what you have available, most HD cards are PCIe x16, if you have enough slots you can fill'em.
 344 2011-03-30 05:08:34 <lfm> dermoth|home: mainly software limited I think. like 4 or 8
 345 2011-03-30 05:08:56 <dermoth> home!~thomas@169-79.162.dsl.aei.ca|I mean with a custol pci bus, mow many can run in parallel
 346 2011-03-30 05:08:59 <dermoth> home!~thomas@169-79.162.dsl.aei.ca|custom
 347 2011-03-30 05:09:25 <grbgout> dermoth|home: check out what this guy did for breaking md5s: http://blog.zorinaq.com/?e=42
 348 2011-03-30 05:09:26 <lfm> dermoth|home: depends if its mswin or linux too
 349 2011-03-30 05:09:31 <grbgout> how are you going to make your custom pci bus?
 350 2011-03-30 05:09:40 roconnor has joined
 351 2011-03-30 05:09:59 <lfm> you can get extention boxes for pcie
 352 2011-03-30 05:11:17 <dermoth> home!~thomas@169-79.162.dsl.aei.ca|1230 Watt at full load -  yay
 353 2011-03-30 05:11:28 <grbgout> lfm: do you have any detailed resources on the power consumption of the various cards?  A comparative look would be ideal.
 354 2011-03-30 05:11:31 <grbgout> 1230 isn't bad
 355 2011-03-30 05:11:32 <lfm> ya that becomes a limit too
 356 2011-03-30 05:12:01 <grbgout> http://golubev.com/gpuest.htm is what I've been looking to for SP:clock comparison, and of course the AMD card specification pages themselves.
 357 2011-03-30 05:12:15 <lfm> grbgout: I think wikipaedia has comparative power consumption for gpu cards
 358 2011-03-30 05:12:16 <grbgout> but I haven't found (or looked) a power consumption comparison resource yet.
 359 2011-03-30 05:12:19 <dermoth> home!~thomas@169-79.162.dsl.aei.ca|not too much of a problem as they have individual power feeds.. you could even add external power supplies I guess
 360 2011-03-30 05:12:23 <grbgout> i'll check it out
 361 2011-03-30 05:12:52 <dermoth> home!~thomas@169-79.162.dsl.aei.ca|or wire it to your stationary bike's dynamo :)))
 362 2011-03-30 05:12:52 SykeP has quit (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
 363 2011-03-30 05:13:03 <roconnor> isn't 32bits for the nonce in block kinda small?
 364 2011-03-30 05:13:06 <grbgout> I'm thinknig about bidding on a 5830 auction, which is currently at ~94$
 365 2011-03-30 05:13:35 SykeP has joined
 366 2011-03-30 05:15:13 <jgarzik> roconnor: there is also ntime and extranonce
 367 2011-03-30 05:15:14 <lfm> roconnor: sorta but there is an extra-nonce in the coinbase txn
 368 2011-03-30 05:15:36 <roconnor> is extra-nonce hidden in the script?
 369 2011-03-30 05:15:50 <grbgout> what script?
 370 2011-03-30 05:16:09 <roconnor> where is extra-nonce?
 371 2011-03-30 05:16:11 <lfm> roconnor: sorta ya, the txn input script
 372 2011-03-30 05:17:10 * roconnor doesn't see it in https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Script
 373 2011-03-30 05:18:48 wolfspraul has joined
 374 2011-03-30 05:19:25 <lfm> roconnor: its not there, the coinbase input script is different from those
 375 2011-03-30 05:19:47 <roconnor> gah
 376 2011-03-30 05:19:52 <roconnor> where is that documented?
 377 2011-03-30 05:22:17 <lfm> if you look at http://blockexplorer.com/t/3mdsJNz4aR it is part of the input(s) script. I think I figured out what was in it from the bitcoin source
 378 2011-03-30 05:22:35 <roconnor> ah oops
 379 2011-03-30 05:25:02 noagenda_ has joined
 380 2011-03-30 05:25:11 noagenda_ has quit (Client Quit)
 381 2011-03-30 05:25:21 noagendamarket has quit (Quit: Leaving)
 382 2011-03-30 05:25:42 noagendamarket has joined
 383 2011-03-30 05:25:42 noagendamarket has quit (Changing host)
 384 2011-03-30 05:25:42 noagendamarket has joined
 385 2011-03-30 05:26:55 <jgarzik> rcorreia_: IncrementExtraNonce()
 386 2011-03-30 05:27:01 <jgarzik> roconnor: ^^
 387 2011-03-30 05:27:17 <lfm> close
 388 2011-03-30 05:27:21 <jgarzik> pblock->vtx[0].vin[0].scriptSig = CScript() << pblock->nBits << CBigNum(nExtraNonce);
 389 2011-03-30 05:28:48 <EPiSKiNG> i uninstalled stream 2.2 and am trying 2.1 to see if it saves on my CPU usage
 390 2011-03-30 05:28:55 <lfm> yup, thats the critical clue
 391 2011-03-30 05:29:08 <EPiSKiNG> but now that i have 2.1 poclbm-gui is telling me i don't have an opencl card
 392 2011-03-30 05:29:21 <roconnor> ?
 393 2011-03-30 05:29:29 <lfm> EPiSKiNG: what model card is it again?
 394 2011-03-30 05:30:12 <EPiSKiNG> 5970
 395 2011-03-30 05:30:51 <lfm> its spozed to work on 2.1
 396 2011-03-30 05:30:56 NickelBot has quit (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
 397 2011-03-30 05:33:05 knotwork_ has quit (Ping timeout: 248 seconds)
 398 2011-03-30 05:34:12 <EPiSKiNG> here's the error log: http://pastebin.com/9NyWuUtd
 399 2011-03-30 05:35:07 larsivi has quit (Ping timeout: 264 seconds)
 400 2011-03-30 05:36:21 larsivi has joined
 401 2011-03-30 05:37:42 <EPiSKiNG> windows 7 x64
 402 2011-03-30 05:38:42 <Validus> i had to get sdk 2.2 on win7
 403 2011-03-30 05:38:45 <Validus> and i have a 4550
 404 2011-03-30 05:38:48 <Validus> iirc
 405 2011-03-30 05:39:42 dissipate has joined
 406 2011-03-30 05:39:47 <lfm> EPiSKiNG: are the environment vars set right? could be Validus is right
 407 2011-03-30 05:40:17 noagendamarket has quit (Quit: Leaving)
 408 2011-03-30 05:40:24 <Validus> somewhere on the forums i member seeing a open cl 2.1 but it was a .deb. im almost positive i installed 2.2 ill check
 409 2011-03-30 05:40:36 noagendamarket has joined
 410 2011-03-30 05:40:59 <lfm> Validus: he had 2.2 running but the cpu utilization was high
 411 2011-03-30 05:41:21 <Validus> was he running it on the cpu?
 412 2011-03-30 05:42:06 <lfm> oh the unit 0 = cpu unit 1 = gpu thing?
 413 2011-03-30 05:42:21 <Validus> yep i can select which i want
 414 2011-03-30 05:42:31 <Validus> i have 2.1 and it failed so i installed 2.2
 415 2011-03-30 05:42:38 <Validus> i see both dir's in my ati folder
 416 2011-03-30 05:43:02 <Validus> and i d/led the latest catalyst by itself from amd
 417 2011-03-30 05:43:14 <lfm> EPiSKiNG: ok I might have misled you, sorry
 418 2011-03-30 05:43:53 <EPiSKiNG> lfm?
 419 2011-03-30 05:44:03 <EPiSKiNG> did you see the error log i posted?
 420 2011-03-30 05:44:10 <EPiSKiNG> thats from poclbm-gui
 421 2011-03-30 05:44:41 <lfm> EPiSKiNG: ya I looked, I cant tell what is wrong there
 422 2011-03-30 05:45:32 Validus has quit (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
 423 2011-03-30 05:46:43 <EPiSKiNG> I think i'm going to install 2.4
 424 2011-03-30 05:49:15 skeledrew1 has joined
 425 2011-03-30 05:50:28 Bosma has quit (Quit: Bosma)
 426 2011-03-30 05:50:43 skeledrew has quit (Ping timeout: 246 seconds)
 427 2011-03-30 05:52:35 brunner has quit (Ping timeout: 250 seconds)
 428 2011-03-30 05:53:23 <dermoth> home!~thomas@169-79.162.dsl.aei.ca|in https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Mining_hardware_comparison, cof cpu what does p/t means? it looks like p = core per cpu, and t == total threads (threads per cpu * number of cpu)
 429 2011-03-30 05:53:54 <dermoth> home!~thomas@169-79.162.dsl.aei.ca|otherwise, either I don't get what it means or some info is wrong
 430 2011-03-30 05:54:05 <grbgout> what do you guys think about an HD 5830 for $94?
 431 2011-03-30 05:54:15 Validus has joined
 432 2011-03-30 05:54:32 <Validus> ate up all my resources hehe
 433 2011-03-30 05:55:16 tcatm has quit (Ping timeout: 246 seconds)
 434 2011-03-30 05:55:20 <lfm> grbgout: I think the 5830 is rather high power consumption iirc
 435 2011-03-30 05:55:38 meeper has quit (Ping timeout: 260 seconds)
 436 2011-03-30 05:55:53 <grbgout> lfm: that reminds me, I still need to hit wikipedia as per your recommendation.  high power, but 1120 SP.  My GT 240 only has 94 :)
 437 2011-03-30 05:56:05 tcatm has joined
 438 2011-03-30 05:56:17 meeper has joined
 439 2011-03-30 05:58:04 dnm_ has quit (Ping timeout: 246 seconds)
 440 2011-03-30 06:00:07 NickelBot has joined
 441 2011-03-30 06:00:31 meeper has quit (Ping timeout: 246 seconds)
 442 2011-03-30 06:00:38 ivan has quit (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
 443 2011-03-30 06:01:30 meeper has joined
 444 2011-03-30 06:01:32 <CIA-96> bitcoin: phantomcircuit <phantomcircuit@covertinferno.org> sqlite3 * re8d40c772ada bitcoin-alt/bitcoin/ (peer.py storage.py): more movement...
 445 2011-03-30 06:04:22 tcatm has quit (Ping timeout: 246 seconds)
 446 2011-03-30 06:06:03 synisma has quit (Quit: synisma)
 447 2011-03-30 06:06:26 tcatm has joined
 448 2011-03-30 06:06:26 tcatm has quit (Changing host)
 449 2011-03-30 06:06:26 tcatm has joined
 450 2011-03-30 06:08:27 brunner has joined
 451 2011-03-30 06:08:39 <grbgout> oh noez.  Another auction, this one for an HD 5850 for $80, but it closes in 4 days!  The auction for the 5830 cloes in 47 minutes, but $94 :)
 452 2011-03-30 06:08:43 <grbgout> what to do, what to do.
 453 2011-03-30 06:09:42 dnm has joined
 454 2011-03-30 06:10:22 <roconnor> okay, I see that the signature script for bitcoin generation just contains a bunch of random values.
 455 2011-03-30 06:10:39 knotwork__ has joined
 456 2011-03-30 06:10:39 tcatm has quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
 457 2011-03-30 06:10:44 <grbgout> roconnor: are you talking about the official bitcoin client?
 458 2011-03-30 06:10:50 ivan has joined
 459 2011-03-30 06:10:52 ivan has quit (Changing host)
 460 2011-03-30 06:10:52 ivan has joined
 461 2011-03-30 06:10:56 <roconnor> I'm talking about the bitcoin protocol
 462 2011-03-30 06:11:03 tcatm has joined
 463 2011-03-30 06:11:03 tcatm has quit (Changing host)
 464 2011-03-30 06:11:03 tcatm has joined
 465 2011-03-30 06:21:06 <dermoth> home!~thomas@169-79.162.dsl.aei.ca|regarding  p/t in the Mining_hardware_comparison page... turns out I was looking at the one wrong entry - model didn't match speed and number of threads
 466 2011-03-30 06:25:21 <grbgout> lfm: somewhat dated, but still interesting: http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/geforce-radeon-power,2122-3.html
 467 2011-03-30 06:30:59 <midnightmagic> renderer was wrong. but oh well.
 468 2011-03-30 06:32:40 TheAncientGoat has joined
 469 2011-03-30 06:36:34 hacim has quit (Ping timeout: 246 seconds)
 470 2011-03-30 06:37:26 hacim has joined
 471 2011-03-30 06:50:00 bk128 has quit (Quit: bk128)
 472 2011-03-30 06:50:48 brunner has quit (Read error: Operation timed out)
 473 2011-03-30 06:52:09 <EPiSKiNG> WIERD!! I just installed the 11.3 Catalyst drivers for my 5970, and now poclbm only shows one GPU
 474 2011-03-30 06:52:34 <[Tycho]> Installing new drivers is bad :)
 475 2011-03-30 06:53:47 FabianB_ has joined
 476 2011-03-30 06:54:59 dissipate has quit (Ping timeout: 250 seconds)
 477 2011-03-30 06:55:09 FabianB has quit (Ping timeout: 260 seconds)
 478 2011-03-30 07:03:21 Kicchiri has joined
 479 2011-03-30 07:03:22 ForceDestroyer has quit (Disconnected by services)
 480 2011-03-30 07:05:51 <EPiSKiNG> got it figured out
 481 2011-03-30 07:07:50 <taco_the_paco> gotta agree there [Tycho]
 482 2011-03-30 07:11:29 brunner has joined
 483 2011-03-30 07:12:20 subpar has quit (Ping timeout: 255 seconds)
 484 2011-03-30 07:14:10 subpar has joined
 485 2011-03-30 07:14:11 subpar has quit (Changing host)
 486 2011-03-30 07:14:11 subpar has joined
 487 2011-03-30 07:15:04 noagendamarket has quit (Ping timeout: 246 seconds)
 488 2011-03-30 07:16:45 ducki2p has quit (Remote host closed the connection)
 489 2011-03-30 07:17:07 ducki2p has joined
 490 2011-03-30 07:22:30 <da2ce7> Please Comment and Expand: https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Secure_Trading
 491 2011-03-30 07:28:10 <ersi> da2ce7: Maybe link to https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Securing_your_wallet ?
