1 2011-11-26 00:01:58 B0g4r7_ has quit (Ping timeout: 248 seconds)
  2 2011-11-26 00:02:02 fortuna has joined
  3 2011-11-26 00:02:03 <gmaxwell> batouzo: better buy fast— bitcoin closes in about 6 days.
  4 2011-11-26 00:02:07 TD has joined
  5 2011-11-26 00:02:41 <sipa> ?
  6 2011-11-26 00:03:40 <gmaxwell> sipa: see the countdown on https://mtgox.com/
  7 2011-11-26 00:05:34 <sipa> right... and then? a big secret announcement?
  8 2011-11-26 00:05:41 da2ce7 has quit (Remote host closed the connection)
  9 2011-11-26 00:06:03 * sipa live from room 1024 of the euro bitcoin conference hotel
 10 2011-11-26 00:06:25 tiz has joined
 11 2011-11-26 00:06:36 merde has quit ()
 12 2011-11-26 00:06:46 peck has quit (Ping timeout: 244 seconds)
 13 2011-11-26 00:09:00 <edcba> soon... december !!! :)
 14 2011-11-26 00:09:53 MimeNarrator has joined
 15 2011-11-26 00:10:17 <[Tycho]> Oh, so it's december !
 16 2011-11-26 00:10:23 protip has joined
 17 2011-11-26 00:12:29 <tiz> hey guys, I'm developing a bitcoin signatures site, and i was wondering if someone would give me a hand?
 18 2011-11-26 00:12:38 _sgstair has joined
 19 2011-11-26 00:12:39 sgstair has quit (Disconnected by services)
 20 2011-11-26 00:12:40 _sgstair is now known as sgstair
 21 2011-11-26 00:13:17 eoss has quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
 22 2011-11-26 00:13:21 <gmaxwell> tiz: "bitcoin signatures site"?
 23 2011-11-26 00:13:32 Raccoon has quit (Ping timeout: 258 seconds)
 24 2011-11-26 00:13:32 protip is now known as Raccoon
 25 2011-11-26 00:13:32 peck has joined
 26 2011-11-26 00:13:47 <tiz> yes, to display your mining hashrate from your pool via API
 27 2011-11-26 00:13:56 <tiz> there was/is a site already, but they are having some problems
 28 2011-11-26 00:14:43 <gmaxwell> ah, you mean those little graph images. okay. Makes sense.
 29 2011-11-26 00:14:48 <tiz> exactly
 30 2011-11-26 00:15:03 <gmaxwell> You can ask here— but I don't know if anyone who knows anything about pool APIs is listening.
 31 2011-11-26 00:15:18 mpr has quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
 32 2011-11-26 00:15:19 <tiz> i'm mining in slush's pool atm, so i can test that API
 33 2011-11-26 00:15:23 mps has joined
 34 2011-11-26 00:15:43 eoss has joined
 35 2011-11-26 00:15:50 eoss has quit (Changing host)
 36 2011-11-26 00:15:50 eoss has joined
 37 2011-11-26 00:16:05 fortuna has quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
 38 2011-11-26 00:16:06 <tiz> i'm trying to do 2 things right now: 1. Get people to start using the site, hopefully once people see others signatures, the will get their own.
 39 2011-11-26 00:16:18 <tiz> and 2: get more api addresses from other mining sites
 40 2011-11-26 00:16:29 spaola has quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
 41 2011-11-26 00:17:11 fortuna has joined
 42 2011-11-26 00:18:05 welterde has quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
 43 2011-11-26 00:18:51 spaola has joined
 44 2011-11-26 00:19:41 Bwild has quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
 45 2011-11-26 00:19:41 MacRohard has quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
 46 2011-11-26 00:19:42 theorb has joined
 47 2011-11-26 00:20:05 wasabi3 has quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
 48 2011-11-26 00:20:15 theorbtwo has quit (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
 49 2011-11-26 00:20:26 theorb is now known as theorbtwo
 50 2011-11-26 00:20:50 wasabi has joined
 51 2011-11-26 00:20:53 wasabi1 has quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
 52 2011-11-26 00:21:09 tiz has quit (Ping timeout: 265 seconds)
 53 2011-11-26 00:21:10 wasabi1 has joined
 54 2011-11-26 00:22:05 fortuna has quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
 55 2011-11-26 00:22:14 danbri has joined
 56 2011-11-26 00:22:56 peck has quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
 57 2011-11-26 00:23:33 peck has joined
 58 2011-11-26 00:24:06 Kobier_ has quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
 59 2011-11-26 00:24:29 underscor has quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
 60 2011-11-26 00:24:52 asuk_ has joined
 61 2011-11-26 00:25:17 asuk has quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
 62 2011-11-26 00:25:17 asuk_ is now known as asuk
 63 2011-11-26 00:26:05 asherkin has quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
 64 2011-11-26 00:26:18 asherkin has joined
 65 2011-11-26 00:26:35 t3a_ has joined
 66 2011-11-26 00:28:25 Kobier_ has joined
 67 2011-11-26 00:28:59 t3a has quit (Ping timeout: 260 seconds)
 68 2011-11-26 00:30:23 danbri has quit (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
 69 2011-11-26 00:31:45 HaltingState has joined
 70 2011-11-26 00:31:46 HaltingState has quit (Changing host)
 71 2011-11-26 00:31:46 HaltingState has joined
 72 2011-11-26 00:34:03 danbri has joined
 73 2011-11-26 00:34:47 fortuna has joined
 74 2011-11-26 00:35:16 erle- has quit (Quit: erle-)
 75 2011-11-26 00:36:19 welterde has joined
 76 2011-11-26 00:36:53 larsivi has quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
 77 2011-11-26 00:37:00 larsivi has joined
 78 2011-11-26 00:37:37 underscor has joined
 79 2011-11-26 00:41:41 Maged has quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
 80 2011-11-26 00:41:56 AStove has quit ()
 81 2011-11-26 00:42:23 Bwild has joined
 82 2011-11-26 00:43:09 Maged has joined
 83 2011-11-26 00:45:38 BurtyBB has joined
 84 2011-11-26 00:45:44 gwillen has quit (Ping timeout: 258 seconds)
 85 2011-11-26 00:46:14 devrandom has quit (Ping timeout: 248 seconds)
 86 2011-11-26 00:46:52 gwillen has joined
 87 2011-11-26 00:46:52 gwillen has quit (Changing host)
 88 2011-11-26 00:46:52 gwillen has joined
 89 2011-11-26 00:47:11 TD has quit (Quit: TD)
 90 2011-11-26 00:47:23 BurtyBB has quit (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
 91 2011-11-26 00:47:25 tiz has joined
 92 2011-11-26 00:47:39 BurtyBB has joined
 93 2011-11-26 00:48:05 dooglus has quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
 94 2011-11-26 00:48:06 BurtyB has quit (Ping timeout: 244 seconds)
 95 2011-11-26 00:48:42 EPiSKiNG- has joined
 96 2011-11-26 00:48:53 fortuna has quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
 97 2011-11-26 00:49:07 fortuna has joined
 98 2011-11-26 00:50:05 dooglus has joined
 99 2011-11-26 00:50:05 dooglus has quit (Changing host)
100 2011-11-26 00:50:05 dooglus has joined
101 2011-11-26 00:50:17 EPiSKiNG- has quit (Client Quit)
102 2011-11-26 00:51:05 danbri has quit (Remote host closed the connection)
103 2011-11-26 00:53:10 eoss has quit (Remote host closed the connection)
104 2011-11-26 00:53:31 devrandom has joined
105 2011-11-26 00:55:46 erus`_ has joined
106 2011-11-26 00:56:53 erus` has quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
107 2011-11-26 00:57:41 erus`_ has quit (Client Quit)
108 2011-11-26 00:58:35 theymos has joined
109 2011-11-26 00:59:47 b4epoche_ has joined
110 2011-11-26 01:01:18 b4epoche_ has quit (Client Quit)
111 2011-11-26 01:01:56 b4epoche_ has joined
112 2011-11-26 01:03:06 b4epoche_ has quit (Client Quit)
113 2011-11-26 01:03:21 denisx_ has joined
114 2011-11-26 01:06:34 denisx has quit (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
115 2011-11-26 01:06:35 denisx_ is now known as denisx
116 2011-11-26 01:14:31 <graingert> tiz: link?
117 2011-11-26 01:14:45 <graingert> tiz: is it possible to link up blocks to polls using their getwork response
118 2011-11-26 01:14:48 <graingert> responce*
119 2011-11-26 01:21:22 BurtyBB has quit (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
120 2011-11-26 01:21:38 BurtyBB has joined
121 2011-11-26 01:24:53 denisx has quit (Quit: denisx)
122 2011-11-26 01:26:47 devrandom has quit (Ping timeout: 248 seconds)
123 2011-11-26 01:27:21 rdponticelli has joined
124 2011-11-26 01:28:40 crazy_imp has quit (Ping timeout: 258 seconds)
125 2011-11-26 01:30:31 crazy_imp has joined
126 2011-11-26 01:31:23 oww has quit (Remote host closed the connection)
127 2011-11-26 01:31:48 iocor has quit (Quit: Computer has gone to sleep.)
128 2011-11-26 01:31:57 oww has joined
129 2011-11-26 01:34:01 devrandom has joined
130 2011-11-26 01:35:17 asuk has quit (Quit: asuk)
131 2011-11-26 01:45:11 <Diablo-D3> http://www.patrick-wied.at/projects/html-qr/
132 2011-11-26 01:45:31 oww has quit (Ping timeout: 260 seconds)
133 2011-11-26 01:46:19 oww has joined
134 2011-11-26 01:51:05 Snapman[afkers] is now known as Snapman
135 2011-11-26 01:55:02 <graingert> Diablo-D3: definately should have used SVG
136 2011-11-26 01:55:22 <Diablo-D3> I dunno, I find that interesting
137 2011-11-26 01:55:37 <luke-jr> IE supports SVG?
138 2011-11-26 01:55:42 <graingert> yup
139 2011-11-26 01:56:02 <graingert> IE is pretty much HTML5 compliant
140 2011-11-26 01:56:08 <theymos> I think IE7 and later do.
141 2011-11-26 01:56:11 <graingert> apart from SVG webfonts
142 2011-11-26 01:56:23 <graingert> otherwise just shim chrome-frame
143 2011-11-26 01:57:00 <theymos> IE9 gets 100/100 on acid3.
144 2011-11-26 01:57:24 <graingert> bull
145 2011-11-26 01:57:44 <graingert> http://ie.microsoft.com/testdrive/benchmarks/acid3/default.html
146 2011-11-26 01:58:06 <gmaxwell> Firefox is 100/100 with current nightlies, dunno about earlier versions.
147 2011-11-26 01:58:51 <gmaxwell> apparently IE claims 100 now but the output is wrong.
148 2011-11-26 01:59:12 <graingert> I'm getting 100/100
149 2011-11-26 01:59:16 <graingert> on firefox 8
150 2011-11-26 01:59:20 <graingert> but it's not smooth
151 2011-11-26 01:59:43 <graingert> much smooth on refresh (intentional part of the test)
152 2011-11-26 01:59:48 <graingert> smoother*
153 2011-11-26 02:00:05 <gmaxwell> Yea yo uneed to test it with refresh, otherwise network latency goofs it up.
154 2011-11-26 02:00:17 <theymos> I just tried it on IE and got 100/100: http://i.imgur.com/6Q4f5.png I've heard it still technically fails, though.
155 2011-11-26 02:00:46 <gmaxwell> theymos: yea, thats failing, there is no shadow on the text for example.
156 2011-11-26 02:00:54 <graingert> the reference rendering is in html
157 2011-11-26 02:01:11 <graingert> lol I just got 99
158 2011-11-26 02:01:18 <gmaxwell> graingert: partially html.
159 2011-11-26 02:01:21 <gmaxwell> partially an image.
160 2011-11-26 02:01:25 <gmaxwell> e.g. http://acid3.acidtests.org/reference.png
161 2011-11-26 02:01:46 <luke-jr> graingert: is it XHTML5 compliant?
162 2011-11-26 02:01:55 <graingert> is what?
163 2011-11-26 02:02:12 <luke-jr> IE
164 2011-11-26 02:02:54 <graingert> well I would presume so - as that's easier than the lax parsing that html requires
165 2011-11-26 02:03:32 <luke-jr> IE has historically had issues with XML
166 2011-11-26 02:03:46 <graingert> IE9 is satisfactory
167 2011-11-26 02:04:51 <theymos> I don't mind recent IE versions at all. It's standards-compliant, pretty fast, and it has an OK UI. If I didn't care about extensions, I'd probably use IE instead of Firefox or Chrome.
168 2011-11-26 02:05:31 test__ has joined
169 2011-11-26 02:06:21 <luke-jr> data:application/xhtml+xml,<!DOCTYPE html5><html><head/><body>foo</body></html>
170 2011-11-26 02:06:24 <luke-jr> try that in IE9
171 2011-11-26 02:06:38 spq has quit (Quit: ChatZilla 0.9.87 [Firefox 7.0.1/20110928134238])
172 2011-11-26 02:06:49 <luke-jr> very simple standards-compliant page
173 2011-11-26 02:08:44 <theymos> No, it doesn't support that. I think it does support the common base64 data: URIs, though.
174 2011-11-26 02:09:01 <graingert> you mean it doesn't work?
175 2011-11-26 02:09:04 <graingert> or it parses like html
176 2011-11-26 02:09:31 <luke-jr> graingert: historically, IE will insist on downloading XHTML
177 2011-11-26 02:10:04 <luke-jr> note that the application/xhtml+xml MIME type is required by XHTML
178 2011-11-26 02:10:17 <luke-jr> ie, it's illegal to serve it as text/html
179 2011-11-26 02:10:28 <graingert> illegal?
180 2011-11-26 02:10:31 <luke-jr> yes
181 2011-11-26 02:10:34 <graingert> or invalid
182 2011-11-26 02:10:44 <luke-jr> same thing
183 2011-11-26 02:11:32 <graingert> seems to be referred to as illegal in the spec
184 2011-11-26 02:11:36 <graingert> seems an odd term to use
185 2011-11-26 02:12:05 <luke-jr> all a spec is, is a set of laws.
186 2011-11-26 02:12:29 <luke-jr> in the context of XHTML, where those laws are strictly enforced, "illegal" seems quite fitting
187 2011-11-26 02:12:44 <graingert> meh
188 2011-11-26 02:14:39 <luke-jr> also, it's illegal to display anything if the XHTML fails to parse strictly
189 2011-11-26 02:14:41 <luke-jr> ;)
190 2011-11-26 02:14:56 <graingert> can't you display an error?
191 2011-11-26 02:15:04 <graingert> also chrome displays up until the error
192 2011-11-26 02:15:54 <roconnor> hi sipa live from room 2^10
193 2011-11-26 02:16:01 <graingert> ?
194 2011-11-26 02:16:14 <luke-jr> graingert: then Chrome is non-compliant
195 2011-11-26 02:16:55 FellowTraveler has joined
196 2011-11-26 02:17:03 <graingert> chrome must burn
197 2011-11-26 02:17:07 FellowTraveler has left ()
198 2011-11-26 02:17:16 FellowTraveler has joined
199 2011-11-26 02:17:25 <FellowTraveler> hi all.
200 2011-11-26 02:21:14 <cjdelisle> 21:09 < luke-jr> also, it's illegal to display anything if the XHTML fails to parse strictly <-- which would break like 35% of the web
201 2011-11-26 02:21:18 <roconnor> FellowTraveler: Hi FellowTraveler; I'm quite interested in OT!
202 2011-11-26 02:21:49 <gmaxwell> cjdelisle: thats what distinguishes xhtml from html.
203 2011-11-26 02:22:05 <gmaxwell> cjdelisle: HTML is fails best effort, xhtml is always validated.
204 2011-11-26 02:22:16 <cjdelisle> ahh, very cool
205 2011-11-26 02:22:42 <cjdelisle> the whole "browsers get more clever so web devs get more stupid" arms race kinda sucked
206 2011-11-26 02:22:54 <luke-jr> cjdelisle: there's no XHTML on the web
207 2011-11-26 02:23:13 <luke-jr> because IE won't do anything with it
208 2011-11-26 02:23:15 <luke-jr> even if it's valid
209 2011-11-26 02:23:32 <cjdelisle> oh right, indeed
210 2011-11-26 02:24:02 <cjdelisle> actually IIRC XWiki sends XHTML *unless* the useragent says IE
211 2011-11-26 02:24:54 <gmaxwell> The browser vendors don't like xhtml because they don't believe people will ever use it.
212 2011-11-26 02:25:08 <gmaxwell> And .. it introduces a whole new class of failure modes: permitting things you should have rejected.
213 2011-11-26 02:25:30 <gmaxwell> s/ever/never/
214 2011-11-26 02:25:39 <cjdelisle> yea
215 2011-11-26 02:26:00 <gmaxwell> thats where the whole WHATWG and HTML5 thing came from the W3C was bent on XHTML and the browser vendors revolted and forked off.
216 2011-11-26 02:26:29 <gmaxwell> it's been healing.. and everyone except IE has workable XHTML support though it often lags HTML in features.
217 2011-11-26 02:26:41 <cjdelisle> it's too bad since browser makers have a responsibilty to teach manors to the unwashed webdev masses..
218 2011-11-26 02:27:58 <gmaxwell> Thats true, but its much harder than it seems. E.g. with xhtml if you create a comment field.. for example, and you validate it enough to keep people from inserting evil stuff, you're fine for html... but w/ xhtml if someone fails to close a tag and your validator isn't a full XML parser you'll possibly miss it and the page won't render.
219 2011-11-26 02:28:10 <gmaxwell> Strictness has some tough consequences.
220 2011-11-26 02:28:58 <cjdelisle> /nod
221 2011-11-26 02:29:49 <cjdelisle> reminds me that something I wanted to do was try to build the xwiki rendering engine with gcj so it took stdin and printed to stdout
222 2011-11-26 02:31:00 MacRohard has joined
223 2011-11-26 02:35:12 Kolky has quit (Quit: Bye bye!)
224 2011-11-26 02:36:04 <FellowTraveler> roconnor, sorry I got pulled away there for a sec.
225 2011-11-26 02:36:36 <FellowTraveler> coincidentally I am actually the author of OT so if you are interested in doing some related side project, I'll be happy to answer any questions or give you support.
226 2011-11-26 02:41:10 <roconnor> FellowTraveler: I know you are the author of OT :D  I've been reading about it, but haven't got around to installing it yet; I probably will soon.  I do have a question though if you have a sec.
227 2011-11-26 02:41:53 <FellowTraveler> roconnor no prob, feel free to ask anytime or initiate a side channel chat.
228 2011-11-26 02:42:09 <FellowTraveler> also email:  fellowtraveler@rayservers.net
229 2011-11-26 02:44:03 <gmaxwell> eldentyrell is reporting in #bitcoin that the osx build of .5 doesn't include bitcoind
230 2011-11-26 02:44:10 <roconnor> FellowTraveler: I think I understand how if you have a server Ivan who holds deposits for Alice and Bob how Alice and Bob exchange funds.  But I don't quite see how this can extend to when Alice "banks" with server Ivan and Bob "banks" with sever Jay. and they want to exchange funds (denominated in the same currency).  I hope my question makes sense.