 492 2011-03-30 07:28:22 <da2ce7> yep :)
 493 2011-03-30 07:34:29 <ersi> Oh, you had a link there. Missed it somehow:)
 494 2011-03-30 07:39:22 <da2ce7> :)
 495 2011-03-30 07:40:15 adlsaks has joined
 496 2011-03-30 07:46:44 <mizerydearia> spread the word: http://organizations.witcoin.com/p/861/Serco-The-Biggest-Company-Youve-Never-Heard-Of
 497 2011-03-30 07:47:17 skeledrew has joined
 498 2011-03-30 07:49:22 skeledrew1 has quit (Ping timeout: 246 seconds)
 499 2011-03-30 07:50:45 <da2ce7> can we please have a wiki backup torrent
 500 2011-03-30 07:50:48 <da2ce7> that we can share arround.
 501 2011-03-30 07:50:50 <da2ce7> :?
 502 2011-03-30 07:51:19 <da2ce7> so anyone can start up a backup of the bitcoin wiki if it gets taken down.
 503 2011-03-30 07:51:40 toffoo has quit ()
 504 2011-03-30 07:52:51 toffoo has joined
 505 2011-03-30 07:54:19 <Aciid> da2ce7: how u think it will be taken down?
 506 2011-03-30 07:55:40 Stellar has quit (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
 507 2011-03-30 07:56:13 <Aciid> da2ce7: ill make a dump right now
 508 2011-03-30 07:56:19 <Aciid> ill update it then weeklly
 509 2011-03-30 07:56:57 <da2ce7> I dont' know, there are many ways it could be taken down.
 510 2011-03-30 07:57:16 <da2ce7> would be good to upload it to freenet as a freesite also.
 511 2011-03-30 07:57:22 <da2ce7> maybe I could do that project.
 512 2011-03-30 07:57:41 <Aciid> where you want me to upload this
 513 2011-03-30 07:57:52 <Aciid> once its done
 514 2011-03-30 07:57:56 <Aciid> S3?
 515 2011-03-30 07:58:20 <da2ce7> hmm, i was thinking jsut having a torrent link on the front page of the wiki.
 516 2011-03-30 07:58:28 <da2ce7> just host the torrent on the wiki
 517 2011-03-30 07:58:45 <da2ce7> that means everyone can download it when they want.
 518 2011-03-30 07:58:46 <Aciid> its kinda stupid, since the wiki gets update
 519 2011-03-30 07:58:48 <Aciid> t
 520 2011-03-30 07:58:49 <Aciid> d
 521 2011-03-30 07:58:51 <Aciid> all the time
 522 2011-03-30 07:59:03 <Aciid> I can tar.gz it to some CDN
 523 2011-03-30 07:59:19 <da2ce7> how big is it?
 524 2011-03-30 07:59:38 <Aciid> 10mb or so
 525 2011-03-30 07:59:40 <Aciid> its mostly text
 526 2011-03-30 07:59:44 <Aciid> but its pure html
 527 2011-03-30 07:59:47 <da2ce7> cool
 528 2011-03-30 08:00:07 <da2ce7> great! that would be good for making a free site.
 529 2011-03-30 08:00:15 <da2ce7> I'll insert it once a week into freenet
 530 2011-03-30 08:00:49 tower has quit (Ping timeout: 248 seconds)
 531 2011-03-30 08:01:14 <ersi> Nothing wrong with a weekly backup or so
 532 2011-03-30 08:01:43 <xelister> da2ce7: yeap, pushing to Freenet would be cool
 533 2011-03-30 08:02:07 <xelister> da2ce7: if you do, you can also link to our spec USK@oG7cGoUEBuHyulWpcmqV0yc-I569Re2A7RRs8zRljEs,IWIcXczmLdP9FEjTvoxJgGnXnK5~PxOppN-wYSADPWQ,AQACAAE/bitcoin-over-freenet/0/  it will be updated soon
 534 2011-03-30 08:02:31 <da2ce7> cool :)
 535 2011-03-30 08:02:39 <da2ce7> I'll make a page in the wiki
 536 2011-03-30 08:02:44 <xelister> for mirroring sites into freenet, scripts really should exist afair
 537 2011-03-30 08:02:46 <Aciid> da2ce7: jabber?
 538 2011-03-30 08:02:49 <xelister> best automate it
 539 2011-03-30 08:03:41 <da2ce7> yeah, know of any good freenet scripts?
 540 2011-03-30 08:03:57 <xelister> hmm ask #freenet or FMS?
 541 2011-03-30 08:04:19 <xelister> actually can jSite be invoked cmd line? if yes, then I say, make .xml of project using jSite, then just wget the site and execute jSite
 542 2011-03-30 08:04:29 <xelister> if no... then well there is source code for it =)
 543 2011-03-30 08:06:08 <Aciid> da2ce7: do you have a jabber account?
 544 2011-03-30 08:06:21 <da2ce7> ah, yeah. but I normaly use pgp email...
 545 2011-03-30 08:06:39 <Aciid> thats fine too
 546 2011-03-30 08:06:45 <Aciid> h/o ill get the necessary plugins
 547 2011-03-30 08:07:06 <da2ce7> http://bitcoin-otc.com/viewgpg.php
 548 2011-03-30 08:07:55 tower has joined
 549 2011-03-30 08:11:04 ducki2p has quit (Ping timeout: 246 seconds)
 550 2011-03-30 08:17:06 <Aciid> I dunno did that even went right
 551 2011-03-30 08:17:16 <Aciid> fcn enigmail
 552 2011-03-30 08:17:57 <Aciid> da2ce7: it didn't ask with whoms key I want to encrypt
 553 2011-03-30 08:18:42 <da2ce7> if you have my key in your keypool, and you have set it up to it will automatiacly encrypt mail to me.
 554 2011-03-30 08:19:09 <Aciid> I did import it
 555 2011-03-30 08:19:15 <Aciid> well we shall see soon
 556 2011-03-30 08:19:43 <Aciid> sent
 557 2011-03-30 08:22:38 <da2ce7> yep got it, was encripted
 558 2011-03-30 08:22:50 <Aciid> did u get to open it with your own key?
 559 2011-03-30 08:26:57 antivigilante has quit (Remote host closed the connection)
 560 2011-03-30 08:28:12 ducki2p has joined
 561 2011-03-30 08:29:01 antivigilante has joined
 562 2011-03-30 08:30:39 Blitzboom has quit (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
 563 2011-03-30 08:32:36 Blitzboom has joined
 564 2011-03-30 08:32:36 Blitzboom has quit (Changing host)
 565 2011-03-30 08:32:36 Blitzboom has joined
 566 2011-03-30 08:32:50 Weishaupt has quit (Disconnected by services)
 567 2011-03-30 08:33:41 Daviey has quit (Excess Flood)
 568 2011-03-30 08:33:47 niekie has quit (Read error: Operation timed out)
 569 2011-03-30 08:33:52 phantomcircuit has quit (Read error: Operation timed out)
 570 2011-03-30 08:33:53 luke-jr has quit (Read error: Operation timed out)
 571 2011-03-30 08:33:54 luke-jr has quit (otg!~luke-jr@ishibashi.dashjr.org|Read error: Operation timed out)
 572 2011-03-30 08:34:10 luke-jr has joined
 573 2011-03-30 08:34:20 luke-jr has joined
 574 2011-03-30 08:34:21 phantomcircuit has joined
 575 2011-03-30 08:34:40 wolfspraul has quit (Ping timeout: 250 seconds)
 576 2011-03-30 08:34:53 niekie has joined
 577 2011-03-30 08:36:25 wolfspraul has joined
 578 2011-03-30 08:39:04 Daviey has joined
 579 2011-03-30 08:39:10 <Aciid> da2ce7: ?
 580 2011-03-30 08:39:42 Daviey has quit (Excess Flood)
 581 2011-03-30 08:40:41 m00p has joined
 582 2011-03-30 08:40:51 <da2ce7> back, had dinner
 583 2011-03-30 08:46:24 <Aciid> check can you get it unencrypted
 584 2011-03-30 08:46:28 Spenvo has joined
 585 2011-03-30 08:46:30 <Aciid> coz I have no idea did it work
 586 2011-03-30 08:48:50 noagendamarket has joined
 587 2011-03-30 08:50:34 Daviey has joined
 588 2011-03-30 09:06:50 Joozero has joined
 589 2011-03-30 09:11:01 rli has joined
 590 2011-03-30 09:21:47 devrandom has quit (Ping timeout: 246 seconds)
 591 2011-03-30 09:22:43 jnd has quit (Ping timeout: 250 seconds)
 592 2011-03-30 09:23:24 RazielZ has joined
 593 2011-03-30 09:29:35 jnd has joined
 594 2011-03-30 09:30:56 Guest96970 is now known as sneak
 595 2011-03-30 09:31:04 sneak has quit (Changing host)
 596 2011-03-30 09:31:04 sneak has joined
 597 2011-03-30 09:41:27 <mizerydearia> more votes needed!!!!! http://slashdot.org/submission/1513876/Bitcoin-a-service-and-the-micro-micro-economy
 598 2011-03-30 09:42:20 <mizerydearia> discussion: http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=5167.msg75431#msg75431
 599 2011-03-30 09:50:30 <mizerydearia> It's on the front page http://news.ycombinator.com/
 600 2011-03-30 09:50:44 <mizerydearia> http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2386392
 601 2011-03-30 09:51:15 <mizerydearia> woo, 7th place so far
 602 2011-03-30 09:57:22 <Spenvo> a SMART comment that poses a real question would REALLY help it. "haha that's interesting" is no good
 603 2011-03-30 09:58:02 <mizerydearia> Spenvo, Are you asking for something?
 604 2011-03-30 09:59:19 <Spenvo> mmk, so we need an intelligent discussion to take place on Hacker News.  It's up on the front page, but there are no comments http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2386392
 605 2011-03-30 09:59:28 <Diablo-D3> jesus christ
 606 2011-03-30 09:59:30 <Diablo-D3> does everyone use hn now
 607 2011-03-30 10:01:11 cosurgi has quit (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
 608 2011-03-30 10:01:15 <sipa> hn?
 609 2011-03-30 10:01:22 <Diablo-D3> hacker news
 610 2011-03-30 10:01:29 * sipa needs coffee
 611 2011-03-30 10:02:58 cosurgi has joined
 612 2011-03-30 10:05:35 overtorque has quit (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
 613 2011-03-30 10:05:35 overtork has joined
 614 2011-03-30 10:12:41 <da2ce7> ;;bc,mtgox
 615 2011-03-30 10:12:42 <gribble> {"ticker":{"high":0.7997,"low":0.7648,"vol":4520,"buy":0.79,"sell":0.795,"last":0.79}}
 616 2011-03-30 10:17:05 Joozero has quit (Quit: Page closed)
 617 2011-03-30 10:22:26 <Aciid> da2ce7: did it work
 618 2011-03-30 10:22:36 <da2ce7> YA
 619 2011-03-30 10:22:45 <da2ce7> inserting it to freenet now
 620 2011-03-30 10:22:52 <Aciid> =)
 621 2011-03-30 10:23:04 <da2ce7> CHK@6O-EgF8YUODGhq66dcslTsmxLIbht8ZL4YnpzuKiRHM,G4dY5kv0P5BVBeKfUCJRTby7DH6zP58QQMCMMdpTJL8,AAIC--8/bitcoin30032011.7z?max-size=4986701
 622 2011-03-30 10:23:33 <da2ce7> should try downloading that file :)
 623 2011-03-30 10:23:58 * da2ce7 makes "Freenet Backups" page on wiki.
 624 2011-03-30 10:24:08 <Aciid> ill try sometime
 625 2011-03-30 10:24:12 <Aciid> tryin to tackle python now
 626 2011-03-30 10:30:32 BlueMatt has joined
 627 2011-03-30 10:38:10 rli has quit (Ping timeout: 250 seconds)
 628 2011-03-30 10:40:36 rli has joined
 629 2011-03-30 11:01:55 Zarutian has joined
 630 2011-03-30 11:08:01 alystair has quit (Ping timeout: 250 seconds)
 631 2011-03-30 11:10:45 da2ce7 has quit ()
 632 2011-03-30 11:12:33 da2ce7 has joined
 633 2011-03-30 11:14:06 devon_hillard has joined
 634 2011-03-30 11:28:24 DrQ has joined
 635 2011-03-30 11:30:06 LtBrenton_ has joined
 636 2011-03-30 11:30:31 <BlueMatt> how the fuck did bitcoin -daemon daemonize on win32 on 0.3.18? I see no code changes that could have effected it between now and then
 637 2011-03-30 11:32:19 <tcatm> BlueMatt: IIRC 0.3.18 was compiled using MSVC++ on win
 638 2011-03-30 11:35:01 <BlueMatt> tcatm: iirc when I compiled a version from dec 2010 last night on mingw, it daemonized
 639 2011-03-30 11:35:11 <tcatm> ok that's strange
 640 2011-03-30 11:35:18 <BlueMatt> but for some reason bitcoind -daemon doesnt daemonize like bitocin -daemon does
 641 2011-03-30 11:35:36 <BlueMatt> yea tell me about it
 642 2011-03-30 11:35:47 Guest23495 has joined
 643 2011-03-30 11:36:48 <tcatm> I tried to clean up init.cpp but I *think* bitcoin.exe on windows uses a completely different entry point than bitcoind or bitcoin on linux.