231 2011-11-26 02:44:41 <roconnor> FellowTraveler: or maybe you have this written up somewhere that I missed.
232 2011-11-26 02:46:45 <FellowTraveler> roconnor: the answer is, that a server MUST redeem any instrument that it issued. Some other server cannot redeem those instruments.
233 2011-11-26 02:46:50 <FellowTraveler> However, keep in mind that the issuer can issue funds onto multiple servers, and they can be transferred between the servers in various ways pretty easily (using BITCOIN, for example, as a "glue" between them…)
234 2011-11-26 02:46:51 <FellowTraveler> also the servers cannot forge transactions against the users, and if the server disappears, the issuer can just re-issue those funds onto another server.
235 2011-11-26 02:47:26 <FellowTraveler> Finally, of course, the client software automates the process of querying whichever server it needs to, when doing any specific transaction. You might have a list of a dozen servers configured inside your wallet.
236 2011-11-26 02:47:32 <FellowTraveler> (Meaning you have a dozen server contracts imported.)
237 2011-11-26 02:47:33 <FellowTraveler> .
238 2011-11-26 02:48:41 MimeNarrator has quit (Ping timeout: 260 seconds)
239 2011-11-26 02:49:07 <roconnor> So the banks "Ivan" and "Jay" have to transfer funds via the server who issues the currency?
240 2011-11-26 02:49:29 <FellowTraveler> In your example, Bob's client would receive a cheque from Alice drawn from her account at server Ivan. A well-designed client would just connect to server Ivan and redeem it there, and move it to server Jay if that's what he has configured as his default.
241 2011-11-26 02:49:40 <roconnor> oh
242 2011-11-26 02:49:43 <roconnor> that makes sense
243 2011-11-26 02:50:04 <roconnor> thanks, that helps a lot
244 2011-11-26 02:50:08 <FellowTraveler> As for moving funds between servers, there are many ways:  (1) any server-to-server transfer can go through the issuer, who is on all servers already.  (2) Use OT market to convert to Bitcoin, then bailout, move to any other server, bail back in, convert back on market again.
245 2011-11-26 02:50:24 <FellowTraveler> I see a future where people can store their money in gold, then use Bitcoins to move it onto a debit card, and spend as dollars.
246 2011-11-26 02:50:39 MimeNarrator has joined
247 2011-11-26 02:50:41 <roconnor> intresting vision
248 2011-11-26 02:50:54 <FellowTraveler> So even people who distrust bitcoin, and prefer gold, and who prefer to spend dollars, will STILL find that Bitcoin is a useful tool that solves unique problems.
249 2011-11-26 02:51:04 <FellowTraveler> Because it makes that possible.
250 2011-11-26 02:51:20 <FellowTraveler> another server-to-server transfer method is to use Ripple (have a p2p protocol between users.)
251 2011-11-26 02:51:40 <FellowTraveler> because ANYTIME someone will give you "acceptable value" on some other system, then your client software would presumably be happy to transfer on-server units to them in return.
252 2011-11-26 02:51:53 <FellowTraveler> So you can actually get your money on other systems without ever having to bail in or out of the server itself
253 2011-11-26 02:52:06 <FellowTraveler> You just get the funds transferred from an existing user based on some other transaction in another system.
254 2011-11-26 02:52:32 <FellowTraveler> At some point I think clients will even employ screen-scraping in order to integrate with their current-day slave banks.
255 2011-11-26 02:52:33 <FellowTraveler> .
256 2011-11-26 02:52:53 <roconnor> thanks
257 2011-11-26 02:52:58 <FellowTraveler> no prob.
258 2011-11-26 02:56:52 <FellowTraveler> One more thing: my goal with Bitcoin is for voting pools on the blockchain to serve as the "issuer", on OT servers.
259 2011-11-26 02:57:01 <FellowTraveler> That way you don't have to trust some asshole with your coins.
260 2011-11-26 02:57:18 <roconnor> FellowTraveler: do you have anything written up about this?
261 2011-11-26 02:57:20 <FellowTraveler> (in order to still have access to the servers, and therefore to the untraceable cash, the instant finality of settlement, etc.)
262 2011-11-26 02:57:36 <FellowTraveler> roconnor just read my wiki, lots of articles and other media.
263 2011-11-26 02:57:39 <roconnor> ok
264 2011-11-26 02:57:45 <FellowTraveler> feel free to join mailing list if any other questions.
265 2011-11-26 02:57:52 <graingert> OT servers?
266 2011-11-26 02:58:42 <FellowTraveler> graingert Normally if you want to have BTC units on a server, like at MtGox, or at MyBitcoin, then you have to trust that server with your coins, until you bail them back off the server again.
267 2011-11-26 02:58:52 <FellowTraveler> My goal with OT is to eliminate that need, so you can have Low-Trust servers.
268 2011-11-26 02:59:17 <FellowTraveler> One way of doing that is to store the Bitcoins in a voting pool while they are bailed in.
269 2011-11-26 02:59:25 <FellowTraveler> So the server cannot steal them, or hackers cannot break into it and steal them.
270 2011-11-26 02:59:32 <FellowTraveler> Even if the server disappears, they are still recoverable.
271 2011-11-26 02:59:51 <gmaxwell> sounds fine, bitcoin facilitates that.
272 2011-11-26 02:59:59 <FellowTraveler> In that case, the "Bitcoin voting pool", which is already made possible by your existing bitcoin scripting language, serves the role of the "issuer"
273 2011-11-26 03:00:18 <FellowTraveler> whereas with Gold, or some other physical asset, the issuer would normally be one of the USERS (and presumably has a gold storage unit somewhere)
274 2011-11-26 03:00:24 <graingert> ah
275 2011-11-26 03:00:33 <graingert> so you're going to be using op_eval for this?
276 2011-11-26 03:00:35 <FellowTraveler> But with Bitcoin, since voting pools are possible, I want to go the extra step and reduce the need to trust that server.
277 2011-11-26 03:00:38 <theymos> Are you talking about having outputs require multiple signatures?
278 2011-11-26 03:00:54 <FellowTraveler> No, one of you will code that for me and I will end up using it in my own protocol, because I have to do things on my side as well. But yes op_eval.
279 2011-11-26 03:00:59 <FellowTraveler> theymos yes.
280 2011-11-26 03:02:11 <theymos> I was thinking before that it would be cool to be able to deposit your coins into several "banks" and specify exactly how many signatures are required out of the total.
281 2011-11-26 03:03:09 <theymos> Kind of reminds me of how Mixmaster allows you to specify the mixes you use to relay or email. You can do the same with BTC banks.
282 2011-11-26 03:03:31 <FellowTraveler> Let's say there are 50 servers in the pool.  So once I bail my Bitcoins onto a specific server, they are now safe in the pool.  The server gives me BTC units inside.
283 2011-11-26 03:03:37 <FellowTraveler> Now I have access to all the things a server can do (untraceable cash, markets, recurring payments, scriptable contracts, instant finality of settlement…)
284 2011-11-26 03:03:38 <FellowTraveler> and whenever I want to bail back out again, I just send my counter-signed request to the pool, and then the 50 servers vote to transfer my BTC back to me at a normal BTC address.
285 2011-11-26 03:03:58 <FellowTraveler> If my server disappears, I can still submit a recovery request to the other servers, and get a 3/4ths vote and get my coins back.
286 2011-11-26 03:04:23 <FellowTraveler> After all, I still have my account (my last signed receipt) which my server was incapable of forging, and the other OT servers (the pool members) have access to the same audit data that any issuer would.
287 2011-11-26 03:04:27 <FellowTraveler> That's the basic plan.
288 2011-11-26 03:04:28 <FellowTraveler> .
289 2011-11-26 03:04:34 <graingert> IC
290 2011-11-26 03:04:56 <FellowTraveler> also should enable microtransactions so you don't have to do them on the blockchain itself.
291 2011-11-26 03:05:49 graingert has quit (Remote host closed the connection)
292 2011-11-26 03:06:44 <theymos> That scheme is pretty good, but I'd like it better if you could choose exactly which of those 50 servers you trust and which you don't. I suppose that would make the assets less fungible, though.
293 2011-11-26 03:06:44 <gmaxwell> yup.
294 2011-11-26 03:07:02 <FellowTraveler> theymos the idea is, users should be able to configure their clients with the list of pools they trust.
295 2011-11-26 03:07:15 <FellowTraveler> A server should be able to join multiple pools, and the pools can discriminate about which servers join.
296 2011-11-26 03:07:22 <gmaxwell> 50 is a bit high in any case.
297 2011-11-26 03:07:42 <FellowTraveler> gmaxwell it was only an example.  The actual number of members in any pool will vary in the real world.
298 2011-11-26 03:07:47 <FellowTraveler> and Buyer beware.
299 2011-11-26 03:07:53 <FellowTraveler> because if all 50 servers are actually the same owner....
300 2011-11-26 03:07:57 <FellowTraveler> .
301 2011-11-26 03:08:14 <gmaxwell> Indeed, there are real costs to having large numbers. .. e.g. more risk that they aren't independant, and larger transactions to move funds in and out of bitcoin.
302 2011-11-26 03:08:28 <gmaxwell> But yea, people will be able to figure out the right sizes in practice.
303 2011-11-26 03:08:52 <FellowTraveler> I just like to say "50" because people think to themselves, "NO ONE could ever hack FIFTY servers."
304 2011-11-26 03:09:13 <FellowTraveler> of course you can never be paranoid enough.  We should have all crypto-cards in our cell phones right now if we were doing it right.
305 2011-11-26 03:09:41 <FellowTraveler> What is the average number of members in your mining pools ?