 644 2011-03-30 11:37:10 <tcatm> does git HEAD daemonize on windows?
 645 2011-03-30 11:40:49 <BlueMatt> no
 646 2011-03-30 11:40:55 <BlueMatt> git HEAD doesnt build bitcoind on windows
 647 2011-03-30 11:41:05 <BlueMatt> or bitcoin.exe
 648 2011-03-30 11:41:32 <BlueMatt> (complaints about lack of fork(), etc)
 649 2011-03-30 11:41:51 <tcatm> merge my fix-deamon branch
 650 2011-03-30 11:42:55 Kicchiri has left ()
 651 2011-03-30 11:43:06 <BlueMatt> tcatm: the one that was already merged into HEAD?
 652 2011-03-30 11:43:45 <tcatm> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/131
 653 2011-03-30 11:44:25 <jgarzik> CMyApp::Initialize() and CMyApp::OnInit() in ui.cpp call into init.cpp for initialization in GUI
 654 2011-03-30 11:45:34 <BlueMatt> tcatm: yes, but it would be nice to get daemonizing working on windows again as it used to be
 655 2011-03-30 11:46:43 <BlueMatt> jgarzik: still see no reason what so ever why it used to properly daemonize
 656 2011-03-30 11:48:26 <Spenvo> wow!!! "proof of work" is also on Hacker News Number #9 - the article is having an effect on Bitcoin awareness!!!
 657 2011-03-30 11:48:59 <Spenvo> and my boss is coming in in 13 minutes, so I've got to log off
 658 2011-03-30 11:49:05 <Spenvo> adios!
 659 2011-03-30 11:50:00 Spenvo has quit (Quit: ChatZilla 0.9.86.1 [Firefox 4.0/20110318052756])
 660 2011-03-30 11:58:27 <BlueMatt> tcatm: re: your pull req.  does it not make sense to daemonize bitcoind always
 661 2011-03-30 11:58:37 <BlueMatt> tcatm: most apps will daemonize unless -debug is set
 662 2011-03-30 12:00:08 <tcatm> in that case we should rename the option to -nodaemon :)
 663 2011-03-30 12:01:19 <BlueMatt> tcatm: gavin has expressed concerns about -upnp vs -noupnp already (and I agree), adding -[no]daemon is the same thing
 664 2011-03-30 12:04:09 <tcatm> so how would one prevent bitcoind from forking? -daemon=0 isn't very intuitive
 665 2011-03-30 12:07:03 <BlueMatt> tcatm: -debug is the norm
 666 2011-03-30 12:07:07 <BlueMatt> tcatm: or -foreground
 667 2011-03-30 12:07:16 <BlueMatt> though Im plartial to -debug personally
 668 2011-03-30 12:07:18 <BlueMatt> partial*
 669 2011-03-30 12:07:40 <tcatm> there are good reasons to run it in foreground without enabling debug mode
 670 2011-03-30 12:08:02 <BlueMatt> tcatm: I agree
 671 2011-03-30 12:08:18 <BlueMatt> tcatm: hence -foreground
 672 2011-03-30 12:10:11 <tcatm> that would mean bitcoin and bitcoind would have different -help. bitcoin would show -daemon, bitcoind -foreground
 673 2011-03-30 12:12:38 <BlueMatt> tcatm: they wont be distributed together eventually anyway, it will be bitcoin and bitcoind as separate programs
 674 2011-03-30 12:19:43 BlueMatt has quit (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
 675 2011-03-30 12:24:17 DrQ has quit (Ping timeout: 250 seconds)
 676 2011-03-30 12:32:50 antivigilante has quit (Ping timeout: 248 seconds)
 677 2011-03-30 12:34:35 bk128 has joined
 678 2011-03-30 12:35:15 bk128 has quit (Remote host closed the connection)
 679 2011-03-30 12:36:47 antivigilante has joined
 680 2011-03-30 12:44:54 gasteve has joined
 681 2011-03-30 12:57:23 mesh has joined
 682 2011-03-30 12:59:21 bitcoiner has joined
 683 2011-03-30 13:00:44 <mesh> I am running ubuntu 11.04 (alpha) and the bitcoin gui does not work, when started from the commandline it will just sit there doing nothing (also no errors or warnings), I've also compiled bitcoin from source but that didn't help, where could I start debugging this problem?
 684 2011-03-30 13:01:57 molecular has quit (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
 685 2011-03-30 13:02:47 molecular has joined
 686 2011-03-30 13:03:18 <xelister> hmm
 687 2011-03-30 13:03:23 <xelister> 2011-03-30 14:54:51 ; 100.00 ; 100.00 ;
 688 2011-03-30 13:03:28 Zenith77 has joined
 689 2011-03-30 13:03:32 <xelister> FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU
 690 2011-03-30 13:04:03 <taco_the_paco> ^
 691 2011-03-30 13:07:19 <nathan7> taco_the_paco: paco the taco?
 692 2011-03-30 13:07:27 * nathan7 feeds xelister taco_the_paco 
 693 2011-03-30 13:07:28 <taco_the_paco> Yes
 694 2011-03-30 13:07:48 <taco_the_paco> onm onm nom nom :p
 695 2011-03-30 13:08:17 <xelister> FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU
 696 2011-03-30 13:08:28 <xelister> 2011-03-30 14:54:51 ; 100.00 ; 100.00 ;     :[     it's temp monitor.
 697 2011-03-30 13:08:46 <taco_the_paco> :o
 698 2011-03-30 13:08:56 <ersi> neat, 100C
 699 2011-03-30 13:09:05 <ersi> enjoy your cooked meal
 700 2011-03-30 13:09:16 <taco_the_paco> sounds like my 8800 GT all over again lol
 701 2011-03-30 13:09:20 <taco_the_paco> what card xelister?
 702 2011-03-30 13:09:23 <xelister> ArtForz: at what reported by sensors temp does 5970 sustain instant damage to the board and components (not caunting in 'just' faster CPU wearing)?
 703 2011-03-30 13:10:02 <[Tycho]> Usually it just trottles down.
 704 2011-03-30 13:10:31 <da2ce7> It took mine about a week to die at 100C
 705 2011-03-30 13:10:33 <xelister> hmm its liquid based cooling keeps working @ 100 ?
 706 2011-03-30 13:10:40 <[Tycho]> And i suppose that VR may overheat first in 5970
 707 2011-03-30 13:10:50 <da2ce7> yep the VR's die first
 708 2011-03-30 13:11:10 <da2ce7> if your core is 100C your VR's are above 110, so they are frying
 709 2011-03-30 13:11:14 <da2ce7> the core should be fine.
 710 2011-03-30 13:11:25 <[Tycho]> Sometimes 120
 711 2011-03-30 13:11:54 <xelister> VR = ?
 712 2011-03-30 13:12:00 <xelister> how to check if VR fried? :P
 713 2011-03-30 13:12:09 <[Tycho]> Voltage Regulator
 714 2011-03-30 13:12:14 <xelister> is it rather a all-works or card totally dies  situation?
 715 2011-03-30 13:12:27 <xelister> can I check if card got demaged
 716 2011-03-30 13:12:31 <[Tycho]> No.
 717 2011-03-30 13:18:12 <xelister> anyone want to buy cheap 5970?  :trollface:
 718 2011-03-30 13:18:33 <xelister> no seriously though, I guess I will just see in this week if it works as before or not :)
 719 2011-03-30 13:19:14 <bitcoiner> 1 btc
 720 2011-03-30 13:20:27 * xelister checks testnet
 721 2011-03-30 13:20:46 <xelister> people Y U NO ON TESTNETS
 722 2011-03-30 13:24:33 wolfspraul has quit (Quit: leaving)
 723 2011-03-30 13:28:35 x6763 has quit (Remote host closed the connection)
 724 2011-03-30 13:29:13 <xelister> someone run testnet plz?
 725 2011-03-30 13:29:31 x6763 has joined
 726 2011-03-30 13:30:22 mesh has quit (Quit: Ex-Chat)
 727 2011-03-30 13:30:37 <sipa> xelister: running
 728 2011-03-30 13:31:00 mmarker has joined
 729 2011-03-30 13:31:31 <xelister> sipa: testnet port is same?
 730 2011-03-30 13:31:43 <sipa> no
 731 2011-03-30 13:31:48 <sipa> 18333
 732 2011-03-30 13:32:06 <xelister> what is your nodes ip?
 733 2011-03-30 13:32:34 <sipa> bitcoin.sipa.be
 734 2011-03-30 13:32:55 <sipa> 178.18.90.41
 735 2011-03-30 13:33:18 mmarker has quit (Client Quit)
 736 2011-03-30 13:33:58 <xelister> still 0 connections :<
 737 2011-03-30 13:34:00 <xelister> forever alone
 738 2011-03-30 13:34:30 <taco_the_paco> ha
 739 2011-03-30 13:35:06 <sipa> ./bitcoind -testnet -connect=178.18.90.41
 740 2011-03-30 13:35:10 <sipa> works perfectly here
 741 2011-03-30 13:35:32 noagendamarket has quit (Ping timeout: 246 seconds)
 742 2011-03-30 13:36:19 <xelister> there is something buggy
 743 2011-03-30 13:36:27 <xelister> is there too strong anti DDoS limiting?
 744 2011-03-30 13:36:39 <xelister> if I start program, stop, restart then I get 0 connections for some time
 745 2011-03-30 13:37:02 <EvanR-work> ive always had that
 746 2011-03-30 13:40:09 <BurtyB> xelister maybe it needs SO_REUSEADDR before it does the bind()?
 747 2011-03-30 13:41:17 <xelister> not sure how this works...  well my side terminates normally, so my side of connections should be free to use
 748 2011-03-30 13:41:27 <xelister> it sounds like some built in anti DDoS that is a bit too strong
 749 2011-03-30 13:51:26 eao has joined
 750 2011-03-30 13:56:55 adlsaks has quit (Ping timeout: 260 seconds)
 751 2011-03-30 14:00:10 da2ce7 is now known as da2ceZzzz
 752 2011-03-30 14:01:45 bitcoiner has quit (Quit: ChatZilla 0.9.86.1 [Firefox 3.6.16/20110319135224])
 753 2011-03-30 14:03:58 Teslah has joined
 754 2011-03-30 14:11:08 kakkapoksy has joined
 755 2011-03-30 14:12:10 <kakkapoksy> Where is should change the port 8333?
 756 2011-03-30 14:12:30 <kakkapoksy> I cant fix modem settings
 757 2011-03-30 14:12:49 <kakkapoksy> Where I*
 758 2011-03-30 14:12:56 <sipa> you need to change the source for that, unfortunately
 759 2011-03-30 14:13:05 <kakkapoksy> how i do that
 760 2011-03-30 14:13:29 <[Tycho]> You don't really need to open 8333, it will work anyway.
 761 2011-03-30 14:13:38 <kakkapoksy> well it doesnt
 762 2011-03-30 14:13:51 <[Tycho]> Then the problem may be in something else.
 763 2011-03-30 14:14:06 <kakkapoksy> i still have 0,00 coins. i have generated coins for over 30 hours now
 764 2011-03-30 14:14:12 <[Tycho]> ^)
 765 2011-03-30 14:14:19 <kakkapoksy> only few connections :/
 766 2011-03-30 14:14:22 <[Tycho]> You didn't do the research.
 767 2011-03-30 14:14:27 <sipa> are the generated coins listed?
 768 2011-03-30 14:14:30 <sipa> in the GUI
 769 2011-03-30 14:14:41 <kakkapoksy> dont know what u mean
 770 2011-03-30 14:14:42 <Blitzboom> he probably mined with his CPU and expected some coins …
 771 2011-03-30 14:14:49 <[Tycho]> kakkapoksy, are you using official client for generating ?
 772 2011-03-30 14:15:00 <kakkapoksy> i dont know
 773 2011-03-30 14:15:08 <[Tycho]> kakkapoksy, you'll need more than a century to generate coins.
 774 2011-03-30 14:15:15 <sipa> can you explain precisely what you are doing for generating coins?
 775 2011-03-30 14:15:22 <kakkapoksy> i downloaded it from here. http://www.bitcoin.org/fi
 776 2011-03-30 14:15:34 <sipa> and you're running the gui?
 777 2011-03-30 14:16:02 <kakkapoksy> i just changed the options limited to 4 processors and pressed generate coins
 778 2011-03-30 14:16:03 <sipa> in the left bottom it should show you its hash rate
 779 2011-03-30 14:16:09 <kakkapoksy> how i run gui?
 780 2011-03-30 14:16:19 <sipa> gui = graphical program
 781 2011-03-30 14:16:29 <[Tycho]> kakkapoksy, you'll need some moodern GPU (preferrably ATI) to generate some coins. And use other mining program.