306 2011-11-26 03:10:54 <theymos> One thing you'd want to make sure of is that every server in the pool is signing things so that some servers don't get destroyed without anyone noticing.
307 2011-11-26 03:11:46 <FellowTraveler> Yeah I have high-level notes on the protocol but all those details still need to be worked out.
308 2011-11-26 03:12:03 <FellowTraveler> In fact I would love if you guys would work it out. You want an open standard anyway, right? For all your own servers.
309 2011-11-26 03:12:21 <FellowTraveler> You can rely on OT being able to do whatever hashes or signed receipts or whatever that you need.
310 2011-11-26 03:12:39 <FellowTraveler> This will require auditing FYI.
311 2011-11-26 03:13:03 <FellowTraveler> to prevent inflation.  Servers can't forge your transactions but they can still inflate currencies using dummy accounts, unless auditing is in place.
312 2011-11-26 03:13:09 <FellowTraveler> Necessary piece for low-trust servers.
313 2011-11-26 03:13:28 <FellowTraveler> And that means I need a common distributed hash table, so the place where users get their receipts, is the SAME PLACE where issuers do their audits
314 2011-11-26 03:13:43 <FellowTraveler> (in the case of bitcoin, that means voting pool members will play the role of "issuer" and vote whenever they have to decide something)
315 2011-11-26 03:13:44 <FellowTraveler> .
316 2011-11-26 03:14:09 <FellowTraveler> It doesn't have to store the receipts forever, but it DOES need to be censorship-resistant, and store them long enough to be useful.
317 2011-11-26 03:14:28 <FellowTraveler> And of course since we have digital cash, we can use that as part of the protocol in order to pay for resources like receipt storage
318 2011-11-26 03:14:36 somuchwin has quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
319 2011-11-26 03:15:10 somuchwin has joined
320 2011-11-26 03:15:22 <FellowTraveler> I think the next generation client will include some kind of anonymous network client with DHT, just to finish out my needs with auditing and low-trust.
321 2011-11-26 03:15:43 <FellowTraveler> And therefore it seems smart to design the anon-net-node to allocate resources based on digital cash.
322 2011-11-26 03:15:54 <FellowTraveler> Anyway just thinking out loud.
323 2011-11-26 03:15:54 <FellowTraveler> ./
324 2011-11-26 03:31:59 <gmaxwell> er. are you aware of an attack resistant dht? basically everything out there is seriously vulnerable. Except perhaps freenet and only CHK and SSK are not vulnerable there (e.g. it doesn't provide attack resistant human friendly nameing)
325 2011-11-26 03:38:46 coventry has joined
326 2011-11-26 03:39:39 <coventry> What is the purpose of OP_CODESEPARATOR
327 2011-11-26 03:44:43 <coventry> This is really confusing.  There is no instance of OP_CODESEPARATOR in etotheipi's list of non-standard transactions.  Is it intended for some future purpose?
328 2011-11-26 03:45:01 [7] has quit (Disconnected by services)
329 2011-11-26 03:45:11 TheSeven has joined
330 2011-11-26 03:48:02 tiz has quit (Quit: Page closed)
331 2011-11-26 03:53:05 Beremat has joined
332 2011-11-26 03:53:51 rphlx has joined
333 2011-11-26 03:54:08 <theymos> I think it's necessary in cases where multiple checksig/checkmultisig commands are executed in the same script.
334 2011-11-26 03:59:33 theorb has joined
335 2011-11-26 03:59:38 theorbtwo has quit (Ping timeout: 244 seconds)
336 2011-11-26 03:59:51 theorb is now known as theorbtwo
337 2011-11-26 04:00:11 copumpkin has quit (Quit: Computer has gone to sleep.)
338 2011-11-26 04:01:52 <coventry> Thansk, theymos.  Do you know of any examples?  I am having trouble wrapping my head around it.
339 2011-11-26 04:05:52 <theymos> If you have a script like "<sigA> <pubkeyA> OP_CHECKSIGVERIFY <sigB> <pubkeyB> OP_CHECKSIG" then each signature will have to sign the other signature, which is impossible. So you put a code separator after the first part, and then the second signature doesn't have to sign the first (but the first does have to sign the second). I don't think it's ever been used in a real transaction. It's also possible I don't understand it correctly.
340 2011-11-26 04:14:30 <FellowTraveler> gmaxwell I don't have much else in mind besides maybe Namecoin, maybe Freenet,, maybe Tahoe-LAFS over i2p.
341 2011-11-26 04:14:37 <FellowTraveler> Does anyone else have any suggestions for solving that problem?
342 2011-11-26 04:14:53 <FellowTraveler> Or the best way to integrate those pieces?
343 2011-11-26 04:16:06 <cjdelisle> you can make dhts attack resistant by forcing the node to add some proof of work to their id -- a "how did you generate that" packet
344 2011-11-26 04:16:41 <theymos> You're trying to prevent servers from issuing more currency than is actually backed by BTC?
345 2011-11-26 04:16:51 <FellowTraveler> I don't want to have to make a dht attack resistant.  Instead I just want to click a button and have the ideal DHT running on my machine so I can focus on coding OT.
346 2011-11-26 04:16:51 <cjdelisle> but if it takes 1 second to generate an id and you have 1000 nodes, with a replication factor of 8, you can still pwn that dht with around 8000 seconds of processing
347 2011-11-26 04:17:12 <cjdelisle> hahaha
348 2011-11-26 04:17:15 <cjdelisle> :)
349 2011-11-26 04:17:30 <FellowTraveler> theymos I would like a common place for receipts to be exchanged, in order to facilitate audits (and therefore low-trust servers)
350 2011-11-26 04:17:52 <FellowTraveler> I would like for the users and auditors to be able to retrieve the receipts from a common, reliable, censorship-resistant place.
351 2011-11-26 04:18:08 <FellowTraveler> and since this is for digital cash, obviously that can be figured in for solving the problem, like if resources need to be paid for.
352 2011-11-26 04:18:22 <cjdelisle> what is the risk? modification or just "feigning forgetfullness"?
353 2011-11-26 04:18:48 <FellowTraveler> not modification, since everything is signed.
354 2011-11-26 04:19:03 <FellowTraveler> On freenet or anywhere else, there's a specific time to live
355 2011-11-26 04:19:10 <theymos> What are receipts in this context and why are they important?
356 2011-11-26 04:19:16 <FellowTraveler> receipts don't have to be stored forever, just a few weeks probably, or even less if real-time auditing.
357 2011-11-26 04:19:35 <FellowTraveler> cheques being deposited, cash being withdrawn, market offers being initiated...
358 2011-11-26 04:19:39 <FellowTraveler> payment plans processing.
359 2011-11-26 04:19:46 <FellowTraveler> Bitcoins being bailed in.
360 2011-11-26 04:19:48 <FellowTraveler> and out.
361 2011-11-26 04:19:50 <FellowTraveler> etc.
362 2011-11-26 04:19:53 <FellowTraveler> transactions of all sorts.
363 2011-11-26 04:20:31 <cjdelisle> ok so the attack model is that you get a bunch of nodes which are close to eachother in key space and then you have them all forget about a certain receipt in concert -- then the dht is unable to load that receipt because it's nolonger there.
364 2011-11-26 04:20:51 <FellowTraveler> The idea is, if the USER has to get his receipt from the same place as the AUDITOR,  therefore the auditor has access to the same receipts.
365 2011-11-26 04:21:03 Cablesaurus has quit (Quit: Relax, its only ONES and ZEROS!)
366 2011-11-26 04:21:16 <FellowTraveler> Any illicit funds (inflated from a dummy acct, for example) would not be able to be spent without flowing into a normal account and thus showing up on audits.
367 2011-11-26 04:21:44 <theymos> Hash the receipts and put the hashes into the Bitcoin block chain for timestamping.
368 2011-11-26 04:21:47 <FellowTraveler> in real-time auditing you'd catch it within the first receipt.  Otherwise if you do 24-hour auditing, then you have to put a 36 hour delay (or whatever) on bailouts.
369 2011-11-26 04:22:01 <FellowTraveler> Yeah but I don't want to have to store them forever.  A few weeks is fine.
370 2011-11-26 04:22:26 <theymos> Put the hashes in transactions and spend the transactions after a few weeks. The network will forget about it.
371 2011-11-26 04:22:56 <FellowTraveler> network forgets spends eventually?
372 2011-11-26 04:23:02 <FellowTraveler> reduces the past to a hash at some point?
373 2011-11-26 04:23:35 <coventry> Thanks, theymos.  I will take a look at multisig.
374 2011-11-26 04:23:40 <theymos> It doesn't do that now, but it will. Spent outputs will eventually be forgotten.
375 2011-11-26 04:23:47 <FellowTraveler> cool thanks for that.
376 2011-11-26 04:24:18 <theymos> Outputs can also have a value of 0, so you don't need to have any money tied up.
377 2011-11-26 04:24:30 <theymos> Bitcoin was pretty much designed for stuff like this.
378 2011-11-26 04:24:55 theorb has joined
379 2011-11-26 04:25:11 <cjdelisle> heh what *I* would do is scrap the servers and rely on bitcoin to handle transfer of property by making an issuer hand out like 1 satoshi which the issuer treats as a certificate and whoever has that satoshi is eligable to buy back the ton of grain.
380 2011-11-26 04:25:28 <cjdelisle> But I realize that reads like "you're doing it wrong" and I won't get in your way ;)
381 2011-11-26 04:25:42 theorbtwo has quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
382 2011-11-26 04:25:48 <FellowTraveler> every technology is useful for its own piece.