 782 2011-03-30 14:16:35 <kakkapoksy> how i run graphical program?
 783 2011-03-30 14:16:40 <sipa> kakkapoksy: never mind
 784 2011-03-30 14:16:44 <sipa> it's what you are using
 785 2011-03-30 14:16:52 <sipa> in the left bottom, what number does it tell you?
 786 2011-03-30 14:16:58 <kakkapoksy> i have some 1 year old nvidia
 787 2011-03-30 14:17:04 <sipa> which one?
 788 2011-03-30 14:17:08 <kakkapoksy> so i cant generate coins at all
 789 2011-03-30 14:17:17 <kakkapoksy> ?
 790 2011-03-30 14:17:28 <sipa> you can, but currently you're doing it so slowly that it'll take ages
 791 2011-03-30 14:17:45 <[Tycho]> nVidia is bad for mining.
 792 2011-03-30 14:17:48 <[Tycho]> kakkapoksy, https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Mining_Hardware_Comparison
 793 2011-03-30 14:17:48 <kakkapoksy> ok. thought it only matters what CPU is
 794 2011-03-30 14:17:56 <kakkapoksy> okey. ty for info
 795 2011-03-30 14:17:58 <sipa> that used to be the case
 796 2011-03-30 14:17:58 <[Tycho]> CPU doesn't matters.
 797 2011-03-30 14:18:05 <kakkapoksy> i change my Gpu first
 798 2011-03-30 14:18:09 <kakkapoksy> bye
 799 2011-03-30 14:18:12 <sipa> ...
 800 2011-03-30 14:18:13 kakkapoksy has quit (Quit: Page closed)
 801 2011-03-30 14:18:27 <[Tycho]> ...
 802 2011-03-30 14:18:35 <Blitzboom> i really hope that damn option is removed/hidden soon
 803 2011-03-30 14:19:35 <sipa> indeed
 804 2011-03-30 14:37:04 yeman has joined
 805 2011-03-30 14:38:50 robotarmy has joined
 806 2011-03-30 14:42:41 m00p has quit (Quit: Leaving)
 807 2011-03-30 14:42:43 <ersi> Hah
 808 2011-03-30 14:55:48 BlueMatt has joined
 809 2011-03-30 14:55:56 BlueMatt has quit (Changing host)
 810 2011-03-30 14:55:56 BlueMatt has joined
 811 2011-03-30 14:58:11 Diablo-D3 has quit (Ping timeout: 250 seconds)
 812 2011-03-30 14:59:04 <vrs> https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/File:Bitcoin_world_map.png this is a bit outdated
 813 2011-03-30 14:59:40 javagamer has quit (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
 814 2011-03-30 15:00:51 <BlueMatt> vrs: isnt there a webapp somewhere that does that live?
 815 2011-03-30 15:02:22 javagamer has joined
 816 2011-03-30 15:03:27 <vrs> there is
 817 2011-03-30 15:03:37 robotarmy has quit (Remote host closed the connection)
 818 2011-03-30 15:03:59 <vrs> https://maps.google.com/maps?q=https://smsz.net/btcStats/bitcoin.kml
 819 2011-03-30 15:04:06 <BlueMatt> I know Ive seen it before, Im just hoping someone has a link
 820 2011-03-30 15:05:46 * vrs points at their last line
 821 2011-03-30 15:06:44 octarine has left ()
 822 2011-03-30 15:07:26 <BlueMatt> thanks
 823 2011-03-30 15:39:55 <BlueMatt> tcatm: re: bitcoin daemonizing on win32, ok after building from nov 8 2010 on mingw, it does not properly fork.  Not entirely sure the exact version from 0.3.18, but I cant get a build on mingw that properly daemonizes
 824 2011-03-30 15:40:03 devrandom has joined
 825 2011-03-30 15:40:04 <BlueMatt> jgarzik: if you are interested ^
 826 2011-03-30 15:45:00 <BlueMatt> ok, building 82201801 (0.3.18 release version) on mingw...
 827 2011-03-30 15:53:32 <BlueMatt> yep still no daemonizing when I build 0.3.18 release version on mingw (only changing the lib paths in the makefile)
 828 2011-03-30 15:53:50 <BlueMatt> I guess it is a difference between mingw and vc
 829 2011-03-30 15:56:28 <BlueMatt> also does not daemonize on the official 0.3.19 release
 830 2011-03-30 15:59:25 * BlueMatt facepalm, facepalm, facepalm, facepalm
 831 2011-03-30 16:02:07 <BlueMatt> bitcoin 0.3.18 did not daemonize, I ran it without bitcoin.conf and no -rpcpassword and when it exited remote desktop laged enough that bitcoin.exe still showed up in task manager when it returned on the terminal
 832 2011-03-30 16:02:28 <BlueMatt> afaict, bitcoin does not and never has daemonized on win32
 833 2011-03-30 16:05:21 <BlueMatt> well no, for some reason it is daemonizing on win7, but no longer on my win server 2003
 834 2011-03-30 16:06:30 <BlueMatt> arg this just keeps getting more confusing
 835 2011-03-30 16:13:31 yeman has quit (Quit: Page closed)
 836 2011-03-30 16:13:39 tower has quit (Ping timeout: 248 seconds)
 837 2011-03-30 16:15:34 <Kiba> jgarzik: so, what's taking so long for pastecoin to come back online?
 838 2011-03-30 16:19:36 tower has joined
 839 2011-03-30 16:20:53 rli has left ()
 840 2011-03-30 16:22:06 <devrandom> hey BlueMatt
 841 2011-03-30 16:22:37 <BlueMatt> devrandom: hi, yea sorry have been busy havent had a chance to look at the gitian signing stuff
 842 2011-03-30 16:22:51 <devrandom> no prob
 843 2011-03-30 16:22:53 <BlueMatt> devrandom: looks really cool though
 844 2011-03-30 16:23:01 <devrandom> cool :)
 845 2011-03-30 16:23:33 <devrandom> let me know if you have better ideas about how to collect signatures... git seems okay, but maybe there's a simpler way
 846 2011-03-30 16:24:06 <devrandom> I've been wondering about deterministic builds on windows
 847 2011-03-30 16:24:30 <devrandom> do you know if  mingw cross compiles with ubuntu as host?
 848 2011-03-30 16:24:44 <BlueMatt> devrandom: yes it does, but ive never tried it
 849 2011-03-30 16:25:22 <BlueMatt> devrandom: not sure if bitcoin will compile on it, but jgarzk says he builds the cpuminer on fedora via mingw
 850 2011-03-30 16:25:37 <BlueMatt> devrandom: might be hard to get it to work, but it would be nice
 851 2011-03-30 16:26:15 <devrandom> are you using vc++?
 852 2011-03-30 16:26:28 <BlueMatt> devrandom: no Im using mingw on win server 2003
 853 2011-03-30 16:27:04 <devrandom> oh, so you are not sure about the cross compile...
 854 2011-03-30 16:27:28 <BlueMatt> devrandom: yea, I know it theoretically works, but bitcoin including wx, boost, etc I dont know
 855 2011-03-30 16:27:41 SykeP has quit (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
 856 2011-03-30 16:27:43 <grbgout> holy crap, my miner solved a block (part of a pool, though).
 857 2011-03-30 16:28:16 <BurtyB> grbgout :)
 858 2011-03-30 16:28:19 <grbgout> I only earned 0.09164314 on it, though >_<
 859 2011-03-30 16:28:24 <grbgout> http://bitcoinpool.com/block.php?block=115778
 860 2011-03-30 16:28:47 SykeP has joined
 861 2011-03-30 16:31:22 <BlueMatt> devrandom: if you do do that, pre-building wx, boost etc would be VERY nice
 862 2011-03-30 16:31:54 <devrandom> you mean, in a separate build?
 863 2011-03-30 16:33:31 <BlueMatt> devrandom: I mean build wx/boost/etc once and then reuse that build each time you build bitcoin instead of rebuilding it like it currently does wx on ubuntu
 864 2011-03-30 16:33:39 Lartza has joined
 865 2011-03-30 16:34:28 <devrandom> BlueMatt - ok, I'll try to get to it soon, but I have a lot on my plate
 866 2011-03-30 16:34:38 Kiba has quit (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
 867 2011-03-30 16:34:45 <BlueMatt> devrandom: no problem, Im just saying what Id like to eventually see ;)
 868 2011-03-30 16:36:14 <devrandom> maybe should post some bounties...
 869 2011-03-30 16:39:15 <[Tycho]> grbgout, what is your mining speed ?
 870 2011-03-30 16:39:33 <grbgout> [Tycho]: garbage ^_^
 871 2011-03-30 16:39:43 <grbgout> 21252 khash/s
 872 2011-03-30 16:39:47 Joozero has joined
 873 2011-03-30 16:40:05 <[Tycho]> Why are you mining in that pool ?
 874 2011-03-30 16:40:16 <grbgout> [Tycho]: I asked you a question about your pool's payout method the other day, did you see it?  If you did, and I missed your response, my bad.
 875 2011-03-30 16:40:28 <[Tycho]> grbgout, what question ?
 876 2011-03-30 16:40:31 <grbgout> [Tycho]: I'm assessing all the pools.  I started with that one.
 877 2011-03-30 16:40:57 <grbgout> [Tycho]: iirc, I was wondering if the 3% fee applied to the pay-per-share method too.
 878 2011-03-30 16:41:04 <[Tycho]> No.
 879 2011-03-30 16:41:26 <[Tycho]> There is no additional fees, only the mentioned price.
 880 2011-03-30 16:41:53 <[Tycho]> It's like 90% on average.
 881 2011-03-30 16:41:54 <grbgout> k, I guess another question would be if there's a way (like once a block has been solved) to determine how many people/shares were involved in it? I.e. so one could calculate what they would have earned had they opted for the proportional method.
 882 2011-03-30 16:42:18 jroot has joined
 883 2011-03-30 16:42:24 <[Tycho]> Yes, there is a number of shares per each block in the stats page.
 884 2011-03-30 16:42:37 <grbgout> hmm, I must have overlooked that
 885 2011-03-30 16:42:44 <[Tycho]> http://deepbit.net/stats.php
 886 2011-03-30 16:42:46 <grbgout> ah, total shares
 887 2011-03-30 16:42:48 <grbgout> Already there ;)
 888 2011-03-30 16:43:10 <xelister> bitcoin connectivity is fucked up
 889 2011-03-30 16:43:12 <xelister> I have 1 conneciton
 890 2011-03-30 16:43:31 <grbgout> xelister: are you behind a router/firewall/NAT, and if so have you opened the appropriate ports?
 891 2011-03-30 16:43:58 <[Tycho]> grbgout, the number of people doesn't matters, only the number of shares does.
 892 2011-03-30 16:44:13 <xelister> grbgout: firewall, ports openee
 893 2011-03-30 16:44:21 <xelister> normally I was getting 50+ conn
 894 2011-03-30 16:44:40 <grbgout> [Tycho]: yes, I'm aware.  That should have read "people or shares, whatever". It was not intended to be read as people per shares.
 895 2011-03-30 16:45:38 <phantomcircuit> roses are red
 896 2011-03-30 16:45:41 <phantomcircuit> violets are blue
 897 2011-03-30 16:45:42 <[Tycho]> grbgout, some people aren't aware and asked for this in forum :)
 898 2011-03-30 16:45:43 <phantomcircuit> sqlite is slow
 899 2011-03-30 16:45:44 <phantomcircuit> >.>
 900 2011-03-30 16:45:50 <grbgout> and so are you!
 901 2011-03-30 16:45:51 <grbgout> sorry
 902 2011-03-30 16:45:58 <phantomcircuit> lulz
 903 2011-03-30 16:45:59 <phantomcircuit> winrar
 904 2011-03-30 16:46:20 <grbgout> [Tycho]: gotchya
 905 2011-03-30 16:46:43 Teslah has quit (Ping timeout: 248 seconds)
 906 2011-03-30 16:46:51 <grbgout> [Tycho]: incidentally, I started with bitcoinpool for the perceived transparency --- that's what drew me to it initially.
 907 2011-03-30 16:47:25 <xelister> is seding busted?
 908 2011-03-30 16:48:01 <phantomcircuit> seding?
 909 2011-03-30 16:48:03 <xelister> seeding is definatelly busted imo
 910 2011-03-30 16:48:29 <grbgout> Technically I started with your pool: "Well, rather than wrapping my head around this BTC thing before I start mining, I should just jump onto a pool until I figure things out a bit."  Then, since I was sleep deprived at the time, I switched to btcpool for its transparency: it wasn't blatently obvious how to calculate if pps or proptional was preferable at the time.
 911 2011-03-30 16:48:39 <grbgout> Ultimately I decided to asses each pool in turn.
 912 2011-03-30 16:48:47 <grbgout> sorry for the long lines.
 913 2011-03-30 16:48:53 maikmerten has joined
 914 2011-03-30 16:50:47 <grbgout> [Tycho]: what about automating the choice?  I realize this would change things, given when pps is applied, but what about a delayed pps for when a block is solved: then automatically choosing the best option for people based on which would pay them more.  Clearly not the best model for the pool operator, but might be something to consider.
 915 2011-03-30 16:50:53 <[Tycho]> grbgout, actually i think that listing users and their share is wrong as bitcoin should be like kind of anonymous thing :)
 916 2011-03-30 16:51:06 <grbgout> [Tycho]: how is it any less anonymous?
 917 2011-03-30 16:51:18 <grbgout> This account and IP doesn't tie me to anything.
 918 2011-03-30 16:51:25 <[Tycho]> grbgout, this is impossible.
 919 2011-03-30 16:51:50 <grbgout> I have an unfair advantage, as I live in a highly populated area: plenty of weak WEP connections.  None of my BTC addresses link to my actual identity in any way.
 920 2011-03-30 16:52:19 <grbgout> [Tycho]: I see how it might not be possible to implement it on deepbit, but I don't see how it would be impossible (say for a new pool).  Could you elaborate?
 921 2011-03-30 16:52:26 <[Tycho]> I have some idea for my users, but it will be revealed only after deployments :)
 922 2011-03-30 16:53:21 <grbgout> Has anyone yet proposed a pool for pools? I.e. a mechanism for linking the collective processing power of /all/ the pools and distributing things fairly.
 923 2011-03-30 16:53:25 <[Tycho]> grbgout, it's impossible for ANY pool because PPS works this way. If people will be switched to Proportional on short rounds and to PPS on long ones, it will be severe negative profit for pool's owner.
 924 2011-03-30 16:54:15 <grbgout> [Tycho]: well, like I said, it's not beneficial to the pool operator.  It would be ideal for a community owned/operated pool, though.  It certainly favors the participants.
 925 2011-03-30 16:54:30 <[Tycho]> grbgout, it just can't work.
 926 2011-03-30 16:54:31 <grbgout> perhaps the ideal technique for a pooling pool.
 927 2011-03-30 16:55:09 <[Tycho]> grbgout, where do additional money should appear from ?
 928 2011-03-30 16:55:33 <[Tycho]> grbgout, it would need hundreds of BTC per day.
 929 2011-03-30 16:55:34 <grbgout> Well I respect your expertise on the matter, and would certainly read a detailed explanation if it were available.
 930 2011-03-30 16:55:58 <grbgout> That depends on the details, I would think.  Since I'm not a pool operator I certainly can't comment.
 931 2011-03-30 16:56:11 <[Tycho]> grbgout, do you know, what PPS is ?
 932 2011-03-30 16:56:15 <BlueMatt> arg, ok final conclusion, bitcoin.exe forks FINE when compiled with minegw (up to and including a07dca7, the on before tcatm's daemon-mode fix, which broke building not necessarily daemonizing) when run from the regular windows command prompt NOT from the msys command prompt (bash).  Official build version 0.3.18 forks fine when bitcoin.exe is run with -daemon, however bitcoind.exe -daemon does not
 933 2011-03-30 16:56:19 <grbgout> pay-per-share?
 934 2011-03-30 16:56:37 <grbgout> I haven't read about how the amount is determined.
 935 2011-03-30 16:56:39 <BlueMatt> bitcoin.exe -daemon DOES daemonize fine under the same circumstances with my winbuildfix branch
 936 2011-03-30 16:58:05 SykeP has quit (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
 937 2011-03-30 16:58:55 <jgarzik> three cheers for BlueMatt :)
 938 2011-03-30 16:59:20 <grbgout> [Tycho]: anyway, I was just thinking out loud.  I acknowledge your stance that it's impossible.  I have many other projects in mind before considering that idea in any more detail.
 939 2011-03-30 16:59:26 <grbgout> jgarzik: indeed!
 940 2011-03-30 16:59:28 <grbgout> BlueMatt: good job.
 941 2011-03-30 16:59:36 <BlueMatt> thanks, now for dinner.
 942 2011-03-30 17:04:38 Joozero has quit (Quit: Page closed)
 943 2011-03-30 17:05:29 nanotube has quit (Quit: Something is wrong...)
 944 2011-03-30 17:05:30 gribble has quit (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
 945 2011-03-30 17:05:52 <joepie92> just heard from a friend that silkroad is closed
 946 2011-03-30 17:05:53 <joepie92> anything known about that?
 947 2011-03-30 17:06:22 <jgarzik> good
 948 2011-03-30 17:06:40 <LtBrenton_> thank fuck, silkroad was dangerous
 949 2011-03-30 17:06:43 LtBrenton_ is now known as LtBrenton
 950 2011-03-30 17:06:45 LtBrenton has quit (Changing host)
 951 2011-03-30 17:06:45 LtBrenton has joined
 952 2011-03-30 17:07:07 <LtBrenton> bitcoin /really/ doesn't need the public perception that only drug dealers and hookers accept it
 953 2011-03-30 17:07:12 gribble has joined
 954 2011-03-30 17:07:15 nanotube has joined
 955 2011-03-30 17:07:18 <jgarzik> indeed
 956 2011-03-30 17:07:22 <Blitzboom> LtBrenton: wuala accepts it now
 957 2011-03-30 17:07:44 <Blitzboom> you should also visiit http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=4667.0
 958 2011-03-30 17:07:52 <Blitzboom> if you want legit shops to accept it
 959 2011-03-30 17:11:10 TippenEin has joined
 960 2011-03-30 17:11:42 <BlueMatt> for reference, the reason bitcoin.exe daemonizes in the first place (technically it doesnt daemonize like it would on unix, just returns to a new line on cmd.exe as if it had) is because of wx as bitcoin.exe "daemonizes" no matter what flags are passed and bitcoind.exe does not
 961 2011-03-30 17:12:08 <jgarzik> BlueMatt: in ui.cpp?
 962 2011-03-30 17:12:10 <phantomcircuit> LtBrenton, there are drug dealers and hookers that accept bitcoin?
 963 2011-03-30 17:12:32 <grbgout> call me when there's a drug dealing hooker.
 964 2011-03-30 17:12:41 <BlueMatt> grbgout: there is
 965 2011-03-30 17:12:45 <grbgout> sweet
 966 2011-03-30 17:12:59 <BlueMatt> grbgout: but it might be harder to find the hooker part, but there are a few nerds ;)
 967 2011-03-30 17:13:08 <grbgout> hehe
 968 2011-03-30 17:13:14 <BlueMatt> jgarzik: I believe so (something to do with wx::Initialize, but I cant be sure as I dont have a full debug environment on win atm)
 969 2011-03-30 17:13:33 <phantomcircuit> oh oh i know
 970 2011-03-30 17:13:46 <BlueMatt> grbgout: though have you seen silk road?
 971 2011-03-30 17:13:58 <phantomcircuit> wx programs are built with the gui flag in their PE header
 972 2011-03-30 17:14:00 <phantomcircuit> magic
 973 2011-03-30 17:14:21 <BlueMatt> phantomcircuit: ah that might do it
 974 2011-03-30 17:14:40 m00p has joined
 975 2011-03-30 17:14:42 <BlueMatt> jgarzik: so cmd.exe "daemonizes" programs which have a gui flag set
 976 2011-03-30 17:14:48 <BlueMatt> ie bitcoin does nothing
 977 2011-03-30 17:17:33 Xunie has joined
 978 2011-03-30 17:21:08 <BlueMatt> yep PE headers include WORD Subsystem which can be set to WINDOWS_GUI or WINDOWS_CUI (among others)
 979 2011-03-30 17:21:47 <roconnor> where can I find documentation on how the merkle tree is constructed?
 980 2011-03-30 17:22:08 <roconnor> i.e.i which order the transactions are put into the merkle tree
 981 2011-03-30 17:22:41 m00p has quit (Ping timeout: 246 seconds)
 982 2011-03-30 17:23:47 <lfm> roconnor: thatd be the reference code again I think
 983 2011-03-30 17:24:16 <roconnor> :/
 984 2011-03-30 17:24:17 <roconnor> ok
 985 2011-03-30 17:24:35 <roconnor> thanks for your help
 986 2011-03-30 17:24:57 <lfm> sorry, not the best answer
 987 2011-03-30 17:25:16 <roconnor> It is probably the only answer :D
 988 2011-03-30 17:25:29 <roconnor> searking for merkle in the wiki hasn't helped me
 989 2011-03-30 17:25:30 brunner has quit (Quit: Leaving.)
 990 2011-03-30 17:25:57 brunner has joined
 991 2011-03-30 17:25:57 brunner has quit (Changing host)
 992 2011-03-30 17:25:57 brunner has joined
 993 2011-03-30 17:25:59 <nanotube> i heard something about them being random... but don't bet on it.
 994 2011-03-30 17:26:31 <lfm> naw cant be random order. its a depth first order with all the leaves at the same level
 995 2011-03-30 17:26:46 <nanotube> if i were doing it, i'd probably put the coinbase closer to the top, so i don't have to recalc the whole tree when i change the extranonce, etc.
 996 2011-03-30 17:27:05 <nanotube> lfm: i mean, ordering the tx in the tree
 997 2011-03-30 17:27:21 <nanotube> once the tree is constructed, of course there's a set order for actually hashing.
 998 2011-03-30 17:27:27 <lfm> well you dont have to recalc the whole tree. just the dependancies
 999 2011-03-30 17:27:34 <roconnor> nanotube: I'm afraid that all the transactions are at the same level in the tree
1000 2011-03-30 17:27:38 <roconnor> I think
1001 2011-03-30 17:27:39 <nanotube> ah
1002 2011-03-30 17:27:44 <lfm> yes
1003 2011-03-30 17:27:45 <tcatm> roconnor: order doesn't matter. the miner decides it.
1004 2011-03-30 17:27:58 <nanotube> so it's not so much a tree, as a bush? :)
1005 2011-03-30 17:28:14 <lfm> tcatm: you sure about that?
1006 2011-03-30 17:28:23 <roconnor> tcatm: the miner decides the order to list the transactions, but given a list of ordered transactions, how is the merkle tree formed
1007 2011-03-30 17:28:33 <roconnor> (espcially if the number of transactions isn't a power of two)
1008 2011-03-30 17:28:52 <lfm> cuz if I were doing it id use a simple queue
1009 2011-03-30 17:29:07 <tcatm> lfm: at least they can't depend on each other
1010 2011-03-30 17:29:11 <roconnor> if that question makes sense
1011 2011-03-30 17:29:29 <tcatm> roconnor: duplicate the last hash
1012 2011-03-30 17:29:49 <roconnor> okay
1013 2011-03-30 17:30:07 <roconnor> so I grab all the trasactions into pairs and if there is an odd number I duplicate the last one
1014 2011-03-30 17:30:13 <roconnor> and then repeat this at the next level up
1015 2011-03-30 17:30:15 <tcatm> yep
1016 2011-03-30 17:30:17 <roconnor> sound right?
1017 2011-03-30 17:30:19 <roconnor> cool
1018 2011-03-30 17:30:31 <lfm> ya when it hashes a txn hash with a non existant hash it just copies
1019 2011-03-30 17:31:08 <roconnor> you people have been really helpful!
1020 2011-03-30 17:31:39 * roconnor has a balance of 100.70 testnet bitcoins now!
1021 2011-03-30 17:31:41 <tcatm> lfm: no sorting in main.h / BuildMerkleTree()
1022 2011-03-30 17:32:58 <lfm> tcatm: I think all the miners need to use the same order but I spoze I could be wrong
1023 2011-03-30 17:34:26 <tcatm> generation tx is first. that's the only rule I know of
1024 2011-03-30 17:34:48 mizerydearia has quit (Changing host)
1025 2011-03-30 17:34:48 mizerydearia has joined
1026 2011-03-30 17:35:14 <lfm> tcatm: ya the order of the txn is up to the miner but once you have the txn then there is a specific way you build the merkle tree from that txn order
1027 2011-03-30 17:36:31 <lfm> tcatm:  theoretically when the number od txn is not 2^x-1 there are several ways to build a merkle tree
1028 2011-03-30 17:37:49 <tcatm> see main.cpp:1103
1029 2011-03-30 17:38:16 <lfm> they would all be equivalent but we need to agree exactly how. It seems the only reference is the code
1030 2011-03-30 17:40:11 <ArtForz> yes, and the rules are rather simple
1031 2011-03-30 17:41:10 <lfm> simple - maybe, obvious - no
1032 2011-03-30 17:41:12 <ArtForz> leftmost leaf is first tx hash, always duplicate last node in a level to make a even number of nodes, parent = hash(left . right)
1033 2011-03-30 17:42:00 <BlueMatt> indeed, bitcoin.exe has Subsystem: GUI subsystem and bitcoind.exe has Subsystem: CUI
1034 2011-03-30 17:42:25 <ArtForz> thats about as bog standard as a hash tree can get
1035 2011-03-30 17:43:09 <lfm> ArtForz: I like the queue algorothm better myself but I spoze its moot
1036 2011-03-30 17:43:10 m00p has joined
1037 2011-03-30 17:44:38 <ArtForz> well, thats just a implementation style
1038 2011-03-30 17:44:47 <lfm> true
1039 2011-03-30 17:45:32 <lfm> I guess our point is it does kinda need to be documented one of these days
1040 2011-03-30 17:45:42 <ArtForz> yeah
1041 2011-03-30 17:45:50 <BlueMatt> there are quite a few of those
1042 2011-03-30 17:46:19 <ArtForz> only "unusual" parts are hash being double-sha256 and "1-item hash trees just get the value of the item"
1043 2011-03-30 17:49:15 <ArtForz> which depending on how you look at it is either completely obvious or "errr... huh?"