383 2011-11-26 04:25:51 theorb is now known as theorbtwo
384 2011-11-26 04:26:04 <FellowTraveler> I like to find angles where combining pieces results in a "whole greater than its parts"
385 2011-11-26 04:26:12 <cjdelisle> indeed
386 2011-11-26 04:26:16 <FellowTraveler> like using Bitcoin for transferring gold, as discussed above.
387 2011-11-26 04:26:31 <cjdelisle> ahh, I didn't see it
388 2011-11-26 04:26:55 <theymos> It feels really wrong to me to tie assets to BTC, since bitcoins are not really separate units and you can "irreversibly" combine them with others. Blind signing also has advantages.
389 2011-11-26 04:27:34 <cjdelisle> So many parts of the problem are so well solved -- by different software which doesn't interface well...
390 2011-11-26 04:28:34 <FellowTraveler> theymos Bitcoins are covertible now on markets, into yen, dollars, euros, etc.
391 2011-11-26 04:28:59 coventry has quit (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
392 2011-11-26 04:29:01 <FellowTraveler> Therefore if a gold issuer had issued gold onto an OT server, I could store my money there in gold, and convert it to Bitcoins on the OT market when I want to move it onto a debit card and spend as dollars.
393 2011-11-26 04:29:23 <FellowTraveler> Or I could take those bitcoins to another server and bail-in there, and convert back to gold again for storage.
394 2011-11-26 04:29:25 <cjdelisle> :D
395 2011-11-26 04:29:35 <FellowTraveler> I'm not saying you should do that, I'm just saying that "people will do that".
396 2011-11-26 04:29:48 <FellowTraveler> Therefore Bitcoin is useful as a gold and dollar transfer system.
397 2011-11-26 04:30:36 <theymos> That sounds like trading, which is fine. It bothers me only when individual coins (outputs) are used to represent things, since you can't always track them accurately.
398 2011-11-26 04:31:03 <FellowTraveler> In fact, if you think of the total overall value that is stored on the earth, most of it isn't even in monetary form. It's in land, or stocks, or equipment, etc.
399 2011-11-26 04:31:18 <FellowTraveler> Only some percentage is stored in money, and only some percentage of that will ever be stored in Bitcoin.
400 2011-11-26 04:31:46 <FellowTraveler> But I bet you, even if Bitcoin only ends up as, say, 1% of the overall money supply, you can see that 1% as representing the ACTUAL VALUE that Bitcoin brings to the table
401 2011-11-26 04:31:54 <FellowTraveler> in terms of its being able to function as a lubricant for all the others.
402 2011-11-26 04:31:57 <FellowTraveler> Due to its unique properties.
403 2011-11-26 04:31:57 <FellowTraveler> .
404 2011-11-26 04:32:49 <FellowTraveler> And then if there are crackdowns, all that will do is cause MORE allocation in bitcoin form instead of dollar or gold form.
405 2011-11-26 04:32:54 <FellowTraveler> Because it's more censorship resistant.
406 2011-11-26 04:33:04 <luke-jr> no
407 2011-11-26 04:33:17 <luke-jr> you assume everyone is antiauthoritarian
408 2011-11-26 04:33:25 <luke-jr> and that censorship is abd
409 2011-11-26 04:33:26 <luke-jr> bad*
410 2011-11-26 04:33:29 <luke-jr> both of which are false.
411 2011-11-26 04:34:01 <FellowTraveler> I simply mean that money routes around obstacles, just like networks.
412 2011-11-26 04:34:09 <luke-jr> if Bitcoin is made illegal, probably most developers will cease.
413 2011-11-26 04:34:38 <FellowTraveler> If filesharing is made illegal, probably Bittorrent will cease also.
414 2011-11-26 04:34:57 dissipate has joined
415 2011-11-26 04:35:05 <luke-jr> probably.
416 2011-11-26 04:35:13 <FellowTraveler> :P
417 2011-11-26 04:35:18 <luke-jr> let's hope it's never made illegal
418 2011-11-26 04:35:33 <FellowTraveler> I don't know — look at SOPA.
419 2011-11-26 04:35:37 <luke-jr> hint: filesharing is 100% legal pretty much everywhere
420 2011-11-26 04:35:48 <FellowTraveler> Perhaps authorities cannot move to overtly ban Bitcoin because it will cause a Streisand effect.
421 2011-11-26 04:35:53 <luke-jr> SOPA has nothing to do with filesharing
422 2011-11-26 04:35:57 <theymos> You can see a similar occurance with Limewire. The main developers all had to quit, but a fork was quickly created.
423 2011-11-26 04:36:09 <FellowTraveler> I just mean that SOPA resulted in 10K+ darknet members on reddit
424 2011-11-26 04:36:18 <FellowTraveler> Maybe banning Bitcoin wouldn't kill it, but cause it to explode.
425 2011-11-26 04:36:37 <luke-jr> only among criminals
426 2011-11-26 04:36:53 <cjdelisle> luke-jr thinks the OWS people are a criminal gang
427 2011-11-26 04:37:00 <FellowTraveler> criminals == people who don't use slave money.
428 2011-11-26 04:37:02 <cjdelisle> so take that with a grain of salt
429 2011-11-26 04:37:16 <luke-jr> wtf is OWS?
430 2011-11-26 04:37:28 <cjdelisle> occupy wall street
431 2011-11-26 04:37:39 <luke-jr> sounds like it from what I've heard on IRC and such
432 2011-11-26 04:37:55 <FellowTraveler> OWS people are the unwashed masses. They are right to oppose corporate welfare and banks, but they are also a bunch of anti-voluntarists.
433 2011-11-26 04:38:25 <cjdelisle> my only point is some people use the word 'criminal' more loosely than others
434 2011-11-26 04:38:30 <FellowTraveler> Just like in Europe, obviously the ruling classes deserve to have riots thrown at them, but the rioters are still basically ignorant and criminal.
435 2011-11-26 04:38:51 <FellowTraveler> Seems like everything is always a false dichotomy in politics. That's the best way to manipulate people.
436 2011-11-26 04:39:24 <FellowTraveler> Everyone is "party right".
437 2011-11-26 04:39:26 <luke-jr> the "ruling class" is to be disciplined by THEIR authorities
438 2011-11-26 04:39:28 <luke-jr> not their subjects
439 2011-11-26 04:39:48 <FellowTraveler> I think in Europe they are "cogs".
440 2011-11-26 04:40:02 <[Tycho]> luke-jr: are you going to implement "green address" payments ?
441 2011-11-26 04:40:06 <FellowTraveler> They line up in queues. They just follow orders.
442 2011-11-26 04:40:10 <luke-jr> [Tycho]: no, it's stupid
443 2011-11-26 04:40:35 <luke-jr> [Tycho]: more importantly, if I did implement it, people "trusting" me would be fools
444 2011-11-26 04:40:46 <luke-jr> since an invalid block could very well reverse them
445 2011-11-26 04:41:21 <[Tycho]> So people trusting mtgox (if any) are fools too ?
446 2011-11-26 04:41:33 <luke-jr> no, MtGox doesn't let you withdraw until you have confirmed funds
447 2011-11-26 04:41:34 <FellowTraveler> Yes.
448 2011-11-26 04:41:41 <luke-jr> Eligius pays out long before then
449 2011-11-26 04:42:16 <luke-jr> because if it turns out the miner didn't actually earn those funds, the block paying them is invalid anyway, and their reward is reversed
450 2011-11-26 04:43:04 <[Tycho]> Oh, I forgot about your special method.
451 2011-11-26 04:43:10 <luke-jr> in other words, there's a relatively high chance an Eligius payout *will* be reversed, and if you take it with 0 confirms, you *are* taking a big risk
452 2011-11-26 04:43:33 <luke-jr> well, maybe not big since payouts are tiny, but still
453 2011-11-26 04:43:48 <cjdelisle> hey what are your thoughts on using & rather than && if you're checking that a bunch of numbers are 0? Shouldn't it be faster to do a bunch of calculations and 1 branch rather than a bunch of branches?
454 2011-11-26 04:43:53 <[Tycho]> I was thinking about normal TXes.
455 2011-11-26 04:44:28 <cjdelisle> err I guess that would be |
456 2011-11-26 04:44:33 <FellowTraveler> off topic but FYI since I just got this running.   Here's a couple client-script OT test scripts (we now have scripting):  http://pastebin.com/Curs5WTL
457 2011-11-26 04:44:33 Lolcust_Backup has quit (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
458 2011-11-26 04:44:44 <FellowTraveler> testing/debugging server side scripting now (smart contracts).
459 2011-11-26 04:45:42 Lolcust_Backup has joined
460 2011-11-26 04:46:25 <cjdelisle> if (a == 0 && b == 0 && c == 0 ...) {
461 2011-11-26 04:46:47 <cjdelisle> vs.  if ((a | b | c | d) == 0)
462 2011-11-26 04:47:30 <cjdelisle> seems like it should run faster because it promises that the right side of the && won't run unless the left side is true
463 2011-11-26 04:47:46 <luke-jr> so does &&
464 2011-11-26 04:47:57 <luke-jr> actually
465 2011-11-26 04:47:59 <luke-jr> only && does
466 2011-11-26 04:48:02 <cjdelisle> that's what I mean && has to branch to make that promise
467 2011-11-26 04:48:11 <luke-jr> so?