1044 2011-03-30 17:55:09 EPiSKiNG has quit ()
1045 2011-03-30 17:58:25 <LtBrenton> ;;bc,stats
1046 2011-03-30 17:58:28 <gribble> Current Blocks: 115791 | Current Difficulty: 68978.89245792 | Next Difficulty At Block: 116927 | Next Difficulty In: 1136 blocks | Next Difficulty In About: 1 week, 0 days, 6 hours, 30 minutes, and 8 seconds | Next Difficulty Estimate: 74992.60987236
1047 2011-03-30 18:06:08 maikmerten has quit (Quit: Leaving)
1048 2011-03-30 18:11:42 <CIA-96> bitcoin: genjix <fake@lol.u> * r09e2947a9d4e intersango/cron/bankd/show_withdraws.sql: withdrawal script to GBP bank.
1049 2011-03-30 18:15:30 Strom- has joined
1050 2011-03-30 18:19:05 Strom has quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
1051 2011-03-30 18:21:38 <CIA-96> bitcoin: phantomcircuit <phantomcircuit@covertinferno.org> sqlite3 * r7a64707b6175 bitcoin-alt/bitcoin/ (__init__.py peer.py storage.py): Finished most of the sqlite3 conversion, significantly faster
1052 2011-03-30 18:21:40 <CIA-96> bitcoin: genjix <fake@lol.u> * r7de5a0b11c77 intersango/cron/bankd/parse_deposits.php: moved into bank subdir. off by default to protected against user error.
1053 2011-03-30 18:21:41 <CIA-96> bitcoin: genjix <fake@lol.u> * r377047703032 intersango/cron/bankd/parse_deposits.php: fix broken require path.
1054 2011-03-30 18:24:57 Teslah has joined
1055 2011-03-30 18:29:21 <xelister> is seeding broken?
1056 2011-03-30 18:29:25 <xelister> meh
1057 2011-03-30 18:37:36 eao has quit (Ping timeout: 246 seconds)
1058 2011-03-30 18:38:48 Bosma has joined
1059 2011-03-30 18:49:12 Joozero has joined
1060 2011-03-30 18:49:32 Bosma has quit (Quit: Colloquy for iPhone - http://colloquy.mobi)
1061 2011-03-30 18:49:39 eao has joined
1062 2011-03-30 18:53:25 TheAncientGoat has quit (Ping timeout: 276 seconds)
1063 2011-03-30 18:55:03 RazielZ has quit ()
1064 2011-03-30 19:02:02 jostmey has joined
1065 2011-03-30 19:05:31 Stellar has joined
1066 2011-03-30 19:05:35 jostmey has quit (Client Quit)
1067 2011-03-30 19:10:11 sethsethseth has joined
1068 2011-03-30 19:11:31 Zarutian has quit (Quit: Zarutian)
1069 2011-03-30 19:18:55 bitcoiner has joined
1070 2011-03-30 19:20:31 <BlueMatt> who runs mybitcoin?
1071 2011-03-30 19:20:57 Joozero has quit ()
1072 2011-03-30 19:22:47 aksoo has joined
1073 2011-03-30 19:23:45 Joozero has joined
1074 2011-03-30 19:25:11 [Noodles] has joined
1075 2011-03-30 19:25:58 sethsethseth has quit (Quit: ~ Trillian Astra - www.trillian.im ~)
1076 2011-03-30 19:26:46 phantomcircuit has quit (Remote host closed the connection)
1077 2011-03-30 19:27:18 <aksoo> is anyone else having seemingly random data appended to the Date header in json rpc requests in bitcoin 0.3.20.2?
1078 2011-03-30 19:30:38 cheeseman has joined
1079 2011-03-30 19:31:37 <CIA-96> bitcoin: phantomcircuit <phantomcircuit@covertinferno.org> sqlite3 * r2a64ca526d15 bitcoin-alt/bitcoin/ (peer.py storage.py): avoid double commit's add unique constraint to blocks(prev_hash)
1080 2011-03-30 19:32:07 lfm has quit (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
1081 2011-03-30 19:32:41 <aksoo> it seems to me the Date: line is always 61 bytes long and isn't null terminating the string. but I haven't looked at the code
1082 2011-03-30 19:33:49 <jgarzik> BlueMatt: unknown
1083 2011-03-30 19:34:05 <dbitcoin> ;;bc;calc 2500000
1084 2011-03-30 19:34:06 <gribble> Error: "bc;calc" is not a valid command.
1085 2011-03-30 19:34:43 <dbitcoin> ;;bc;help
1086 2011-03-30 19:34:44 <gribble> Error: "bc;help" is not a valid command.
1087 2011-03-30 19:35:38 <dbitcoin> ;;bc,calc 2500000
1088 2011-03-30 19:35:40 <gribble> The average time to generate a block at 2500000 Khps, given current difficulty of 68978.89245792 , is 1 day, 8 hours, 55 minutes, and 4 seconds
1089 2011-03-30 19:35:55 <dbitcoin> ;;bc,help
1090 2011-03-30 19:35:56 <gribble> Alias bc,bcm, Alias bc,blocks, Alias bc,btcex, Alias bc,calc, Alias bc,calcd, Alias bc,channels, Alias bc,diff, Alias bc,estimate, Alias bc,gen, Alias bc,gend, Alias bc,help, Alias bc,hextarget, Alias bc,labs, Alias bc,lbs, Alias bc,markets, Alias bc,mtgox, Alias bc,nexttarget, Alias bc,poolstats, Alias bc,prob, Alias bc,stats, Alias bc,timetonext, Alias bc,totalbc, and Alias bc,wiki
1091 2011-03-30 19:36:14 <dbitcoin> ;;bc,nexttarget
1092 2011-03-30 19:36:15 <gribble> 116927
1093 2011-03-30 19:36:23 <ersi> ;;bc,prob
1094 2011-03-30 19:36:23 <gribble> (bc,prob <an alias, at least 1 argument>) -- Alias for "math calc 1-exp(-$1*1000 * [seconds $*] / (2**32* [bc,diff]))".
1095 2011-03-30 19:36:28 <ersi> ;;bc,stats
1096 2011-03-30 19:36:30 <gribble> Current Blocks: 115802 | Current Difficulty: 68978.89245792 | Next Difficulty At Block: 116927 | Next Difficulty In: 1125 blocks | Next Difficulty In About: 1 week, 0 days, 5 hours, 7 minutes, and 30 seconds | Next Difficulty Estimate: 74817.55526522
1097 2011-03-30 19:38:14 <dbitcoin> ;; bc,poolstats
1098 2011-03-30 19:38:19 <gribble> {"ghashes_ps": "161.931", "shares": 454401, "active_workers": 2011, "round_duration": "3:17:21", "score": "16259975.5646", "round_started": "2011-03-30 16:19:08", "shares_cdf": "99.86", "getwork_ps": 517}
1099 2011-03-30 19:39:19 <dbitcoin> ;;bc,totalbc
1100 2011-03-30 19:39:20 <gribble> 5790150.00000000
1101 2011-03-30 19:40:32 Kicchiri has joined
1102 2011-03-30 19:41:45 <Kicchiri> If I have two nodes behind a NAT, naturally, only one gets the port... might this cause bugs/trouble?
1103 2011-03-30 19:41:52 jroot has quit (Remote host closed the connection)
1104 2011-03-30 19:45:21 <ersi> Kicchiri: Make the other one, connect to that one - locally
1105 2011-03-30 19:45:24 <ersi> problem solved? :P
1106 2011-03-30 19:45:36 jackSmith has joined
1107 2011-03-30 19:45:45 <Kicchiri> How do I do that :P
1108 2011-03-30 19:45:45 lfm has joined
1109 2011-03-30 19:46:15 <ersi> you can specify either -addnodes= (which just adds it to the node table) or specify -connect= (which makes it Only connect to *this* node)
1110 2011-03-30 19:47:04 <ersi> so, you give bitcoin on Computer A the port. It connects to the swarm and is happy. And make bitcoin on Computer B connect to Computer A (Internal, LAN address that is) - which will get hooked up to the other ones
1111 2011-03-30 19:47:47 <ersi> or you could make Computer B just connect outwards to any of the Fallback nodes (check wiki, same parameters, just different IPs)
1112 2011-03-30 19:47:52 <BlueMatt> Kicchiri: best is always one with port forwarding/etc and -connect on the other
1113 2011-03-30 19:48:14 <Kicchiri> okay!
1114 2011-03-30 19:51:43 <Kicchiri> Is there any security issue for an "almost isolated" node? In case the node that links it in is compromised? Just curious.
1115 2011-03-30 19:52:13 <BlueMatt> Kicchiri: look up sybil on the forums
1116 2011-03-30 19:52:42 <BlueMatt> Kicchiri: it only applies if all the nodes a specific node is connected to are "bad"
1117 2011-03-30 19:53:00 <BlueMatt> Kicchiri: otherwise as long as the real blockchain is the longest, you are fine
1118 2011-03-30 19:53:37 sethsethseth has joined
1119 2011-03-30 19:53:47 <Kicchiri> okay... so I shouldn't do transactions while being connected to only one node if that one is considered insecure.
1120 2011-03-30 19:54:39 <BlueMatt> Kicchiri: yep, also never do transactions which have only one or two confirmations
1121 2011-03-30 19:55:25 dust1 has joined
1122 2011-03-30 19:55:44 xelister has quit (Remote host closed the connection)
1123 2011-03-30 19:56:28 <Kicchiri> You mean I should wait for many confirmations before believing an incoming transaction?
1124 2011-03-30 19:56:45 <BlueMatt> Kicchiri: yep
1125 2011-03-30 19:57:12 <BlueMatt> Kicchiri: 6 is the standard, but you should be fine with 4/5
1126 2011-03-30 19:57:31 <BlueMatt> if its a large tx, make sure to get a couple extra confirms just to be sure
1127 2011-03-30 20:02:43 nathan7 has quit (Quit: Lost terminal)
1128 2011-03-30 20:04:27 Teslah has quit (Ping timeout: 260 seconds)
1129 2011-03-30 20:05:33 <Kicchiri> OK, thanks.
1130 2011-03-30 20:06:28 <BlueMatt> Kicchiri: ,,bc,wiki weaknesses
1131 2011-03-30 20:06:29 <gribble> https://bitcoin.it/ | Mar 24, 2011 ... Sourced from Wikipedia. Bitcoin is a digital currency created in 2009 by Satoshi Nakamoto. It is also the name of the open source software ...
1132 2011-03-30 20:06:48 <BlueMatt> ;;bc,wiki weaknesses
1133 2011-03-30 20:06:48 <gribble> https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Weaknesses | Mar 3, 2011 ... Weaknesses. From Bitcoin. Jump to: navigation, search .... Retrieved from "https ://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Weaknesses". Category: Technical ...
1134 2011-03-30 20:06:49 genjix has joined
1135 2011-03-30 20:06:49 genjix has quit (Changing host)
1136 2011-03-30 20:06:49 genjix has joined
1137 2011-03-30 20:06:51 <BlueMatt> there we go
1138 2011-03-30 20:06:57 <midnightmagic> lol. Nice to see a vortex 6" pushes enough air for my miners..
1139 2011-03-30 20:07:05 <genjix> hey
1140 2011-03-30 20:07:10 <midnightmagic> yay do-it-yourself air exchange!
1141 2011-03-30 20:07:17 <CIA-96> bitcoin: tcatm <tcatm@gawab.com> rfc1123Time_localefix * r454bc86479a3 bitcoind-personal/init.cpp: allow coredumps by not catching SIGSEGV
1142 2011-03-30 20:07:52 <luke-jr> O.o
1143 2011-03-30 20:08:02 <luke-jr> how did it do *that*
1144 2011-03-30 20:13:59 lfm has quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
1145 2011-03-30 20:14:19 Mango-chan has quit ()
1146 2011-03-30 20:16:39 <CIA-96> bitcoin: Luke Dashjr <luke-jr+git@utopios.org> rfc1123Time_localefix * re19f6b23d7a5 bitcoind-personal/rpc.cpp: Bugfix: force POSIX locale and GMT timezone for rfc1123Time, which it needs
1147 2011-03-30 20:18:00 <luke-jr> git://gitorious.org/~Luke-Jr/bitcoin/luke-jr-bitcoin.git rfc1123Time_localefix <-- proposed for merging
1148 2011-03-30 20:20:31 xelister has joined
1149 2011-03-30 20:20:51 <xelister> :happy:  YEY  I  MINED A BLOCK  :D   Just 5 minutes after starting the miner \o/
1150 2011-03-30 20:21:14 devon_hillard has quit (Quit: Leaving)
1151 2011-03-30 20:21:19 <xelister>     "testnet":"true"  :problem?:
1152 2011-03-30 20:21:23 * xelister forever alone
1153 2011-03-30 20:23:01 <luke-jr> hahaha
1154 2011-03-30 20:23:12 devon_hillard has joined
1155 2011-03-30 20:23:47 Mango-chan has joined
1156 2011-03-30 20:23:47 Mango-chan has quit (Changing host)
1157 2011-03-30 20:23:47 Mango-chan has joined
1158 2011-03-30 20:28:35 sethsethseth has quit (Ping timeout: 264 seconds)
1159 2011-03-30 20:30:21 BlueMatt has quit (Quit: Ex-Chat)
1160 2011-03-30 20:32:01 <ersi> xelister: awesome, godly luck ;D
1161 2011-03-30 20:32:33 cheeseman has quit (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
1162 2011-03-30 20:32:56 antivigilante_ has joined
1163 2011-03-30 20:33:26 <jgarzik> according to http://www.alloscomp.com/bitcoin/calculator.php I am beyond 95% probability :/
1164 2011-03-30 20:33:42 rcorreia_ has quit (Ping timeout: 246 seconds)
1165 2011-03-30 20:33:48 rcorreia has joined
1166 2011-03-30 20:34:06 <[Tycho]> jgarzik, with solo mining ?