468 2011-11-26 04:48:20 <cjdelisle> I understand branches are slow
469 2011-11-26 04:48:23 <luke-jr> …
470 2011-11-26 04:48:28 <luke-jr> not slower than verifying a signature
471 2011-11-26 04:48:44 <cjdelisle> no, I'm just checking for zeros atm
472 2011-11-26 04:49:10 <cjdelisle> meh, rare occurance.. readability > *
473 2011-11-26 04:53:10 [Tycho] has quit (Remote host closed the connection)
474 2011-11-26 04:57:58 RobinPKR_ has joined
475 2011-11-26 04:58:59 roconnor has quit (Remote host closed the connection)
476 2011-11-26 05:00:07 RobinPKR has quit (Ping timeout: 248 seconds)
477 2011-11-26 05:00:08 RobinPKR_ is now known as RobinPKR
478 2011-11-26 05:06:11 Lolcust_Backup has quit (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
479 2011-11-26 05:14:43 Lolcust_Backup has joined
480 2011-11-26 05:40:01 dissipate has quit (Ping timeout: 276 seconds)
481 2011-11-26 05:54:19 BurtyBB has quit (Ping timeout: 276 seconds)
482 2011-11-26 05:58:25 BurtyB has joined
483 2011-11-26 06:01:13 BurtyBB has joined
484 2011-11-26 06:03:32 BurtyB has quit (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
485 2011-11-26 06:05:21 BurtyBB has quit (Ping timeout: 244 seconds)
486 2011-11-26 06:16:04 localhost has quit (Remote host closed the connection)
487 2011-11-26 06:19:55 localhost has joined
488 2011-11-26 06:21:51 skittixch has joined
489 2011-11-26 06:30:05 <skittixch> hey all, I'm a beginner trying to make a very simple ticker website with javascript, and I'm having a little trouble understanding what's going on in the wiki.  http://codepad.org/TaMCfOiQ any ideas?
490 2011-11-26 06:38:18 RazielZ has joined
491 2011-11-26 06:53:17 CaptainDDL has quit (Ping timeout: 276 seconds)
492 2011-11-26 07:09:04 wolfspraul has quit (Quit: leaving)
493 2011-11-26 07:11:49 ThomasV has joined
494 2011-11-26 07:15:20 <vrs> skittixch: wrong channel
495 2011-11-26 07:16:38 <vrs> oh, mtgox stuff. anyway, this is probably a JS problem and you should ask there (and provide actually useful info like error messages and the like)
496 2011-11-26 07:22:27 Raccoon has quit (Changing host)
497 2011-11-26 07:22:27 Raccoon has joined
498 2011-11-26 07:23:21 coingenuity has quit (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
499 2011-11-26 07:24:40 osmosis has quit (Ping timeout: 276 seconds)
500 2011-11-26 07:26:00 <skittixch> cool, thanks!
501 2011-11-26 07:35:46 Beremat has quit (Quit: ( www.nnscript.com :: NoNameScript 4.22 :: www.esnation.com ))
502 2011-11-26 07:37:54 skeledrew has joined
503 2011-11-26 07:43:33 Sedra has quit (Quit: ( Quit ))
504 2011-11-26 07:48:34 <diki> Wow
505 2011-11-26 07:48:44 <diki> considering that the doom 3 sourcecode is 9 megabytes
506 2011-11-26 07:48:52 <diki> how on earth is the game 1.75 gigs?
507 2011-11-26 07:49:01 <Diablo-D3> are you retarded?
508 2011-11-26 07:49:14 <Diablo-D3> did you forget the 1.75 gigs of game media?
509 2011-11-26 07:49:27 <bd_> diki: source code doesn't include game assets (textures, sounds, models, maps...)
510 2011-11-26 07:49:37 <diki> What??
511 2011-11-26 07:49:40 <bd_> that 9mb is just the game engine itself
512 2011-11-26 07:49:40 <diki> Why?
513 2011-11-26 07:49:51 <bd_> diki: because they didn't want to release the game assets?
514 2011-11-26 07:50:05 <bd_> because open-sourcing the game assets would make it basically impossible to sell doom 3?
515 2011-11-26 07:50:13 <Diablo-D3> diki: because you touch yourself at night
516 2011-11-26 07:50:16 <batouzo> diki: do you have any idea how computers are working?
517 2011-11-26 07:50:35 <diki> batouzo:do not speak
518 2011-11-26 07:50:42 <diki> Diablo-D3:same goes for you
519 2011-11-26 07:51:01 <Diablo-D3> an ant does not ask a god not to speak, it is considered rude.
520 2011-11-26 07:51:14 <diki> You're forgetting who's the god ;)
521 2011-11-26 07:51:32 * batouzo *throws lighting bolts at diki*  me zeusta
522 2011-11-26 07:51:45 <luke-jr> Diablo-D3 thinks he is Gilgamesh
523 2011-11-26 07:52:37 <Diablo-D3> I said god, not demigod.
524 2011-11-26 07:52:52 <diki> :trollface:
525 2011-11-26 08:13:57 fortuna has quit (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
526 2011-11-26 08:34:59 molecular has quit (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
527 2011-11-26 08:40:52 asuk has joined
528 2011-11-26 08:51:43 molecular has joined
529 2011-11-26 08:55:49 <wumpus> diki: in games it's the assets that are big, not the code, usually.. (and it has some pleasant advantages for the "hot code" to fit in the cache). that said, I was pleasantly surprised by the readabilty and cleanness of the doom3 code
530 2011-11-26 09:01:56 karnac has joined
531 2011-11-26 09:05:28 amiller has quit (Ping timeout: 248 seconds)
532 2011-11-26 09:05:28 random_cat has quit (Ping timeout: 248 seconds)
533 2011-11-26 09:06:31 karnac has quit (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
534 2011-11-26 09:06:45 karnac has joined
535 2011-11-26 09:09:04 fortuna has joined
536 2011-11-26 09:09:37 theymos has quit (Remote host closed the connection)
537 2011-11-26 09:12:27 ThomasV has quit (Quit: Quitte)
538 2011-11-26 09:19:07 amiller has joined
539 2011-11-26 09:20:51 random_cat has joined
540 2011-11-26 09:31:48 _Fireball has joined
541 2011-11-26 09:34:40 _Fireball has quit (Client Quit)
542 2011-11-26 09:40:10 karnac has quit (Quit: karnac)
543 2011-11-26 09:50:58 _Fireball has joined
544 2011-11-26 09:53:19 iocor has joined
545 2011-11-26 09:53:48 abragin has joined
546 2011-11-26 09:53:48 abragin has quit (Changing host)
547 2011-11-26 09:53:48 abragin has joined
548 2011-11-26 09:59:33 cronopio has quit (Quit: leaving)
549 2011-11-26 09:59:55 iocor has quit (Quit: Computer has gone to sleep.)
550 2011-11-26 10:14:27 iocor has joined
551 2011-11-26 10:23:00 denisx has joined
552 2011-11-26 10:37:18 skittixch has left ()
553 2011-11-26 10:39:09 dissipate has joined
554 2011-11-26 10:41:09 jav__ has joined
555 2011-11-26 10:41:48 jav__ has quit (Client Quit)
556 2011-11-26 10:42:24 jav__ has joined
557 2011-11-26 10:43:13 Kolky has joined
558 2011-11-26 10:43:36 urstroyer has joined
559 2011-11-26 10:45:11 AStove has joined
560 2011-11-26 10:46:01 jav__ has quit (Client Quit)
561 2011-11-26 10:51:47 osmosis has joined
562 2011-11-26 10:53:20 marf_away has joined
563 2011-11-26 10:58:52 chrisb__ has joined
564 2011-11-26 10:59:43 ThomasV has joined
565 2011-11-26 11:06:28 dvide has joined
566 2011-11-26 11:08:16 fimp has joined
567 2011-11-26 11:38:25 osmosis has quit (Quit: Leaving)
568 2011-11-26 11:40:14 datagutt has joined
569 2011-11-26 11:40:14 datagutt has quit (Changing host)
570 2011-11-26 11:40:15 datagutt has joined
571 2011-11-26 11:43:44 sacarlson has quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
572 2011-11-26 11:48:19 Turingi has joined
573 2011-11-26 11:48:19 Turingi has quit (Changing host)
574 2011-11-26 11:48:19 Turingi has joined
575 2011-11-26 11:55:50 chrisb__ has quit (Ping timeout: 258 seconds)
576 2011-11-26 11:59:52 B0g4r7_ has joined
577 2011-11-26 12:00:04 chrisb__ has joined
578 2011-11-26 12:00:27 sacarlson has joined
579 2011-11-26 12:02:01 B0g4r7__ has quit (Ping timeout: 248 seconds)
580 2011-11-26 12:13:56 dissipate has quit (Ping timeout: 276 seconds)
581 2011-11-26 12:23:31 urstroyer has quit (Quit: ~ Trillian Astra - www.trillian.im ~)
582 2011-11-26 12:29:33 iocor has quit (Quit: Computer has gone to sleep.)
583 2011-11-26 12:50:03 chrisb__ has quit (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
584 2011-11-26 12:51:23 chrisb__ has joined
585 2011-11-26 12:51:46 coventry has joined
586 2011-11-26 12:52:26 blacks has joined
587 2011-11-26 12:55:38 [Tycho] has joined
588 2011-11-26 13:00:47 <denisx> why is the target in getwork not also deprecated? it is part of the data already
589 2011-11-26 13:01:29 <sipa> it is not
590 2011-11-26 13:02:07 <sipa> well, the real target is, but maybe not the target requested by the pool
591 2011-11-26 13:02:33 <denisx> sipa: I'm talking about bitcoind and not a pool
592 2011-11-26 13:02:39 <denisx> the pool rewrites anyway
593 2011-11-26 13:02:58 <sipa> right, but target field is part of the getwork protocol, if you want it to work with pools
594 2011-11-26 13:03:35 <denisx> sipa: ah ok, that makes sense
595 2011-11-26 13:04:14 <sipa> you could make it implicit, saying that the field is optional, and if it's not present, use the nbits field in the data
596 2011-11-26 13:04:21 <sipa> but that makes it harder for implementors
597 2011-11-26 13:04:35 wolfspraul has joined
598 2011-11-26 13:04:37 larsivi has quit (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
599 2011-11-26 13:05:53 TD has joined
600 2011-11-26 13:12:32 bobke has quit (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
601 2011-11-26 13:15:58 larsivi has joined
602 2011-11-26 13:16:19 bobke has joined
603 2011-11-26 13:31:57 ThomasV has quit (Read error: Operation timed out)
604 2011-11-26 13:36:44 [Tycho] has quit (Remote host closed the connection)
605 2011-11-26 13:47:32 TheAncientGoat_ has joined
606 2011-11-26 13:58:17 <luke-jr> ;;bc,gen 50000000
607 2011-11-26 13:58:18 <gribble> The expected generation output, at 50000000 Khps, given current difficulty of 1192497.7500895 , is 42.1731772873 BTC per day and 1.7572157203 BTC per hour.
608 2011-11-26 14:29:16 marf_away has quit (Ping timeout: 258 seconds)
609 2011-11-26 14:41:41 ThomasV has joined
610 2011-11-26 14:44:39 coventry has quit (Ping timeout: 245 seconds)
611 2011-11-26 14:47:43 cronopio has joined
612 2011-11-26 14:50:08 cronopio has quit (Client Quit)
613 2011-11-26 14:51:47 TD has quit (Quit: TD)
614 2011-11-26 14:58:27 erle- has joined
615 2011-11-26 15:02:02 ThomasV has quit (Quit: Leaving)
616 2011-11-26 15:06:43 ThomasV has joined
617 2011-11-26 15:12:01 Xunie has joined
618 2011-11-26 15:19:36 TD has joined
619 2011-11-26 15:20:31 abbe has quit (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
620 2011-11-26 15:24:21 [Tycho] has joined
621 2011-11-26 15:24:41 abbe has joined
622 2011-11-26 15:42:34 da2ce7 has joined
623 2011-11-26 15:51:21 TD has quit (Quit: TD)
624 2011-11-26 15:58:36 davout has quit (Changing host)
625 2011-11-26 15:58:36 davout has joined
626 2011-11-26 16:01:36 <denisx> anyone knows how to hash the transactions from getmemorypool?
627 2011-11-26 16:05:40 <makomk> Hash the for what - to build a block?
628 2011-11-26 16:05:52 <denisx> makomk: no, for the merkletree
629 2011-11-26 16:05:58 Dras has joined
630 2011-11-26 16:06:15 <denisx> so, yeah, for the block
631 2011-11-26 16:06:59 <sipa> Hdouble sha256
632 2011-11-26 16:07:05 <sipa> -H
633 2011-11-26 16:07:19 <diki> and what is -H?
634 2011-11-26 16:08:21 <denisx> diki: a typo
635 2011-11-26 16:08:47 <diki> no i really meant what hdouble means
636 2011-11-26 16:08:49 <diki> or -h
637 2011-11-26 16:09:07 <denisx> that he only meant double
638 2011-11-26 16:09:13 <denisx> minus h
639 2011-11-26 16:10:57 <luke-jr> denisx: I'm obviously doing it :P
640 2011-11-26 16:11:05 Turing_i has joined
641 2011-11-26 16:11:12 Turing_i has quit (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
642 2011-11-26 16:11:12 <denisx> luke-jr: yeah, but its python
643 2011-11-26 16:11:21 <luke-jr> shrug
644 2011-11-26 16:14:12 arneis has joined
645 2011-11-26 16:14:35 Beremat has joined
646 2011-11-26 16:14:38 Turingi has quit (Read error: Operation timed out)
647 2011-11-26 16:14:43 TD has joined
648 2011-11-26 16:14:44 karnac has joined
649 2011-11-26 16:14:48 fortuna has quit (Quit: Leaving)
650 2011-11-26 16:14:54 fortuna has joined
651 2011-11-26 16:15:58 knotwork_ has joined
652 2011-11-26 16:16:13 marf_away has joined
653 2011-11-26 16:16:35 NickelBot7 has joined
654 2011-11-26 16:16:36 davout_ has joined
655 2011-11-26 16:16:59 davout has quit (Quit: i <3 pork (http://dev.ojnk.net))
656 2011-11-26 16:17:18 molec has joined
657 2011-11-26 16:17:18 davout_ has quit (Remote host closed the connection)
658 2011-11-26 16:17:26 justmoon has joined
659 2011-11-26 16:17:35 NickelBot has quit (Ping timeout: 245 seconds)
660 2011-11-26 16:18:05 <justmoon> da2ce7 speaking at prague bitcoin conference: http://www.ustream.tv/channel/justmoon
661 2011-11-26 16:18:16 <justmoon> stream is low quality and contingent on the flaky wifi
662 2011-11-26 16:18:25 NickelBot7 is now known as NickelBot
663 2011-11-26 16:18:31 molecular has quit (Remote host closed the connection)
664 2011-11-26 16:18:33 knotwork has quit (Ping timeout: 244 seconds)
665 2011-11-26 16:18:41 <luke-jr> justmoon: do they have a local bitcoin node to seed the blockchain? :p
666 2011-11-26 16:18:42 TbbW has joined
667 2011-11-26 16:18:43 molecular has joined
668 2011-11-26 16:19:19 <justmoon> luke-jr: no, that may very well be the problem -_-
669 2011-11-26 16:19:44 molecular_zapp has joined
670 2011-11-26 16:19:50 molecular has quit (Client Quit)
671 2011-11-26 16:19:50 molecular_zapp has quit (Client Quit)
672 2011-11-26 16:19:50 molec has quit (Client Quit)
673 2011-11-26 16:20:08 <luke-jr> fail
674 2011-11-26 16:20:20 molecular has joined
675 2011-11-26 16:20:37 <justmoon> luke-jr: to be fair, we are here for the talks, not for the wifi :)
676 2011-11-26 16:20:40 molecular_zapp has joined
677 2011-11-26 16:20:55 davout has joined
678 2011-11-26 16:21:13 davout has quit (Changing host)
679 2011-11-26 16:21:14 davout has joined
680 2011-11-26 16:21:41 <luke-jr> justmoon: but you need the block chain to trade
681 2011-11-26 16:21:51 <luke-jr> you know, lunch and stuff
682 2011-11-26 16:22:00 molecular has quit (Remote host closed the connection)
683 2011-11-26 16:22:19 molecular_zapp has quit (Client Quit)
684 2011-11-26 16:22:27 molecular has joined
685 2011-11-26 16:22:46 <justmoon> amir added an extra talk and let the money panel run overtime, so there wasn't much in the way of breaks lol
686 2011-11-26 16:23:02 molecular has quit (Client Quit)
687 2011-11-26 16:23:28 <davout> amir probably codes a lot better than he manages time ;)
688 2011-11-26 16:23:33 molecular has joined
689 2011-11-26 16:24:12 <justmoon> I say he did a fine job!
690 2011-11-26 16:24:17 * justmoon knows the channel is logged
691 2011-11-26 16:24:24 <justmoon> ;)
692 2011-11-26 16:24:50 <[Tycho]> Hello, justmoon
693 2011-11-26 16:24:59 <davout> we'll see when we're having the next coffee break at 10pm hah! :D
694 2011-11-26 16:25:07 <justmoon> lol
695 2011-11-26 16:25:11 <justmoon> hey tycho
696 2011-11-26 16:25:51 <diki> ;;seen zenith
697 2011-11-26 16:25:51 <gribble> I have not seen zenith.
698 2011-11-26 16:25:58 * davout just read justmoon's comment about the channel being logged ><
699 2011-11-26 16:27:14 <diki> davout:yup
700 2011-11-26 16:27:16 <diki> that is correct
701 2011-11-26 16:28:13 <[Tycho]> I see bitcoin people !
702 2011-11-26 16:30:35 karnac has quit (Quit: karnac)
703 2011-11-26 16:30:42 Kobier_ has quit (Max SendQ exceeded)
704 2011-11-26 16:33:35 * _Fireball is watching the conference stream
705 2011-11-26 16:33:43 p0s has joined
706 2011-11-26 16:33:52 <batouzo> meh the conference cuted Open Transactions talk in half
707 2011-11-26 16:34:07 <batouzo> organized missunderstooded the questions with end of speach apparently?
708 2011-11-26 16:34:11 TD has quit (Quit: TD)
709 2011-11-26 16:35:03 Beremat has quit (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
710 2011-11-26 16:36:31 larsivi has quit (Remote host closed the connection)
711 2011-11-26 16:36:36 CaptainDDL has joined
712 2011-11-26 16:37:36 Turingi has joined
713 2011-11-26 16:38:13 larsivi has joined
714 2011-11-26 16:42:53 Kobier_ has joined
715 2011-11-26 16:49:28 <justmoon> just spoke with amir - if you guys have questions for any of the speakers, put it in the chat in #bitcoin
716 2011-11-26 16:50:16 Dras has quit (Remote host closed the connection)
717 2011-11-26 16:50:16 <luke-jr> [11:50:12] [479] luke-jr #bitcoin Illegal channel name
718 2011-11-26 16:51:06 <justmoon> o_O
719 2011-11-26 16:51:24 denisx has quit (Quit: denisx)
720 2011-11-26 16:51:32 <luke-jr> justmoon: is that a pi at the end?
721 2011-11-26 16:51:56 <justmoon> I'm on a borrowed macbook
722 2011-11-26 16:52:07 <justmoon> so don't ask me what kind of awesome unicode it adds to messages
723 2011-11-26 16:52:12 <luke-jr> lol
724 2011-11-26 16:56:15 <batouzo> justmoon: yea I have questions
725 2011-11-26 16:56:26 <justmoon> batouzo: put them in #bitcoin
726 2011-11-26 16:56:33 <justmoon> (just the normal bitcoin channel)
727 2011-11-26 16:56:43 <batouzo> amir's irc nick?