1167 2011-03-30 20:34:31 antivigilante has quit (Ping timeout: 246 seconds)
1168 2011-03-30 20:34:52 <jgarzik> [Tycho]: kinda-sorta.  I'm running a difficulty-1 pool server, with all my own mining power.  Testing pool server software.
1169 2011-03-30 20:35:09 <jgarzik> solo mining, but not in the traditional sense
1170 2011-03-30 20:35:11 Lartza_ has joined
1171 2011-03-30 20:37:18 lfm has joined
1172 2011-03-30 20:38:47 Lartza has quit (Ping timeout: 264 seconds)
1173 2011-03-30 20:40:47 nathan7 has joined
1174 2011-03-30 20:40:52 mko7 has quit (Ping timeout: 248 seconds)
1175 2011-03-30 20:41:18 <nathan7> daveparrish, sirius-m: op gribble?
1176 2011-03-30 20:45:09 <[Tycho]> jgarzik, there was nore than 99.99% in slush's pool :)
1177 2011-03-30 20:47:16 mko7 has joined
1178 2011-03-30 20:51:29 EPiSKiNG has joined
1179 2011-03-30 20:53:11 <EPiSKiNG> [Tycho] is God
1180 2011-03-30 20:53:16 <EPiSKiNG> thanks for deepbit
1181 2011-03-30 20:53:32 <sipa> i remember a forum post where satoshi did a suggestion for a system to verify transactions immediately?
1182 2011-03-30 20:53:58 <sipa> that's not really the question though - the question is whether someone remembers where to find it
1183 2011-03-30 20:56:12 <[Tycho]> EPiSKiNG, you are welcome :)
1184 2011-03-30 20:56:54 dust2 has joined
1185 2011-03-30 20:56:54 dust1 has quit (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
1186 2011-03-30 20:59:05 <sipa> found it: http://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=423.msg3819#msg3819
1187 2011-03-30 20:59:54 kupo has quit (Remote host closed the connection)
1188 2011-03-30 21:00:56 <ersi> [Tycho]: Um, I pressed 'new worker' and I can't set the name of the worker :o
1189 2011-03-30 21:01:28 <EPiSKiNG> using poclbm-gui?
1190 2011-03-30 21:01:37 <EPiSKiNG> right click on the tab and hit rename
1191 2011-03-30 21:01:51 <ersi> I'm using the website @ deepbit.net
1192 2011-03-30 21:02:09 <EPiSKiNG> the name of the new worker is (your previous login)_0
1193 2011-03-30 21:02:17 <[Tycho]> ersi, have you read the text under the renaming box ?
1194 2011-03-30 21:02:18 <EPiSKiNG> so like episking@mail.me_0
1195 2011-03-30 21:02:26 <EPiSKiNG> then _1
1196 2011-03-30 21:02:27 <ersi> lol
1197 2011-03-30 21:02:37 <ersi> I thought it said "can't be changed later"
1198 2011-03-30 21:02:44 <[Tycho]> ersi, it's a temporal restriction, will be fixed in a day or two.
1199 2011-03-30 21:03:01 <ersi> Alrighty. Well, it's just that I read it.. but didn't parse it correctly :)
1200 2011-03-30 21:04:00 <[Tycho]> I will change it so users can rename the part to the right of "_"
1201 2011-03-30 21:04:41 <ersi> Sounds good
1202 2011-03-30 21:05:19 <EPiSKiNG> is the PPS or Proportional question still up in the air...?
1203 2011-03-30 21:05:39 <EPiSKiNG> I've been using proportional, but I've read that people are getting good results with PPS
1204 2011-03-30 21:05:50 <[Tycho]> EPiSKiNG, Proportional fee is 3%, PPS is more like 10%
1205 2011-03-30 21:06:55 <EPiSKiNG> the forum post for deepbit is soooo long
1206 2011-03-30 21:07:04 <EPiSKiNG> I'm on like page 10 and not sure how much more I can read
1207 2011-03-30 21:07:05 <EPiSKiNG> lol
1208 2011-03-30 21:07:06 <[Tycho]> My fee for Proportional is almost the best among the pools :)
1209 2011-03-30 21:07:06 <Aciid> good bedtime reading
1210 2011-03-30 21:07:12 Joozero has quit ()
1211 2011-03-30 21:09:00 <EPiSKiNG> word
1212 2011-03-30 21:09:17 <Aciid> excel
1213 2011-03-30 21:09:21 dust2 has quit (Quit: Leaving.)
1214 2011-03-30 21:09:27 dust1 has joined
1215 2011-03-30 21:09:43 <Aciid> powerpoint
1216 2011-03-30 21:09:44 <Aciid> visio
1217 2011-03-30 21:09:46 <Aciid> access and that
1218 2011-03-30 21:09:50 <Aciid> gotta catch em all
1219 2011-03-30 21:09:55 <Aciid> gotta catch em allllll
1220 2011-03-30 21:09:59 <Aciid> pirated licences
1221 2011-03-30 21:10:05 <Aciid> *** fees may apply on OEM
1222 2011-03-30 21:10:16 <Aciid> brought to you by, trolling on IRC networks
1223 2011-03-30 21:10:28 <Aciid> Thu Mar 31 00:08:46 EEST 2011
1224 2011-03-30 21:10:30 <Aciid> yes yes...
1225 2011-03-30 21:12:11 <xelister> ;;; rate Aciid 5 bought weed, all ok, he used it immediatelly
1226 2011-03-30 21:12:11 <gribble> Error: ";" is not a valid command.
1227 2011-03-30 21:15:53 Spenvo has joined
1228 2011-03-30 21:19:54 dust1 has left ()
1229 2011-03-30 21:22:54 xelister_ has joined
1230 2011-03-30 21:23:14 xelister_ has quit (Remote host closed the connection)
1231 2011-03-30 21:23:42 <ersi> [Tycho]: If my worker is set to PPS, can I change it to proportionally on a whim - and all later shares will be counted proportionally instead?
1232 2011-03-30 21:25:02 <[Tycho]> ersi, yes, the switch is seamless.
1233 2011-03-30 21:25:35 xelister has quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
1234 2011-03-30 21:25:44 <ersi> [Tycho]: Sweet. You're the man :]
1235 2011-03-30 21:41:06 adlsaks has joined
1236 2011-03-30 21:44:51 <EPiSKiNG> ;;block
1237 2011-03-30 21:44:52 <gribble> Error: "block" is not a valid command.
1238 2011-03-30 21:44:56 <EPiSKiNG> ;;stats
1239 2011-03-30 21:44:56 <gribble> I have 17 registered users with 21 registered hostmasks; 1 owner and 0 admins.
1240 2011-03-30 21:45:00 <EPiSKiNG> ;;status
1241 2011-03-30 21:45:00 <gribble> I am connected to freenode as gribble, i2p as gribble, and oftc as gribble.
1242 2011-03-30 21:45:06 kelp has quit (Quit: Bye!)
1243 2011-03-30 21:45:07 <EPiSKiNG> ;;help
1244 2011-03-30 21:45:08 <gribble> The bot responds when you start a line with the ! character. A good starting point for exploring the bot is the !facts command. You can also visit the bot's website for a list of help topics and documentation: http://gribble.sourceforge.net/
1245 2011-03-30 21:46:02 <EPiSKiNG> ;;facts
1246 2011-03-30 21:46:02 <gribble> To see a nice sortable web view of all factoids, click here: http://gribble.dreamhosters.com/viewfactoids.php?db=%23bitcoin-dev || To see a list of the most popular factoids, run !rank || To search factoids, run !factoids search <yoursearchterm>
1247 2011-03-30 21:46:35 kelp has joined
1248 2011-03-30 21:50:38 Xunie has quit (Remote host closed the connection)
1249 2011-03-30 21:51:37 <CIA-96> bitcoin: phantomcircuit <phantomcircuit@covertinferno.org> sqlite3 * r2a9156e8a8c7 bitcoin-alt/bitcoin/ (peer.py storage.py): connect heads to tails dont collect tx's in the tx handler implemented tails() transaction's position get's set
1250 2011-03-30 21:52:33 bitcoiner has quit (Quit: ChatZilla 0.9.86.1 [Firefox 3.6.16/20110319135224])
1251 2011-03-30 21:58:13 <genjix> luke-jr: would it be possible to turn on the tinyurls which contain a diff/url to projects? :)
1252 2011-03-30 21:58:30 RBecker is now known as RBecker|Laptop
1253 2011-03-30 21:58:35 RBecker is now known as Laptop!~Ryan@unaffiliated/rbecker|RBecker
1254 2011-03-30 21:58:36 <genjix> im often curious about people's commits
1255 2011-03-30 21:58:39 xelister has joined
1256 2011-03-30 21:58:52 phantomcircuit has joined
1257 2011-03-30 21:58:57 <genjix> (i know github has them so i assume it's standard/easy to enable)
1258 2011-03-30 21:59:32 <EPiSKiNG> So I have a 5970 in my computer now, and I want to put in a 5870 as well, is that possible?
1259 2011-03-30 21:59:37 SykeP has joined
1260 2011-03-30 21:59:45 <EPiSKiNG> or will my Windows 7 x64 wig out with two seperate video cards
1261 2011-03-30 21:59:59 <nanotube> EPiSKiNG: if you have a spare slot, and sufficient power in your PSU, and sufficient cooling in your case - then yes ;)
1262 2011-03-30 22:00:07 <EPiSKiNG> sweet
1263 2011-03-30 22:01:10 <[Tycho]> EPiSKiNG, you may have to plug another monitor (or dummy) in your second card.
1264 2011-03-30 22:02:53 <EPiSKiNG> bbl!
1265 2011-03-30 22:02:56 EPiSKiNG has quit ()
1266 2011-03-30 22:05:11 overtork has quit (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
1267 2011-03-30 22:05:29 <xelister> epiit should be possible eventyally yea
1268 2011-03-30 22:05:32 overtork has joined
1269 2011-03-30 22:08:58 DrQ has joined
1270 2011-03-30 22:16:12 <luke-jr> genjix: yeah, possible. I'd have to code it :P
1271 2011-03-30 22:16:40 <luke-jr> Girroco has it internal, not using hooks
1272 2011-03-30 22:16:56 <luke-jr> will do shortly
1273 2011-03-30 22:17:18 <luke-jr> (actually, Girroco DOES send URIs, just not tiny, and not in the message field)
1274 2011-03-30 22:19:13 Teslah has joined
1275 2011-03-30 22:24:24 bitcoiner has joined
1276 2011-03-30 22:24:30 Kicchiri is now known as ForceDestroyer
1277 2011-03-30 22:25:51 <xelister> Samsung troyans laptops they sell wih keyloggers:  User found a keylogger program installed on his brand-new laptop — not once, but twice. After initial denials, Samsung has admitted they did this, saying it was to 'monitor the performance of the machine and to find out how it is being used. - slashdot
1278 2011-03-30 22:26:31 adlsaks has quit (Ping timeout: 246 seconds)
1279 2011-03-30 22:28:05 RBecker has joined
1280 2011-03-30 22:28:55 RBecker has quit (Laptop!~Ryan@64.253.2.80.dyn-cm-pool72.pool.hargray.net|Client Quit)
1281 2011-03-30 22:28:58 osmosis has joined
1282 2011-03-30 22:30:37 <phantomcircuit> xelister, wat
1283 2011-03-30 22:31:01 <[Tycho]> phantomcircuit, looks like a user with no brain.
1284 2011-03-30 22:31:42 <xelister> phantomcircuit: samsung deliveres brand new laptops, already with keyloggers installed. woot...
1285 2011-03-30 22:32:08 <phantomcircuit> i seriously doubt they would admit that
1286 2011-03-30 22:32:19 <[Tycho]> phantomcircuit, they didn't.
1287 2011-03-30 22:32:23 <luke-jr> phantomcircuit: unless someone got fired over it
1288 2011-03-30 22:32:27 <phantomcircuit> the potential legal ramifications are tremendous
1289 2011-03-30 22:32:40 <phantomcircuit> also
1290 2011-03-30 22:32:53 <phantomcircuit> how does the mainline client know when it's finished downloading the initial block chain?
1291 2011-03-30 22:33:20 <[Tycho]> phantomcircuit, if you can start mining - it's done :)
1292 2011-03-30 22:33:34 <phantomcircuit> what
1293 2011-03-30 22:33:38 <phantomcircuit> that's not what i asked
1294 2011-03-30 22:34:06 <xelister> phantomcircuit: well in usafagsland, everyone is slave of corportaions
1295 2011-03-30 22:34:38 <phantomcircuit> xelister, you haven't made any legally binding agreement with samsung by purchasing the laptop
1296 2011-03-30 22:34:56 <xelister> if in usafaglang uneducated niggers can order you around, unress you and your gf and your child doughter and grope them, or imprison you for stupid downloading of shitty mp3,  this doesnt seem unbelivable
1297 2011-03-30 22:35:13 <phantomcircuit> huh
1298 2011-03-30 22:35:23 <phantomcircuit> you cant be imprisoned for downloading music
1299 2011-03-30 22:35:33 <luke-jr> you can in Japan
1300 2011-03-30 22:35:34 <xelister> also Sony is known for previous scandal when Sony ROOTKITED the systems (well, windows) into which original Sony CDs where inserted
1301 2011-03-30 22:35:43 <xelister> luke-jr: yeap
1302 2011-03-30 22:35:51 DrQ has quit (Ping timeout: 276 seconds)
1303 2011-03-30 22:35:58 <phantomcircuit> xelister, lol yeah did you know that's technically legal though?