728 2011-11-26 16:57:17 <justmoon> batouzo: genjix
729 2011-11-26 16:57:21 <justmoon> send them to me
730 2011-11-26 16:57:25 <justmoon> I'll read #bitcoin
731 2011-11-26 16:57:28 <justmoon> and give them to amir
732 2011-11-26 16:57:57 <[Tycho]> Who is amir ?
733 2011-11-26 16:58:01 <justmoon> genjix
734 2011-11-26 16:58:13 <justmoon> from bitcoin consultancy / libbitcoin
735 2011-11-26 17:01:43 test__ has left ("ERC Version 5.3 (IRC client for Emacs)")
736 2011-11-26 17:01:50 <batouzo> genjix:  question to Cameron(OT) - with OT can we quickly buy gold, then trade it for silver on exchange, and then buy some good in shops for that?
737 2011-11-26 17:02:11 <batouzo> justmoon: btw genjix is not on channels here, so you can forward
738 2011-11-26 17:03:31 <justmoon> batouzo: genjix is the guy on the far left - he asked me to collect questions from IRC
739 2011-11-26 17:03:50 <justmoon> batouzo: if he turns around and sees me waving I'll try and get your question in :)
740 2011-11-26 17:04:09 <batouzo> justmoon: ok. so mine #1 is above.
741 2011-11-26 17:05:01 wolfspraul has quit (Quit: Lost terminal)
742 2011-11-26 17:05:28 <batouzo> justmoon: #2 with OT can I easly borrow some bitcoins to some person, and have him and his friends promise he will pay back in 2 weeks - and can I easly prove if it would be not done as agreed
743 2011-11-26 17:06:33 <davout> batouzo: you can do this with just pgp
744 2011-11-26 17:07:08 <batouzo> davout: sure. And with 1000 customers?
745 2011-11-26 17:07:44 <batouzo> you must code some system, and get everyone to use it.  and that is what ot is
746 2011-11-26 17:08:16 <davout> batouzo: i'll continue on #bitcoin
747 2011-11-26 17:08:39 wolfspraul has joined
748 2011-11-26 17:10:08 da2ce7 has quit (Ping timeout: 248 seconds)
749 2011-11-26 17:13:54 karnac has joined
750 2011-11-26 17:14:46 erle- has quit (Quit: erle-)
751 2011-11-26 17:24:42 karnac has quit (Quit: karnac)
752 2011-11-26 17:32:11 Zarutian has joined
753 2011-11-26 17:36:37 wolfspra1l has joined
754 2011-11-26 17:38:24 wolfspraul has quit (Ping timeout: 248 seconds)
755 2011-11-26 17:38:59 p0s has quit (Ping timeout: 244 seconds)
756 2011-11-26 17:39:11 p0s has joined
757 2011-11-26 17:42:36 karnac has joined
758 2011-11-26 17:45:52 Lexa has joined
759 2011-11-26 17:46:01 lfm has quit (Ping timeout: 260 seconds)
760 2011-11-26 17:47:28 devrandom has quit (Ping timeout: 248 seconds)
761 2011-11-26 17:48:43 karnac has quit (Quit: karnac)
762 2011-11-26 17:54:11 devrandom has joined
763 2011-11-26 18:00:00 fimp has quit (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
764 2011-11-26 18:02:24 lfm has joined
765 2011-11-26 18:10:08 <jeremias> hi everyone, created this example application for django-bitcoin: http://kangasbros.fi:9999/
766 2011-11-26 18:10:13 <jeremias> https://github.com/kangasbros/django-assmarket
767 2011-11-26 18:10:20 <jeremias> (death prediction market)
768 2011-11-26 18:10:26 <jeremias> or so called assasination market
769 2011-11-26 18:10:47 <jeremias> I'm at the euro bitcoin conference, so if anyone haves questions, you are welcome
770 2011-11-26 18:11:01 <jeremias> to ask
771 2011-11-26 18:11:03 wolfspra1l has quit (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
772 2011-11-26 18:11:42 erus` has joined
773 2011-11-26 18:11:54 wolfspraul has joined
774 2011-11-26 18:22:46 copumpkin has joined
775 2011-11-26 18:25:04 davout has quit (Remote host closed the connection)
776 2011-11-26 18:28:17 fred9145 has joined
777 2011-11-26 18:34:14 rphlx has left ("Leaving")
778 2011-11-26 18:36:07 Sedra has joined
779 2011-11-26 18:37:50 jav__ has joined
780 2011-11-26 18:37:53 p0s has quit (Ping timeout: 244 seconds)
781 2011-11-26 18:40:01 kiba has joined
782 2011-11-26 18:42:38 fortuna has quit (Quit: Leaving)
783 2011-11-26 18:52:17 eueueue has joined
784 2011-11-26 19:02:31 larsivi has quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
785 2011-11-26 19:03:00 larsivi has joined
786 2011-11-26 19:04:58 eueueue has quit (Quit: Saindo)
787 2011-11-26 19:14:25 fred9145 has quit (Remote host closed the connection)
788 2011-11-26 19:17:20 p0s has joined
789 2011-11-26 19:19:21 Maged has quit (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
790 2011-11-26 19:21:26 p0s has quit (Remote host closed the connection)
791 2011-11-26 19:23:15 justmoon has quit (Quit: justmoon)
792 2011-11-26 19:34:40 TheAncientGoat_ has quit (Ping timeout: 245 seconds)
793 2011-11-26 19:38:18 merde has joined
794 2011-11-26 19:39:32 kiba has quit (Ping timeout: 244 seconds)
795 2011-11-26 19:45:46 BlueMatt has joined
796 2011-11-26 19:47:50 ThomasV_ has joined
797 2011-11-26 19:53:59 davout has joined
798 2011-11-26 19:54:48 RazielZ has quit (Quit: Leaving)
799 2011-11-26 19:55:43 molecular has quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
800 2011-11-26 20:01:36 cronopio has joined
801 2011-11-26 20:09:53 davout has quit (Remote host closed the connection)
802 2011-11-26 20:13:46 erle- has joined
803 2011-11-26 20:20:28 larsivi has quit (Remote host closed the connection)
804 2011-11-26 20:24:17 larsivi has joined
805 2011-11-26 20:33:27 larsivi has quit (Ping timeout: 260 seconds)
806 2011-11-26 20:51:16 molecular has joined
807 2011-11-26 20:56:43 denisx has joined
808 2011-11-26 21:02:02 stalled has quit (Ping timeout: 244 seconds)
809 2011-11-26 21:12:51 cande has joined
810 2011-11-26 21:15:25 stalled has joined
811 2011-11-26 21:30:41 <Lolcust_Backup> batouzo isn't the dark exchange more or less that - a peer to peer system for exchanging coins for "stuff" with PGP-based pseudonymous reputation system ?
812 2011-11-26 21:34:46 freewil has quit (Quit: Leaving)
813 2011-11-26 22:06:19 iocor has joined
814 2011-11-26 22:09:53 wasabi has quit (Ping timeout: 248 seconds)
815 2011-11-26 22:13:37 t3a_ has quit (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
816 2011-11-26 22:14:30 eastender has joined
817 2011-11-26 22:18:05 eastender has quit (Client Quit)
818 2011-11-26 22:19:24 larsivi has joined
819 2011-11-26 22:20:39 BlueMatt has quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
820 2011-11-26 22:22:16 ThomasV_ has quit (Quit: Quitte)
821 2011-11-26 22:31:04 _Fireball has quit (Quit:  HydraIRC -> http://www.hydrairc.com <- It'll be on slashdot one day...)
822 2011-11-26 22:31:08 abragin has quit ()
823 2011-11-26 22:34:06 BlueMatt has joined
824 2011-11-26 22:53:26 BlueMatt_ has joined
825 2011-11-26 22:53:52 dissipate has joined
826 2011-11-26 22:57:03 BlueMatt has quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
827 2011-11-26 23:02:23 BlueMatt_ is now known as BlueMatt
828 2011-11-26 23:07:37 wasabi1 has quit (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
829 2011-11-26 23:09:52 larsivi has quit (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
830 2011-11-26 23:10:10 random_cat has quit (Ping timeout: 248 seconds)
831 2011-11-26 23:10:53 BlueMatt has quit (Quit: Ex-Chat)
832 2011-11-26 23:11:09 davout has joined
833 2011-11-26 23:12:04 marf_away has quit (Quit: Nettalk6 - www.ntalk.de)
834 2011-11-26 23:17:00 random_cat has joined
835 2011-11-26 23:21:35 marf_away has joined
836 2011-11-26 23:22:41 davout has quit (Remote host closed the connection)
837 2011-11-26 23:23:24 blacks has quit (Ping timeout: 265 seconds)
838 2011-11-26 23:25:38 random_cat has quit (Ping timeout: 248 seconds)
839 2011-11-26 23:32:37 theymos has joined
840 2011-11-26 23:34:36 [Tycho] has quit (Remote host closed the connection)
841 2011-11-26 23:38:44 Kiba has joined
842 2011-11-26 23:38:47 <Kiba> hello
843 2011-11-26 23:39:01 random_cat has joined
844 2011-11-26 23:41:24 eoss has joined
845 2011-11-26 23:41:24 eoss has quit (Changing host)
846 2011-11-26 23:41:24 eoss has joined
847 2011-11-26 23:44:17 B0g4r7__ has joined
848 2011-11-26 23:46:26 B0g4r7_ has quit (Ping timeout: 248 seconds)
849 2011-11-26 23:46:58 wasabi has joined
850 2011-11-26 23:48:35 marf_away has quit (Ping timeout: 244 seconds)
851 2011-11-26 23:55:22 chrisb__ has quit (Quit: Ex-Chat)
852 2011-11-26 23:56:37 roconnor has joined