1304 2011-03-30 22:36:07 <xelister> phantomcircuit: it is of course illegal
1305 2011-03-30 22:36:15 <phantomcircuit> nope
1306 2011-03-30 22:36:18 <phantomcircuit> totally legal
1307 2011-03-30 22:36:23 <xelister> which thing
1308 2011-03-30 22:36:31 <phantomcircuit> the sony DRM rootkit
1309 2011-03-30 22:36:43 <xelister> it is? then the law sucks cocks in places where it is legal...
1310 2011-03-30 22:36:57 <xelister> but I doubt it was legal since they had trouble and penalties etc
1311 2011-03-30 22:37:01 m00p has quit (Quit: Leaving)
1312 2011-03-30 22:37:04 <phantomcircuit> they didn't get fined for it anywhere iirc
1313 2011-03-30 22:37:34 RBecker has joined
1314 2011-03-30 22:37:44 Diablo-D3 has joined
1315 2011-03-30 22:40:24 <[Tycho]> phantomcircuit, it's a nice example how bad technical support can cost millions of $ to a company :)
1316 2011-03-30 22:41:03 <phantomcircuit> [Tycho], bad technical support? this was a concious decision by executives im sure
1317 2011-03-30 22:41:38 <[Tycho]> phantomcircuit, what decision ? There wasn't any keylogger in the pc.
1318 2011-03-30 22:42:02 <phantomcircuit> oh i thought you meant sony
1319 2011-03-30 22:42:02 <Spenvo> TD, some interesting product developments at the big G today
1320 2011-03-30 22:42:20 <phantomcircuit> yeah im sure the keylogger wasnt a factory addition ;)
1321 2011-03-30 22:42:55 <Spenvo> premature congrats, i think +1 will be a hit and offer lasting value :)
1322 2011-03-30 22:44:14 <Spenvo> for context:  http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2011/03/1s-right-recommendations-right-when-you.html   and if it hasn't rolled out to you, you can join it here: http://www.google.com/experimental/index.html
1323 2011-03-30 22:44:52 ApertureScience has quit (Quit: Linux: because a PC is a terrible thing to waste)
1324 2011-03-30 22:44:58 <genjix> luke-jr: kk no worries. just wondered if it was an easy switch to turn on
1325 2011-03-30 22:45:47 <luke-jr> genjix: the hook version is old and required a lot of hacking when I used it
1326 2011-03-30 22:45:51 <luke-jr> and used email :p
1327 2011-03-30 22:45:55 <genjix> phantomcircuit: don't you remember the Sony rootkit?
1328 2011-03-30 22:45:57 <luke-jr> Girocco uses XML-RPC
1329 2011-03-30 22:46:06 <phantomcircuit> genjix, yes
1330 2011-03-30 22:46:49 <genjix> damn, i'm having trouble keeping track of how to boycott
1331 2011-03-30 22:47:14 Netsniper has quit (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
1332 2011-03-30 22:47:19 DrQ has joined
1333 2011-03-30 22:47:27 <[Tycho]> ;;bc,stats
1334 2011-03-30 22:47:29 <gribble> Current Blocks: 115830 | Current Difficulty: 68978.89245792 | Next Difficulty At Block: 116927 | Next Difficulty In: 1097 blocks | Next Difficulty In About: 6 days, 23 hours, 17 minutes, and 33 seconds | Next Difficulty Estimate: 75413.98324875
1335 2011-03-30 22:47:50 ApertureScience has joined
1336 2011-03-30 22:48:05 <ArtForz> erm... usually by not buying products... I have more trouble keeping track of *who* to boycott ;)
1337 2011-03-30 22:48:20 antivigilante_ has quit (Ping timeout: 250 seconds)
1338 2011-03-30 22:49:02 <ArtForz> </typo nazi>
1339 2011-03-30 22:51:19 <phantomcircuit> damn sub selects in sqlite are partially why this is slow
1340 2011-03-30 22:51:38 <CIA-96> bitcoin: phantomcircuit <phantomcircuit@covertinferno.org> sqlite3 * r2c2e5ff49c8e bitcoin-alt/ (bitcoin.py bitcoin/peer.py bitcoin/storage.py): load transactions with blocks
1341 2011-03-30 22:51:39 <phantomcircuit> turns out my original problem with sqlite was sqlalchemy being retarded about back populating references
1342 2011-03-30 22:52:05 devrandom has quit (Ping timeout: 246 seconds)
1343 2011-03-30 22:52:06 <dirtyfilthy> what's the add speed now?
1344 2011-03-30 22:52:26 <phantomcircuit> lets see ill time it
1345 2011-03-30 22:52:43 <sipa> add speed?
1346 2011-03-30 22:53:38 <phantomcircuit> merging blocks/transactions into an sqlite database
1347 2011-03-30 22:54:39 <phantomcircuit> 14002 blocks in 49.533 seconds
1348 2011-03-30 22:54:48 noagendamarket has joined
1349 2011-03-30 22:54:51 <phantomcircuit> now mind you that's not even trying to verify the transactions
1350 2011-03-30 22:55:19 <[Tycho]> phantomcircuit, what you are developing ?
1351 2011-03-30 22:55:30 <phantomcircuit> a full p2p node
1352 2011-03-30 22:55:45 <phantomcircuit> so about 7 minutes to download the entire block chain
1353 2011-03-30 22:56:06 <phantomcircuit> i could probably improve that by several orders of magnitude by seeding the block chain
1354 2011-03-30 22:56:10 <genjix> how does that work? are you only downloading headers?
1355 2011-03-30 22:56:18 <xelister> phantomcircuit: what are you doing noob
1356 2011-03-30 22:56:19 <genjix> or not verifying it?
1357 2011-03-30 22:56:19 <phantomcircuit> genjix, blocks/transactions
1358 2011-03-30 22:56:28 <phantomcircuit> ffs this is all on github
1359 2011-03-30 22:56:28 <genjix> :o
1360 2011-03-30 22:56:30 <xelister> phantomcircuit: just use freenet like a linux user
1361 2011-03-30 22:56:36 <genjix> yeah I've been following it
1362 2011-03-30 22:56:40 RBecker has quit (Laptop!~Ryan@unaffiliated/rbecker|Remote host closed the connection)
1363 2011-03-30 22:56:47 <xelister> =)
1364 2011-03-30 22:56:54 <genjix> but mostly just drive by reading of the code
1365 2011-03-30 22:56:57 <phantomcircuit> xelister, i like mah ipv6
1366 2011-03-30 22:56:58 <phantomcircuit> ;)
1367 2011-03-30 22:57:02 <xelister> although yea, faster initiall block implemented lightweight in the bitcoin itself is cool
1368 2011-03-30 22:57:09 <genjix> mostly waiting for a working demo :)
1369 2011-03-30 22:57:10 <xelister> phantomcircuit: what do you mean? freenet works with ipv6
1370 2011-03-30 22:57:36 <phantomcircuit> genjix, removing sqlalchemy resulted in significantly fewer bugs (especially with the ordered lists of transactions/transaction inputs/outputs)
1371 2011-03-30 22:57:56 xelister has quit (Remote host closed the connection)
1372 2011-03-30 23:00:30 <genjix> ic
1373 2011-03-30 23:01:30 Kiba has joined
1374 2011-03-30 23:01:34 <phantomcircuit> yeah for some reason sqlalchemy doesn't back populate foreign key references before flush(), so if you have a type where part of the primary key is also a foreign key, you end up with NULL and tons of duplicates
1375 2011-03-30 23:02:12 <phantomcircuit> not very smart of them
1376 2011-03-30 23:04:00 * BurtyB looks at his britcoin ... hmmm
1377 2011-03-30 23:04:17 <phantomcircuit> BurtyB, what now
1378 2011-03-30 23:04:59 <BurtyB> phantomcircuit nothing, just checking what has happened as I guess genjix is back to auth stuff
1379 2011-03-30 23:07:31 Bosma has joined
1380 2011-03-30 23:07:41 <genjix> BurtyB: you deposited, right?
1381 2011-03-30 23:08:40 xelister has joined
1382 2011-03-30 23:08:56 <xelister> waaaait. hold the horses... I fucked up previous chat to phantomcircuit
1383 2011-03-30 23:09:12 <genjix> horses are held.
1384 2011-03-30 23:09:14 <genjix> proceed.
1385 2011-03-30 23:09:27 <phantomcircuit> xelister, are you stoned ? :P
1386 2011-03-30 23:09:29 <BurtyB> genjix yeah just looking at the trades
1387 2011-03-30 23:09:29 <xelister> the hisotrical ROOTKIT troyaning of own customers was ofcourse Ati, and currnet  troyanning own laptops with preinsalled keyloggers - this is Samsung
1388 2011-03-30 23:09:41 <genjix> BurtyB: nobody has matching rates
1389 2011-03-30 23:09:42 <xelister> what it is with companies starting on S.
1390 2011-03-30 23:09:47 <genjix> there was some trades earlier today
1391 2011-03-30 23:09:59 <xelister> phantomcircuit: no
1392 2011-03-30 23:10:26 <genjix> BTC sell price: 0.58  BTC buy price: 0.33
1393 2011-03-30 23:10:39 <genjix> 0.51
1394 2011-03-30 23:11:01 <genjix> once sell price comes down OR buy price goes up, then trades happen.
1395 2011-03-30 23:11:15 mko7 has quit ()
1396 2011-03-30 23:11:42 <BurtyB> genjix yeah, i guess my "Your trades" bit is from stuff that happened earlier today (well 30th)
1397 2011-03-30 23:12:07 <JFK911> ;;bc,stats
1398 2011-03-30 23:12:09 <gribble> Current Blocks: 115834 | Current Difficulty: 68978.89245792 | Next Difficulty At Block: 116927 | Next Difficulty In: 1093 blocks | Next Difficulty In About: 6 days, 22 hours, 40 minutes, and 57 seconds | Next Difficulty Estimate: 75526.70769880
1399 2011-03-30 23:13:03 <phantomcircuit> so what im thinking is that ill implement a webcache
1400 2011-03-30 23:13:04 <genjix> yeah
1401 2011-03-30 23:14:03 <phantomcircuit> hmm actually
1402 2011-03-30 23:16:24 Lartza_ has quit (Quit: Lähdössä)
1403 2011-03-30 23:17:05 Spenvo has quit (Quit: ChatZilla 0.9.86.1 [Firefox 4.0/20110318052756])
1404 2011-03-30 23:18:20 devon_hillard has quit (Ping timeout: 246 seconds)
1405 2011-03-30 23:19:25 EPiSKiNG has joined
1406 2011-03-30 23:19:39 <EPiSKiNG> argh... just tried to put my 5870 in my case with a 5970
1407 2011-03-30 23:19:55 <EPiSKiNG> boots fine, then when it's about to get into the windows screen i get an error
1408 2011-03-30 23:19:57 <EPiSKiNG> and BSOD
1409 2011-03-30 23:23:32 RBecker has joined
1410 2011-03-30 23:27:46 <phantomcircuit> EPiSKiNG, you're not using crossfire are you?
1411 2011-03-30 23:28:41 DrQ has quit (Ping timeout: 250 seconds)
1412 2011-03-30 23:33:15 <BurtyB> genjix PM?
1413 2011-03-30 23:33:57 antivigilante has joined
1414 2011-03-30 23:34:22 <genjix> BurtyB: yes
1415 2011-03-30 23:34:43 devrandom has joined
1416 2011-03-30 23:38:32 antivigilante_ has joined
1417 2011-03-30 23:38:32 antivigilante has quit (Ping timeout: 260 seconds)
1418 2011-03-30 23:38:48 subpar_ has joined
1419 2011-03-30 23:39:58 subpar_ has quit (Client Quit)
1420 2011-03-30 23:47:10 kelp is now known as kelp_
1421 2011-03-30 23:48:47 kelp_ is now known as kelp
1422 2011-03-30 23:49:36 <lfm> EPiSKiNG: try linux
1423 2011-03-30 23:51:05 <phantomcircuit> ;;bc,stats
1424 2011-03-30 23:51:07 <gribble> Current Blocks: 115835 | Current Difficulty: 68978.89245792 | Next Difficulty At Block: 116927 | Next Difficulty In: 1092 blocks | Next Difficulty In About: 6 days, 22 hours, 50 minutes, and 0 seconds | Next Difficulty Estimate: 75314.79956511
1425 2011-03-30 23:55:48 <phantomcircuit> ;;bc,stats
1426 2011-03-30 23:55:50 <gribble> Current Blocks: 115836 | Current Difficulty: 68978.89245792 | Next Difficulty At Block: 116927 | Next Difficulty In: 1091 blocks | Next Difficulty In About: 6 days, 22 hours, 40 minutes, and 50 seconds | Next Difficulty Estimate: 75325.36672629
1427 2011-03-30 23:57:30 <phantomcircuit> block end 56.8924000263
1428 2011-03-30 23:57:31 <phantomcircuit> wat
1429 2011-03-30 23:58:15 <sipa> ?